Category: Nursing

hello this assignment is a EPSLO case study, this is my final case study for my nursing school.
End of Program Student Learning Outcomes
BOPSLO #1:
Utilizes a holistic approach in the nursing assessment of the client’s condition.
EOPSLO #2:
Incorporates the client’s cultural values and needs in the provision of care.
EOPSLO #3:
Utilizes the nursing process and elinical judgment model when providing care to clients.
EOPSLO #4:
Collaborates effectively with clients, families, and other members of the healthcare team.
EOPSLO #5:
Advocates for autonomy of the client in decision making and adherence to the plan of care.
EOPSLO #6:
Prioritizes nursing interventions to maximize client safety.
please make sure to put each of the EOPSLO topics in the case study
I will attach all the requirements that the professor is asking me! please make sure this is a low level of plagiarism and AI they check very hard on this.
thank you

Empowerment and resilience are key concepts in health promotion. Select a vulnerable population group that was not discussed in class. Select one social determinants of health and explain how you can promote the group’s empowerment and resilience and how you can impact their wellbeing. (be sure to use citations and references in keeping with APA and proper posting format). For your response post engage in a professional dialogue in this discussion board. so for the response I will drop somones posting for you in the chat box. that the person you will be responding to

Step 1 Reflect on your use of electronic health records.
Reflect on your involvement with the implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) within the clinical setting (either as a practicing nurse or as a student in the clinical setting).
If you have not used an EHR, think about how you might implement an EHR in your practice setting. Answer the questions in Step 2 using this hypothetical EHR system.
Step 2 Analyze the implementation of electronic health records.
Write your paper using the APA 7.0 formatting style. Cite all resources used to complete the assignment and be sure to include a reference list.
Address the following topics in your paper:
Explain at least three functional considerations to take into account when implementing an EHR.
Explain regulatory considerations for implementing EHRs.
Explain interoperability. Why is interoperability important?
Explain data integrity. Why is data integrity important?
Explain why the security of data is important when implementing an EHR.
Explain the legal concerns surrounding the implementation of EHRs.
You are required to provide evidence to support your statements in your submissions. The level of evidence you use to support your statements in your assignment submissions is important and must be properly cited and referenced. Scholarly resources should be < 5 years old, peer reviewed, and from reputable resources. Your textbook and any article you are asked to locate/read should always be used as evidence. The next level of evidence would be peer reviewed articles, and after that, well known web sites for example: CDC or the AHA. Avoid the use of blogs or obscure or non-healthcare related web sites. Never utilize Wikipedia for scholarly work.

Part I Conduct a Community Assessment      Location: East Harlem 
1. Community – Identify and name the Community. Describe the location, geographic boundaries and features. Provide a very brief history of the community. 
2. Demographics – Describe the demographic characteristics of the community 
a. Total population – report the population density 
b. Socioeconomic characteristics  
https://a816-health.nyc.gov/hdi/profiles/
https://furmancenter.org/neighborhoods/view/east-harlem#demographics

Week 3 Case:
A 92 y/o African American male is brought to the Emergency Department by his daughter. The patient has slurred speech. His blood pressure is 210/100.
Assignment: Diagnostic Reasoning
Include the following:
1.Identify the patient’s chief complaint.
2.Identify what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Be specific and explain your reasoning.
3.Explain how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
4.Identify three to five (3–5) possible
conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Explain your thinking.

Create a 15-20 page curriculum evaluation that incorporates the curriculum analysis and course design you created for Assessments 1 and 2
Nurse educators are responsible for many areas of evaluation, including students, curriculum, and program evaluation. Additionally, they have a responsibility to the internal and external stakeholders when it comes to the evaluation process. There are two types of evaluation: summative and formative evaluation. Formative evaluation takes place during the learning process (Billings & Halstead, 2019). Summative evaluation refers to the outcomes of the learning when the learning environment has ended (Billings & Halstead, 2019.)
You will use the work you completed for Assessments 1 and 2 as parts of this assessment. Combine Assessments 1 and 2, and add a section about curriculum evaluation. The evaluation you create should flow smoothly as one cohesive document. When combining the previous assessments, make revisions based on feedback you received from faculty.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Who should perform curriculum evaluation: individual faculty, a curriculum committee, or full faculty?
When should curriculum evaluation be done: each semester, each academic year, at the end of a program cohort, or prior to accreditation visits?
How can a curriculum be revised to ensure that program outcomes are met without compromising the whole curriculum?
How can a curriculum be revised to reflect changes in society, nursing, health care delivery, health care needs, educational practice, learner diversity, and emerging technology when curriculum revision entails a lengthy process involving state regulations and accreditation standards?
Consider curriculum evaluation and address the following:
Explain the importance of ongoing curriculum evaluation, why it is important, and for whom it is important.
List criteria that are important to consider in curriculum evaluation.
Explain how and why pilot testing can be used in curriculum evaluation.
Provide examples of both short-term and long-term curriculum evaluations for process improvement, and explain why both types are necessary to curriculum development.
Describe how to apply evidence-based nursing concepts, theories, and best practices to improve curriculum development.
Identify the appropriate accreditation body for a selected curriculum and describe appropriate accreditation evaluation criteria.
For example, a school of nursing might be accredited by CCNE or ACEN, whereas a hospital staff development program might be accredited by JCAHO, HFAP, or others.
To achieve a successful project experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
Number of resources: Cite a minimum of five resources that are not included in the resource activities for this assessment.
Length of evaluation: 15-20 typed double-spaced pages, excluding the title page and the reference page.
Appendix: Included appropriate material from Assessments 1 and 2. The appendix will not be included in the page count.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
Use template provided in documents.As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.
Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.
Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.
Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected.
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
Please see previously written work for reference only

Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications. Topic is  limited access to
healthcare due to lack of transportation, lack of health
insurance, unaffordable costs of services, poverty, and health literacy. 
Describe the health care problem or issue you selected and provide details about it. 
Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic. Must be published within 3-5 years.
Analyze the health care problem or issue.
Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.
Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.
Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.
Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:
Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
Conclusion. One paragraph.

I have provided the PDF of the research paper I would like used for the annotated bibliography and the instructions provided on how we should write it from our professor.