Category: Other

Think about a business project on which you have worked. How would you apply an enterprise analysis framework to this project? The BABOK® Guide talks about key performance indicators (KPIs) in Section 10.28 as tools that measure progress toward a strategic goal and aid in enterprise analysis. Discuss how using KPI milestones could also be used by business analysts as a communication tool during the evaluation stage. Why are strong communication skills important to today’s business analysts? In addition to peer-reviewed academic journal articles, back up all opinions with foundation knowledge from the BABOK Guide and in-class lessons.
Safe Assign Submission:
To submit your original post to SafeAssign, you first need to go to Discussions – SafeAssign Checks link on the left navigation panel or Getting Started> Discussions – SafeAssign Checks (Weeks 1-8). In this link, you have unlimited attempts to upload your original post, return to check your SafeAssign score, fix your post if needed, and resubmit the corrected document by selecting the Start New button.  Once you press Start New, you no longer have access to the previous posts or their SafeAssign scores.  So, save those if you need a record to refer to as you make further corrections.
After you have submitted your final version of the original post and you are satisfied with the SafeAssign score and your corrections, copy/paste that same version of the original post to the discussion forum so your classmates and instructor can read it, by following the next steps below.

Based on Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the following questions: Describe dermatitis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment modalities Describe the drug therapy for Conjunctivitis and Otitis Media Discuss Herpes Virus infections, patient presentation, and treatment Describe the most common primary bacterial skin infections and the treatment of choice. Submission Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in an essay format. Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2, followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth. You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) Your response should be at least 150 words. All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday. You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Thesis Statement Draft and Source Evaluation
In Modules 1 and 2 you chose a course project topic and narrowed your focus through the process of brainstorming and finding preliminary sources. Each week make sure you are reading your instructor’s feedback and making improvements before submitting the next Milestone. For example, if your instructor suggested replacing any of the sources you listed in Milestone 2, or refining your narrowed topic of focus, make sure to take that into account before submitting Milestone 3.
Now, in Module 3, you will draft a thesis statement and evaluate your sources for relevance and credibility.
This is the template:
Instructions: Replace the example wording in brackets below with your wording for each prompt.
IND101 Milestone 3 Template
1. Thesis statement:
[Example: The US government should increase incentives for the production and consumption of electric
cars because they are still too expensive for most consumers, US consumption is falling behind other
nations, and electric cars are effective at reducing carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to climate
change.]
2. In-depth evaluation of one source:
Source (not required to be in APA format, but must include author, date, title, and a link):
[Example: Sperling, D. (2018). Electric vehicles: Approaching the tipping point. Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists, 74(1), 11–18.
http://vlib.excelsior.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ulh&AN=1
27161734&site=eds-live&scope=site
• Relevance: This source is very relevant to my topic because it concerns the future of electric
vehicle production in the United States. The article also compares government policies on
electric and non-electric vehicles in multiple countries, including China, France, and Britain. This
will be useful in thinking about the second point of my thesis statement about how the US
compares to other nations in electric car production.
• Authority: The author of this article, Dr. Daniel Sperling, is a professor of civil and environmental
engineering at UC Davis. His area of expertise is in the environmental impact of motor vehicles.
He has a considerable number of publications and is a recognized authority on this subject.
• Currency: This article was published in January of 2018, so it is relatively current, but not the
most up to date on the topic. This field is changing quickly, so articles that articles that have
come out in the past two years may be more useful.
• Objectivity: The author is a trained scientist and engineer so although he may have personal
biases, his work would be likely to be objective in its use of evidence and conclusions. The article
also includes a disclosure statement noting no potential conflict of interest for the author.
According to its website, the publication Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is a nonprofit that
“informs the public about threats to the survival of humanity from nuclear weapons, climate
change, and disruptive technologies” (https://thebulletin.org/about-us/). This means that the
publication would be more likely to publish pieces like Sperling’s which advocate for potential
solutions to climate change and use non-technical language to communicate to the public.
• Verifiability: This article is not a ty

The point of this paper is to show how well you interpret a scatterplot and correlation. Please read the scenario and prompt before completing the assignment.
Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Please follow the directions very carefully and the grading rubic. If you are not able to see the graph that relates to this paper, please let me know by text only.
Last company I used did not follow the directions and I made a C on that paper.

Add In-text citations to this case study, add flow, and make the necessary edits so my paper is unreadable by Turnitin as it is AI generated. I have provided the prompt and the paper below.

Mythology Course
Week 3: Heroes and Tricksters

– Please see attached document for details.
– You will be required to access course platform and digital textbook to complete the assignments for week 3.
– PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THE DEADLINES IN THE WORD DOCUMENT. PLEASE DELIVER PROJECTS IN ORDER THAT IS ACCORDING TO THEIR DEADLINES.
The total amount of text/copy due will be around 4-5 pages long, depending on how long you make the Discussion topics. I prefer to keep the discussion topics as brief as possible. That said, please keep them around two paragraphs long, if possible.

Performance Interviews
I. Introduction
a. Capture readers attention
b. Thesis statement
c. Background information on performance interviews
II. Body Section One
a. State the purpose of performance interviews b. Explain why performance interviews are important
c. Give examples of what a performance interview consist of
III. Body Section Two
a. Compare performance interviews versus traditional interviews questions
b. Sample questions c. Best Practices for performance interviews IV. Body Section Three
a. Pros b. Cons
V. Body Section Four
a. Findings of data analysis results of the effectiveness of performance interviews
b. Recommendations for improving VI. Conclusion
a. Summary of research
b. Final remarks
VII.

Instructions
This week, you will prepare a narrated presentation using PowerPoint presentation software. You will create your audio presentation by using an audio/video capturing tool located in NCUOne. To access the capture tool, follow the tutorial found in this week′s resources.
You are the HR manager for a very large nonprofit organization that is planning to grow to its next phase and will need to increase its public relations. Senior leadership has asked you to develop a PowerPoint presentation that they can share with the Board of Directors that depicts a compensation model for creating a whole new public relations department of 15 diverse staff members.
Starting with a Director of Public Relations and mapping down to all of the direct reports and their direct reports, design a compensation model for this department. Include the various aspects of the compensation design model (job analysis, job documentation, job evaluation, and pay structure). See the HR Guide in this week′s resources for the definitions of each of the components of a compensation system.
Be sure your presentation includes a step-by-step illustration of each part of the process.
Length: 5 to 7-minute video accompanied by 12-15 slides (with a separate reference slide)
Notes Length: 200-350 words for each slide to serve as your transсrіpt.
References: Support your presentation with at least 3 scholarly resources.

A 500-word summary document is based on the transcripts from the video class. Please make sure no AI is detected on Canvas.

These questions must be answered in Spanish. Each response requires at minimum 100 words each. I will attach each discussion board. There are 7 different ones. Let me know if you have any questions please. It is a very short deadline, I’m sorry. The top of each attachment will have the different weeks. It should we a total of 7 weeks. Week 2,3,6,7,9,10,11.