Develop and write ten research questions, each with two research/alternative hypotheses and not null hypotheses. See the Cozby and Bates textbook for definitions of both research/alternative and null hypotheses. This results in a total of 20 hypotheses on leadership research topics of your choice. Cite theories/concepts that support the variables you use, but do not write a literature review — just state the theories/concepts.
LPHD 753 Minor Project 1 (youtube.com)
Category: Quantitative Research
-
“Exploring Leadership: 10 Research Questions and 20 Hypotheses on Leadership Topics” 1. Research Question: How does transformational leadership style impact employee motivation? Research/Alternative Hypothesis: Employees under transformational leadership will have
-
Title: Results and Conclusions of a Study on the Relationship between Social Media Use and Self-Esteem among College Students
I have already written most of the paper and provided you with the tables at the end of the ppaper.
PLEASE READ THE PAPER TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF MY RESEARCH
I ONLY NEED THE RESULTS AND CONCLUSION WRITTEN WHICH TABLES ARE GIVEN TO YOU
– if possible please calcualte the IQV and include it
Please cite the tables when you use information from them
DIRECTIONS FROM PROFESSOR:
Results (Point Value: 35)
v Univariate Analyses: Present and interpret frequency distributions and descriptive statistics.
Regarding descriptive statistics, discuss the appropriate measures of central tendency and
variability of your dependent, independent, and control variables (i.e. means, medians, modes,
minimum and maximum values, skewness, standard deviations, and IQVs). Describe if the
variables follow a bimodal, normal or skewed distribution. Describe box plots, histograms,
pie charts, and/or bar charts to illustrate the results (one graph per variable).
v Bivariate Analyses: Describe the results of cross-tabulations, comparison of means, and/or
measures of association. Report results of all relationships tested, including statistical
significance, direction, and strength of association (ie., weak, moderate, or strong
relationships).
v
Multivariate Analyses: Describe the results of your TWO-WAY ANOVA, including
4
differences between groups that are statistically significant. Discuss whether you reject or
did not reject all 3 null hypotheses. After reporting your results, interpret your findings by
offering thoughts about the reliability and validity of your findings, relating your findings to
existing studies, and/or noting the larger ramifications of your findings.
CONCLUSION:
v Present a short summary of your major findings and insights with regard to your original
research question and hypotheses. Where your hypothesis supported or rejected?
v How do those findings relate to past research? Do they confirm or contradict prior research?
v List the limitations of your study.
v Make suggestions for further research based on your findings, including relationships you
would have liked to have examined but didn’t get a chance to do.