Category: Nursing

See PowerPoint attached, it speaks about the work being done around reducing CAUTI on a medical surgical unit. The ask for this paper is to construct 10 questions, well-thought out questions. The pre/post tests are identical. They should be 10 questions multiple choice with one answer and should reflect the education that you are providing to your staff.
The staff is being taught thigs that could reduce CAUTI. removing the foleys, collaborate with the physicians on alternate methods such as the external urinary catheter etc. Construct questions around education for the nurses. The PowerPoint should help you to hopefully formulate the 10 multiple choice questions
6-9 APA format

Provide peer reviews to two other scholarly Evidence-Based Practice PPTs.
Use one of the tools provided in the Required Resource section of Module 7.
Pick either the Decision to Adopt an EBP tool 10.1 or the Decision to Implement 10.3 tool to evaluate the presentations you selected to review.
After you complete the form, discuss the appropriate improvements, with rationale and support.
DOI refernce link
PLEASE ATTACHED PEER POWER POINT AND FORM 

Pick any diease you want to do. 
Instructions:
Title Page:
Include the title of your paper, your name, the institution’s name, the course name, the instructor’s name, and the due date, all centered and double-spaced.
Follow the APA 7th edition format for the title page.
Abstract (optional): Not Required but should be on a separate page if included:
Introduction:
Introduce the disease
Provide background information on the significance of the disease and its impact on health.
State the purpose of your paper.
Pathophysiology:
Describe the pathophysiology of the disease.
Explain how the disease develops and progresses in the body.
Include details on cellular, genetic, and biochemical aspects if relevant.
Diagnostic Criteria:
Outline the diagnostic criteria for the disease.
Include information on diagnostic tests, imaging studies, and laboratory findings.
Explain how these criteria are used to confirm a diagnosis.
Clinical Manifestations:
Describe the clinical manifestations of the disease.
Include common signs and symptoms that patients may exhibit.
Discuss how these manifestations affect patients’ daily lives and overall health.
Treatment:
Detail the treatment options for the disease.
Discuss both pharmacological treatments (medications) and non-pharmacological treatments (lifestyle changes, therapies etc.).
Include current best practices and emerging treatments if applicable.
Nursing Diagnosis and Interventions:
Identify nursing diagnosis and interventions for managing and caring for patients with the disease.
Discuss specific nursing actions, including monitoring, administering treatments, and providing supportive care.
Explain the rationale behind each intervention and how it benefits the patient.
Patient Education:
Outline key points for educating patients about their disease.
Include information on disease management, medication adherence, lifestyle modifications, and follow-up care.
Provide strategies to enhance patient understanding and engagement in their own care.
Conclusion:
Summarize the key points discussed in the paper.
Emphasize the importance of comprehensive care for patients with the disease.
Suggest areas for future research or practice improvements.
References:
Include a reference list in APA 7th edition format.
Ensure all sources cited in the paper are included in the reference list.
Use at least five credible sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and reputable websites.
Formatting:
The paper should be a minimum of 5 pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages.
Use 1-inch margins on all sides, double spacing, and a readable font such as 12-point Times New Roman.
Include page numbers in the upper right-hand corner.
Use headings and subheadings to organize the content clearly.
Evaluation Criteria:
Your paper will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Adherence to APA 7th edition formatting guidelines.
Depth and relevance of information on pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, clinical manifestations, and treatment.
Clarity and comprehensiveness of nursing interventions and patient education.
Coherence and logical flow of the discussion and conclusion.
Proper citation and referencing of sources.
Grammar, spelling, and overall presentation.

Objective: The purpose of this assignment is to help you learn how to teach a patient about a specific type of diet, the benefits and the effectiveness of this diet, help the patient plan out a sample menu, and ensure that you know which high points of the diet you need to ensure you teach your patient on.
TOPIC: Iron deficiency anemia diet 

I HAVE UPLOADED EVERYTHING YOU NEED. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL DIRECTIONS/INSTRUCTIONS. PLEASE USE CORRECT APA 7TH EDITION FORMAT
Introduction
The focus of Assessment 4 is on how informatics support monitoring of nursing-sensitive quality indicator data. You will develop an 8–10 minute audio (or video) training module to orient new nurses in a workplace to a single nursing-sensitive quality indicator critical to the organization. Your recording will address how data are collected and disseminated across the organization along with the nurses’ role in supporting accurate reporting and high quality results.
Professional Context
The American Nursing Association (ANA) established the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI®) in 1998 to track and report on quality indicators heavily influenced by nursing action.
NDNQI® was established as a standardized approach to evaluating nursing performance in relation to patient outcomes. It provides a database and quality measurement program to track clinical performance and to compare nursing quality measures against other hospital data at the national, regional, and state levels. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators help establish evidence-based practice guidelines in the inpatient and outpatient settings to enhance quality care outcomes and initiate quality improvement educational programs, outreach, and protocol development.
The quality indicators the NDNQI® monitors are organized into three categories: structure, process, and outcome. Theorist Avedis Donabedian first identified these categories. Donabedian’s theory of quality health care focused on the links between quality outcomes and the structures and processes of care (Grove et al., 2018).
Nurses must be knowledgeable about the indicators their workplaces monitor. Some nurses deliver direct patient care that leads to a monitored outcome. Other nurses may be involved in data collection and analysis. In addition, monitoring organizations, including managed care entities, exist to gather data from individual organizations to analyze overall industry quality. All of these roles are important to advance quality and safety outcomes.
Reference
Grove, S. K., Gray, J. R., Jay, G. W., Jay, H. M., & Burns, N. (2018). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice (7th ed.). Elsevier.
Preparation
As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the Conabedian Quality Assessment Framework activity. Quality health care delivery requires systematic action. Completion of this will help you succeed with the assessment as you consider how the triad of structure (such as the hospital, clinic, provider qualifications/organizational characteristics) and process (such as the delivery/coordination/education/protocols/practice style or standard of care) may be modified to achieve quality outcomes.
This assessment requires you to prepare an 8–10 minute audio training tutorial (with optional video) for new nurses on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. To successfully prepare for your assessment, you will need to complete the following preparatory activities:
Review the nursing-sensitive quality indicators presented in the Assessment 04 Supplement: Informatics and Nursing Sensitive quality Indicators [PDF]  Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Informatics and Nursing Sensitive quality Indicators [PDF] resource and select one nursing-sensitive quality indicator to use as the focus for this assessment.
Conduct independent research on the most current information about the selected nursing-sensitive quality indicator.
Interview a professional colleague or contact who is familiar with quality monitoring and how technology can help to collect and report quality indicator data. You do not need to submit the transcript of your conversation, but do integrate what you learned from the interview into the audio tutorial. Consider these questions for your interview:
What is your experience with collecting data and entering it into a database?
What challenges have you experienced?
How does your organization share with the nursing staff and other members of the health care system the quality improvement monitoring results?
What role do bedside nurses and other frontline staff have in entering the data? For example, do staff members enter the information into an electronic medical record for extraction? Or do they enter it into another system? How effective is this process?
Watch the Informatics and Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators Video Exemplar.
Recording Your Presentation
To prepare to record the audio for your presentation, complete the following:
Set up and test your microphone or headset using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. You only need to use the headset if your audio is not clear and high quality when captured by the microphone.
Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality is sufficient.
Review Using Kaltura for Kaltura to record your presentation.
View Creating a Presentation: A Guide to Writing and Speaking. This video addresses the primary areas involved in creating effective audiovisual presentations. You can return to this resource throughout the process of creating your presentation to view the tutorial appropriate for you at each stage.
Notes:
You may use other tools to record your tutorial. You will, however, need to consult Using Kaltura for instructions on how to upload your audio-recorded tutorial into the courseroom, or you must provide a working link your instructor can easily access.
You may also choose to create a video of your tutorial, but this is not required.
If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact  to request accommodations.
Instructions
For this assessment, first review the nursing-sensitive quality indicators presented in the Assessment 04 Supplement: Informatics and Nursing Sensitive quality Indicators [PDF]Download Assessment 04 Supplement: Informatics and Nursing Sensitive quality Indicators [PDF]resource and select one nursing-sensitive quality indicator to use as the focus for this assessment.
Next, imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council at any type of health care system, whether acute, ambulatory, home health, managed care, et cetera. Your Council has identified that newly hired nurses would benefit from comprehensive training on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. The Council would like the training to address how this information is collected and disseminated across the organization. It would also like the training to describe the role nurses have in accurate reporting and high-quality results.
The Council indicates a recording is preferable to a written fact sheet due to the popularity of audio blogs. In this way, new hires can listen to the tutorial on their own time using their phone or other device.
As a result of this need, you offer to create an audio tutorial orienting new hires to these topics. You know that you will need a script to guide your audio recording. You also plan to incorporate into your script the insights you learned from conducting an interview with an authority on quality monitoring and the use of technology to collect and report quality indicator data.
You determine that you will cover the following topics in your audio tutorial script:
Introduction: Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicator
What is the National Database of Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators?
What are nursing-sensitive quality indicators?
Which particular quality indicator did you select to address in your tutorial?
Why is this quality indicator important to monitor?
Be sure to address the impact of this indicator on the quality of care and patient safety.
Why do new nurses need to be familiar with this particular quality indicator when providing patient care?
Collection and Distribution of Quality Indicator Data
According to your interview and other resources, how does your organization collect data on this quality indicator?
How does the organization disseminate aggregate data?
What role do nurses play in supporting accurate reporting and high-quality results?
As an example, consider the importance of accurately entering data regarding nursing interventions.
After completing your script, practice delivering your tutorial several times before recording it.
Additional Requirements
Audio communication: Deliver a professional, effective audio tutorial on a selected quality indicator that engages new nurses and motivates them to accurately report quality data in a timely fashion.
Length: 8–10 minute audio recording. Use Kaltura to upload your recording to the courseroom, or provide a working link your instructor can access.
Script: A separate document with the script or speaker’s notes is required. Important: Submissions that do not include the script or speaker’s notes will be returned as a non-performance.
References: Cite a minimum of three scholarly and/or authoritative sources.
APA: Submit, along with the recording, a separate reference page that follows APA style and formatting guidelines. For an APA refresher, consult the Evidence and APA page on Campus.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Describe nurses’ and the interdisciplinary team’s role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.
Describe the interdisciplinary team’s role in collecting and reporting quality indicator data to enhance patient safety, patient care outcomes, and organizational performance reports.
Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.
Explain how a health care organization uses nursing-sensitive quality indicators to enhance patient safety, patient care outcomes, and organizational performance reports.
Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality and safety standards for patients.
Justify how a nursing-sensitive quality indicator establishes evidence-based practice guidelines for nurses to follow when using patient care technologies to enhance patient safety, satisfaction, and outcomes.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
Deliver a professional, effective audio tutorial on a selected quality indicator that engages new nurses and motivates them to accurately report quality data in a timely fashion.
Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

Assignment: Please use the following Case Studies to complete your Assignment for this week that is Due by Day 7.  
To Prepare:
Review the following case studies and answer ALL questions.
When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, special instructions, # dispensed (days supply), refills, etc. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications.
Use clinical practice guidelines in developing your answers. Please review all Required Learning Resources. Use the Medscape app or website and JNC 8 to complete assignment.
Include at least four references to support each scenario and cite them in APA format. Please include in-text citations. You do not need an introduction or conclusion paragraph.
Case Study 1:
Sara is a 45-year-old female presenting for her annual exam. Her blood pressure today is 160/90 HR 84 RR 16. Her height is 64 inches   and her weight is 195. Her last visit to the clinic 3 months ago shows a BP of 156/92. She is currently taking ibuprofen 600 mg tid for back  pain. She has no known allergies. What is the goal for her blood pressure? What medication would you prescribe to treat her blood pressure? What education would you prescribe?
Case Study 2:
Monty is a 52-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on Lisinopril 20 mg po daily. He is allergic to penicillin. Fasting lipid profile shows total cholesterol 266, LDL cholesterol 180, HDL cholesterol 40, and Triglycerides 185. What treatment plan would you implement for Monty’s lipid profile? What is the goal Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, and LDL-C level for Monty? How would you monitor the effectiveness of your treatment plan? How many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them specifically.
Case Study 3:
Beatrice is a 17-year-old female diagnosed with mild persistent asthma since age 7. During her visit today, she reports having to use her albuterol MDI 3 to 4 days per week over the past 2 months. Over the past week she has been using albuterol at least once per day. She reports being awakened by a cough three nights during the last month. She is becoming more short of breath with exercise. She also has a fluticasone MDI, which she uses “most days of the week.” Her current medications include: Flovent HFA 44 mcg, two puffs BID, Proventil HFA two puffs Q 4–6 H PRN shortness of breath, Yaz one PO daily, Propranolol 80 mg PO BID. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication changes would you make? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan? 
Case Study 4:
Daute is a 56-year-old man seeking evaluation for increasing shortness of breath. He noticed difficulty catching his breath about 3 years ago. Physical activity increases his symptoms. He avoids activity as much as possible to prevent any SOB. His previous physician had placed him on salmeterol/fluticasone (Advair Diskus) one inhalation twice daily 2 years ago. He thinks his physician initiated the medication for the shortness of breath, but he is not entirely sure. He did not refill the prescription and has not been taking it. Pertinent history – Chronic bronchitis X 8 years with one exacerbation in last 12 months of treatment with oral antibiotics. He has a 40-pack-year smoking history. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication(s) would you prescribe? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan?

Write a 3-4 page paper in APA format with a minimum of 3 references. 
Address the following Areas:
Project Objectives
The objectives are something you hope to achieve from doing the project
Strategies
Strategies are the method you will use to reach the objectives you have set for your project
Background Analysis
This may also be called a situation analysis. This section you will need to discuss what is happening that made you decided to do your capstone project.
For example, the nurses at a facility are making a many medication errors. For your capstone project you decide you will try to reduce the number of medication errors from 10 every week to three a week. You will have to analyze why the errors are taking place. Maybe the lighting in the medication room is poor or maybe the nurses are working 70 hours every week.
You will also need to locate peer review articles that support you analysis.
this is a continual assigment from the past two orderd , I attached them bellow for refernce .
Please use the templet I attached bellow 
Capstone Objectives, Strategies, and Background Template
Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019 (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning and Reflection
15 pts
Exemplary
Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.
10 pts
Accomplished
Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored
5 pts
Developing
Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making and Clinical Reasoning
15 pts
Exemplary
Provides distinguishing, and accurate evidence base analyzing and integrating the main concept beyond the required (5) peer-reviewed sources. Research sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
10 pts
Accomplished
Provides distinguishing, and accurate evidence base analyzing and integrating the main concept beyond the required (5) peer-reviewed sources. Research sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
5 pts
Developing
Provides some evidence to support the central position with less than 3 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Presentation
15 pts
Exemplary
Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing
10 pts
Accomplished
Content is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing.
5 pts
Developing
Content is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting
15 pts
Exemplary
Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.
10 pts
Accomplished
Content shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. APA guidelines for formatting are present. In-text citations are present but may not be complete or correctly formatted. References are written using correct APA format
5 pts
Developing
Content shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines are generally present, however are incorrectly formatted.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Content shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA paper: title page, references, in-text citations, headers.
15 pts
Total Points: 60

This assignment will focus on the research methodology for the study that you proposed in your Problem Significance and Review of Literature Assignment.  Once again, your modules and your textbook will help you develop the sections of this paper.  For example, when you are deciding on your study design, you will go to the Module 6 and review the power points and read Chapters 9 and 10 in your textbook. The information in these resources will help you decide on the type of design that best fits your study.  
Here are some tips for the sections of the Methodology Assignment.  Use the following headings to develop APA headings for your paper.   Include the following information in each section.  
Purpose: Use the corrected draft from your other assignment.  Identify the purpose of the study. You will write this as: The purpose of the study is to…. 
Methodology
Research Design: identify the type of design you will use.  Be specific—descriptive, quasi-experimental or experimental is not enough.  Examples might include: Randomized control trial, cohort, correlational, pre-test-post-test, etc. The text provides descriptions of the designs.  Be sure to include why the design is appropriate for the study. This sentence should be referenced.  For example:
Type of design: A cross-sectional, correlational study will be conducted to examine the relationship between knowledge of HIV transmission, prophylactic use of antiretroviral medications, altruism, and the use of safe sexual practices (no reference needed since this is our study).  A cross-sectional design is a non-experimental research design in which the data is collected at one point in time (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2019). Because participants will be completing variable specific questionnaires at one point in time, the research design is appropriate for the study.
Extraneous variables: These can be situational—such as a cold environment when taking a test, personal—such as an individual taking a test being sleepless; or researcher based—such as if the researcher gave clues on how to act or respond during the study. Additionally, using self-report instruments or tools might be an extraneous variable—because the individual is having to ‘self-report information’).
Sampling plan: describe the type of sampling plan you will conduct—usually a non-probability or probability sample—the LoBiondo-Wood and Haber textbook describes the types of sampling plans you can choose to fit your study. Be sure to indicate the specific sampling plan and to reference the information.
Population: include the population your sample will represent and an estimated sample size you would obtain to conduct the study. Be sure to include exclusion and inclusion criteria and remember that these criteria can help to control extraneous variables and bias too.
Obtaining sample: describe how you would obtain the sample. Describe your recruitment process or any plans for using flyers or advertisements.  If you plan a randomized study, how will you randomize the participants (coin toss/computer program)?
Plan for Data Collection: describe the how, when, and where of data collection.  Be sure to include that you will first obtain IRB approval and how you will obtain informed consent—include the venue where you would conduct the study.
Data Collection Tools/Measures:
If you decide to use a tool (questionnaire or instrument) from a study you read, include the number of items (or questions) the tool has, who created the tool, and reliability and validity of the tool.  A copy of the tool should be added as an appendix to the paper. If the reliability and validity of the tool is not available in the literature, this would be a limitation.
If you plan to develop your own data collection tool, a copy must be provided as an appendix.  Be sure to describe how your methodology speaks to reliability and validity and how the tool you develop ensures accurate measurement of the variable.  For example, if you plan to examine the number of hours someone walks per week, how will you document that to ensure consistency among participants?  If you plan to develop a table for data entry, that must also be included as an appendix. All appendices are placed behind the references.
If using physiologic measures, describe how you will ensure consistency in data collection among all participants.

Less than 20% plaigarism and 0% AI.
Instructions:
Make your search on the Cultural Expression, Meanings, Beliefs, and Practices of Mexican American Women During the Post- Partum Period. Review their beliefs and myths about it, not only for the mother’s care but also for the new baby. Write an essay with your findings, and explain how you can, as a DNP, provide culturally congruent care to this patient.
Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
Add a case study related to the topic  in a separate paper to be discuss in class. 
Submission Instructions:
Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism. 
Rubric
– Official Essay Rubric
– Official Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
Mastery of the Information
30 to >27.0 pts
Excellent
The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.
27 to >24.0 pts
Good
The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.
24 to >21.0 pts
Fair
The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.
21 to >18.0 pts
Poor
The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.
18 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
Structure of the Essay
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
Development of Ideas
15 to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.
14 to >12.0 pts
Good (12 -11 pts)
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.
12 to >11.0 pts
Fair
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.
11 to >9.0 pts
Poor
Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.
9 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy
Quality of Resources
15 to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.
14 to >12.0 pts
Good
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.
12 to >11.0 pts
Fair
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.
11 to >9.0 pts
Poor
The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.
9 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
Mechanics and Grammar
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
7 to >5.0 pts
Poor
Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.
8 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.
6 to >5.0 pts
Poor
The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

Assignment: To create an Infographic on an Artificial Intelligence System used in Healthcare. You will choose a specific type of AI system. DO NOT explain what AI is for this assignment. Your team will create an infographic (you can find free infographic makers online, such as Canva, Visme, PowerPoint, and Venngage). 
Assignment Requirements
The infographic must include the following components: 
Information about AI system – what is it, and what does it do?
Pros and cons of the AI system
Ethical concerns of the AI system
Uses in healthcare or potential uses in healthcare.
APA does not provide direction on how to cite an Infographic. I want you to add a list of URLs at the bottom of the infographic where you found your information for the Infographic. In-text citation is not required for this assignment.
All team members will submit the same assignment; their names must appear on each submission. All team members will receive the same grade. 
Include a breakdown of how each team member contributed to the assignment.