Category: Nursing

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice
The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.
Your presentation should:
1. Identify and select a screening tool (AUDIT SCREENING TOOL for alcohol abuse) 2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.
Submission Instructions:
Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
PLEASE NO AI!
Requirements: 10-15 Slides With at Least 100 Words of Speaker Notes on Each Slide | .ppt file
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool

Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) sources using APA citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Pick a cultural group (different from yours) that you commonly care for at work. Research the answers to the following…
Health Beliefs and Practices
Family patterns
Communication style
Space orientation and Time orientation
Nutritional Patterns
Pain Responses
Childbirth and perinatal care
Death and Dying
Spirituality, religion, and faith (include holy days)
Prayer and meditation
What knowledge did you gain about this group that you were not aware of?
How will this knowledge change the way you care for this cultural group?
Title Slide (1 slide)
Objective Slide (1 slide)
Health Beliefs and Practices (1-2 slide)
Family patterns (1-2 slide)
Communication style (1-2 slide)
Space orientation and Time orientation (1-2 slide)
Nutritional Patterns (1-2 slide)
Pain Responses (1-2 slide)
Childbirth and perinatal care (1-2 slide)
Death and Dying (1-2 slide)
Spirituality, religion, and faith (include holy days) (1-2 slide)
Prayer and meditation (1-2 slide)
What knowledge did you gain about this group that you were not aware of? (1-2 slide)
How will this knowledge change the way you care for this cultural group? (1-2 slide)
References (1 slide)
The following specifications are required for this assignment:
Length: 15-27 slides; answer must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
Structure:
Title slide, objective slide, and reference slide in APA format. Additionally, because a good presentation has few words on the slides include a scriipt with the verbiage you would say when presenting; scriipt should be a minimum of 50 words per slide.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.
Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document and a Word document (.pptx) and (.doc or .docx) or Open Office Impress.
Filename: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the assignment number (for example, “RHall Assignment 1.docx”)

Reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought into your own experiences related to the concepts of the week. Answers should be detailed. In reflections students:Demonstrate understanding of concept of assessment for the week
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection
I work in the Emergency Department

Required Media
Grande, T. (2019, August 21). Presentation example: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. Gift from Within. (Producer). (2008). PTSD and veterans: A conversation with Dr. Frank OchbergLinks to an external site.[Video]. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?u…
Know & Grow with Dr. K. (2021, July 18). Does your child suffer from post traumatic stress disorder?Links to an external site. (Strictly Medical-English Version). [Video]. YouTube. It is estimated that more almost 7% of the U.S. population will experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in their lifetime (National Institute of Mental Health, 2017). This debilitating disorder often interferes with an individual’s ability to function in daily life. Common symptoms of anxiousness and depression frequently lead to behavioral issues, adolescent substance abuse issues, and even physical ailments. For this Assignment, you examine a PTSD video case study and consider how you might assess and treat clients presenting with PTSD.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating PTSD.
View the media Presentation Example: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and assess the client in the case study. For guidance on assessing the client, refer to Chapter 3 of the Wheeler text.
Note: To complete this Assignment, you must assess the client, but you are not required to submit a formal comprehensive client assessment.
THE ASSIGNMENT
Succinctly, in 1–2 pages, address the following:
Briefly explain the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
Discuss the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and relate these criteria to the symptomology presented in the case study. Does the video case presentation provide sufficient information to derive a PTSD diagnosis? Justify your reasoning. Do you agree with the other diagnoses in the case presentation? Why or why not?
Discuss one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study. Explain whether your treatment option is considered a “gold standard treatment” from a clinical practice guideline perspective, and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners.
Support your Assignment with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
BY DAY 7
Submit your Assignment. Also attach and submit PDFs of the sources you used.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSuccinctly, in 1–2 pages, address the following:• Briefly explain the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
13 to >11.0 ptsGood 80%–89%
The response includes an accurate explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
11 to >10.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness.
10 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the neurobiological basis for PTSD illness. Or, response is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Discuss the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and relate these criteria to the symptomology presented in the case study. Does the video case presentation provide sufficient information to derive a PTSD diagnosis? Justify your reasoning. Do you agree with the other diagnoses in the case presentation? Why or why not?
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
The response includes an accurate and concise description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and an accurate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study…. The response includes a concise explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates strong diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills.
22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89%
The response includes an accurate description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and an adequate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study…. The response includes an explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates adequate diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills.
19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study…. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates somewhat inadequate diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills.
17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague or inaccurate description of the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for PTSD and a vague or inaccurate explanation of how they relate to the symptomology presented in the case study. Or, response is missing…. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of whether the case provides sufficient information to derive the PTSD and other diagnoses. Justification demonstrates poor diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking skills. Or, response is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Discuss one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study. Explain whether your treatment option is considered a “gold standard” treatment from a clinical practice guideline perspective, and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners.
30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study…. The response clearly and concisely explains whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs.
26 to >23.0 ptsGood 80%–89%
The response includes an accurate explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study…. The response adequately explains whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs.
23 to >20.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study…. The response provides a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs.
20 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of one other psychotherapy treatment option for the client in this case study, or the treatment option is innappropriate. Or, response is missing…. The response provides a vague or incomplete explanation of whether the recommended treatment option is a “gold standard” treatment and why using gold standard, evidence-based treatments from clinical practice guidelines is important for PMHNPs. Or, response is missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Support your approach with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. PDFs are attached.
15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
The response is supported by specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.
13 to >11.0 ptsGood 80%–89%
The response is supported by examples from this week’s media and three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide appropriate support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.
11 to >10.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
The response is supported by examples from this week’s media and two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. Examples and resources selected may provide only weak support for the rationale provided. PDFs may not be attached.
10 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
The response is supported by vague or inaccurate examples from the week’s media and/or evidence from the literature, or is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.
4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%
Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors.
3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts

Clinical Experience Reflection #4
Create a video to reflect on a clinical encounter when you became emotionally charged during this semester with a patient experiencing psychosis or a schizophrenia-related disorder.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be a 5-7 minute video. Your initial post is worth 8 points.How do I upload media files in my Canvas Studio account?Links to an external site.
How do I embed Canvas Studio media in a discussion reply in Canvas as a student?Links to an external site.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) All replies must be in video format, constructive, and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Discussion Board #2: Management Neurologic Disorders
*Pick one of the disease processes mentioned in this module for your Discussion Board. The grading rubric is attached for viewing and to help you prepare. 3: Peripheral Neuropathies
6: Seizure Disorders
7: Dementia
8: Multiple Sclerosis
9: Parkinson’s Disease
Name: Common Disorders Discussion Board
• Grid View
Proficient
Identify selected condition. Briefly discuss pathophysiology. Discuss common objective presentation of condition. Discuss management. Points Range:11 (22.00%) – 20 (40.00%)
Idenfitied condition. Discussed pathophysiology, objective presentation and management.
Peer responses: review condition (s) that are different than the one you selected. Identify new knowledge learned from peer postings. Points Range:11 (22.00%) – 20 (40.00%)
Response to 2 peers. Identified new knowledge.
Three Reference (< 5 years old) in APA format. Writing skill, grammar, spelling Points Range:6 (12.00%) - 10 (20.00%) Current reference in APA. No writing errors. • List View Name:Common Disorders Discussion Board

Please, read all instructions/rubrics carefully. Use the template to write the answers. Please, be precise and short. Only write what is being asked. I have uploaded instructions/rubrics, resources, word template which you will use to write in. opic is Obsessive compulsive disease. Reach out if you have any questions.

Introduction: Use Walden White paper or the CDC
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022), “Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the nonmedical factors that influence health outcomes. They are the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age, and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life… SDOH are one of three priority areas for Healthy People 2030, along with health equity and health literacy. Healthy People 2030 sets data-driven national objectives in five key areas of SDOH: healthcare access and quality, education access and quality, social and community context, economic stability, and neighborhood and built environment. Some examples of SDOH included in Healthy People 2030 are safe housing, transportation, and neighborhoods; polluted air and water; and access to nutritious foods and physical health opportunities”.
https://www.cdc.gov/about/sdoh/index.htmlLinks to an external site.
RESOURCES-
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 293–316)
Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety, Quality Outcomes, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration” (pp. 323–349)
Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 357–378)
Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 383–397)
Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 403–432)
Benda, N. C., Veinot, T. C., Sieck, C. J., & Ancker, J. S. (2020). Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health!Links to an external site.. American Journal of Public Health, 110(8), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784
Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study Download Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)?Links to an external site. Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-healt…
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagementLinks to an external site.. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.
Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., Callahan, B., & Siefer, A. (2021). Digital inclusion as a social determinant of healthLinks to an external site.. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), 52.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8
Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applicationsLinks to an external site.. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.
Sharma, P., & Patten, C. A. (2022). A need for digitally inclusive health care service in the United States: Recommendations for clinicians and health care systemsLinks to an external site.. Permanente Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/21.156
OPTIONAL RESOURCES-
Iott, B. E., Adler-Milstein, J., Gottlieb, L. M., & Pantell, M. S. (2022). Characterizing the relative frequency of clinician engagement with structured social determinants of health dataLinks to an external site.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(3), 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac251 Links to an external site.
Lyles, C. R., Sharma, A. E., Fields, J. D., Getachew, Y., Sarkar, U., & Zephyrin, L. (2022). Centering health equity in telemedicineLinks to an external site.. The Annals of Family Medicine, 20(4), 362-367. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2823
Romain, C. V., Trinidad, S., & Kotagal, M. (2022). The effect of social determinants of health on telemedicine access during the COVID-19 pandemicLinks to an external site.. Pediatric Annals, 51(8), e311-e315. https://doi.org/10.3928/19382359-20220606-04
Singh, P., Jonnalagadda, P., Morgan, E., & Fareed, N. (2022). Outpatient portal use in prenatal care: differential use by race, risk, and area social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(2), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab242
Ye, J., & Ma, Q. (2021). The effects and patterns among mobile health, social determinants, and physical activity: a nationally representative cross-sectional studyLinks to an external site.. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 653-662.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC83786…
To Prepare:
Reflect on the concept of social determinants of health as presented in the resources.
Contemplate whether digital inclusion or broad band access should be added to the 5 key areas of social determinants of health.
Using the optional outside resources or other peer reviewed journal articles, consider how electronic health records, mobile health, patient portals, or telemedicine can impact and be impacted by the social determinants of health.
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 9
Post a description of your views on whether or not digital inclusion or broad band access should be added as a key area to the social determinants of health. Be specific and provide examples that support your position. Explain how electronic health records, mobile health, patient portals, or telemedicine can impact and be impacted by the social determinants of health. Support your explanation with the required or optional resources

Understand the anatomy and physiology of the respiratory system (Gas exchange, inspiration/expiration, alveoli, bronchi, pleural space etc)
2. Know the definition, signs and symptoms of respiratory diseases (Rhinitis, Rhinosinusitis, URTI, epiglottitis, bronchiolitis, Pharyngitis and strep pharyngitis)
3. Know definition, signs and symptoms of Mononucleosis, Herpangina, Hand foot and mouth disease.
4. Know mechanism of edema and the fluid volume systems (Fluid space such as -intracellular, interstitial, extracellular, vascular etc…all the spaces)
5. Understand fluid volume terms such as (blood osmolarity, hypotonic, hypertonic, normotonic, crystalloids)
6. Understand the electrolytes such as potassium, potassium, phosphorous, chloride etc
7. Know the following diseases that present with rash (HSV, Hand foot and mouth, syphilis, varicella)
8. Know the following conditions, signs and symptoms, define and management (cystic fibrosis, bronchiolitis, rhinovirus, adenovirus, RSV, surfactant deficiency)
9. Know Tuberculosis, define, sign and symptoms, testing methods such as Tuberculin test and interferon gamma assay. Know how to read and analyze the results, why some places ask for TB test while some ask for interferon.
10. Know croup, causes, signs and symptoms and treatment.
11. Know laryngeal cancer, signs and symptoms, risk factors
12. Know COPD, define, group of diseases included, signs and symptoms and management
13. Know Asthma, define, signs and symptoms, management
14. Know obstructive sleep apnea in adults and children
15. Know the following respiratory diseases define, signs and symptoms, and management (pneumonia, pneumothorax-all types, pleural effusion, empyema, ARDS)
16. Know the different types of sleep disorders, differentiate them, example narcolepsy.
17. Know Laryngeal cancer, signs and symptoms, risk factors
18. Know types of lung cancers
19. Know legionaries’ disease, signs and symptoms, spread, and treatment
20. Understand ventilator settings 21. Know acid base balance (respiratory and metabolic acidosis and alkalosis, compensatory, know the lab values that explains each)
22. Know hyperkalemia, the lab value and treatment, hyponatremia definition, causes and treatment, hypophosphatemia definition, signs and symptoms, causes and treatment, hypercapnia definition, signs and symptoms, and treatment.
23. Know about dehydration, insensible water loss, specific gravity in urine
24. Seal barking cough in children
25. When to use antibiotics in respiratory illness in children
26. Understand aldosterone effect
27. Understand meconium ileus

Discussion Prompt
Pick a specific population within your clinical environment or community and discuss the overall health of that population – morbidity, mortality, health behaviors, risk factors, barriers to access, etc. Identify a targeted health issue or health promotion service/program that is needed or being utilized and discuss the benefits/downfalls or pros/cons. Reference and citations required.
Expectations
Length: A minimum of 270 words, not including references
Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years