Category: Nursing

Critique attaches
article using provided template:
The student provides insightful
analysis of the article, answering all or nearly all of the questions assigned,
The student articulates novel ideas that are clearly beyond what is in
the 
article itself. The analysis is clear
and rational.
The summary clearly outlines the main
research question, methods, results, and 
implication for clinical practice.
No grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
Writes logically in complete sentences. Text, title 
page, and reference pages are
consistent with APA guidelines.
Answer these questions about the article:
1.   
Key concepts discussed in the
introduction of the article
1.   
Identifying and summarizing Hypothesis
(including operational definition of variables and relationships among
variables)
OR
Question formulation (including Key concepts identification)
1.   
Description of target population and
participants
1.   
Description of Research Design
1.   
Description of data collection
instrument
1.   
Description of the procedure
1.   
Description of the results
1.   
Do the findings support the
hypothesis/respond to question?
1.   
Description of strengths/weaknesses as
per author
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
1.   
What is missing? As per your judgment
With cover page

Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is for the student to demonstrate an understanding of how stakeholders influence practice change. You will continually gain experience considering the organization, community, and national stakeholders and how they influence sustained practice change.
Instructions
Identify and examine organization and/or community stakeholders you anticipate will be a part of the interprofessional team when implementing your future practice change project.
Integrate your key stakeholders into the constructs from the translational science model that you identified in Week 6.
(Breast cancer usiing knowledge- to -action model) what I used inn week six 
Analyze the barriers you might experience with these stakeholders with the proposed practice change.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve healthcare. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes healthcare policies to advocate for equitable healthcare and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care (POs 1, 4)

Preparing the Assignment
Requirements
Read the case study below.
In your initial discussion post, answer the questions related to the case scenario and support your response with at least one evidence-based reference by Wed., 11:59 pm MT.
Provides a minimum of two responses weekly on separate days; e.g., replies to a post from a peer; AND faculty member’s question; OR two peers if no faculty question using appropriate resources, before Sun., 11:59 pm MT.
Case Scenario
A 76-year -old man is brought to the primary care office by his wife with concerns about his worsening memory. He is a retired lawyer who has recently been getting lost in the neighborhood where he has lived for 35 years. He was recently found wandering and has often been brought home by neighbors. When asked about this, he becomes angry and defensive and states that he was just trying to go to the store and get some bread.
His wife expressed concerns about his ability to make decisions as she came home two days ago to find that he allowed an unknown individual into the home to convince him to buy a home security system which they already have. He has also had trouble dressing himself and balancing his checkbook. At this point, she is considering hiring a day-time caregiver help him with dressing, meals and general supervision why she is at work.
Past Medical History: Gastroesophageal reflux (treated with diet); is negative for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke or head injury or depression
Allergies: No known allergies
Medications: None
Family History
Father deceased at age 78 of decline related to Alzheimer’s disease
Mother deceased at age 80 of natural causes 
No siblings
Social History
Denies smoking
Denies alcohol or recreational drug use 
Retired lawyer
Hobby: Golf at least twice a week
Review of Systems
Constitutional: Denies fatigue or insomnia
HEENT: Denies nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.  
Chest: Denies dyspnea or coughing
Heart: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or palpitations.
Lymph: Denies lymph node swelling.
Musculoskeletal: denies falls or loss of balance; denies joint point or swelling
General Physical Exam  
Constitutional: Alert, angry but cooperative
Vital Signs: BP-128/72, T-98.6 F, P-76, RR-20
Wt. 178 lbs., Ht. 6’0″, BMI 24.1
HEENT
Head normocephalic; Pupils equal and reactive to light bilaterally; EOM’s intact
Neck/Lymph Nodes
No abnormalities noted  
Lungs 
Bilateral breath sounds clear throughout lung fields.
Heart 
S1 and S2 regular rate and rhythm, no rubs or murmurs. 
Integumentary System 
Warm, dry and intact. Nail beds pink without clubbing.  
Neurological
Deep tendon reflexes (DTRs): 2/2; muscle tone and strength 5/5; no gait abnormalities; sensation intact bilaterally; no aphasia
Diagnostics
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): Baseline score 12 out of 30 (moderate dementia)
MRI: hippocampal atrophy
Based on the clinical presentation and diagnostic findings, the patient is diagnosed with Alzheimer’s type dementia.
Discussion Questions
Compare and contrast the pathophysiology between Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia.
Identify the clinical findings from the case that supports a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.  
Explain one hypothesis that explains the development of Alzheimer’s disease
Discuss the patient’s likely stage of Alzheimer’s disease.

Case Study 3 & 4 (10 Points) Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.
Case Studies will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)
Turn it in Score must be less than 25 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25 %. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

Assignment Instructions
Include the following in this week’s initial discussion response:
Explain why the narrator in the film, BBC Ancient Greece: The Greatest Show on Earth: Democrats states, “To understand ourselves, it turns out, we need to understand the ancient Greeks (Scott, 2013, 1:39).” Make sure to discuss the overall meaning of this film.  
What does history have to teach us this week?
Discussion Response Requirements:
Your post should explain your stance using evidence from the course content.  
Always provide clear and credible evidence to support your responses.

To Prepare:
Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)
Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.
Part 1: Legislation Grid
Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:
Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:
Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.
Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.

Instructions
1. Prepare a literature review on Policy and Politics in Healthcare Organizations
2. Submit before Wednesday
3. Use APA references format, no more than 1000 words
Plagiarism will be check and need to be less than 20%

Assignment Description:
Signature Assignment
Public Health PowerPoint
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely address all the prompts for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least five (5) sources throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. Create a narrated PowerPoint slide presentation that presents the content described below:
Title
Introduce and provide background information on the public health issue investigated in your Module 4 and Module 6 assignments.
Present each of the refined three graphic displays of data created in Module 4 and Module 6 assignments.
Interpret the data and propose a change that will impact the data to improve health outcomes related to your chosen topic.
Discuss the ethical implications of your proposed change.
Examine the data available and discuss the data needed to measure the impact of your proposed change.
Summarize your work and next steps on a concluding slide.
References
M8 Assignment UMBO – 1, 4, 5
M8 Assignment PLG – 4, 5, 6, 7
M8 Assignment CLO – 6, 7
Assignment Dropbox
Instructions & SpecificationsSubmissionRubric
Start by reading and following these instructions:
Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.
Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.
The following specifications are required for this assignment:
Length: 15-20 slides (2-3 slides for each bullet point)

PICOT question – 
During shift change in hospital settings(P), how does implementing bedside shift report(I), compared to communication/shift change at the nurse’s station(C), affect improved satisfaction and safety outcomes(O), over a three-month period(T)?
NR505-10926
Week 7: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
Week 7: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 150
Submitting a file upload
Purpose
Earlier in the course, an issue was identified that influences practice. The impact of the issue was explored, and an evidence-based intervention was proposed via development of a PICOT statement. Scholarly literature was reviewed to identify evidence in support of the intervention in order to achieve the outcome described in the PICOT statement.
The purpose of this assignment is to draw upon previous learning in the course to create a proposal for an evidence-based practice intervention. The outline will include the following elements: overview and significance of the practice issue, PICOT statement, description of proposed intervention and expected outcome, synthesis of evidence from scholarly literature to support the proposed intervention, and stakeholder implications.
Click the following link to download and view a student exemplar example: NR505 Week 7 Assignment: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Student ExemplarLinks to an external site..
Click the following link for a printable version of the instructions: NR505 Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal AssignmentLinks to an external site.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will address the following Course Outcomes:
CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO # 1)
CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5)
CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)
CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points: 150 points
Assignment Overview
In this assignment, you will draw upon previous assignments in the NR 505 course to create the outline of a proposal for evidence-based practice change (using the template provided). Within the outline, you will address the following:
Overview and significance of the practice issue
PICOT statement
Proposed evidence-based intervention and expected outcome
Synthesis of evidence from the literature to support the proposed intervention
Stakeholder Implications
Assignment Instructions
Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Complete the Week 7 Evidence-based Practice Change Proposal OutlineLinks to an external site. template using complete sentences.
Include a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies to support your work.
Sources should be from peer-reviewed, scholarly journals.
Sources should be current within 5 years.
Credit sources with citations and a reference list using current APA format guidelines.
Use correct grammar, sentence structure, spelling, word usage, and punctuation congruent with scholarly writing.
No direct quotes may be used in this assignment.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
Assignment Criteria
Points
%
Description
Overview and Significance of the Practice Issue
15
10%
Identify and describe the practice issue
Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery
Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
PICOT Statement
5
3%
Include the PICOT statement
Include each of the required elements in the PICOT statement (P- population and problem, I-intervention, C- comparison, O- outcome, T- timeframe for outcome achievement)
Proposed Intervention and Expected Outcome
25
17%
Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention
Discuss the expected outcome that will result from the proposed intervention
Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
Synthesis of Evidence to Support the Proposed Intervention
60
40%
Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources
Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention
Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
Important reminder: This section should not be presented as an annotated bibliography; instead, a synthesis of findings should be presented that demonstrate evidence to support the proposed intervention.
Stakeholder Implications
30
20%
Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue
Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue
Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
Graduate-level Writing Style
15
10%
For full credit in this rubric category, all of the following criteria must be met:
Correct spelling and word usage
Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing
Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person
Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes
Correct APA format for the following:
Citing sources
Referencing sources
Total
150
100%
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all the above requirements.
Rubric
Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline (MAY21)
Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline (MAY21)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Criteria
15 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
13 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
12 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
11 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Statement
5 pts
Accurate PICOT Statement
Accurate PICOT statement is provided with all of the following required elements included: • P- Population and Problem • I-Intervention • C- Comparison • O- Outcome • T- Timeframe for outcome achievement
0 pts
Insufficient PICOT Statement
Insufficient statement of the PICOT statement that does not portray all of the following required elements: • P- Population and Problem • I-Intervention • C- Comparison • O- Outcome • T- Timeframe for outcome achievement
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Intervention and Expected Outcome
25 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcome that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
23 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
21 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
19 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis of Evidence to Support the Proposed Intervention
60 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
55 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
50 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
45 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder Implications
30 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
27 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
25 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
22 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraduate level writing style
15 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary graduate level writing style is evident, which meets the criteria below with 0-1 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
13 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished graduate-level writing style is evident which addresses the criteria below with 2-3 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
12 pts
Proficient
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evident which addresses the criteria below with 4-5 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
11 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable graduate-level writing is evident with 6-7 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient graduate-level writing style is evident with 8 or more errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
15 pts
Total Points: 150

Evidence-Based Practice Model and Change Model
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) sources using APA citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Part 1: Choose and explain one Evidence Based Practice Model from the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2022). Then, related to your research topic from Mod 1, describe in detail how you would utilize the model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your personal clinical practice environment. Models to choose from include: Stetler Model of EBP, Iowa Model of EBP, A Model for EBP Change, ARCC Model, PARIHS, Clinical Scholar Model, John Hopkins Nursing EBP, ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
Part 2: Choose one Change Model/Theory from the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2022). Then, related to your research topic from Mod 1, describe in detail how you would utilize the model/theory to implement an evidence-based practice change in your personal clinical practice environment. Models/theories to choose from include: Change Curve, Kotter and Cohen’s, Roger’s Theory of Diffusion of Innovations, The Transtheoretical Module of Health Behavioral Change
Title Slide (1 slide)
Objective Slide (1 slide)
Choose and explain one Evidence Based Practice Model from the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2022). (1-2 slides)
Related to your research topic from Mod 1, describe in detail how you would utilize the model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your personal clinical practice environment (2-3 slides)
Choose one Change Model/Theory from the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2022). (1-2 slides)
Related to your research topic from Mod 1, describe in detail how you would utilize the model/theory to implement an evidence-based practice change in your personal clinical practice environment. (2-3 slides)
References (1 slide)
Length: 8-14 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference slides do not count towards the minimum slide count for this assignment.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of three (3) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Format:  Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document and a Word document (.pptx) and (.doc or .docx) or Open Office Impress.