Category: Psychology

Assignment #1 is a Short Essay on the critical and specific roles of adults in early childhood. You must use the lectures and readings from our course to support your points. I would like to see how you integrate the research. TOPIC: Describe three issues in the course to date that have made a particular impression on you. In In a short (2-page) essay explain why these issues are important to you and to society more broadly. Support your points with research from the lectures and from at least three of the course readings. You may include other sources with proper citations. 
* Examples for citations : Readings: e.g., Gunnar et al, date; Lectures: e.g., Lecture 1, Topic). I also want to see how you express yourself in writing with these specific sources. Your reference list will not count as part of the 2 pages – and will be in APA formatting. 
Describes three areas based on references from lectures and readings
Cites all sources ataached multiple times (please cite the lecture slides too, no need to do extra researches, just cite what I have attached)
Excellent language and communication  

Reflect on a time when your understanding of yourself changed? 
How did you know your self-
concept had changed? What occurred that brought about the change? 
What does this teach
you about self-concept in general?

During the reflection circle, you will thoughtfully reflect upon your textbook readings, lectures, Achieve assignments, supplemental materials, and independent research(if you explored information related to topics presented in this class).
Please prepare for the discussion by answering the following three questions and submitting your answers before attending your reflection circle.
How much did you know about clinical psychology before we started?
Describe your five biggest takeaways from this course up to this point.
The following prompts are designed to help you brainstorm your answer for question # 2
What do you remember about what you learned so far in this course? Write down as many things as you can in 30/60/90 seconds. (From off the top of your head)
Of what you remember, what seemed to be the most important ideas? Write down 3-5 things in bullet-point format.
What did I obviously learn? What might I have learned, practiced, or improved my understanding that may not be obvious? (Consider all of the opportunities for learning in this course.)
What did you find most surprising?
So? So What? What now? (Summarize what you learned, roughly explain its significance, and estimate what you might/could/should do next in response.
How has your perspective on clinical psychology changed, been challenged, reinforced, or deepened due to what you learned in this course?
The following prompts are designed to help you brainstorm your answer for question # 3
What should I do with what I learned and know? What will I be able to do with this–both now and later?
Have you found any practical use for the information you have learned so far? If so, what and how have you found it helpful?
How do I feel about this content?
How does what you learned relate to what you already knew

Discussion: Research in Psychology
Analyzing Research
Step 1: Visit the Public Library of Science (PLOS One) website: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/browse/psychology (a peer-reviewed journal that freely publishes research articles with open licenses). Do a search for an article that interests you, then answer the following:
What is the hyperlink to the study you chose?
What is the title of the study, and who conducted the research?
Describe the study in a few sentences in your own words.
Identify and describe either the basic assumption of the researchers, or if it was an experiment, the hypothesis. Why were they conducting this research?
How was the study performed? What methods were used?
What were the results and conclusions of this study?
What questions do you still have after reading about this study? For example, if you were to conduct another study based off of this study, what questions would you ask and what would you still want to find out?

Please review the screening/assessment tools discussed in module 2 of the course. You will select one of the tools to administer during your recorded interview assignment that is due in module 6. Once you select a tool, please provide an original summary analysis that describes why you selected this tool based on the population (peer’s mock case) you are interviewing. Your summary analysis should be between 250-500 words not including any references you use and will be submitted to the course for a grade.
Topic: Unsatisfactory
Marginal
Proficient
Exceptional
Summary Analysis
(20 points)
[EPAS 2022 Advanced 1.1 & 4.4]
NoScreening/Assessment Tool Selection Analysis (0 points)
None or one of the following is evident: 1) Summary analysis is the appropriate length; 2) analysis demonstrates understanding of the tool and application for the population of interest; 3) analysis demonstrates examination of culture relevance related to the tool and application with the population identified; 4) analysis demonstrates critical thinking, as evidenced by thoughtful reflections, perceptiveness, and insight pertaining to the application of the tool.
(1-8 point)
Two or three of the following are evident: 1) Summary analysis is the appropriate length; 2) analysis demonstrates understanding of the tool and application for the population of interest; 3) analysis demonstrates examination of culture relevance related to the tool and application with the population identified; 4) analysis demonstrates critical thinking, as evidenced by thoughtful reflections, perceptiveness, and insight pertaining to the application of the tool.
(9-14 points)
All the following are evident: 1) Summary analysis is the appropriate length; 2) analysis demonstrates understanding of the tool and application for the population of interest; 3) analysis demonstrates examination of culture relevance related to the tool and application with the population identified; 4) analysis demonstrates critical thinking, as evidenced by thoughtful reflections, perceptiveness, and insight pertaining to the application of the tool.
(15-20 points)

Please read very direct clear instructions in the attatched and follow the rubric, These are the topics you can pick out of 
History of Psychology
Biology of the Mind
Development
Social Psychology
Personality
Psychological Disorders
Pleases NO PLAGRISIM OR AI ! 

Follow these steps to participate in this discussion: Compare social cognitive career theory (SCCT) with one of the previously studied theories (Holland, TWA, Super, or Gottfredson). Review the Meet the Interviewee document.
Review the “Additional Cases” section in Chapter 11 of your Career Theory and Practice text and choose one of the following cases:
Kamicha

Topic: How does the interplay between objectivity and subjectivity influence perception and decision-making processes in cognitive psychology?
Write a 3-page paper that summarizes and critiques on ONE of your primary sources (i.e., experiment, study, etc. conducted by the author and published in a peer-reviewed academic journal). The primary source should relate to the original research question you generated in Discussion 4 (topic question). Your source analysis should demonstrate your ability to identify the key components of a study or experiment as well as your critical thinking and analysis of research.
Your paper should:
Introduce your topic;
Provide a summary of the research method that the authors used by identifying the purpose of the study or experiment and the hypothesis or research question.
Describe the findings, conclusions, and implications of this study, as well as future directions for research suggested by the author/s.
Provide a critical analysis of this source. Your writing should be a coherent presentation of your analysis of the authors’ research design, their conclusions about their findings, and the relevance of these findings to your own research question
Your APA style paper should be three pages, not including a title page or your reference page. Be sure to include an APA style reference page for the article that you reviewed and any other sources that you used.
Please choose ONE source to discuss from this list: Alhadad, S. S. J. (2018). Visualizing Data to Support Judgement, Inference, and Decision Making in Learning Analytics: Insights from Cognitive Psychology and Visualization Science. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(2), 60–85.
Aleksey A. Dyachkov. (2023). Psychological Mechanisms of Cognitive Subjectivity Development. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 14(6), 422–442. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.12731/2658-4034-2023-14-6-422-442
Eva, K. W. (2018). Cognitive Influences on Complex Performance Assessment: Lessons from the Interplay between Medicine and Psychology. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 177–188. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.008
Klempe, S. (2013). Kierkegaard and Psychology as the Science of the “Multifarious Life.” Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 47(3), 367–375. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.1007/s12124-013-9235-1
Li, L. (2023). The other side of false belief: Constructing the objectivity of reality. Infant & Child Development, 32(3), 1–13. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.1002/icd.2416

Pick 3 different magic tricks to analyze from the movie “Now You See Me 2” and provide insight to how these magic tricks are designed and work. Use evidence from the movie to explain how the magic tricks influence, impact, or effect and individuals senses or perception. 

You must paraphrase/condesne some of the parts of the paper to fit the poster requirements. All the information is from the paper just attach to the slide.