Brisk Essay Writers

Category: Nursing

  • Title: “Mastering the Art of Giving Instructions”

    Instructions will be in the attachment. Please use simple but proper words or grammar. No plaigirism please. Thank you!

  • Title: “Analyzing the Trend of Blood Administration Errors: Individual or System Failure?”

    Your unit data reflect an upward trend in blood administration errors. Is this likely an individual failure or a system failure? Which performance improvement theory or model would you use to address it?

  • Title: Improving Patient Safety through Standardized Handoff Communication in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Introduction: Effective communication is crucial in healthcare settings, especially in high-risk environments such as the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Inadequate

    Select a Service Improvement within your area of practice where a service improvement project could be developed and implemented from the attached list. Identify a gap or a need for quality or safety improvement. Utilise background literature and evidence to support the rationale and patient outcomes for your proposed project proposal.
    Using relevant literature, relevant improvement methodology/ies and module guidance, critically discuss the project proposal and how the project would be led and  implemented in practice.

  • “Addressing Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare: An Evidence-Based Approach” “Improving Academic Writing Skills: Addressing Inadequate Information and Inaccurate Writing in Scholarly Papers”

    For this assignment, students will select an ethical dilemma in healthcare and propose evidence-based intervention(s) for the identified problem. The paper should be a minimum of four to five paragraphs, 500- 800 words in length, and no more than four pages, not including the title and reference pages.
    Assignment Details:
    Perform the following tasks:
    Conduct a literature review to identify an ethical dilemma and explore opposing viewpoints.
    Write an engaging and informative paper that would be helpful for someone in the discipline wanting to learn about ethical dilemmas in healthcare
    Use the following as a checklist for the scholarly paper:
    Include the following elements:
    Title page (APA formatted title page).
    Introduction
    Background knowledge-brief summary of current knowledge of ethical dilemma being addressed
    Discuss the opposing viewpoints
    Challenges imposed in practice
    Intext citation present and appropriate
    Literature Review
    Literature searches for the topic on the web and in databases are limited to peer-reviewed professional nursing and medical journals, texts, and writings (no older than 5 years).
    Uses literature to support claims, facts, and statistics.
    Intext Citation present and appropriate.
    Proposed Intervention
    Clearly state proposed intervention(s)
    Define the ethical considerations or issues relevant to proposed intervention
    State why the intervention(s) were chosen
    Describe the implications of the proposed intervention to nursing education and practice.
    Discussion/Implications/Conclusion
    All work should have appropriate citations and reference lists.
    Use Times New Roman, 12 pt. font; 1-inch margins; double-spaced.
    Consists of 500 to 800 words in length (four to five paragraphs)
    Citation and references are to follow the APA manual format
    References should be no more than 5 years old
    Sources:
    Wikipedia (or similar sites) is not to be used as a reference
    Taber’s and/or other medical dictionaries or encyclopedias are not to be used as references.
    Proofread and edit the paper carefully, following the assignment rubric.
    Use the plagiarism tool to check the summary against unintended plagiarism.
    Spell check the paper and submit via Canvas.
    Rubric
    NUR101 Recognize Ethical Dilemmas Rubric
    NUR101 Recognize Ethical Dilemmas Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Choice & Introduction
    45 to >41.0 pts
    Well-Done
    Strong topic defined addressing the assignment prompts in a highly focused and inviting way. Reasons, details, facts relate to prompt in compelling, highly effective ways. Varied and subtle transitions enhance the flow of the piece. Strong conclusion. Thorough plan with useful detail (when required).
    41 to >35.0 pts
    Above-Average
    The topic is clearly focused on the assignment prompts. Reasons, details, facts directly relate to prompt. Effective transitions: interesting conclusion summarizes main idea. Clear, careful plan (when required)
    35 to >25.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Attempts to define a topic. Reasons, details, facts mostly relate to prompts. Ineffective transitions. Weak, repetitive conclusion. Sketchy, inaccurate plan (when required)
    25 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Absent/unclear topic. Reasons, details, facts do not relate to prompt. No transitions. No or inappropriate conclusion. Little/ no plan (when required)
    45 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
    20 to >18.0 pts
    Well-Done
    High quality information focuses on the prompts in engaging ways. Intriguing and/or compelling examples, evidence and explanations bring the topic to life. Prompt/task fully developed.
    18 to >14.0 pts
    Above-Average
    All information is accurate and focused on task/topic. Examples/explanations support topic. Prompt/task developed consistently.
    14 to >9.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Information sometimes repeated and/or wanders from prompt/task; may contain inaccuracies. Examples/explanations are incomplete; lacks detail. Prompt/task/topic inconsistently or not adequately developed.
    9 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Information inaccurate, inadequate, or omitted. Examples/explanations unclear or missing. Prompt/task not developed or may not be addressed.
    20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Intervention & Conclusion
    20 to >18.0 pts
    Well-Done
    High quality information focuses on the prompt in engaging ways.
    18 to >14.0 pts
    Above-Average
    All information is accurate and focused on task/topic. Examples/explanations support topic. Prompt/task developed consistently.
    14 to >9.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Information sometimes repeated and/or wanders from prompt/task; may contain inaccuracies. Examples/explanations are incomplete; lacks detail. Prompt/task/topic inconsistently or not adequately developed.
    9 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Information inaccurate, inadequate or omitted. Examples/explanations unclear or missing. Prompt/task not developed or may not be addressed.
    20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, APA Guidelines, Grammar, & Mechanics
    15 to >13.0 pts
    Well-Done
    Writing is clear, accurate, and concise without errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, sentence structure, and APA manual 7th edition publication guidelines. Supporting evidence-based research is superior, supports viewpoint and is rephrased in own words.
    13 to >10.0 pts
    Above-Average
    Writing is clear, accurate, and concise with no more than 1-3 types of errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, sentence structure, and APA manual 7th edition publication guidelines. Supporting evidence-based research supports viewpoint and most is rephrased in own words with minimal use of direct quotation.
    10 to >7.0 pts
    Acceptable
    Writing is not clear, accurate, or concise with no more than 4-5 types of errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, sentence structure, and APA manual 7th edition publication guidelines. Supporting evidence-based research is minimal in supporting viewpoint. Evidence-based research with minimal use of rephrasing into own words with some use of direct quotation.
    7 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Writing is not clear, accurate, or concise with 6 or more types of errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, sentence structure, and APA manual 7th edition publication guidelines. Supporting evidence-based research is minimal to no use in supporting viewpoint. Evidence-based research with minimal to no rephrasing into own words with excessive use of direct quotation.
    15 pts

  • “Exploring Ethical and Policy Issues in Coordinating Care: A Presentation for Community Organizations and Groups”

    select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues that affect the coordination of care.

  • Peer Review Feedback for CJMM Worksheet Section 1: Patient Demographics The information provided is accurate and relevant to the patient. However, it would be helpful to include the patient’s age and date of birth for a more complete picture.

    Utilize the Peer Review Feedback worksheet to evaluate your peer’s responses (CJMM worksheet) by providing 2-3 sentences of relevant feedback for each section (6) of the CJMM worksheet. You can use the case notes to reference back to what the peer is saying to make sure what they are saying is accurate. 
    Things to think about as your leaving feedback…
    Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?
    Is there any missing information?
    How could your peer have improved their responses?

  • Title: The Power of Functional Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of a Successful Therapy and its Applications for Self-Wellness and Patient Care

    Functional Medicine
    Instructions:
    Find research articles in a peer-reviewed source about a successful functional therapy.
    Summarize the article by answering the following question:
    What is the therapy?
    How is the therapy used for illness prevention, health promotion, and heath restoration?
    Choose one (1) technique to promote self-wellness and describe its function.
    Identify the actions you can take to work with patients who use functional medicine and safeguard a patient’s rights that choose to use this therapy.
    What are some of the limitations of this therapy?
    Include any other pertinent information.
    Below are some guidelines on summarizing research articles. You may want to review one or more of these before beginning this assignment:
    Writing Summaries (Columbia)
    How to Summarize a Research Article (UCONN)Links to an external site.
    Guidelines for writing an article summary (Andrews)Links to an external site.
    Your paper should be written in APA Writing Style,Links to an external site. and be 3-4 pages, including:
    title page
    reference page
    spacing and margin settings 
    Type your paper in a Microsoft Word document, and save the file.
    THESE ARE THE LINKS PROVIDED IN THE RESOURCE SECTION
    https://www.ifm.org/functional-medicine/get-started-with-functional-medicine/?utm_medium=referralreferral&utm_source=vidyard&utm_campaign=ecourses-intro-to-fm-2018&utm_term=unaware&utm_content=intro-to-fm-hub-header-get-started-page

    Home

  • “Promoting Health: A Comprehensive Plan for Addressing a Fictitious Health Concern”

    For this assessment, you will propose a hypothetical health promotion plan addressing a particular health concern or health need affecting a ficti …

  • Patient Safety Improvement Plan Patient Safety Improvement Plan: Addressing the Root Cause of Medication Errors in a Hospital Setting Introduction Patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare delivery and is essential for ensuring positive patient outcomes. However, despite efforts

    The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting, provide a rationale for your plan.
    Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX] Download Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX]template to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.
    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
    Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
    Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
    Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
    Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
    Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
    Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 4–6 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
    Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
    APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.

  • “Exploring the Risks and Benefits of Alternative and Pharmaceutical Therapy and Their Impact on Recovery: A Comparative Analysis” Introduction Alternative therapy, also known as complementary or integrative medicine, refers to treatments and practices that are not considered conventional or mainstream

    Assignment 1
    *APA format
    *1000 word or more
    * minimum 5 or more citation
    * Due: 5/24/24 midnight. ( NO LATE ASSIGNMENT WILL BE
    GRADED)
    Research the risk and benefit of both alternative and
    pharmaceutical therapy
    Explain how they impact recovery of an ill patient
    Provide individual or personal researched example from the
    impact from both alternative and pharmaceutical therapy with
    evident recovery disclosure by individuals or 3rd party record
    (evidence base data)
    ( ex: this could be personal or researched individual that
    recovered from a disease, illness by using either therapy with
    evidence of effectiveness.