Category: Political science

arvard
Job Requirements / Instructions for writers
The European course of the Western Balkans: a critical overview of the enlargement process.
Scope of work: 2,000 words, (+) (-) 500 words. Bibliography not included.
include at least 7 references
The tutor must provide a pdf ai plagiarism report from turnitn of the paper given

Using her methodology of everyday Black talk explain the ways in which Harris-Lacewell’s work understands the following concepts: Black counter public, bottom-up political develpment and mass orientation. In her articulation of these principles what are the main Black political thought questions that she is attempting to address? Does she achieve her objecives? 
Books referenced: Barbershops, Bibles and Bet, Melissa Harris Perry 
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691126098/barbershops-bibles-and-bet

Case study 
** read articles then compare and contrast 
* need 3 references (2 scholarly articles and 1 from the book) 
in depth details sent via attachment 

Extending suffrage has been a multi-generational endeavor throughout the history of the United States.
1) Consider the following timeline which shows the changes to the American electorate over time.
1865 – The 13th Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, abolishing slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime.
1868 – The 14th Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution. It granted citizenship to all people “born or naturalized in the United States,” and gave all citizens equal protection under the law.
1870 – The 15th Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, determining that a citizen’s right to vote could not be denied or diminished because of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
1877 – The end of Reconstruction. From 1877 through the mid-20th century, new state laws and amendments to state constitutions ushered in a system of racial segregation and the near-complete disenfranchisement of Black voters in the South.
1882 – The Chinese Exclusion Act denied people of Chinese ancestry from the right to citizenship and suffrage.
1884 – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Elk v. Wilkins that Indigenous peoples did not have equal protection under the law and, therefore, did not have the right to vote.
1890 – Individual states started extending suffrage to include women in state and local, not federal, elections.
1920 – The 19th Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, extending suffrage to include all women in all elections. However, de facto and de jure  racial discrimination limited the voting rights of women of color.
1922 – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Ozawa v. United States that people of Japanese ancestry were ineligible for citizenship.
1923 – The U.S. Supreme Court similarly ruled in Thind v. United States that Indians were ineligible for citizenship.
1924 – The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 extended citizenship to all Indigenous peoples, although it took over 40 years for all states to comply and extend suffrage.
1952 – The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 extended the right to citizenship and suffrage to all people of Asian ancestry.
1961 – The 23rd Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, extending suffrage to include citizens of Washington, DC.
1964 – The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. Title 1 of the Act specifically guaranteed equal voting rights and eliminated many restrictive voting requirements and procedures.
1964 – The 24th Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, abolishing poll taxes in federal elections. Two years later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Harper vs. Virginia Board of Elections that poll taxes were also unconstitutional in state and local elections.
1965 – The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed, becoming the most significant effort to protect voting rights in the history of the U.S.
1971 – The 26th Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, extending suffrage to include 18 to 20-year-olds.
1993 – The National Voter Registration Act increased access to voter registration by requiring the Department of Motor Vehicles, public assistance facilities, and disabilities agencies to make voter registration readily available.
2013 – The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County v. Holder eliminated Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, dismantling federal pre-clearance requirements and allowing states that had previously needed to seek approval from the federal government to change voting laws and procedures, to do so by themselves.
2023 – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Allen v. Milligan that Alabama’s redistricting process was racially discriminatory, upholding Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
2) Answer the following questions:
Question to Answer: Which events along this timeline do you consider to be the most significant in altering the American electorate (both positive and negative)? Discuss why you think each is significant? make sure to use the word terminate at least 3 times in your responses
3) Head over to Pew ResearchLinks to an external site.. Read through the page and consider voter turnout, 2018-2022, and how it manifests across demographics.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/voter-turnout-2018-2022/
4) Answer the following questions:
Question to Answer: Using data from this source, report back which groups are likely to turnout and those which are not. make sure to use the word terminate at least 3 times in your responses
Question to Answer: Amongst the groups that turnout vs those that don’t, what do you think is going on here in terms of their overall levels of turnout by group, discuss your answer?

Rewrite the essay attached, so that it fits into the word limits and isn’t flagged as AI, but at the same time maintaining all information written. 
Do not change the context, just rewrite and make sure that the end of each point leads back to the essay title.

please reply to post with in depth information (in depth to the post or relevant information) 
** 2 sources needed 

This assignment will require you to write an essay with at least 5 full pages All detailed requirements are in the file uploaded. Please do read through the requirements

So for my final exam for my class Pol 301 CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS, I have to write an Argumentative Essay. ALL my intructions are in the Final Exam Intructions PDF below, including the Essay Question.
I already had to do a Outline for the Final. So please take a look at my outline and also take a look at the Prrofessor’s Feedback Analysis in regards to my outline and how he wannts the essay to be. 
We are to reference the notes from certain classes which I will attach below as attachmentss. Bu keep in mind this essay is more to assess our own opinion in answering the question so we o not need to break down each little if you know what i mean.  
***Class 19 – April 2 – Thirteenth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment: Incorporation. (Important) 
Class 25 – May 2 – Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure 
Class 27 – May 9 – Legal System Definition of Crime 
_______________________________________________________________

Each student will submit a research paper on a topic in American Government.  Students may choose any topic they wish with the exception of abortion.  Any student writing their research paper on abortion will receive No Credit for the assignment.  Students will choose a controversial topic in American Government, present the pros and cons of the chosen topic (supported by cites), and provide an analysis of the subject with an opinion/conclusion.  The analysis must present a critical review of the topic as well as a critical analysis of the sources used.  Options for critical topic analysis include, but are not limited to, liberal/conservative ideology, media coverage, political parties, institutions, political participants, and details of the actual topic (refer to SLO’s for areas of analysis).  Source analysis is based on a critical review of the articles/citations used for the paper.  
Papers must be a minimum of five (5) pages of text in length (7 pages max.) plus a standard bibliography of no fewer than 5 reputable sources.  Any paper submitted without a complete bibliography will receive no credit for the assignment. 
Students MUST use the following publications as sources (minimum 1 article from each source: 3 of the 5 required citations) for their papers:  Mother Jones, the National Review, One Government Publication (US or state) or One Interest Group Publication; additional cite choices are at the discretion of the student.  All of these publications can be found via LBCC Library online resources, specifically the search engine ProQuest.  If a website is used as a required cite, it must be from a reputable publication, institution or association.  Non-reputable websites will not be counted toward required sources.  The required textbooks, dictionaries, Wikipedia, or any encyclopedia or standard reference volume may not be used as a required cite (reference material may be used as additional citations, and must be included in the bibliography). 
Papers must be written in the following format:  ½  page introduction and facts, 1 page pros of topic (properly cited from research), 1 page cons of topic (properly cited from research), 1 page source analysis (a discussion of the positives and weaknesses of your sources), 1 page subject/topic analysis (choose 2 from the list below) and ½ page conclusion (including author’s position on the topic). 
The Analysis section of the paper should include a one (1) page source analysis where the student critically analyzes 2 – 3 of the sources used in writing the paper; AND a (1) page topic analysis using two of the following:  1. ideology (liberal and conservative), 2. media/source treatment of topic, 3.  institutions, or 4. political participants, to further analyze the topic beyond pro/con.
The paper is worth 250 points, 10 points will be deducted each day for a late paper up to one (1) week late.  Papers shorter than the minimum 5 pages, lacking a complete bibliography, or not meeting the requirements of the assignment will receive severe point deductions or no credit. See Semester Schedule for Due Date.  Students needing assistance with writing a complete bibliography, check out the website www.aresearchguide.com.
The Research paper, including bibliography, Must be typewritten, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman or CG Times font.  
Please refer to the Syllabus for additional information and a list of mandatory deductions.
Something like this 
Sure, here’s a sample research paper on the topic of gun control in American Government, following the specified structure:
Gun Control in America: A Controversial Debate
Introduction and Facts
Gun control remains one of the most contentious issues in American politics. The debate centers on the extent to which the government should regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms. Proponents of stricter gun control argue that it is essential for reducing gun violence and enhancing public safety. Opponents, however, believe that such regulations infringe upon the Second Amendment rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. This paper examines both sides of the gun control debate, analyzing the pros and cons, and providing a critical review of the sources used.
Pros of Gun Control
Advocates for stricter gun control measures argue that such regulations are necessary to curb gun violence and reduce the number of mass shootings. According to an article from Mother Jones, countries with stringent gun laws, such as Australia and the United Kingdom, have significantly lower rates of gun-related deaths compared to the United States . Additionally, research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that states with stronger gun laws have fewer gun deaths per capita . Proponents also point to studies showing that background checks and restrictions on assault weapons can prevent firearms from falling into the hands of criminals and individuals with mental illnesses, thereby reducing the potential for violence .
Cons of Gun Control
Opponents of gun control argue that such measures are unconstitutional and ineffective. The National Review asserts that the Second Amendment explicitly protects an individual’s right to own and bear arms, and that any infringement on this right is a violation of constitutional freedoms . Critics also argue that gun control laws do not deter criminals, who are unlikely to obey such regulations. Instead, they believe that these laws only restrict law-abiding citizens’ ability to protect themselves. Additionally, some studies suggest that areas with strict gun control laws, such as Chicago, continue to experience high rates of gun violence, indicating that other factors, such as socio-economic conditions, play a more significant role in influencing crime rates .

Please do not accept order if you don’t have access to Jason Hickel’s Less is More. You must quote direct page numbers and it’s your only source you can use.