Category: Nursing

10 questions and answers. answers can be gotten from an academic source. the university has zero tolerance for plagiarism. thank you.

Develop the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan
Complete the following:
Select one of the health concerns in the Assessment 01 Supplement: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan [PDF]resource as the focus of your care coordination plan. In your plan, please include physical, psychosocial, and cultural needs.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Document Format and Length
Your preliminary plan should be an APA scholarly paper, 3–4 pages in length.
Remember to use active voice, this means being direct and writing concisely; as opposed to passive voice, which means writing with a tendency to wordiness.
In your paper include possible community resources that can be used.
Be sure to review the scoring guide to make sure all criteria are addressed in your paper.
Study the subtle differences between basic, proficient, and distinguished.
Supporting Evidence
Cite at least two credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications that support your preliminary plan.
Grading Requirements
The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Analyze your selected health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Cite supporting evidence for best practices.
Consider underlying assumptions and points of uncertainty in your analysis.
Describe specific goals that should be established to address the health care problem.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Write with a specific purpose with your patient in mind.
Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and current APA formatting requirements.

(should have an “interview” incorporated in PowerPoint presentation)
Purpose: The purpose of the assignment is to provide an opportunity to demonstrate an understanding and communicate an overview of a selected disease process including basic pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and potential complications. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of: CLO: Based on prerequisite knowledge of anatomy and physiology. Explain abnormal physiological processes and disorders in the human body. CLO: Describe cellular adaptation and defense mechanisms. CLO: Describe the role of genetics and genomics in pathophysiology. CLO: Describe the pathophysiological processes of common alterations in health. CLO: Explain the physiological basis for signs, symptoms, diagnostic test results, and treatments of common alterations in health. CLO: Identify risk factors, prevention strategies, and health promotion strategies based on genetics and pathophysiological knowledge. CLO: Apply pathophysiological principles to case situations as a basis for nursing practice. CLO: Discuss pathophysiological changes in special populations. CLO: Discuss ethical issues related to genetic and pathophysiological knowledge related to some disorders. Requirements: Using the appropriate APA writing format and requirements, construct a paper on a selected and approved disease process. Review the assignment criterion listed below to develop your document. Course Outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. Explain the pathophysiologic processes of select health conditions. Predict clinical manifestations and complications of select disease processes. Correlate lifestyle, environment, and other influences with changes in levels of wellness. Requirements: Each student is to choose a medical disorder that they would like to learn more about from a list provided. It is the responsibility of the student to research the topic using current literature (at least 2 current professional resources), and become familiar with the pathophysiology, causes, risk factors, common clinical manifestations, and common complications of the disorder. Questions to be answered: Found in resources: Identify the chosen disease. What are the causes? What are the risk factors? Give a brief definition and describe in detail the pathophysiology of the disorder. Explain how the disorder works at a cellular level and interacts with other chemicals or cells in the body. (Do Not just copy this section from a resource-use your own words and understanding with reference) What are the common clinical manifestations of the disease/disorder according to your resources? Explain WHY or WHAT causes the clinical manifestations that you see. Describe the common complications of this disorder/disease according to your resources. Explain the relationship between the disorder and the complication. Explain what causes the complications. What diagnostic tests are used to diagnose the disease/disorder? PowerPoint Presentation has been provided. Use 7th-ed APA formatting. References Minimum of 2 professional references within 5 years Your textbook Professional website Scholarly journals Reference page to be written according to APA guidelines/format.

Part 1 – Situation Assessment Assignment
You will write a 5-page research-based paper in current AMA format focusing on the potential
of avian influenza A (H7N9) to expand into a local epidemic or spread beyond to pandemic
proportions. The paper must include at least 5 peer-reviewed references in addition to the five
background resource, the course textbooks, and the Bible. A biblical perspective on the response
must be considered and referenced appropriately.
Couse Textbooks below:
Sompayrac L. How the Immune System Works. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son; 2019. ISBN: 9781119542124.
The following required PDF is provided as web link in the course.
Atkinson W, Hamborsky L. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. 13th ed. Washington, DC: Public Health Foundation, 2015. ISBN: 9780990449119. (Free download available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/index.html)
AMA formatt reference need to be within past 5 years thank you

Write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes. Video and audio will be created by myself

Goal:
To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of the Quality Improvement Project.
Evaluate the clinical project.
Create an outline of the action plan for the project.
Content Requirements:
A description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.
A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis for the project. Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the quality improvement process.
An outline of the action plan for the project.
An assessment of clinical issue that is the focus of the quality improvement project.
Discuss stakeholders and decision makers who need to be involved in the quality improvement project.
Discuss resources including budget, personnel and time needed for the quality improvement project.
Discuss potential strategies for implementation and evaluation.
Identify stakeholders that will be impacted by the quality improvement project.
Identify and discussed resources including budget needed to implement the quality improvement project.

Epidemiology covid
Epidemiology/Global Infectious Disease Paper: DUE WEEK 3 (80 pts)
1. Watch the APU introduction to epidemiology video. Review the CDC global health page https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/index.html
2. Write the Epidemiology/Global Infectious Disease Paper, using prompts below:
Write a four page paper (see Rubric) including
a. Definition of epidemiology
b. The difference between Descriptive and Analytical epidemiology
c. You will be assigned an infectious disease that threatens health either globally or in the United States.
3. Using Epidemiological Principles and current data (publications within the last five years 2016-2021) – make sure you address all of the issues below
a. Describe where it originated
b. Recent number of cases globally and in the united states
c. Describe this disease using the epidemiological triangle
d. Who is at greatest risk for becoming infected? Why?
e. Describe how primary, secondary and tertiary measures apply to this disease
f. Considering the number of cases, risk of becoming infected and potential for debilitation or death, do you believe this disease is being adequately researched and receiving the attention it deserves so more cases might be prevented?
g. If you had an amazing opportunity to make recommendations to the CDC or world health organization regarding this disease, what would you recommend? (brief paragraph

SCENARIO SUMMARY:
62 yo stroke patient whose insurance only covers a 3 night stay at the hospital. 
According to the insurance company, they recommend discharging her today. The patient’s nurse and healthcare team say she isn’t ready for discharge and still has to undergo rehab and physical therapy to relearn many basic daily movements. 
This patient has no one to take care of her at home because her daughter works full time. 
Others argue that 1-2 additional nights in the hospital aren’t going to solve these issues. 
Also, if the hospital is overpacked, she is at risk of infection. If she stays longer, she has to pay out of pocket. 
The healthcare team is conflicted on what to do and ultimately decide to discharge the patient. 
This episode raises important questions about the ethical responsibilities of healthcare professionals. Even though Joan’s condition had not fully stabilized, a shortage of available beds, the hospital’s policy, and insurance algorithms appear to have dictated her care. What potential consequences and ethical dilemmas do you observe in this scenario?  What ethical frameworks or guidelines should healthcare team members and their organizations follow when facing this situation? 
In Addition, address ONLY three (3) of the following questions:
What emotions and/or internal conflict did you feel when you watched this episode? 
How did your personal and professional background impact your feelings about Joan’s situation? 
Do you feel that the administrators’ and practitioners’ responses were reasonable or typical? 
How can healthcare team members balance the need to provide quality care with resource constraints?
Which ethical decision-making model might provide a systematic way to evaluate this ethical dilemma?

Module 2 Discussion
Depressive Disorders Answer the questions below based on the following case study.
A 41-year-old man presents to his PCP with feelings of hopelessness, sadness, and helplessness. He says that he cries for no reason, and has difficulty sleeping. He noticed that the problems began about 6 weeks before, and he did not feel able to shrug them off. He has been drinking more alcohol than usual and has stopped going to work. When on his own, he admitted that he had thought of driving his car into the nearest canal.
Summarize the clinical case.
What is the DSM 5-TR diagnosis based on the information provided in the case?
Which pharmacological treatment would you prescribe including the name, dose, route and frequency of the drug in accordance with the clinical guidelines? Include the rationale for this treatment.
Which non-pharmacological treatment would you prescribe according to the clinical guidelines? Include the rationale for this treatment excluding a psychotherapeutic modality.
Include an assessment of the treatment’s appropriateness, cost, effectiveness, safety, and potential for patient adherence to the chosen medication. Use a local pharmacy to research the cost of the medication and provide the most cost-effective choice for the patient. Use great detail when answering questions 3-5.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Discussion Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPoints
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and ConceptsDistinguished – 4 points Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.Excellent – 3 points Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.Fair – 1-2 points Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.Poor – 0 points
Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear.4 points
APA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished – 2 points The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Excellent – 1 point
The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Fair – 0.5 points
The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Poor – 0 points The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations.2 points
Writing MechanicsDistinguished – 2 points Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.Excellent – 1 point
Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.Fair – 0.5 points
The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.Poor – 0 points The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.2 points
Response to Posts of PeersDistinguished – 2 points Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.Fair – 1 point Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.Poor – 0 points Provided no response to a peer’s post. 2 points

The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.
Below is a quick review table of several well-known Evidence-Based Practice Models used to guide exploration:
Evidence-Based Practice Models
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
Stetler Model
Ottawa Model
PARiHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) Model
ACE (Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice) Star Model
ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration) Mode
John Hopkins Model
KTA (Knowledge-to-Action) Model
For this assessment:
Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen diagnosis for this assessment. Your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented diagnosis you selected. Since you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis/health care issue you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that were identified.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.
Describe a chosen diagnosis that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a chosen diagnosis.
This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the diagnosis you selected for the first assessment.
Identify the Evidence-Based Practice model and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the EBP model used to address a chosen diagnosis. 
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
Length of submission: 2-4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
Number of references: Cite 3-5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.