Category: Writing

Please transcribe Group Two’s discussion dialogue from last week’s Forsythe groups. I’ve attached the Group One document for reference on formatting. Make it look like Group One. DO NOT edit any of the dialogue.
Formatting Requirements:
Font: Garamond, size 12
Spacing: Two spaces after each period
Moderator’s dialogue: Normal type
Participants’ dialogue: In quotation marks
Hand Votes: If the moderator asks for a hand vote, format it in bold.

Revise your interpretive essay draft to engage peer sources
Start by thinking about your inquiry/argument and the inquiries/arguments of your two peers. Where do they intersect and overlap? Where is there agreement and where is there disagreement? Where is that agreement and disagreement rooted? What do your various arguments have to say to one another? The aim for this essay is to make an interpretive argument in relation to the interpretive arguments of others, so try to get a sense of where your peers stand in relation to each other and where you stand in relation to them. In case it helps, I have provided a few student samples, though they are not perfect. Then, think about how you’ll want to arrange your essay. You’ll need to summarize the perspectives of your peers, and you’ll need to explain how those perspectives are relevant to your interpretive question; where will those sections go? And you’ll want to include your own analysis; where will that work best?
Note: There are many effective ways to organize of this essay, though simply adding your peer perspectives to the end won’t really work because it will seem as though you’d already come to a conclusion before examining the work of your sources. Instead, try to integrate the work with peer sources so that the draft has a smooth, organic “flow.”
Then, revise your initial interpretive essay draft so that it grows from a central research question, explains what your peer sources might say in response to that question (in detail!), evaluates the strength and weaknesses of their perspectives, and that then draws on your own analysis of the text and your evaluation of peers’ arguments to make an argument of your own.
Be sure to cite your peers’ work and the primary text, “Go Carolina,” according to MLA format for in-text citationsAlso in academic writing, in which the goal is to articulate a claim in relation to the claims of others, we often use “I” when evaluating sources’ perspectives and comparing/contrasting them with our own, so don’t be afraid to say things like, “Whereas [Source A] believes the text is about _____, I argue that it is instead about ______.”
Once you’re finished, go over the draft to make sure that it’s well-polished, flows well, and is grammatically correct.
i will send you my interpretive essay and then i will send my two friends essay and you need to use the other two essay find inquires as stated above .
keep in mind that the point of this unit is not about writing interpretive essays, but about working with scholarly sources, so you’re meant to treat your peer essays just as you would any scholarly source.
Here are some tips for success: Introduce your peer sources formally, giving their full names and the titles of their essays (after that, refer to your peers by their last names)
Summarize their arguments in *detail* (using phrases like, “so-and-so argues…”)
Quote and paraphrase them and use proper citation as you do so
Explain what you think of your peers’ arguments and your perspective in relation to them (it’s okay and even recommended to use “I”)
In a nutshell, the draft you turn in should pose an interpretive question, explain what your peers (your sources) would say in response to that question, and then make your own argument in relation to the arguments of your peer sources.
Also, consider your readers to be people outside of this class, which means you will have to introduce and summarize “Go Carolina” as well.
I hope this helps, and good luck!

Theories and models ground teaching practice in empirical research and tested experiences. As a technology coach and classroom teacher, you can use theory to apply technology purposefully to meet instructional challenges.
Read “Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Strategies.” Imagine you have been asked to conduct a professional development session about design theories and models that can be applied to instructional technology and promote learning in the digital environment. Create an 8-10 slide digital presentation for a staff development session for teachers who represent the grade level where you are most interested in working.
Select two learning theories and two instructional design models that will be the basis of your research and presentation.
The presentation should address the following:
Explain each theory and model and how it relates to instructional practice when using technology. Include specific, real-world examples to illustrate your ideas.
Provide 2-3 examples of specific frameworks or instructional strategies that are relevant to each model and include a rationale why each supports learning in the digital environment.
Title slide, reference slide, and speaker notes.
Support your presentation with a minimum of three scholarly resources.
The digital presentation should include graphics that are relevant to the content, visually appealing, and use space appropriately.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success enter.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

Instructions
In this assignment, you will create a teaching lesson unit that includes two lesson plans for a developmental level (K-3, 4-6, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12, or community college).
Please see documents attached
Please click on the Link for assignment requirements. Review and complete the following:
Teaching Tolerance Guidance Unit Teaching Tolerance Guidance Unit. Lesson Plan here.

Give your own statement and at least one example on these questions “What is globalization? How is it related to sustainability?” Connect it to a reading or other outside source in a paragraph
Select 3 UN SDGs and show how their causes and effects inter-relate. Give specific examples. Also a paragraph.
Two replies of one paragraph each

Download the assignment and follow instructions. Type your responses to questions 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, and 2C below the respective question prompts.  Upload your assignment when finished.

Essay #2: Drama and Logic
As we’ve discussed, Trifles takes the form of a classic murder mystery. The characters, to varying degrees, try to solve the muder of Mr. Wright although they focus on different things and use different techniques. By the end of the play, it’s clear that the women–with their focus on trifles-solve the murder while the men are still left clueless.
In this essay, you’re going to analyze the characters’ use of logic (or misuse of logic when you identify logical fallacies) to explain (pick one): why the women were able to solve the murder OR why the men were unable to solve the murder.
Requirements:
At least 1750 wordsArgumentative thesis statement in last position of first paragraph
Analysis of logic, which may include premises, syllogisms, and logical fallacies
Quotations with parenthetical citations using MLA style Header with name, date, class and final word count
Note: Failure to meet the minimum word count will count as a failure to complete the assignment.
Your essay will be graded on (1) the strength of argument, (2) the specificity of your thesis, and (3) your use of textual evidence (this includes your selection of quotes and your analysis of them) In addition to writing your essay, you are required to include a self-reflection
SELF-REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS
Write at least 250 words in complete sentences and paragraphs (not a list).
**Note: Your essay will be returned ungraded if your self-reflection is not written in paragraph form or if you do not include it at all. Your essay will be considered late until you resubmit your essay and reformatted self-reflection.
PLEASE TELL ME THE STORY OF HOW YOU WROTE YOUR ESSAY
How long did you spend writing this essay? (Days? Weeks? Hours?)
What steps did you take to write the essay? What did you do 1st? 2nd? 3rd?
Did you write a rough draft? Second draft? Third draft?
Did you visit office hours?
Did you seek help from other sources (Family? Friends? Tutors? Students?)
What are the greatest strengths of your essay?
What are the greatest weaknesses of your essay?
What would you do differently next time?
What steps did you take to improve your proofreading? So i need to submit one body paragraph and thesis statement by Tuesday night and The actual essay itself is due Friday night. And don’t forget the self reflection. Log into my account and go to the modules:Click on “4.2 essay #2: More Examples and Sample Outlines” This will show you how to structure the essay and any outlines u may need

AEW 5
What is the purpose of adjusting entries? Please provide an example of at least one adjusting entry.
AW 6
Question 1
Review the Inpatient Discharge Summary of John Madison (Case Study 1) and provide the following in your post.
Conduct research on bronchiolitis, using available library resources and trustworthy medical websites such as the Mayo Clinic. Post a one-paragraph summary on bronchiolitis, and cite your source. Use the information you’ve gathered from your research to address the following questions in b. and c. below.
What is bronchiolitis, and what are its symptoms and some risk factors for developing it? In the discharge summary, the baby was seen for a “viral-type” syndrome. What is the likely name for this virus, which causes most cases of bronchiolitis?
Differentiate between the terms “rhonchi” and “rales” that are referred to in the discharge summary. What is a croup tent and why was Ampicillin given to the baby?
Question 2
Review the Emergency Department encounter of Trey Archer (Case Study 2)and provide the following in your post.
Conduct research on HIV/AIDS, using available library resources and trustworthy medical websites such as the Mayo Clinic. Post a one-paragraph summary on HIV/AIDS, and cite your source. Use the information you’ve gathered from your research to addressing the following questions below. After conducting research, what are the risk factors for getting HIV?
How are the ELISA and Western blot tests used to detect HIV different? What treatment would be given to Trey for his low CD4 count? Cite your source/s.
Question 3
General questions:
Describe the major structures of the respiratory system and clearly define their functions.
Use your ebook, an online authoritative source, or a medical dictionary to define the following terms relating to the lymphatic and immune systems. Cite your source for each definition: Immunity
Immunoglobulins
Blymphocyte
Tlymphocyte
Acquired immunity

Take notes on the first chapter of Writer
Designer.
Guidelines:
One page of notes to be shown in class – I will look at them first thing after attendance.
Can use bullet points
Handwritten or Typed | Your preference
Be sure to find all Five ‘modes’
Proper MLA

Read “The Traditional College Student” by Dr. Regina Deil-Amen. & Then, write a 1-2 page double-spaced analysis of it. Sample Analysis by Dr. Hofmann &
This is an analysis, not a persuasive essay, so you do not need a thesis. However, every analysis should mention the title and author of the piece at the beginning so readers know your subject.
Make sure to include:
the title and author’s name of the reading you are analyzing in the first sentence
a brief summary (1-2 paragraphs) of the main points
an important quote or two from the piece that are remarkable- some professors call these “golden lines.” You can list these at the top of embed them within your discussion, as you prefer. These quotes might be useful to you later in an essay.
any logical fallacies you observe (I don’t expect to see this before the week when we learn about logical fallacies)
your analysis (1-2) paragraphs) of the importance and/or validity of the reading’s content.
The analysis is the most important item in the assignment. In the analysis portion you can:
” evaluate the importance, or lack thereof, of the author’s main ideas (you can also compare the importance of some of the contents of the reading versus others)
evaluate the amount of evidence the author provides to support his/her points (it is sufficient? relevant? valid? etc.)
* ask questions that the piece raises for you
try to make connections between this reading and other readings in this class and/or elsewhere, or in the public sphere, the news, etc.
You may conclude with a brief reflection, but that is entirely optional.