Category: Nursing

Discuss medications commonly used in the treatment of Opioid Use Disorder, such as methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Share insights into their mechanisms, benefits, and potential challenges. 2. Explore medications approved for the treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder, including disulfiram, acamprosate, and naltrexone. How do these medications work, and what considerations should be taken into account when prescribing them? 3. Discuss medications, such as nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) and prescription medications like varenicline, used in treating nicotine dependence. What factors influence the choice of medication, and how effective are they in supporting smoking cessation?

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to create a visual map that connects the work of the course (assignments, readings, discussion board, internet reviews , etc.) to all of the objectives specified below. 
Take some time now to mindfully reflect over the assignments, readings, discussion board, and web site exploration activities of the course, Population Health, Epidemiology, and Statistical Principles. Next, take a look at the written directions for the assignment and the rubric for the assignment. You will be constructing a Concept Map that relates (connects) the activities of the course to all of the outcome objectives provided for you in the Requirements section below. 
Activity Learning Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize knowledge of population health to the role of political advocacy as an Advanced Practice Nurse.
Due Date
This assignment must be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7.
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth 50 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Requirements
The Concept Map must visually  connect all of the specified objectives  (Program Outcomes, MSN Essentials, and NONPF Competencies) to course work (such as specific discussion board topics, written assignments, exams, lessons, and reading content).     
All items should be labeled, for instance, label the objectives and label the course work you select with name of the assignment/reading/discussion board topic and which week it was introduced.
Use Microsoft Word or a PowerPoint to create a Concept Map. You can use the features found on the “Insert” tab of a Word doc (in the horizontal ribbon on the top of a Word doc page). For instance, if you click on “insert” you will see shapes and SmartArt. You can use a PowerPoint slide with shapes and lines to create a concept/mind map. This is not a PowerPoint presentation , but a PowerPoint slide can be used to “draw” the Map.
Outcomes/Competencies to be connected with course learning: 
MSN Program Outcome #2:
Create a caring environment for achieving quality health outcomes (Care-Focused).
MSN Essential VIII:
Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health
National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Competencies #4
Practice Scholarship and Translational Science
Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies and integrates broad, organizational, client-centered, and culturally appropriate concepts in the planning, delivery, management, and evaluation of evidence-based clinical prevention and population care and services to individuals, families, and aggregates/identified populations.
Your Concept Map will visually depict how you see the assignments of the course meeting the outcomes above.
Preparing the Assignment
View the following video: How to Create a Concept MapLinks to an external site.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
MSN Program Outcome #2  15 30%
The Map visually connects the Category to a minimum of two (2) assignments. 
Each assignment is clearly labeled with week and content topic. 
MSN Essential VIII 15 30%
The Map visually connects the Category to a minimum of two (2) assignments. 
Each assignment is clearly labeled with week and content topic. 
NONPF Competencies #4  15 30%
The Map visually connects the Category to a minimum of two (2) assignments. 
Each assignment is clearly labeled with week and content topic. 
45 90% Total CONTENT Points = 45 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT 
Category Points % Description
Grammar, Syntax, Spelling   5 5%
Grammar, spelling, syntax are accurate. 
Total FORMAT Points = 5 pts
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = 50 points
Rubric
NR503_Concept Map_Sept19
NR503_Concept Map_Sept19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 45 Points
MSN Program Outcome Objective #2
15 pts
Excellent
The reflection specifically identifies and addresses the pre-determined program outcome and provides two (2) or more examples of how the student specifically achieved or had exposure to this outcome during this course/clinical. All items are labeled.
14 pts
V. Good
The reflection specifically identifies and addresses the pre-determined program outcome and provides one (1) example of how the student specifically achieved or had exposure to this outcome during this course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
12 pts
Satisfactory
The reflection is vague and/or does not address the correct pre-determined program outcome that the student achieved or had exposure to during the course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
8 pts
Needs Improvement
The reflection addresses the pre-determined program outcome in a generic manner without a specific example of exposure to or achievement of the outcome during this course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The reflection does not address the program outcomes or the assignment has not been submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMSN Essential VIII Competence Objective
15 pts
Excellent
The reflection specifically identifies and addresses the pre-determined MSN Essential Competency and provides two (2) or more examples of how the student specifically achieved or had exposure to this competency during the course/clinical. All items are labeled.
14 pts
V. Good
The reflection specifically identifies and addresses the pre-determined MSN Essential Competency and provides one (1) example of how the student specifically achieved or had exposure to this competency during this course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
12 pts
Satisfactory
The reflection addresses the pre- determined MSN Essential Competency in a generic manner without a specific example of exposure to or achievement of the competency during this course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
8 pts
Needs Improvement
The reflection is vague and/or does not address the correct pre-determined MSN Essential Competency that the student achieved or had exposure to during the course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The reflection does not address the MSN Essential Competence.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNONPF Competencies #4
15 pts
Excellent
The reflection specifically identifies and addresses the pre-determined NONPF competencies and provides two (2) or more examples of how the student specifically achieved or had exposure to this competency during this course/clinical. All items are labeled.
14 pts
V. Good
The reflection specifically identifies and addresses the pre-determined NONPF Competencies and provides one (1) example of how the student specifically achieved or had exposure to this competency during this course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
12 pts
Satisfactory
The reflection addresses the pre- determined NONPF Competencies in a generic manner without a specific example of exposure to or achievement of the competency during this course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
8 pts
Needs Improvement
The reflection is vague and/or does not address the correct pre-determined NONPF Competencies that the student achieved or had exposure to during the course/clinical. All items may or may not be labeled.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The reflection does not address the NONPF Competencies.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 5 Points
Grammar, Syntax, Spelling & Punctuation
5 pts
Excellent
Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one error.
4 pts
V. Good
Two to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
3 pts
Satisfactory
Five to seven errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Eight to nine errors grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Post contains ten or greater errors grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Minus Points
0 pts
Minus Points
0 pts
Total Points: 50

General Instructions Create a PowerPoint PresentationLinks to an external site. and address the following requirements: Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create the presentation. Submit the presentation as a .ppt or .pptx file to the Week 6 Dropbox. The presentation should total 8-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides). Create slides that are professional in appearance and tone and balanced spatially including words and graphics. Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing. Include speaker notes for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences. Important Note: Please do not add recorded voice narration to the PPT.
Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric) Title Slide Introduction (1 slide): Identify the purpose of the presentation. Advanced Nursing Role (1-2 slides): Explain three ways advanced practice nurses can contribute to the resolution of ethical dilemmas in healthcare. Provide citations to scholarly references to support your assertions. Description of an Ethical Dilemma (2-4 slides): Describe a fictional ethical dilemma or a dilemma you have encountered in your nursing practice. Identify the stakeholders and describe how the situation impacts them. You may reuse the information you wrote for this week’s collaboration café. Ethical Analysis (2-4 slides): Analyze the ethical principles in the conflict. Discuss which provisions of the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics apply. Provide citations to scholarly references to support your assertions. Recommendations (1-3 slides): Provide at least three recommendations for resolving the ethical dilemma. Provide citations to scholarly references to support your assertions. Conclusion (1 slide): Summarize the key points of the presentation. References: Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required.

Hi I have attached the demonstration outline that my professor wants me to follow. Below in the comments I have copy and pasted a message from her as well.
In your persuasive speeches, you’ve established your credibility largely through cited research. With this speech, you may not have to do quite as much research, so how will you establish your credibility? What can you tell your audience that will enable them to trust you as an authority on your chosen task? Keep the following in mind as you prepare to deliver your speech:
Tell your audience why you are qualified to give this demonstration
Have all necessary items and equipment for your demonstration (BE PREPARED!)
Make sure all aspects of your demonstration are visible to the audience 
Be organized with your presentation
Share important information when necessary (for example: safety, cost, impact, etc)
Speak with confidence and don’t rush
Tell your audience how/why they can personally benefit from your demonstration
Smile at the end! 🙂

Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional
team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue
you identified in the second assessment.
Introduction
The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain
organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to
encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision
and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also
offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a
sense of ownership and collegiality.
You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop
the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the
opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of
financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative
will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity
also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your
time, and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
 Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial
resources to promote organizational health.
o Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget,
needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those
resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by
the plan.
 Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to
achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
o Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to
improving patient or organizational outcomes.
o Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to
improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include
best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
 Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership
strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific
organizational goals.
o Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by
relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary
team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in
for, the project plan.
 Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication
strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
o Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions;
contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and
spelling.
o Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting
nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Reference
Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve
interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual
framework. BMC Family Practice, 17.
Professional Context
This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of
best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies,
and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the
problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.
Scenario
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified
the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary
intervention to address the issue.
Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the
plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your
interviewee’s organization.
Instructions
For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your
interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you
identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the
information gathered in your interview.
The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your
planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to
further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the
previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and
best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the
implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.
Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized
and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA
format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as
well as the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the
grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you
understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
 Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary
plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational
outcomes.
 Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant
evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in
collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
 Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the
likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of
interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
 Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the
plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements
described in the plan are not made.
 Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically
organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current
APA style.
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template
Write a brief introduction (2 to 3 sentences) to your proposal that outlines the
issue you are attempting to solve, the part of the organization in which the
plan would be carried out, and the desired outcome. This will set the stage for
the sections below.
Objective
Describe what your plan will do and what you hope it will accomplish in one or
two succinct sentences. Also, comment on how the objective, if achieved, will
improve organizational or patient outcomes. For example:
Test a double-loop feedback model for evaluating new product risk with a
small group of project managers with the goal of reducing the number of new
products that fail to launch. This objective is aligned to the broader
organizational goal of becoming more efficient taking products to market and,
if successful, should improve outcomes by reducing waste.
Questions and Predictions
For this section ask yourself 3 to 5 questions about your objective and your
overall plan. Make a prediction for each question by answering the question
you posed. This helps you to define the important aspects of your plan as well
as limit the scope and check its ability to be implemented.
For example:
1. How much time will using a double-loop feedback model add to a project
manager’s workload?
a. At first, it will likely increase their workloads by 5 to 10 percent. However, as
the process is refined and project managers become more familiar and
efficient, that percentage will decrease.
Change Theories and Leadership Strategies
For this section, you may wish to draw upon the research you did regarding
change theories and leadership for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue
Identification assessment. The focus of this section is how those best
practices will create buy-in for the project from an interdisciplinary team,
improve their collaboration, and/or foster the team’s ability to implement the
plan. Be sure that you are including at least one change theory and at least
one leadership strategy in your explanation. Always remember to cite your
sources; direct quotes require quotation marks and a page or paragraph
number to be included in the citation.
Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through
the following:
• What is the theory or strategy?
• How will it likely help an interdisciplinary team to collaborate, implement,
and/or buy in to the project plan?
o Make sure to frame this explanation within the organizational context of the
proposed plan, that is, your interviewee’s organization.
Team Collaboration Strategy
In this section, begin by further defining the responsibilities and actions that
represent the implementation of the plan. One strategy to defining this is to
take a “who, what, where, and when” approach for each team member.
For example:
• Project Manager A will apply the double-loop feedback model on one new
product project for a single quarter.
• Project Manager B will apply the double-loop feedback model on all new
product projects for a quarter.
Vice President A will review the workloads of project managers using the
double-loop feedback model every Thursday for one quarter.
After you have roughly outlined the roles and responsibilities of team
members, you will explain one or more collaborative approaches that will
enable the team to work efficiently to achieve the plan’s objective. As with the
change theories and leadership strategies, you may draw on the research you
conducted for the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification
assessment.
However, you are being asked to give a more in-depth explanation of the
collaboration approaches and look at how they will help the theoretical
interdisciplinary team in your plan proposal.
Another way to approach your explanations in this section is to think through
the following:
• What is the collaboration approach?
• What types of collaboration and teamwork will best help the interdisciplinary
team be successful?
• How is the collaboration approach relevant to the team’s needs and will it
help drive success?
o Make sure to frame this explanation in terms of the subject of the plan
proposal; that is, your interviewee’s organization.
Required Organizational Resources
For this section, you will be making rough estimates of the resources needed
for your plan proposal to be successful. This section does not have to be
exact but the estimates should be realistic for the chosen organization.
Items you should include or address in this section:
• What are the staffing needs for your plan proposal?
• What equipment or supplies are needed for your plan proposal?
o Does the organization already have these?
▪ If so, what is the cost associated with using these resources?
▪ If not, what is the cost of acquiring these resources?
• What access (to patients, departments, and so forth) is needed?
o Are there any costs associated with these?
• What is the overall financial budget request for the plan proposal?
o Staff time, resource use, resource acquisition, and access charged?
▪ Remember to include a specific dollar amount in your request.
After you have detailed your budget, make sure that you explain any impacts
on organizational resources that could happen if your plan is not undertaken
and successful. In other words, if the issue you are try to solve through your
plan proposal persists or gets worse, what will be the potential costs to the
organization?
Plus references
Additional Requirements
 Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of
this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is
critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in
length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
 Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or
professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be
no more than 5 years old.
 APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow
current APA style.
Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment.
The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to
develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the
Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that
you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
 Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial
resources to promote organizational health.
o Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget,
needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources
if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan.
 Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to
achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
o Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to
improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including
best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
 Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within
an interdisciplinary team.
o Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving
patient or organizational outcomes.
 Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership
strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific
organizational goals.
o Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by
relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary
team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in
for, the project plan.
 Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication
strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
o Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions;
contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and
spelling.
o Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting
nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Hello, I would need a medication brochure Created for the medication: 
Truqap (capivasertib) this is a medication used to treat breast cancer that meets certain disease criteria.
I have the rubric attached below and an example of a brochure 
Please include pictures and colors the “RUAPHARMExample.docx” 1st pic shows the front of the brochure and the outside. The 2nd photo shows information inside the brochure. The third page would be a one-page reflection more details are found in the rubric. 

Week 6
Methodology: Formative Evaluation
DISCUSSION
PURPOSEThe purpose of the discussion this week is to create a plan for the formative evaluation. (Please refer to the Week 6 Intervention Fidelity Lesson for this discussion). The intervention must be implemented as planned to achieve outcome success. As the project manager, you will create a process to check if the intervention is being implemented as planned. This process is called the formative evaluation. Intervention fidelity is high when the intervention is implemented almost exactly as planned. Low intervention fidelity indicates there is variance in the intervention implementation.
INSTRUCTIONSReview this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less: 
State your practice question in PICOT format.MY PICOT PICOT Question: In adults who were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at a primary care clinic, does the implementation of the CDC Diabetes Prevention Program compared to current practice affect fasting blood glucose levels over 8-10 weeks?P (Population): Adults who were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at a primary care clinicI (Intervention): Implementation of the CDC Diabetes Prevention ProgramC (Comparison): Current practiceO (Outcome): Fasting blood glucose levelsT (Time): Over 8-10 weeks
Describe the formative evaluation plan for your project design, outlining the steps and/or tools you will utilize as the project manager to conduct this week-to-week assessment process.
Detail your plan for feedback if the results of the formative evaluation demonstrate low intervention fidelity.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Problem Statement: Analyze the factors that contribute to increased turnover rates among emergency room nurses.
Title Page: 1 page
Abstract: 1 page
Table of Contents: 1 page
Problem Statement: 1-3 pages
Review of the literature: 5-7 pages
Methods: 5-8 pages
Findings: 6-8 pages
Conclusions and Recommendations: 4 -6 pages
Limitations: 1-2 pages
References: 1-2 pages
Appendices: if applicable
Total 25-50 pages ( excluding title page and table of contents)
Below are some sources that need to be incorporated into the paper as well.

select 1 general surgery surgical procedure and select 4 instruments that would be used to assist you

Develop a 5–7 page implementation plan addressing the various factors critical to the successful deployment of the new or upgraded telehealth technology that was the focus of the previous two assessments.
Collapse All
Introduction
Technology continues to move at an accelerated pace, and the delivery of health care is shifting from office-based environments to the home. For this reason, health care organizations must be at technology’s cutting edge in order to remain competitive in today’s environment. Integrating the daily activities of patients into the health care continuum will improve the quality of care that is provided and enable more holistic care.
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop an implementation plan that addresses the various factors critical to the successful deployment of the new or upgraded telehealth technology that was the focus of your previous assessments.
Preparation
Based on the positive reactions and feedback from stakeholders with regard to the proposed telehealth technology, executive leaders have decided to move forward with implementation of this telehealth solution and have asked you to develop the implementation plan.
To prepare for the assessment, you are encouraged to reflect on the factors critical to the successful deployment of the new or upgraded telehealth technology and on how such technology would be implemented in your organization or practice setting. In addition, you are encouraged to become familiar with the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) process for successfully implementing information systems or a change model for technology use that you think best supports your technology implementation ideas. Refer to the suggested readings, supplemented, as desired, by your own research. You may also wish to:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Review the Guiding Questions: Implementation Plan [DOCX] Download Guiding Questions: Implementation Plan [DOCX], which includes questions to consider and additional guidance on how to successfully complete the assessment.
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.
Requirements
Develop a technology implementation plan that supports the vision for safe, high-quality health care in your organization or practice setting.
Complete the Vila Health: Preparing to Develop an Implementation Plan simulation.
The implementation plan requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Implementation Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. The Guiding Questions: Implementation Plan document, linked above, provides additional considerations that may be helpful in completing your assessment. In addition, be sure to note the requirements below for document format and length and for citing supporting evidence.
Assess the adequacy of existing telehealth technology infrastructure in your organization or practice setting.
Assign tasks and responsibilities for deploying the new or upgraded telehealth technology.
Develop an implementation schedule.
Determine staff training requirements and strategies.
Develop a strategy for collaborating with patients and other health care providers.
Develop a post-deployment telehealth technology evaluation and maintenance strategy.
Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.
Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
Document Format and Length
Format your implementation plan using APA style.
Use the Student Paper Format for APA seventh edition. Be sure to include:
A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
Appropriate level 1 section headings.
Your implementation plan should be 5–7 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting Evidence
Cite at least five credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your implementation plan.
Additional Requirements
Proofread your implementation plan before you submit it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your implementation plan to your ePortfolio.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 2: Develop a collaborative technology integration strategy.
Assess the adequacy of existing telehealth technology infrastructure in an organization or practice setting.
Assign tasks and responsibilities for deploying a new or upgraded telehealth technology.
Develop an implementation schedule.
Develop a post-deployment telehealth technology evaluation and maintenance strategy.
Competency 3: Develop a strategy for managing technology use that enhances patient care and organizational effectiveness.
Determine staff training requirements and strategies.
Develop a strategy for collaborating with patients and other health care providers.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.
Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.