Category: Writing

ometimes new ideas are not appreciated when they are first introduced. It can take hard work and perseverance to convince others to adopt a new idea. Think about someone who had to fight hard for his or her idea to be accepted.
In a well-developed essay, identify a person and a new idea he or she introduced. Explain the struggles that person faced, the outcome of his or her work, and the impact the new idea had. Be sure to include examples and specific details.

1.    
An analysis of an empirical research study that
is 10 years or less in age and that provides support for either the
compensatory approach or the rehabilitative approach (given) that you select. This
section should be 3-4 pages in length. 
Short-Term Goals
Compensatory
Approach (1 week):
§ 
Within one week, Ana
will utilize compensatory swallow strategies and maintain a chin-tuck posture
during oral intake to consume IDDSI level 4 (pureed) safely and adequately and
IDDSI level 3 (moderately liquids) with maximum assistance, thereby reducing
the risk of aspiration.
Rehabilitative
Approach (2 weeks):
Ana will
initiate oral motor exercises targeting lingual strengthening and
coordination within two weeks with maximum assistance.
Brief
Description of Treatment Approaches:
Compensatory
Approach: Focuses on adapting the environment or behavior to improve
safety and function without directly changing the underlying impairment.
For example, using a specific posture to reduce aspiration risk.
Rehabilitative
Approach: Aims to improve or restore function by directly addressing the
underlying impairment through exercises or therapies. For example,
targeting specific muscle groups for strengthening and coordination to
improve swallowing function. 
Case Study information: 1.     The IMPRESSIONS from the MBS report are
as follows:
a.    
Severe dysphagia characterized by piecemeal oral
transfer of pudding consistency, delayed pharyngeal swallow response, impaired
laryngeal closure, and impaired pharyngeal motility
b.    
Laryngeal penetration down to the level of the
folds secondary to impaired laryngeal closure and also due to impaired
pharyngeal motility. Over the course of several swallows, including dry
swallows, the penetrated material accumulated to the point of causing
aspiration up to the 5% level.
c.     
No cough in response to laryngeal penetration
and aspiration.
Case study: Date of birth June 6, 1946 Location of study St. Matthew’s Regional Medical Center Patient’s current hospital status Inpatient in acute rehabilitation unit of St. Matthew’s Regional Medical Center Date of admission to hospital March 23, 2024 Date of study March 25, 2024 Referring physician Mark Kawasaki, M.D. (Physiatrist) Date of onset: March 20, 2024 Location of acute hospitalization Broward County Medical Center Discharge diagnosis from Broward County Right thrombotic CVA Prior medical diagnoses Hypertension treated with Zestril 20 mg 1x/day; hyperlipidemia treated with Lipitor 20 mg 1x/day Major signs and symptoms of primary illness Left hemiparesis, mild cognitive-linguistic impairment, moderate dysphagia Previous swallowing evaluation Clinical swallowing evaluation on March 21 characterized by wet upper airway sounds following the first dose of nectar-thick liquid and for each small dose of other consistencies. Evaluation stopped after four small doses. Re-assessed on March 22 with similar results. Current route for nutrition and hydration NPO since admission to Broward County Medical Center. NG feedings as a rate of 80cc/hour started on the morning of discharge from Broward County Medical Center. Prior Level of Function Independent for all activities at the community level

identify a socio-economic need or technological challenge that affects PNG and describe how the curriculum can address it. the discussion must also focus on how curriculum (curriculum philosophy, curriculum theory and practice) decisions can contribute towards addressing the issue.

Write an 6-page interpretive essay that demonstrates, using evidence from the debate itself, that either Hitchens or Craig–who both evoke science in their arguments–is the debater with the greatest allegiance to the scientific method, as we will come to define this in class, and to good-faith argumentation in the Socratic sense. You may not choose a middle ground and say that both sides are equally Sophistic and Socratic. It is up to you to choose how you make your determination, but your terms of analysis, your yardstick by which you make your decision, should be usefully clear in the first part of your thesis section.
You must have a paragraph that offers a road map—”In this essay I will. . .” in which you name your yardstick methodology and specifically name the aspects of bad-faith argumentation that you will be exploring. And then say that you will, in your conclusion, be addressing the likely negative consequences for engaging in this kind of bad-faith argumentation.
For a conclusion: make a forward-thinking case about the negative consequences in a pluralistic society for making bad-faith arguments in favor of science AND for faith. In other words, no matter who you think is making the better, good-faith case in this debate, use the conclusion to contemplate the negative consequences for those who debate in bad faith. For example: if you think Hitchens is the best “good-faith” debater, what would a “bad faith” argument in favor of science look like and what might the likely consequences of that be? Conversely, if you think Craig, a man of evident faith, is making a bad-faith argument, what would a better, good-faith argument look like? What are the negative consequences for Christianity when a Christian apologist ignores this?

at least 15 slides with speaker notes.
YOu have to work on
OPTION B – if you did fewer than 35 hours or no placement at all (due to cancellation of placement or other circumstances)
Please do quality work because my teacher is very strict only use Harvard references. Please follow attached file very carefully.
if you need anything else please let me know.

Five pages double spaced, not including the works cited. 
This is to a free copy of Jane Eyre:
https://archive.org/details/janeeyrenelsoncl0000char/page/n5/mode/2up
This is a free copy to Mad Woman in the Attic:
https://archive.org/details/TheMadwomanInTheAttic
I hope that helps.

This assessment is a 8 pages writing research paper and 2 pages reflection paper, in total 10 well written papers. MLA or APA style format; however, what ever the choosing style has to be well represented, with citations mark, & references well presented and more importantly ensuring that the paper is plagiarized free . I’ll upload Additional info concerning the assignment.

Podcast Episode Instructions: Exploring Dating & Relationships in the US Virgin Islands (USVI)
Objective:
Host an engaging podcast episode exploring the cultural influences, challenges, and dynamics of dating and relationships in the USVI, with a focus on highlighting both the positives and challenges within the topic.
Research Guidelines:
Conduct thorough research on dating and relationship dynamics in the USVI from 2021 to 2024, with minimal reliance on data from 2020.
Develop deep analytical insights to foster engaging conversations and discussions during the podcast recording.
Topic for Discussion: Dating & Relationship (10 pages)
– Format:
The podcast will feature insightful discussions and conversations with a diverse panel of participants. Prepare detailed talking points formatted as flashcards to guide the conversation effectively. Explore cultural influences on dating and relationships in the USVI, considering traditions, values, and societal norms.
Discuss “Gender Wars” and how gender dynamics impact dating experiences in the USVI.
Examine the online dating scene and its effects on traditional dating practices.
Delve into relationship dynamics, emphasizing family values and community involvement.
Highlight the challenges and benefits of dating within a small, tight-knit community like the USVI.
Develop a Panel Casting and Criteria for guests for the show: (2-3 pages)
Baby Daddy (x2): Individuals who have fathered children outside of marriage or formal relationships.
Baby Mother (x2): Individuals who have children but may not be in a traditional family unit.
Old Married Couple: Represents the longevity and wisdom gained from relationships over time.
Young Married Couple: Provides insights into modern relationship dynamics and challenges.
Boyfriend and Girlfriend (x2): Reflects experiences of couples in various stages of commitment.
Two sets of single individuals: Represents diversity within the single community.
and a set of co parenting couples
develop a Panel Discussion and Question Round: (10 pages)
Prepare round-robin discussion questions that are deep, insightful, and expressive, ranging from serious relationship topics to lighthearted romantic themes.
Plan a structured segment for the panelists, allowing each participant to share their experiences and perspectives.
develop a Social Media Survey:(1-4 pages)
Engage the community through social media surveys to gather data and insights on dating and relationship topics specific to the USVI.
Use survey responses to inform discussions and provide community perspectives during the podcast episode.
create your Talking Points and Research Breakdown: (10 pages)
Compile comprehensive talking points covering each discussion topic and subtopic.
Include key research data, statistics, and insights to support the podcast conversation.
Organize information into flashcard format for easy reference during the podcast recording.
Host Preparation:
Prepare personal talking points and contributions to the podcast based on research and discussion guidelines.
Facilitate the podcast recording, leading engaging conversations and ensuring all panelists have opportunities to share their insights.

https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/standardized-testing-still-failing-students https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/usable-knowledge/17/11/when-testing-takes-over https://nextcity.org/urbanist-news/study-violence-schools-zuckerberg-money-school-donation?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwltKxBhDMARIsAG8KnqXj3O1HLcm01ssM-yJqLgjCZYhkvMcqPsPmZSIdfakrgxYPsjsedOsaArecEALw_wcB

The task is turning the original comparison essay into a “researched paper.” I have attached the original paper here was original thesis:
Malcolm X’s political strategies of fighting for Black freedom “by any means necessary,” are demonstrated in his speech “The Ballot or the Bullet”, are preferred because of the focus on self-defense against violence, its appeal to a wider audience, and its support for the black nationalism ideals.
Her is the new research idea:
How has Malcolm X’s endorsement of self-defense violence as a political strategy for Black freedom influenced contemporary Black male culture and current perspectives in Black studies?
And here is the new working thesis (you can change to fit sources better)
Malcolm X’s political strategies, particularly his advocacy for self-defense against violence as he states in his speech “The Ballot or the Bullet,” has influenced Black male culture and the way Black studies is approached. This research looks at the appeal of Malcolm X’s methods, focusing on the principles of self-defense and Black nationalism, and looks at their relevance and application in today’s societal and cultural areas within Black communities. 
I have provided:
The new essay prompt
the original essay
the original sources 
the three NEW scholarly sources (1 quote from each)
This should be written in the voice of an 18 year a freshman in college composition writing class.