Category: Philosophy

–  Provide an interpretation of Nietzsche’s criticisms of ‘anti-natural’ morality. Provide some contemporary examples to help explain his target. Do you find his argument compelling? What may some objections be?
– Pease use down to Earth language. The purpose of the essay to show understanding and interpretation of his philosophy so it must be understandable for people who arent familiar with the subject. 
–   Include a list of at least six academic references you used in your project. Cite these in your writing. (An ‘academic source’ is one that is found through the Queens College Library search. This includes journal articles, published books, as well as the websites ‘Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’ and ‘Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.’ Other websites (eg. Reddit, Quora, Spark Notes and Cliff Notes) are not academic sources!)
2 out of 6 sources you can use are provided below:
1. 
https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/index.html
2.

Welcome

– Please, provide AI and pagiarism reports. 

Identify a case study from the Supporting Materials section of this assignment.
Identify a professional code of ethics from a profession or organization that is related to the case study you select in this assignment. This is the code of ethics you will use in your project.
An internet search with keywords including the profession or organization and code of ethics is a good place to start. For examples of professional codes of ethics, consider the following:
American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics
American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Ethics
American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses
American Psychological Association (APA) Code of Conduct
American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Code of Ethics
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA) Code of Conduct
National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics
National Education Association (NEA) Code of Ethics for Educators
National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics for Engineers
Radio Television Digital News Association (RTDNA) Code of Ethics
Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) Code of Ethics
Explain how this professional code of ethics informs decision making within the context of your case study.
What is the purpose of this professional code of ethics?
How does it support decisions?
Explain what makes the code of ethics you chose applicable to your selected case study.
Identify the origin of this professional code of ethics.
Consider the history of your chosen professional organization.
Explain which ethical principles are most important to this professional code of ethics, and why.
Refer to the list of ethical principles in the Module Two Guide.
Identify a possible ethical framework that includes these ethical principles.
Consult the list of five ethical frameworks described in the Module One Guide
Submit your project proposal as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. You must cite the case study, ethical framework, and the professional code of ethics and any sources regarding its origin/history. If other sources are used, follow APA citation guidelines when citing sources both throughout and at the end of your paper.

Discussion: Find a fallacy of weak induction or emotional appeal Weak induction fallacies and fallacious appeals to emotion are quite common.  See if you can find one online.  Look at web sites like the NRA; Fox News; NRLC; PETA; and other such political or agenda-driven  organizations.  Comment on another students’ post. Weak induction:  Small sample; unrepresentative sample; questionable cause; slippery slope; faulty analogy; biased experts; irrelevant expertise. Emotional appeals:  Fear; Pity; Anger

Requirement attached. I have to have it done by 11:55pm. Only 50 minutes. I know it is too little time but as long as it is done, I’m fine with it.

Write a 1500-word (excluding bibliography) essay on African philosophy.
Question: Explain Nzegwu issues with Western feminism? Is her argument compelling?
Please use the example of the transition of FGM (female genital mutilation) in African countries in the essay. 
Readings: 
Family Matters – Nzegwu

Prompt
What are philosophical zombies? Present and explain Chalmers’s zombie argument (pp.388-389). According to Chalmers, how does the possibility of philosophical zombies challenge or raise a problem for materialism/physicalism? Do you find his argument convincing? Why or why not? (To clarify, the task is to give your evaluation of Chalmers’s argument — not to present Dennett’s.)

The essay is completed. I just need it revised according to the professor’s comments. I have attached pictures of the comments the professor left and the doc of my essay.    Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! 

Pedagogy – The student will analyze how Pedagogy influences a student’s ability to learn and apply knowledge in personal, academic, and/or professional ways by reviewing one or more assigned readings from the course and providing examples.
The student will be evaluated in the following areas:
1) Knowledge of philosopher(s)
2) Ability to compare ideas
3) Critical thinking skills
Please note the following questions when reviewing the rough draft:
Is the subject of analysis clearly introduced in paragraph one?
Is the essay’s thesis clearly worded?
Is the paper properly sourced (quotes to prove your point)?
Are the body paragraphs clearly unified?
Does the essay properly transition between paragraphs?
Are the philosophers noted in the paper properly explained?
Is the analysis (explanation) clear?
Does the paper contain a strong conclusion?
Is the paper at least 4 complete pages? 

Compare and contrast three philosophic or theological responses to the Holocaust on a single topic.   It can be on their application to a new moral, philosophic or theological topic related to the Holocaust or a parallel situation such as Rwanda, 9/11 or the Yazidi genocide. It can also be an application to an educational or medical situation, or an angle that they did not consider. It can be looked from any angle.
Make sure your paper has three opinions. Three opinions does not mean three sources but three different opinions- the way this class surveys many opinions. The paper is three people’s opinions on one topic. This is comparing and evaluating what other wrote not your attempt at solving big issues. The goal is not to harmonize or combine the opinions but to compare and contrast them as conflicting opinions.
write this paper on Three contasting views and opinions on the Blood libel.
Useful things to think about: How do your three thinkers use scripture and other texts? Are they useful in our age? Do people accept that position? Why is your topic important in your local? Are you sources mystical, political, or doctrinal? 

Please check the attached essay prompt pdf for instructions.
I do not expect you to read all the attached material but I do expect you to reference and cite the materials.
Thank you.