Category: Political science

Instructions are attached below. But also don’t write the answers to these questions to perfect or professionally, what I’m saying is my professor is aware I’m one of those students who isn’t fond on this subject. Thanks! Also please attach a turnitin check, because the document will be submitted through turnitin. I still need a good grade though. ALSO ONLY USE THE LINK PROVIDED AND REFERERENCE THAT SOURCE FROM THE LINK ONLY.

Student submissions will be 500-words of double-spaced text, 12-point, and Times New Roman font. All sources (such as class readings and lectures) must be cited using in-text citations and a “works cited” section at the end of your essay. This work is intended to be done in discussion with your group members.
First, summarize the discussion of your group. What did you find most compelling?
Second, answer the questions of the prompt in your own manner.
as provided below, I have included the chapter that we have covered this week and I have also covered some notes from my discussion for this week for my group. You can use these to complete the assignment.

“In the tumultuous central Italy of the Renaissance, Cesare Borgia and O/liverotto da Fermo contended for power with one another as well as with other captains and princes like the Orsini and Vitelli. How were the two alike, and how did they differ? Which of them might Machiavelli have esteemed more highly, and why?”
Only use The Prince as a source. 

In the work, you need to write an essay on a chosen topic. There is an explanation of the requirements in the task brief. My work should be devoted to all this+ epistemology of the word.
Types of Democratic Regimes: Representative, Parliamentary, Presidential, Direct
Main Ingredients of Democracy:
Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
Separation of Power (Montesquieu)
Elections
Rule of Law
The Parliament
Government and the Opposition
Political Pluralism
Public Opinion and Free Media
Prospects for Democracy: Is the world becoming more democratic?
Democratic Peace Theory: Are democracies more peaceful
But in the work you need also analyse an event or the process of modern life through the lenses of all points that are written above, you can do it in any way, but the topic should be covered. I would start with democracy by itself, its justifications, ingredients and then talking about the exmaple. I have written a bit, so you can use it in the work:  
Democracy is a word that appeared many years ago and can be used to describe a system of governance where power is held by people in two possible ways: either directly or through representatives elected by the citizens. It originally comes from the Greek words “demos”-people and “kratos”-rule, which can explain Athenian democracy, where citizens were allowed to engage directly in various decision-making processes, participate in assemblies, and have their “say” in the adoption of different laws and policies. This direct type of democracy became the groundwork for the establishment of modern interpretations and concepts of democratic regimes. Subsequently, philosophers and political theorists have provided a wide range of justifications for the democratic type of governance, which has influenced the modern structures of society. 
First of all, one of the main examples of justification is the social contract theory, which takes its roots from Tomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. According to them, people in their natural state set up a social contract to create a government that will ensure their security and protect their rights and freedoms together with the promotion of their well-being and prevention of crises and instabilities. John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau advocated more for democracy, as this form of governance meets the will of citizens and assists them in achieving the common good, establishing a community of free and equal people, with the consent of citizens to be governed by representatives they elected. 
Talking about the event, you can focus on Hong-Kong, and its problems with democracy or democratic movements that take place there. Or you can choose another event that is suitable and better describes the situation, but its should be something global, like taking a country and analysing the processes that take place there. 
In the beginning there should be a small sort of executive summary, where you will write what is work about and like an introduction. 
It is very nice when there citations in the work and the words of someone. 

In
Zoom class meetings we have noted two different views and explanations of The
Shoah/Holocaust often referred to as the “Intentionalist” view and
the “Functionalist” view.  Briefly describe and explain these
perspectives as noted in our Zoom meetings and recorded on the CANVAS site for
Political Science 4313/The Holocaust.  Refer to segments of at least one
of the films/videos listed below and two (2) of the materials listed below
which lend support to one or the other of these different perspectives or views.
The two or more materials you select should be in addition to a brief
description of Daniel Goldhagen’s intentionalist view as indicated in the
following paragraph. 
Include
in your essay a brief description of Daniel Goldhagen’s intentionalist view as
explained in our Zoom meetings.  This
has been recorded. Goldhagen’s own explanation of his book can be viewed in one
of the videos listed here.  Briefly note the criticisms of Goldhagen’s
book and Goldhagen’s reply to his critics.  Conclude your essay with a
discussion and explanation of which of these two perspectives in your own view
is supported by or not supported by the materials you have looked at and
described in your essay. 

Since January 6, 2021, the former US President, Donald Trump, has 1) been impeached by Congress; 2) been the subject of a long and critical Congressional investigation; and 3) become embroiled in a number of criminal and civil legal processes. Nonetheless, he is leading in the Republican electoral primary and intends to be the Republican nominee for the presidential election in November, 2024. This has generated mounting suggestions from the Democratic Party and beyond that during the upcoming election, ‘democracy will be on the line’, and that the possibility of a fascistic turn in American politics is now very real. Is democracy itself in peril during the upcoming US election cycle, and would a right-wing victory result introduce fascistic elements into US politics? Why or why not?

I am writing a thesis paper titled ‘Anti-hegemonic alignment: ideational synergy in contemporary Russo-Iranian relations’ I have a few paragraphs that I need written. Each paragraph has a specific word count, I will upload a document with the instructions. All sections are linked to each other and will be put into one paper. I will include readings and sources that should be used for every section. I will also attach my notes and research proposal for the writer to get an idea of what my argument is and what the paper is about. Please include a bibliography and in-text referencing where relevant.

Part 1
Briefly describe and discuss the major analytical approaches to the
study of American 
foreign policy.  Include in your description and discussion, where
appropriate, some 
reference to the following article:
Barry Gewen, “The Book That Shaped Foreign Policy for a Generation
Has More to Say”, New York Times Book Review, May 9, 2020
Part 2
Briefly describe and discuss the various strategic approaches employed
in American foreign policy from the end of World War II in 1945 to the
present.
Include in your description and 
discussion, where appropriate, some
reference to the following article:
George F. Kennan (“X”), “The Sources Of Soviet Conduct” Foreign
Affairs July 1947

In no less than 200 words, describe the five types of violence, according to political scientist Fred R. von der Mehden? What are the distinguishing features of each type of violence? Are these types of violence mutually exclusive or not? Which type of violence do you think is the hardest to prevent? Why?

Please check the instructions document uploaded
14 pages, times roman font, double spaced, MLA citations for atleast 10 sources