Category: Psychology

Discussion paper on the Right to Die: 
What is the history of the subject in this country?  Research the dying process and how other countries handle it.Are there US national or state laws regarding this?
Discuss the difference between common terms used in this subject: difference in the terms of euthanasia, voluntary-non-voluntary etc.
Is this suicide? Why or why not? Why do you think people are so afraid to do this?
Is this a law in Maine? When was it passed and what are the conditions? (please don’t reprint the law in its entirety, it is too long)
What about in a Living Will someone has that says they do not want to be kept alive on machines. Who pulls the plug in that case?
Finally what is your own stand about the right to die? Under what conditions?
What are you own views on this subject? Have you had any experience with this personally?
700 words or more. Use at least three references:

Individual health behaviors are increasingly important to personal well-being and future health risk. Health psychologists often seek to intervene at the level of the individual in order to modify behavior. 
Here are the tasks you will need to accomplish in order to complete this project. They are broken down into smaller assignments on Canvas with more detailed instructions and a rubric, but this provides an overview of each component:
1. After reviewing the attached list, select a specific health behavior whose frequency you wish to either increase or decrease. You may tailor the behavior to be more applicable to you. For example, you may choose to increase physical activity by walking more, doing yoga, or training for a marathon. If you wish to modify another health behavior not on the list, please discuss it with me. If you have a current mental or physical condition that could be affected by this behavior, please consult your health care provider PRIOR to changing the behavior.
2. Review the research literature about your chosen health behavior. Why would you want to modify the behavior? What are the benefits to your health? What are the risks? Are there any gaps or controversies in the literature? Read at least 3 high-quality studies. These may be either empirical studies or review papers from peer-reviewed journals. Chapters 3, 4 and 5 (and others) of your text may be a useful starting point and might provide you with a few sources to get you started (depending on your topic).
3. Based on your reading of the literature, determine how you will measure your health behavior of choice and create a coding system to collect data. You will have to decide (i.e. operationally define) what constitutes the behavior. One option is to simply measure the frequency of the behavior. This may be as simple as recording the number of times a given behavior does or does not happen (e.g. # of cigarettes smoked) over a certain period of time. You will need to define the behavior precisely. Does taking a single puff of a cigarette count? Other health behaviors may involve more complex measurement methods. This will require searching the literature to learn about how it has been measured in other studies, and possibly coming up with your own original way of measuring it. Regardless, the way your behavior and/or outcome are measured should be given careful thought BEFORE data collection is begun. All variables must be quantifiable. 

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
**My chosen population is the LGBTQIA+ community so that’s the population the paper should be focused on.**
**I will provide chapters from the following textbook to you which pertain to the Gracism readings and 7 sayings discussed in the book once you are selected to work on the question**
Anderson, D. A. (2023). Gracism: The Art of Inclusion. InterVarsity Press. https://www.amazon.com/Gracism-Art-Inclusion-Bridg…
This portion of the Cultural Immersion Project Assignment includes two interviews focusing on the identified cultural group and an immersion summary experience. The first interview will be with an employee/representative of an agency/organization which engages in social justice work with your chosen population. The second interview will be with an individual or married couple from the selected cultural group to develop an understanding of what helped shape that individual’s or couple’s cultural identity. These interviews are a significant part of the immersion project as you get to hear the voices and listen to the hearts of those involved with the population.
Requirements: 2500 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

make corrections and follow the corrections made in the draft paper, you may shorten the paper as it states in the draft the paper is too long anyway, follow the red writing on the draft paper to help you make the corrections

Overview
This assignment is another building block for the final project. Before you begin, please review the Required Resources to support your success with this milestone assignment.
Keep in mind the differences between research papers and literature reviews. Research papers take a topic and describe all aspects of that topic. They use current articles and books to support the statements in the paper. A literature review is literally a review of current articles designed to support the topic. This milestone assignment will have you focus on writing a literature review.
For example, if you want to investigate color preference among adult men and women, you first need to review current studies on the topic. Your paper needs to begin with an introduction and an explanation of the topic. You need to find peer-reviewed journal articles, like the six in your annotated bibliography. You need to summarize each article, including what the researcher found, a brief description of the research design, the advantages and disadvantages of the design, and how the article compares to other articles in the literature review. These details are essentially your annotations in your annotated bibliography. You need to add more information to each annotation, but they are a great start.
Then, you describe the gaps or pieces that are missing in the research (if any), ethical considerations (if any), and validity issues (if any). Each article becomes its own paragraph or two (or three) and then leads into the next article. Once you describe each of the articles in the literature review individually, you collectively include a discussion of any gaps in the current body of research. This is where your research comes in. You are going to be investigating an area with a gap. So, by discussing the gaps, you lead on to your research question and finally to your hypothesis and the proposed study’s key variable. Now you have a literature review that contains an introduction to the topic, a review of each current article, a discussion of where there are gaps in the current literature, your research question and how that fits into the gaps, and a concluding hypothesis. Your literature review becomes the beginning of your research report.
Prompt
In Module Six, you will submit your problem statement and literature review. In addition, you will revise your previously submitted research question and hypothesis based on the feedback from your instructor in Milestone Two.
Your work should include the following critical elements:
Problem Statement: This is a short description of the problem to be improved upon. Your introduction to the problem statement will provide your reader with the general topic of the proposal and its importance and relevance to real-world issues.
Literature Review: Include an overview of previously published work on your selected topic. This should include scholarly resources. Your literature review should consist of the following elements:
Existing Research: Summarize existing, applicable research, utilizing peer-reviewed sources, and attempts to do so in an integrated way.
Research Designs: Identify different research designs used to generate knowledge on the topic and describe how they differ.
Advantages and Disadvantages: Differentiate between research designs for their advantages and disadvantages in addressing the research question.
Appropriateness: Evaluate the appropriateness of the research designs to the research questions and determine the most appropriate design, providing justification for each.
Unknown: Summarize what is unknown or uncertain about the topic, utilizing applicable research.
Principles and Standards: Discuss the appropriateness of the data analysis procedures used in the literature as they relate to the APA’s principles and standards.
Research Question and Hypothesis
Research Question: Include the testable research question written in Milestone Two. This should be a revised research question based on your instructor’s previous feedback.
Hypothesis: Include the testable hypothesis written in Milestone Two. This should be a revised testable hypothesis based on your instructor’s previous feedback.
Variables: Describe the variables that will be measured and manipulated in the study, explaining the selection of the variables

Topic for this assignment: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders
Write a five- to seven-page paper in which you describe the methodology, design, and data management tools you plan to use in your research proposal. Define the process from the selection of participants (and stakeholders, as applicable) through data collection to data analysis, including any limitations and assumptions. Provide a detailed plan to collect and analyze data and disseminate findings. Include all ethical considerations. Your paper should give a complete description of the entire process used to conduct the study. If your proposal involves implementation of interventions, then include a program evaluation component that describes your research design.In your submission, be sure to include the following critical elements:
State the chosen research method or methods used.Are they qualitative, quantitative, or both?
Provide support of method selection. Discuss why the chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation of the intervention.Justify your choice of method, design, sampling, data collection, analysis, and overall process with logic and evidence.
Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the research design. Explain why it is the best design for the proposed study or evaluation. Support your explanation with logic and specific evidence.
Select valid and reliable data-collection tools for the research questions (and research design). If you develop data-collection tools, explain how validity and reliability will be determined.
Support the selection of the population and sampling procedures.
Describe data collection. Describe the process used to collect data from recruitment to consent to data collection. Include ethical considerations and mitigation. Include how you will handle the following:Recruiting and managing study participants
Eliminating or mitigating any chance of harm to participants
Data handling, storage, and access
Handling consent, management of data, and requests to withdraw
Protecting confidentiality for the entire life of the data
Explain the proposed data-analysis process, including the following:Any transcription and transformation of data for analysis
Use of tools, including software, for analysis
Select and provide justification for use of statistical analysis and/or processes for qualitative analysis.Discuss methods for ensuring reliability of qualitative analysis if applicable.
Explain the limitations and assumptions connected to the research.Identify potential limitations and delimiters to be used.
Describe proposed dissemination of findings. Propose how findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and interested parties.Include any plans for presentation and publication of material.
Fully explain the ethical considerations that apply to the proposal or intervention.Identify the ethical considerations associated with the individuals, communities, and organizations most likely to be affected by the identified gap or problem.
Articulation of Response: Ensure the submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax.

1) Discuss the differences between behavioral medicine and health psychology.
2) Discuss the psychosocial effects (patterns of behavior and lifestyle) on physical disorders, including the relationships among immune system function, stress, and physical disorders. 3) What are the roots of many causes of death, including therelationships among stress and cardiovascular disease, AIDS, and cancer? How can many of causes of death be linked to lifestyle behaviors?
4) Discuss the psychological and social factors that contribute to the onset of chronic pain. Discuss the differences between acute and chronic pain and their potential causes.
5) Identify some procedures and strategies used in stress management, and prevention and intervention programs. Discuss Type A Personality Management in the reduction of stress and premature death. View and critique two of the following video clips: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fNPyAUcap8


1). Describe and discuss the defining clinical features, causes, and treatment of gender dysphoria 2) Discuss the four types of sexual dysfunction, including the assessment of sexual dysfunction, causes, and treatment of these disorders:
3) Discuss how sexual dysfunctions are organized around the sexual response cycle.
4) Discuss the common clinical features of each of the different paraphilias. 5) Describe available psychosocial and drug treatments for paraphilias, including what is known about their relative effectiveness.
View and critique two of the following videos:Start a New Threadww.youtube.com/watch?v=UZw8B9v6FOs

This is considered a homework assignment. I will send all the requirements and it is not possible to take any information outside of the textbook that I will send with the assignment as well. This only includes the 12 chapter, so read only the 12 chapter from the textbook then you will answer the question that required. This is a psychology lesson. Please make sure it is only 300 words.
Thank you

You are welcome to use the same participant for all 3 activities or a different person for one or two of the activities.
There are no formatting requirements for the paper except these:
You should have a cover page with your name, the name of your specific assignment (which will be the title of the document you received through email), and the date that you turn in the assignment.
You must use complete sentences and paragraphs in each part of the assignment. NO bullet points or numbered lists at all. Bulleted/Numbered lists lead to very concise answers but I want you to explain to me how the activity went and give details about the participant’s expressions and your own feelings as you complete the activity.
You may only submit papers in these formats: .pdf, .doc, .docx, and .rtf. 
There is no required font or spacing, but 12 point Times New Roman, double-spaced formatting is preferred.
In your activity description, you should describe how you instructed the participant to do the activity and what materials you may have used to complete the activity.  In this case, more details are better than fewer details.  You do not need to give your participant’s full name or any other identifying information, but make sure to include in your description what information was given.  For example, if you asked the participant how they would describe themselves and they answered with their full name, then you could say: “When I asked her how she would introduce herself to a stranger, she said that she would give her full name and said that she would also ask them what their name is.” You are welcome to assign a pseudonym to your participant to protect their identity.  You are welcome to use initials, like this: “My participant, S. A., is a 12 year old girl who lives with both of her parents and an older brother.” You could also use a nickname, like this: “My participant, who I will reference as Jane to protect her identity, is a 12 year old girl. Jane lives with her mother and a younger sister.”
Please read your instructions carefully.  If you do an activity and then do not report that you completed the activity or complete the activity incorrectly, then you will lose points for this assignment.  You must complete the activity with a real, living person.  You may not ask Generative AI to complete the activity and then turn in that report.  This will be viewed as plagiarism 

The document “Topic 2 Discussion Question Vignettes” located in the Topic Resources includes two vignettes about learners who are attempting to conduct research and be productive doctoral learners. What are the main differences between these two learners? What are the most significant mistakes made by each of these learners? How you can avoid making similar mistakes?
A third character, Dissertation Diane, was not described in the vignettes but graduated the program much quicker than both Walter and Sally. What do you think Dissertation Diane was doing differently from Sally and Walter that allowed her to successfully complete her dissertation and graduate in a more timely manner? In what ways can you implement those ideas into your practice as a doctoral learner and novice researcher?