Category: Nursing

Two arguments of why termination should be allowed in cases of mild congenital fetal abnormalities
two arguments of why termination should NOT be allowed in cases of mild congenital fetal abnormalities

hello, how are you?
I wanted to say I attached the instruction  for you to follow all the instructions, add bullets to key points, add pictures as well. please make me proud. 
thank you.

This assignment will aide you in organizing your thoughts, and in collecting  research/studies which address your PICOT question. Your systematic review begins by strategically conducting a literature search, literature evaluation, and literature analysis.
Submitting this assignment will aide you in addressing course outcomes:
#1 – Evaluate the basic elements of the research process and models for employing evidence in clinical practice.
#2 – Justify credible resources of evidence relevant to nursing practice.
Link here Download herefor the Literature Search Strategy, CRAAP test, Evaluation of Literature assignment template. 
There are four (4) graded portions to this assignment: 
Literature search strategy
CRAAP Test
Evaluation of literature- summary & analysis  (table and APA 7th ed. summaries and analysis)
Upload primary studies 
Portion 1:  Literature search strategy 
The literature search strategy portion is an organized method to help you find research studies applicable to your PICOT question.  The organization of key terms used to search will help you to retrieve accurate results.  Begin your search broadly, looking for as many studies as you can in as many databases as you can, then begin to narrow your search down by using inclusion and exclusion criteriaLinks to an external site., or boolean operators.Links to an external site. You will also narrow your focus with primary resources.  Your final systematic review paper should have ten (10) or more scholarly research studies utilized and referenced throughout your paper.
Primary resources contain first-hand information, meaning that you are reading the author’s own account on a specific topic or event that s/he participated in. Examples of primary resources include scholarly research studies, books, and diaries. Primary sources such as research studies/original research often do not explain terminology and theoretical principles in detail.
Secondary sources describe, summarize, or discuss information or details originally presented in another source; meaning the author, in most cases, did not participate in the research event. This type of source is written for a broad audience and will include definitions of discipline specific terms, history relating to the topic, significant theories and principles, and summaries of major studies/events as related to the topic. Use secondary sources to obtain an overview of a topic and/or identify primary resources.
Answer all of the questions posed in the literature search. 
Portion 2:  CRAAP Test 
The CRAAP test is a method to evaluate the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose of the primary sources/original studies/research you find to address your PICOT question.
Conduct a CRAAP Test on two (2) primary sources/original studies/research you retrieved during the literature search process.  Respond to the criteria questions found in the left column with full sentences in the right column before rating the research study.
Portion 3:  Evaluation of literature- summary & analysis  (table and APA 7th ed. summaries and analysis)
Restate your PICOT question
Using APA 7th ed. format, type in the references for the three primary sources/original studies related to the same strategy from your PICOT question.  Following APA format (alphabetical, line spacing, indents, italics, doi, etc)  Use 3 primary sources/original studies not used in the CRAAP portion
Using the three primary sources/original studies, complete the table (Study author’s/date-Study location, population & sample size-Type of study conducted/level of evidence-Identify strengths and weaknesses of the study-Identify the significance of the study ).  Full sentences are not required.
Summary and analysis – in APA 7th ed. format (font, font size, line spacing), write out a summary for each primary source/original study/research in its own paragraph (1 paragraph for each primary sources/original studies/research). 
In a fourth paragraph compare/analyze the three primary sources/original studies/research collectively for their similarities, strengths and weaknesses, for the meaning of the study/research findings as they relate to your PICOT question.  
In this portion, you are breaking down the three primary source/original study/research related to the same strategy.  You may decide to use (or not) these primary source/original study/research in the writing of your systematic review analysis/evaluation of literature section (here you CAN NOT use meta-analysis, systematic reviews, or a review source).  Your summaries should provide an overview of what the primary source/original study/research was trying to examine:  the problem, the objective of the study/research, the sample size, the population, the study location, the methods, the assessment tool, and the findings. Make sure to cite APA 7th ed. format, the researchers name/date.  You should include information/data specific to the source, creating a ‘picture’ of the study.  
Questions you want to consider when collectively analyzing the studies are:  What are the studies distinctive features as a group?  What is each hypothesis, similar? What previous research findings does this study build upon? Were the sample sizes similar? Were the data collection methods similar? Were the findings similar? What do you think is most important or effective regarding the research/arguments? What limitations do you see in the research or argument? That is, what counter-claims or arguments can you make in response to the study?  Can you cluster?
Your Grove & Gray (2019) textbook, pages 338-344 addresses critical appraisal of quantitative studies.
Your Grove  & Gray (2019) textbook, pages 357-362 addresses critical appraisal of qualitative studies.  
Box 12.1 on p337 in your Grove & Gray (2019) textbook may aid you in completing the table identifying key principles for appraising. 
Please review your textbook, Grove & Gray (2019), review pages 338-344 for the 3-steps in a critical appraisal of a quantitative study and pages 357 -362 for the 3-steps in a critical appraisal of a qualitative study.
Portion 4:  Upload the primary studies
Upload the three primary sources/original studies used in the evaluation of literature section to the assignment 
https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/data-collection/
Please review the rubric for grading of this assignment. 
Submit by posted due date/time.  

Psychotherapy is often misunderstood or devalued.
Discuss your views of the PMHNP as a psychotherapist
Discuss whether it is feasible to provide psychotherapy at each patient encounter
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.

1-What are the primary aims of the first psychiatric interview?
2-How should the initial interview be organized?

Identify a pathological state in detail and in your own words with any sources cited.
Explain the condition/disease and elaborate on the signs and symptoms of the condition/disease.
Explain the effect of the condition/disease on each of the selected hemodynamic values;
pulmonary artery pressure,
pulmonary wedge pressure,
cardiac output,
mean arterial pressure, and
central venous pressure.
Explain what these values mean, and what they control
How do you monitor or measure these pressures?

Module 5 Discussion
The Genogram as a Tool
After studying Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources, review and discuss the Genogram Video. Create a video that demonstrates you performing an explanation of the attached genogram Download attached genogramto a parent during a patient session.
Your video should be at least 5-7 minutes and recorded with the media recorder or uploaded into Canvas Studio. Then, post the video in this discussion as your initial post. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
Submission Instructions:
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response).
All replies must be constructive and use evidence-based articles where possible to support your position.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Do the signature assignment on nursing theorist Dorothea Orem: Creator of self care deficit nursing theory. Also include the references of this book “Alligood, M. R. (2022). Nursing Theorists and Their Work (10th ed). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. ISBN 9780323757027”
Instructions are down below!

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state in which change can occur through advocacy and legislation.
Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system.
Identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state. Examples of problems relevant to nursing include, but are not limited to, title “nurse” protection, sharps injury prevention, nursing shortage, nurse well-being, valuation of nursing services, etc. Research the issue you selected and use the attached “Creating Change Through Advocacy” template to complete this assignment.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Inlude these
1. Varghese, J., & Moss, E. L. (2021). The Power of Influence: Nurses’ Role in Advocacy and the Legislative Process. AAACN Viewpoint, 43(5), 12–13. 
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=789b4571-f468-4de4-ba3b-7d39a5bd4079%40redis
2. Abood S. (2007). Influencing health care in the legislative arena. Nursing News, 31(2), 3–7.
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=fe1c4bce-3fd8-4428-9a6e-98fd17452122%40redis

Instructions: Select a research article related to nursing and write a 2-3 double spaced page (NOT including
the title page and reference) article evaluation.
• 
Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed articles written within the last 5 years 
You must choose your article by the end of week 2 and submit to your instructor for approval using the
assignment dropbox in Canvas
• 2-3 double spaced page (NOT including the title page and references) 
In your evaluation, address each of the following components:
o The author(s), their credentials, and practice areas 
If the article has more than four authors only write about the first three authors.
o The purpose of the study
o Research question(s)
Provide discussion of the author’s review of the literature
o Population, sample size, and sample selection process 
Research method(s) used in the study
o Research findings  
Article critique
o Discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice. 
Written in current APA format. This paper should include: 
Formal components including title page 
APA headers (include page numbers) 
APA formatted headings in the body of the paper 
Appropriate in-text reference citations
o A reference page, in correct APA format