Home

This is the intro  paragraph I have so far; feel free to tweek 
Over the
past few years, there has been a notable change in the way marijuana is viewed,
shifting from being seen as a threat to public health and a cause of criminal
activity to being recognized for its economic potential. This transformation is
supported by several studies that highlight its ability to make a positive
contribution to our economy. In the article ‘The Economic Benefits of
Legalizing Marijuana,’ Mrinalini Krishna promotes its legalization by
emphasizing its capacity to generate significant tax revenue, create job
opportunities, and stimulate overall economic growth.
You should write on one of the following essays from your Norton Field Guide: 
“The Economic Benefits of Legalizing Marijuana,” Mrinalini Krishna, Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/110916/economic-benefits-legalizing-weed.asp
First, you will summarize the article, identify the author’s point of view (argument/thesis), describe the author’s approach and writing strategies, assess whether the author’s strategy is effective or not, and provide evidence from the essay to support your point of view. For the evaluative section of the essay, it is recommended you write in 3rd person point of view.
In addition, you will compose a response to the essay, such as an Author’s Response (with you as the author). In your response, you will state your position on the topic and whether you agree with your selected essay’s argument or not. You will conduct research and include one source from the Keiser library that provides additional perspective and supports your position on the topic. You will also address a potential opposing view and respond to it.
A conclusion will review the author’s stance and the effectiveness of the essay. It will also restate your thesis and your position on the topic, adding perspective and a final thought for the audience to consider.
Your essay should include the following:
Third Person Point of View (Objective) – Paragraphs 1-4
1-An introduction to the topic and article. A thesis should end your introduction
2-A summary of your selected essay
3-A discussion of the author’s purpose or goal and evidence used
4-A discussion of the author’s writing strategy and why the author may have used this strategy
Note:  A minimum of one cited direct quote is required in first half of essay (additional paraphrasing and/or quotes may also be used).  Use your week 2 outline paragraphs as the base (including any necessary revision)
First Person Point of View (Subjective “I/me/my”) – Paragraphs 5-8
5-Your response to the essay and its topic
6-An introduction of a Keiser University Library source to support your view. 
Essays without a KU source will receive deductions in the first portion of the rubric
(Engagement and Understanding)
7-A discussion of the audience, a possible objection, and your counterargument 
8-A conclusion
Note:  A minimum of one cited direct quote is required in second half of essay (additional paraphrasing and/or quotes may be used).
Be sure to follow this format above in terms of order of paragraphs!  Paragraphs 1-4 (the summary/first half of the essay) should be objective, in formal third person, NO opinion.  Beginning in paragraph 5 (the response half of the essay) you insert your opinion and can use first person I/me/my.  Paragraph 7 may need to be expanded into more than one paragraph and you can certainly add more to any in the list, but the order should be followed carefully in terms of organization. Do NOT add extra paragraphs that DO NOT address the above prompts, in order. Avoid general or broad statements or claims.  While the paragraphs are connected, each has a distinct focus.
REQUIREMENTS
1000 words (minimum)
A Minimum of two sources with in-text citations (including your selected essay + a library source)
Attach a Microsoft Word document formatted to APA standards, including title page and a reference page.
Submission to OWL is recommended. Use of Tutor.com is recommended. 
Please note the following:
All papers must be Microsoft Word documents.
The paper is double-spaced in Times New Roman, size 12, and has no extra spaces between the paragraphs.
The paper uses one-inch margins and half-inch indentions for the beginning of paragraphs. You can set this up in Microsoft Word to automatically default to these settings for your paper.
Your paper should include title page, body text, and a reference page.

TOPIC NAME —–DOES SOCIAL MEDIA MORE HARM THAN GOOD TO INDIVIDUAL MENTAL WELL BEING ?
SHOULD BE IN 6 PARAGRAPHES
BP 1-INTRODUCTION BP 2- SUPPORTING 1ST POINT WITH EXPLANATION AND EXAMPLE BP3- SUPPORTING 2ND PT WITH EXPLANATION AND EXAMPLE BP4- SUPPORTING 3RD PT WITH EXPLANATION AND EXAMPLE BP5 – COUNTER ARGUMENTS WITH REFUTATION ( WITH EXPLANATION )
BP6 – CONCLUSION I AM ALS0 ATTACHING A TEMPLATE FOR YOUR HELP TO COMPLETE FASTER AND ACCURATELY.AND PLZ THINK THESIS LINE BASED ON ARGUMENTS AND OPINION.
MINIMUM 5 REFERENCES SHOULD BE ADDED IN APA 7 FORMAT . ALSO REFERENCES SHOULD BE FROM BOOK , JOURNEL OR ARTICAL ( NOT FROM THE WEBSITE OR ,COM)
WORD LIMIT 1500

Submit your revised draft Executive Summary (the one that you first developed for peer review in Week 6 and then modified) in the appropriate assignment folder. This document must
(1) address the problem,
(2) provide simple background,
(3) offer your proposed solution, and
(4) list the specific steps required for the decision maker to take to implement your solution. Headings would most likely assist the reader.
Grading criteria:
In correct format with “EXECUTIVE SUMMARY” as title (no memo or report headers, etc., needed)
Addresses a specific REAL problem in your workplace, school, church, region, or volunteer
Identifies (a) the Problem and (b) impact of Problem; and proposes (c) a Solution and (d) Steps that decision maker must take to implement that Solution.
At least one-half page single-spaced (around 300 words or so)
Does not use “we” or “our” wording to identify research or recommendations (which would mask the amount of work/effort done by the writer alone)
Does NOT tell the reader who the decision maker is (because the reader IS the decision maker)
Wording makes it obvious that the Executive Summary is addressed to the decision maker and not to the professor or to the class
Expresses what is contained in the attached proposal and does NOT suggest what “will be written” or “will be researched” at a later date
Uses appropriate spelling, grammar, vocabulary, spelling, and mechanics
Reflects positive tone