Category: Psychology

What are some of the characteristics involved in comorbidity/dual diagnosis? What are the obstacles involved in the treatment and recovery process of clients with dual diagnosis? Using support from the text, presentations, and outside sources, what is a general approach to treatment with comorbid clients? 

I have attached the almost completed paper, the instructions, and the template for the the paper should be structured. What I am asking of the writer is to complete all of the sections that have not been completed. Please use the information provided in all of the attached documents to complete this assignment. Please do not change anything that was previously written. If you have any questions please reach to me for clarification. Thank you in advance!

Before responding to this forum, you should read the following information from the textbook: Section 6-6c (p.168) “DO PEOPLE REALLY RECOVER REPRESSED MEMORIES FROM CHILDHOOD?” and the page titled “CAN WE TRUST EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY?” from Section 6-6d (p.169). 
You should also watch the video on the North Carolina case when eyewitness testimony failed. The link is located just above the link for this forum. There are two parts to the video. Once the first part ends it should take you directly to the second part. 
Once you have read the material from chapter 6 in the textbook and watched the two parts of the video, you should respond to the following questions.
1. Based on your reading and viewing of the video, discuss some of the reasons why this might have happened? Discuss some specific things from the case that might have led to the incorrect memory.
2. Does it surprise you that memory can be so unreliable at times? Explain
3. Based on what you saw and heard on the video, as well as what you read in the textbook, respond to the following: Many people assume that if a person is confident about their memory of an event, then it means that their memory is probably accurate. Does the research and information from the video support this? What are your thoughts on this?

I have attached the required material to complete the assignment. If you have any questions feel free to ask.
I attached the completed milestone 1 as reference to complete the assignment.
please use the template to complete

So, I have attached my last assignment literary review two. That has the original study where we are viewing both genders as a whole. Now we will only be viewing females. I also attatched an example paper, only view the portion where it says STUDY TWO. That willbe the basis of this assignment. We changed the dependent variable. I have also attached tables to help you understand! Thank you ! 
Here will be references to use and their respective citations:
Studies have, for instance, shown that girls are represented and expected to be quiteter and more agreeable and understanding than boys. 
-Norberg, C. (2016). Naughty boys and sexy girls: The representstion of young individuals in a web-based corpus of English. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(4), 291–317. https://doi. org/10.1177/0075424216665672
The similar, but not identical, cultural background influences an individual’s neural activity, which underlies cognitive functions such as emotional processing, mental attribution, self-representation, and self-awareness (Han and Northoff, 2008). 
-Wang, S., Wang, J., Guo, W., Ye, H., Lu, X., Luo, J., & Zheng, H. (2019). Gender difference in gender bias: Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces male’s gender stereotypes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00403 
3.
Ideas of gender appropriateness translate into discrimination through discretionary policy
-Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2011). Gender discrimination at work. Gender & Society, 25(6), 764–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211424741 
A recent study showed that when the proposer was a friend rather than an unknown person, the FRN typically associated with unfair offers was reversed to positive polarity (Campanhã et al., 2011)
-Campanhã, C., Minati, L., Fregni, F., & Boggio, P. S. (2011). Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: Neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(43), 15569–15574. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1253-11.2011 

Recall a time when your expectations of an upcoming situation differed from the actual experience. What was the situation? Who was involved? What did you expect would happen? Why? How did your preconceived ideas influence your frame of mind going into the situation and the way interacted with the other(s) involved? How did the real-life experience differ from the imagined experience? How did your perception change after the experience –of the situation? –of the person/people involved? –perhaps even, of yourself?
**NO REFERENCES ARE NEEDED MUST BE OWN WORK NO AI PROFESSOR USES SAFEASSIGN** DISCUSSION POST ONLY NEEDS TO BE 2 PARAGRAPHS WITH QUESTIONS ANSWERED EFFICIENTLY

The second part of chapter 12 focuses on the development of diversity knowledge regarding yourself and others.
This week, for the discussion thread, identify specific areas where you plan to develop and the strategy that you plan to use (what you will do specifically).
Clearly link the domain of knowledge, the goal that you have for growth, and the activities you plan to undertake to meet those goals.
When responding to others posts, focus on both identifying blind spots (e.g. the goal doesn’t seem to match the plan), intersecting identity growth opportunities that goals/plans may offer (e.g. the goal may be regarding self-knowledge, but do you see their plan offering additional learning about other intersecting identities they hold, or additional learning about others?), or alternative plans that you think may better help them pursue their goals? When you offer your input, be specific about why you are thinking what you are (using material and constructs from the text).

Topic: Depression is caused by personal weakness. Focus on major depressive disorder or bipolar disorders.
Create a poster in MS Word that includes:
Identify the chosen myth about mental health or a specific disorder.
Identify the flawed source of information related to the myth.
Describe the psychological disorder, including the key symptoms.
Relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological health.
Describe the mechanism and/or actions in the brain that lead to the symptoms of the disorder.
Explain the research you found regarding the disorder.
Brief mention of findings and the population the results can be generalized to.
Explain the actions of a medication used to treat the psychological disorder.
Describe the biological details of how it works.
Provide an alternative explanation based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims in the overall message.
Use visual elements that support the main points.

Individual Summary Paper Guidelines
Conduct further research on how the pandemic has (or has not) affected child development

Team Case Summary for Module 5
Review the assigned Case Studies
Prior to your Team Discussion meeting, review the following Case Scenarios from Sush and Najdowski (2021):
Module 5, Ethics Code 3: 66, 72, 74, 78, 81, 83
Team Discussion Summary
Meet with your Team members via Zoom. Make sure your meeting is recording. Meetings must be recorded to the cloud and link to your recording included with your team discussion summary submission in order to receive credit for this assignment. MP4s are not accepted.
Refer to the Ethics Case Review Team Discussions Overview for more information.