Category: Nursing

Create a (PEDIATRIC PATIENT) soap note, SIMILAR to the soap note attached but (WITH PEDIATRIC CONSIDERATIONS), and utilizing the template provided.
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW THE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED, AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED.

Instructions: Main Post (325 Word minimum)
Subject Heading: Type the Number and Name of your topic before posting material.
RESEARCH (Label this section)
The explanation / background of the topic- Teach the topic to students. Share interesting and current research on the topic.
Use APA in text citations in the text to clarify sources.
Reminder: Your textbook should be one of the sources. Best posts include secondary scholary sources.
CRITICAL THINKING (Label this section, too)
This section is only for your thoughts/conclusions. This is not research based. It is not a summary of your research.
Everyday living: Connect the dots. Why is this an important topic for you, your community, society, or the world? How does it relate to other concepts in the text?

I need detailed speaker notes…. I then need those detailed speaker notes in a word document in APA format that looks like a paper. headings, title page, reference page.
I will of course complete the audio portion
I have attached PDF and supporting documents
please make sure all competencies (rubric points) are hit and APA formatting is correct

After
you have read the Healthcare Delivery Systems and
Organization article, write a 3 page paper responding to the
following questions:
What role does
the nurse practitioner and/or DNP-prepared nursing student have in the
provision of quality health care in an era of reform?
Should
consumers enter the healthcare marketplace through a gatekeeper?
Is it possible
that such a condition already occurs, but the gatekeeper is a health
insurance organization?
Is it possible
that the graduate nursing student as case manager might be a more
effective gatekeeper?
How might the
graduate nursing student be positioned to best provide low-cost and
high-quality care?
How might a
group of four graduate nursing students, including a nurse practitioner,
nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, and clinical nurse specialist, offer
unique services as a case management team?
For this
assignment, make sure that the page count does not include the title page or
reference list, uses formal writing mechanics, and is in APA 7th edition
format. The paper should include at least five references published in the last
five years, one of which could be the course textbook.
Be sure to think creatively. Your response to these
questions just might be the edge that graduate nursing students offer in our
evolving world of health reform. The paper should demonstrate the knowledge you
gained relative to dispersed models of healthcare delivery and models of
healthcare delivery

generate an interview with a manager, nurse leader, or department head of your           choice. The write up should be similar to an interview publsihed in a magazine.
You can choose any format and use any questions that you would like to use during your interview.
However, incorporate following questions.
– Your inspiration that led you to your current role?
-Describe your career trajectory.
-What  strategies helped you the most?
– How do you plan your budget and how do you prioratize?
-What are some leadership initiatives that you have implimented for aspiring employees in your organization?
– What action items you have developed to educate nurses/staff about Climate             Change?
-What are some of the advaned technologies that are incorporated in your                      organization? What role did you play to support the project?
– What is your vision for the company/ healthcare?
-How do you summarize your own mission statement in one line?
-Be original and innovative.

Hello, 
Below are is the full description for the assignment, most of which is already completed. I just need your help 
with 9, 10, and 11. Edits/revisions to any other parts of the work are also welcomed (willing to pay).  Attached is 
the first draft along with the rubric.  This turnaround time for this assignment is just a few hours, so please only 
respond if it can be be met. Thank you in adavance for your help. 
In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Develop a 2,500-3,000-word written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:
Background of clinical problem
Clinical problem statement (Topic 3 assignment)
Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system (Topic 2 assignment)
PICOT question (Topic 3 assignment)
Literature search strategy employed (Topic 4 assignment)
Synthesis of literature review (Topic 6 assignment)
Applicable change or nursing theory utilized (Topic 4 DQ 2)
Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures (Topic 5 assignment)
Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention (Topic 6 assignment)
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (Topic 5 DQ 2 and any other barriers that have not yet been considered)
Appendix section: Update the Capstone Change Project Evaluation plan developed in Topic 7 as needed. Include it as Appendix A. Additional items developed for your capstone project (i.e., patient or staff education materials, etc.) can also be attached but are optional.
Review the feedback from your instructor on the Capstone Project assignments submitted throughout the course and referenced above. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

Review the Problem-Based Learning: Patients’ Background StoryLinks to an external site. and the Problem-Based Learning: EENT Visit with JackLinks to an external site..http://media.samuelmerritt.edu/N675/pbl/pbl_background/story.html and http://media.samuelmerritt.edu/N675/pbl/pbl_w01_eent_jack/story.html. read both of these links above as mentioned to complete the soap note. 
This course mimics a problem-based learning (PBL) style in which you diagnose a patient based on the line of questions asked and symptoms displayed. The patients shown in the case studies are used throughout this course showing different symptoms. 
Note: The clinic visit story may not have all the information needed or would normally get during a patient visit. Consider what questions you would ask, or physical exam you would do to the patient in this story while in your clinic. If the story does not have the answers or the necessary physical exam done, come up with your own realistic answers and physical exam that fit the narrative of the story and diagnosis.
Create a SOAP note using the SOAP Note Template for Jack’s chief complaint (CC) for this week.
Submit your SOAP note 
Below is the grading rubric for this assignment:
SOAP Note 675 (1)
SOAP Note 675 (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubjective
HPI, All histories, Medications, Allergies, ROS
5 pts
Exceeds
Complete and concise summary of pertinent subjective information.
4 pts
Met
Well organized; partial but accurate summary of pertinent information (>80%).
3 pts
Not Met
Poorly organized and/or limited summary of pertinent information (50%-80%); information other than subjective info provided.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Less than 50% of pertinent information is addressed; or is grossly incomplete and/or inaccurate.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjective
Physical Exam, Diagnostics History
5 pts
Exceeds
Complete and concise summary of pertinent objective information.
4 pts
Met
Partial but accurate summary of pertinent objective information (>80%).
3 pts
Not Met
Poorly organized and/or limited summary of pertinent information (50%-80%); information other than objective info provided.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Less than 50% of pertinent information is addressed; or is grossly incomplete and/or inaccurate.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDifferential Diagnosis
5 different differential diagnosis (NOT including the actual diagnosis for the patient).
At least 1 differential diagnosis should be a RED Flag diagnosis
10 pts
Exceeds
Complete list of 5 different differential diagnosis. 1 differential diagnosis is a red flag diagnosis. Diagnoses are rationally prioritized. Each diagnosis is thoroughly explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, accurate pertinent negatives and positives are listed. No extraneous information or issues listed
8 pts
Met
Complete list of 5 different differential diagnosis. 1 differential diagnosis is a red flag diagnosis. Diagnoses may be partially prioritized. Each diagnosis is explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, explanation may have small inaccuracies. No extraneous information or issues listed
6 pts
Not Met
Less than 5 different differential diagnosis are listed OR a red flag diagnosis is note listed. Some of the differential diagnosis are not appropriate. Differential Diagnoses are not rationally prioritized. Only some of the diagnoses Are explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, Some of the explanation may be inaccurate.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Less than 2 differential diagnosis are provided. Explanation for each differential diagnosis is not provided OR most of the explanations are inaccurate.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment
10 pts
Exceeds
An optimal and thorough assessment is present for each problem. Each diagnosis is a diagnosable ICD 10 diagnosis. Each diagnosis is thoroughly explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, accurate pertinent negatives and positives are listed.
8 pts
Met
An assessment is present for each problem listed but not optimal. Each diagnosis is a diagnosable ICD 10 diagnosis. Each diagnosis is explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, there may be slight inaccuracies in the explanation of pertinent negatives and positives are listed.
6 pts
Not Met
Assessment is present for 50-80% of problems. Only some (>50%) of the diagnosis are ICD 10 diagnosis. Most diagnoses are explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, there may be inaccuracies in the explanation of pertinent negatives and positives are listed, but > 50% is accurate.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Less than 50% of problems include an appropriate assessment. Most of the diagnosis are ICD 10 diagnosis. Some diagnoses are explained with the information provided in the case/SOAP note, there may be inaccuracies in the explanation of pertinent negatives and positives are listed, 80%). Treatment Plan is complete and appropriate for each identified problem (>80%).
6 pts
Not Met
Appropriate therapeutic goals for a few identified problems (50%-80%). Treatment plan is partially complete and/or inappropriate for a few identified problems (50%-80%); information other than necessary “plan” information is provided.
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Less than 50% of problems have appropriate therapeutic goals. Less than 50% of problems have an appropriate and complete treatment plan.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCounseling, Referral/Follow Up, Patient Education
5 pts
Exceeds
Specific patient education points, monitoring parameters, follow-up plan and (where applicable) referral plan for each identified problem.
4 pts
Met
Patient education points, monitoring parameters, follow-up plan and referral plan (where applicable) for >80% of identified problems.
3 pts
Not Met
Patient education points, monitoring parameters, follow-up plan and referral plan (where applicable) for a few identified problems (50%-80%).
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Less than 50% of problems include appropriate counseling, monitoring, referral and/or follow-up plan.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRefences
2.5 pts
Exceeds
All references are appropriately cited via APA. All references are primary sources less than 10 years old *(unless landmark study/paper)
2 pts
Met
Most (>80%) references are appropriately cited via APA. All references are primary sources but may be more than 10 years old
1.5 pts
Not Met
Some (>50-80%) references are appropriately cited via APA. Most references are primary sources but may be more than 10 years old
0 pts
Not Acceptable
Only some (<50%) references are appropriately cited via APA. Only some of the references are primary sources 2.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSBAR Report 2.5 pts Exceeds The SBAR report is exceptionally clear, but includes only the necessary pertinent positives and negatives of the case. Information is accurately and succinctly organized following the SBAR format. The SBAR correlates exceptionally well to the SOAP note Report is well-structured, with no major grammatical or spelling errors. 2 pts Met The SBAR report is clear and accurately reflects the case study. Information is organized appropriately according to the SBAR format. Includes all necessary details relevant to the case without unnecessary information. Shows good clinical reasoning and decision-making skills. Report is structured correctly, with minimal grammatical or spelling errors. 1.5 pts Not Met The SBAR report partially reflects the case study but lacks some important details. Some elements of the SBAR format are missing or not clearly presented. The report includes some relevant details but omits others that are crucial for understanding. Clinical reasoning and decision-making skills are not clearly demonstrated. Report structure has several grammatical or spelling errors. 0 pts Not Acceptable The SBAR report does not adequately reflect the case study. Fails to follow the SBAR format or the format is used incorrectly. Lacks critical details necessary for understanding the case, showing poor clinical reasoning. Report is disorganized, with multiple grammatical or spelling errors. 2.5 pts Total Points: 50

For your Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) project on the management of postoperative pain, here are some steps you can follow:
1. Develop a PICO question: This stands for Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome. For example, “In postoperative patients (P), does the use of non-opioid pain management strategies (I) compared to opioid-based pain management (C) result in better pain control and fewer side effects (O)?”
2. Conduct a literature review: Search for high-quality studies, such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials, on postoperative pain management strategies. Focus on studies that compare different interventions or approaches.
3. Critically appraise the evidence: Evaluate the studies you have found regarding their quality, relevance, and findings. Look for any biases or limitations that may impact the strength of the evidence.
4. Consider patient preferences and values: Consider the preferences and values of postoperative patients when selecting a pain management approach. Some patients may prefer non-opioid options due to concerns about dependency or side effects.
5. Develop an implementation plan: Based on the evidence and patient preferences, create a plan for implementing effective postoperative pain management strategies in your practice or healthcare setting. This may include developing protocols, providing staff education, and monitoring outcome.
6. Monitor and evaluate outcomes: Track the effectiveness of the pain management strategies you have implemented by monitoring pain scores, side effects, patient satisfaction, and other relevant outcomes. Make adjustments as needed based on feedback and data.
7. Share your findings: Consider presenting your EBP project findings at conferences, publishing them in journals, or sharing them with colleagues to contribute to the broader understanding of postoperative pain management.
Remember to involve a multidisciplinary team in your project, including healthcare providers, nurses, pharmacists, and other relevant stakeholders, to ensure a comprehensive and collaborative approach to improving postoperative pain management.
I have attached what information is needed for the board and also an example of a previous EBP project.

Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to synthesize a literature review that will be used to draw conclusions in
order to propose an evidence-based practice change to address your identified nurse practice problem.
Using the “Literature Evaluation Table” assignment in Topic 1, and accompanying faculty feedback, you will
synthesize the information created for your PICOT question into a literature review and evidence-based
proposal.
In a 1,500-1,750-word paper, provide an overview that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT
question.
Use the following components from the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete the assignment:
Identified practice problem
Two qualitative peer-reviewed research articles
Two quantitative peer-reviewed research articles
Use the “Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Guidelines” document to organize your
paper.
You are required to cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must
be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is
located in Class Resources if you need assistance.  

Complete a two-page Word Document ( 750 words minimum) explaining each stage of the nursing process in detail! Then, explain the significance of the nursing process to the profession and how it has evolved since the 1950s!