Category: Philosophy

  • “Exploring Theories of Living Well: Evaluating Philosophers and Applying Concepts to Personal Struggles”

    Word Count – 2000 words maximum
    This semester we have examined various theories about how to live well, that fall on one side or the other of the basic distinction between change and stability that we have been examining all semester.  They are:
    Changing/Relative Stability                                  Unchanging/Absolute Stability        
    Skeptical Socrates’ questioning everything                          Plato’s Socrates’ search for Eternal Forms
    Epicurus’ right pleasures                                                     Stoic Logos
    Buddha’s theory of non-attachment                                     Taoist harmony
    For the first part of your final paper, you will be evaluating philosophers from the book Words of Wisdom Download Words of Wisdomand where they fall in the categories above.  The book has 7 parts. Take one thinker  from each part (other than the ones we examined in class) and defend which side of these categories they are on by giving evidence for their positions from the book.
    For the second part of the paper you will pick two of the theories of living well from the above list, one from each side, and examine them by applying them to a struggle that you are having in your own life.   To provide a context for your paper, read the excerpt from Viktor Frankl about the finding meaning in life and the article by Stephen Law called “The Meaning of Life,” both on Canvas.
    When you successfully complete this paper you will have shown that you can:
    Explain how several philosophers fall on the change/stability axis
    Explain the theory of how to live well for two of the theories we have studied
    Understand the relevance of those theories and the concepts of change and stability for struggles in our lives today
    Describe clearly a current personal struggle that you have
    Analyze how those two theories can be applied to your struggle
    Determine how well those theories would work to overcome the struggle
    Defend a position about which one is more effective in dealing with the struggle
    Make sure that you do the following:
    Clearly explain two theories about how to live well, one from each side of the relative/absolute line.
    Provide details about how you need to think about how you think is the best way to think about the world and what concepts are important to living well
    Clearly describe a personal struggle with which you are currently dealing
    Explain all the parts of the struggle that are relevant to finding a solution
    Apply each theory to your struggle so you have explained two different ways of dealing with the struggle
    Explain how well you think each theory would work to solve the struggle
    Explain the limits of these theories – that is, why would they not work completely?

  • “Exploring the Concept of Epistemic Injustice in the Context of Social Media” Part 1: Summary In the article “Epistemic Injustice in the Era of Social Media” by Miranda Fricker, the author discusses the concept

    art 1: Summary
    o Write a 250-word summary of the article, pointing out the main argument and how
    the author works with the concept of “epistemic injustice”
    § Part 2: Engagement
    o Write a 250-word engagement with the ideas mentioned in the article. You might
    consider expanding on a topic you found interesting, raising an objection,
    § Part 3: Discussion Questions
    o You will include three (3) discussion questions, as if you were to lead a discussion
    on this article. These must relate to the central topic of that article.

  • “The Just Life vs. The Unjust Life: A Philosophical Disputation”

    Hello, I need a college level disputation paper. The assignment instructions are included below as well as the example sample paper. The disputation question i chose is “Whether the unjust life is better than the just life?” The sources I suggest is The Republic in the Plato Reader. It can be 4-6 pages long. Make sure to make a citation page at the end.  

  • “The Role of Individualism and Society in the Development of Modern Western Thought”

    Do not use secondary sources, do not use AI and most importantly, only use evidence form the following books: 
    The Essential Adam Smith  978-0393955309
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality 978-0-87220-150-7
    Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America 978-0226805368
    John Stuart Mill, On Liberty  978-0486421308
    Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism 978-0140439212
    Emile Durkheim, On Suicide 978-0140449679
    E.B. DuBois, The Souls of Black Folk 978-15005223378
    I have attatched a picture of the instructions, please follow instructions thoroughly.  When you decide what books you are going to write on, send me a message so I can send you the specific fragments of the book where my professor wants us to retrieve our evidence, thank you.