Category: Political science

In
Zoom class meetings we have noted two different views and explanations of The
Shoah/Holocaust often referred to as the “Intentionalist” view and
the “Functionalist” view.  Briefly describe and explain these
perspectives as noted in our Zoom meetings and recorded on the CANVAS site for
Political Science 4313/The Holocaust.  Refer to segments of at least one
of the films/videos listed below and two (2) of the materials listed below
which lend support to one or the other of these different perspectives or views.
The two or more materials you select should be in addition to a brief
description of Daniel Goldhagen’s intentionalist view as indicated in the
following paragraph. 
Include
in your essay a brief description of Daniel Goldhagen’s intentionalist view as
explained in our Zoom meetings.  This
has been recorded. Goldhagen’s own explanation of his book can be viewed in one
of the videos listed here.  Briefly note the criticisms of Goldhagen’s
book and Goldhagen’s reply to his critics.  Conclude your essay with a
discussion and explanation of which of these two perspectives in your own view
is supported by or not supported by the materials you have looked at and
described in your essay. 

Since January 6, 2021, the former US President, Donald Trump, has 1) been impeached by Congress; 2) been the subject of a long and critical Congressional investigation; and 3) become embroiled in a number of criminal and civil legal processes. Nonetheless, he is leading in the Republican electoral primary and intends to be the Republican nominee for the presidential election in November, 2024. This has generated mounting suggestions from the Democratic Party and beyond that during the upcoming election, ‘democracy will be on the line’, and that the possibility of a fascistic turn in American politics is now very real. Is democracy itself in peril during the upcoming US election cycle, and would a right-wing victory result introduce fascistic elements into US politics? Why or why not?

I am writing a thesis paper titled ‘Anti-hegemonic alignment: ideational synergy in contemporary Russo-Iranian relations’ I have a few paragraphs that I need written. Each paragraph has a specific word count, I will upload a document with the instructions. All sections are linked to each other and will be put into one paper. I will include readings and sources that should be used for every section. I will also attach my notes and research proposal for the writer to get an idea of what my argument is and what the paper is about. Please include a bibliography and in-text referencing where relevant.

Part 1
Briefly describe and discuss the major analytical approaches to the
study of American 
foreign policy.  Include in your description and discussion, where
appropriate, some 
reference to the following article:
Barry Gewen, “The Book That Shaped Foreign Policy for a Generation
Has More to Say”, New York Times Book Review, May 9, 2020
Part 2
Briefly describe and discuss the various strategic approaches employed
in American foreign policy from the end of World War II in 1945 to the
present.
Include in your description and 
discussion, where appropriate, some
reference to the following article:
George F. Kennan (“X”), “The Sources Of Soviet Conduct” Foreign
Affairs July 1947

In no less than 200 words, describe the five types of violence, according to political scientist Fred R. von der Mehden? What are the distinguishing features of each type of violence? Are these types of violence mutually exclusive or not? Which type of violence do you think is the hardest to prevent? Why?

Please check the instructions document uploaded
14 pages, times roman font, double spaced, MLA citations for atleast 10 sources

template and information hopefully all provided bellow please for further questions feel free to contact me i will reply quickly

Submit a 1-2 page analysis of Laffan’s alternate scenarios on the future of European integration (ch. 29 of Cini). What are they, which are most and least probable and why? In your analysis be sure to cover how each scenario would impact issues of legitimacy and the democratic deficit perception among EU citizens.

Describe how the media portrayed the politicians involved (1 page).
Discuss the outcome of the scandal (1 page).
Did individuals gain greater political power and exposure? Did they resign from office or were their political careers cut short due to the scandal?
Explain what effect, if any, the scandal had on the political environment and the media and why (1 page).
The scandal assigned is the Iran-contra affair.

Completion of clean copies based on the last completed research proposal
“Check-In” Assignments: These are ungraded assignments in which you must submit clean copies of your research work up to that point. These assignments include any thought pieces, compositions of certain sections, outlines, evidence and commentary blocks, notes, or any remarks related to your research