Category: Nursing

You are a nurse caring for 16-year-old Jonathan Collins. He was admitted to the emergency department after passing out during gym class. During your admission assessment, he admits he has not been eating much and exercising more to lose weight.  Based on this information, your prior knowledge of this client (refer to medical card from the Collins-Kim family tree interactive), and your knowledge of the pathophysiology of anorexia and fluid and electrolyte imbalances, respond to the following prompts:
Thoroughly explain the pathophysiology of anorexia. Use a scholarly or authoritative source to support your answer.
Examine each of the following three factors related to this disease process. Support all three with a scholarly source.
cultural
financial
environmental implications
Identify 3-5 priority nursing interventions for the client while in the emergency department.
Describe labs and diagnostic testing you would want to include in client’s plan of care and why. What are critical indicators? Support with a scholarly source.
What members of the interdisciplinary team need to be included for holistic patient-centered care? Provide a rationale and support with a scholarly source.

If new lessons are going to be remembered and bring long-term value, effort must be taken to reflect on the experiences one has had, evaluate them in terms of whether they were positive or not, consider what one might do to alter future activities and behaviors as a result, and do concrete things to bring about real change.
The previous seven modules have laid the foundation for understanding the current state of the science in nursing informatics. This final module focuses on the future of nursing informatics, challenging students to think of what will or could be, and how their current practice setting and nursing informatics applications could evolve or develop over time. Students will learn about the power of informatics tools to develop a professional ePortfolio and to help network with other professionals to build and share professional knowledge. Finally, this module concludes by reintegrating the Foundation of Knowledge model as we look toward the future of nursing informatics.
This module explored some of the merging technologies that are in both general use and in use and development within health care. The prospect that emerging technologies may create more problems than they solve was considered. However, by having an awareness of likely and possible technological developments nurses can assess what impact they might have on the ways in which we work and live. This module addressed web-based electronic portfolios as both a social networking and professional networking tool.
Finally, the four key areas of the Foundation of Knowledge model were considered. The critical challenges for the future lie within identifying which emerging technologies will best provide the usable tools that nurses will need to manage the coming knowledge “explosion” as more information becomes available to support diagnosis, treatment, and care.
**Note: You will not have access to the Signature Assignment without first submitting the Proctored Assessment, including a verified identification and receiving confirmation from your instructor with a satisfactory grade for Module 7. You must complete this requirement to pass the course.
Module Goals
Goals Alignment
Professional Standards
After completing this module, students will be able to do the following:
Distinguish between social networking and professional networking.
Compare and contrast bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and computational biology
Outline the history of technology development and informatics applications.
Assess the state-of-the-art technologies of today.
Predict the evolution of technology and its impact on knowledge generation in nursing.
Explore the contribution of nursing informatics to the foundation of knowledge.
Learning Materials
McGonigle, D. & Mastrian, K. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284142990. Read chapters 11 & 26.
PowerPoints
Chapter 11: The Human-Technology Interface
Chapter 26: Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge

Policy Advocacy Project – Part B: Report
PSLOs 1, 4, 5, 7; CSLOs: 1, 5
Directions: Arrange a meeting and speak with the elected official or staff member that you identified in the
Policy Advocacy Project: Proposal to advocate for the legislation you selected.
Use the information in the Policy Advocacy Project Assignment Reference document found in Canvas to help
with this assignment. Make sure to complete all the requirements specified in this assignment and the
assignment rubric.
The Meeting
• Meet with the elected official or staff member to discuss the legislation.
• Do not mention that you are a student or that you have arranged this visit as part of a course requirement.
The Report
Write a report of your visit and include all the items listed below.
1. Include the exact name of the elected official or staff member whose office you visited and the person
with whom you spoke.
2. Indicate whether the elected official or staff member was familiar with the legislation.
3. Describe how you conveyed your issue in the meeting. Summarize the topic and how you presented the
topic, including what facts or supporting information that you provided. Once you lay out the issue, you
should ask for the legislator’s support.
4. Summarize the elected official’s or staff member ‘s response to the your request; namely, will the
legislator provide the requested support or not? If not, why not? If the individual can support your
position, you should elaborate why he or she was so enthusiastic about showing support (so that we
might convey that enthusiasm to other less enlightened legislators).
5. Describe how the meeting ended. Was there additional information that you needed to send the elected
official or staff member?
6. Summarize the elected official’s or staff member’s demeanor. Was he or she cordial, merely civil, barely
engaged, etc.? In other words, despite your anxiety about the meeting (which is common for most nurses),
did the individual seem agreeable to having the discussion? For example, did he or she:
• Seem interested in the topic?
• Ask good questions?
• Seem candid about their position or remain noncommittal?
• Seem pleasant, easy to talk to versus merely civil versus confrontational?
• Relate any experiences that contributed to his or her understanding about the topic (e.g., has a
family member in one of the health professions or some other relevant personal experience). If so,
did these experiences help the individual to support your request or did it have the opposite effect?
7. Present information in a scholarly manner including skillful and proficient writing using appropriate
spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, appropriate
in-text reference citations, and reference page.
8. No more than 2-3 double spaced pages (NOT including the title page, references, and thank you e-mail).
9. Thank-you email – Send a thank-you email that briefly summarizes the bill number and the issue
discussed at the meeting. The letter must be written in a professional manner, including your full contact
information (address, phone, and e-mail) and the elected official’s or staff member’s full mailing address.
Assignment Submission:
The summary report and the thank you letter must be submitted in Canvas by the indicated due date.
Identified Elected Official or Staff Member and Familiarity with Legislation 
CSLOs: 1, 5 
Identified the exact name of the elected official or staff member visited. Successfully described the individual’s familiarity (or lack of) with the selected legislation. 
Conveyed Own Understanding of the Legislation 
CSLOs: 1, 5 
Successfully described how the information was presented and discussed with the elected official or staff member, including what facts or supporting information was provided; as well as how solicitation for support was requested.  
Summarized Elected Official or Staff Member Response 
CSLOs: 1, 5 
Successfully summarized the elected official or staff member response to the request; as well as acknowledgement of support or lack of support for the legislation. Discussed how the meeting ended.  
Evaluated Elected Official or Staff Member Demeanor 
CSLOs: 1, 5 
Described 3 features or more of the demeanor of the elected official or staff member. 
Criteria 
Excellent 
10 points 
Developed a Thank You Letter  
CSLOs: 1, 5 
Letter briefly summarized the bill number and issue discussed at the meeting. Written in a professional manner including full contact information and the mailing address of the elected official or staff member. 
Thank you letter was included with the written report. 
Presented Information in a Scholarly Manner 
Skillful and proficient writing using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page. Written 2-3 pages, double spaced. 
I have inserted 2 picture the first one is the email sent and the second one is the reponese from the first emai; kindly write a very short reponse for the email . 
read part A first so you can see how to approach part be 

General Instructions
Identify one vulnerable population within a selected community. Explore current literature and related data to understand better the variables that place this population at risk for health concerns and health disparities. Analyze national health directives, such as Healthy People or another national initiative, to determine the correlation to the vulnerable population’s needs/risks/disparities.
Create a concept map, either neatly drawn by hand or using Microsoft Word, that portrays each element and its relationships.
Use the provided worksheet Links to an external site. to answer the questions related to the concept map scenario.
Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
Provide resources from at least three scholarly resources. Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable.
No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) may be used in this assignment.
First person should not be used within this assignment.
Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.
Include the Following Sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric)
Concept Map:
Using a concept map format, identify the following elements:
a. vulnerable population
b. the variables that place the population at risk
c. the identified health risk or disparity to which the population is susceptible
d. the relationships between the elements.
Worksheet:
Provide a descriiption of the elements on the concept map:
a. succinct descriiption of the vulnerable population identified
b. minimum of three variables that place the population at risk
c. the identified health risk(s) or disparity that the population is at risk of experiencing
d. Explain how the concept map portrays the relationships between each element
e. Provide support from a scholarly source
Intervention Proposal:
a. Identify one national population health goal or objective that relates to the identified risk or disparity, such as Healthy People or another national initiative
b. Propose one strategy for the advanced practice nurse to collaborate at the local, state, or national levels to advocate for the health of the vulnerable population and advance the identified Healthy People goal or objective
c. Identify the stakeholders with whom the advanced practice nurse could collaborate.
d. Support your proposal with at least one scholarly source

My paper is to be a quantitative article review.
Must have the quantitative in the title of article researching.
APA Format
Follow the instructions and answer all questions provided from the rubric.

hello I need this assignment done on nursing theorist Martha E Rogers: Science of Unitary Human Beings. Also use references out of this book “Alligood, M. R. (2022). Nursing Theorists and Their Work (10th ed). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. ISBN 9780323757027”
Instructions are down below!!!!!!!!

Revisit the various nursing and/or management theories you have studied in the program. Select at least one nursing theory and one administration/management organization theory that complement each other.
Develop and post an approximately 2-page description of your personal management philosophy based on your exploration of nursing and management theory. Support your philosophy with relevant citations from the literature (minimum of four). Reflect on how this program has sharpened your leadership philosophy and skills, and provide examples.
Rubric Details
Introduction
15% of total grade
Below C- Unacceptable
Vague or absent
0
C
Minimally acceptable
11.25
B
Somewhat clear but vaguely introduces topic
12.75
A
Clear but vaguely introduces topic
14.25
A+
Clear and concise
15
Management Theory
30% of total grade
Below C- Unacceptable
Very unclear
0
C
Missing or vague in most of the areas; 1. describing theory 2. why chosen 3. what makes it personal
22.5
B
Could be improved in two of the areas: 1. describing theory 2. why chosen 3. what makes it personal
25.5
A
Could be improved in one of the areas: 1. describing theory 2. why chosen 3. what makes it personal
28.5
A+
Clearly describes the theory, why chosen, and what makes it personal
30
Nursing Theory
30% of total grade
Below C- Unacceptable
Very unclear
0
C
Missing or vague in most of the areas; 1. describing theory 2. why chosen 3. what makes it personal
22.5
B
Could be improved in two of the areas: 1. describing theory 2. why chosen 3. what makes it personal
25.5
A
Could be improved in one of the areas: 1. describing theory 2. why chosen 3. what makes it personal
28.5
A+
Clearly describes the theory, why chosen, and what makes it personal
30
Conclusion
15% of total grade
Below C- Unacceptable
Vague or missing
0
C
Minimally acceptable
11.25
B
Somewhat clear but vaguely vaguely topic
12.75
A
Clear but vaguely concludes topic
14.25
A+
Clear and concise
15
Grammar,APA, Spelling
10% of total grade
Below C- Unacceptable
More than 4 errors
0
C
4 errors
7.5
B
3 error
8.5
A
1-2 errors
9.5
A+
No errors
10

Students, this module gives you the opportunity to explore the HWE standards we won’t have time to discuss:Effective Decision Making; Adequate Staffing and Meaningful Recognition. 
For our DB we will be focusing on Meaningful Recognition; please make sure to review the critical elements associated with this standard as they need to be addressed/discussed. 
For this assignment you will be randomly paired with one of your classmates; take time to get to know each other – perhaps over a cup of tea, via zoom or face time – or maybe even in person. In order to authentically recognize each other you must have some depth of understanding of the challenges you each face, ways that you’ve overcome the challenges – your successes as well as perhaps an incident which you wish you’d handled differently. You must evidence knowing each other in order to successfully complete this assignment. I’ll make sure to pair you early in the quarter so you have plenty of time to prepare. 
Write a letter to your colleague thanking them for their contribututions based on what is meaningful to them. This could reference a clinical scenario which you discussed; perhaps it relates to material or contributions they’ve made during our class [during classes or on the DB]. Many students share with me that they’re so glad that another colleague opened up about… [some difficulty] as it was something also troubling them [the student writing to me]. Invariably I ask them to please give that feedback to the other student. If you’ve been in a situation like this you’ll know it will absolutely make their day. 
I expect this letter to have depth; it would be the equivalent of a 2-page hand-written card. [you may wish to also send each other a card with perhaps more personal information than can be shared publically] Be mindful that this is a public forum; you may allude in broad terms to events discussed in private but don’t spell out any details. I know this is tricky: spell out enough detail for me to know that you both know what you’re discussing while maintaining privacy. Trust yourself – run your ideas by each other; work in teams with your partner for the big ideas but please don’t share the actual letter until it’s published on BB. It should be a wonderful, heart-warming surprise. 
Address critical elements of Meaningful Recognition discuss them in the body of the letter using language reflective of the wording of the AACN. It might go like this ‘Susan, I wish that we both worked in the same health care system as I would like to nominate you for [such and such] award. This award is given out to nurses on our unit who exhibit [specific qualities]. You demonstrated these qualities [values] in these specific ways…’ 
IF you are having difficulty getting in touch with each other then please complete the assignment by writing an ‘as if’ letter to a work colleague following the same directions as I gave in the DB. Because you won’t have a letter written to you to which you are to reply you may then write an ‘as if’ thank you letter to that same colleague thanking them for the recognition that they gave you.

Module 1 Discussion 1
Discussion 1
Hematopoietic:
J.D. is a 37 years old white woman who presents to her gynecologist complaining of a 2-month history of intermenstrual bleeding, menorrhagia, increased urinary frequency, mild incontinence, extreme fatigue, and weakness. Her menstrual period occurs every 28 days and lately there have been 6 days of heavy flow and cramping. She denies abdominal distension, back-ache, and constipation. She has not had her usual energy levels since before her last pregnancy.
Past Medical History (PMH):
Upon reviewing her past medical history, the gynecologist notes that her patient is a G5P5with four pregnancies within four years, the last infant having been delivered vaginally four months ago. All five pregnancies were unremarkable and without delivery complications. All infants were born healthy. Patient history also reveals a 3-year history of osteoarthritis in the left knee, probably the result of sustaining significant trauma to her knee in an MVA when she was 9 years old. When asked what OTC medications she is currently taking for her pain and for how long she has been taking them, she reveals that she started taking ibuprofen, three tablets each day, about 2.5 years ago for her left knee. Due to a slowly progressive increase in pain and a loss of adequate relief with three tablets, she doubled the daily dose of ibuprofen. Upon the recommendation from her nurse practitioner and because long-term ibuprofen use can cause peptic ulcers, she began taking OTC omeprazole on a regular basis to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding. Patient history also reveals a 3-year history of HTN for which she is now being treated with a diuretic and a centrally acting antihypertensive drug. She has had no previous surgeries.
Case Study Questions
Name the contributing factors on J.D that might put her at risk to develop iron deficiency anemia.
Within the case study, describe the reasons why J.D. might be presenting constipation and or dehydration.
Why Vitamin B12 and folic acid are important on the erythropoiesis? What abnormalities their deficiency might cause on the red blood cells?
The gynecologist is suspecting that J.D. might be experiencing iron deficiency anemia.
In order to support the diagnosis, list and describe the clinical symptoms that J.D. might have positive for Iron deficiency anemia.
If the patient is diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia, what do you expect to find as signs of this type of anemia? List and describe.
Labs results came back for the patient. Hb 10.2 g/dL; Hct 30.8%; Ferritin 9 ng/dL; red blood cells are smaller and paler in color than normal. Research list and describe for appropriate recommendations and treatments for J.D.
Cardiovascular
Mr. W.G. is a 53-year-old white man who began to experience chest discomfort while playing tennis with a friend. At first, he attributed his discomfort to the heat and having had a large breakfast. Gradually, however, discomfort intensified to a crushing sensation in the sternal area and the pain seemed to spread upward into his neck and lower jaw. The nature of the pain did not seem to change with deep breathing. When Mr. G. complained of feeling nauseated and began rubbing his chest, his tennis partner was concerned that his friend was having a heart attack and called 911 on his cell phone. The patient was transported to the ED of the nearest hospital and arrived within 30 minutes of the onset of chest pain. In route to the hospital, the patient was placed on nasal cannula and an IV D5W was started. Mr. G. received aspirin (325 mg po) and 2 mg/IV morphine. He is allergic to meperidine (rash). His pain has eased slightly in the last 15 minutes but is still significant; was 9/10 in severity; now7/10. In the ED, chest pain was not relieved by 3 SL NTG tablets. He denies chills.
Case Study Questions
For patients at risk of developing coronary artery disease and patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarct, describe the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.
What would you expect to see on Mr. W.G. EKG and which findings described on the case are compatible with the acute coronary event?
Having only the opportunity to choose one laboratory test to confirm the acute myocardial infarct, which would be the most specific laboratory test you would choose and why?
How do you explain that Mr. W.G temperature has increased after his Myocardial Infarct, when that can be observed and for how long? Base your answer on the pathophysiology of the event.
Explain to Mr. W.G. why he was experiencing pain during his Myocardial Infarct. Elaborate and support your answer.
Submission Instructions:
Include both case studies in your post.
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

Scenario: You are an advanced practice nurse working with patients. You are training new nurses and nurse practitioners on quality, safety, and interprofessional partnerships.  
Write a 2-3 APA page (not including title page and reference pages) paper focusing on the importance of Essentials 5 and 6 and QSEN Safety and Quality Improvement for nursing practice. Answer the following questions in your paper:
Why are quality and safety important enough to be considered Essentials AND a QSEN module? 
How do these Essentials have an impact on patient care? Why should we still have to emphasize “safety” in advanced practice nursing? 
How are the two Essentials (5 & 6) linked? Do poor interprofessional partnerships affect patient safety? 
What will be your role in ensuring that these competencies are incorporated into clinical practice and/or upheld by the staff? What can you do to ensure that your staff stays updated on competencies?
Incorporate a minimum of 3 supporting academic peer-reviewed sources (journal articles)
Requirements 
This assignment needs to be submitted following APA format (title page, headings, reference page, etc.). The 2-3 page paper number count does not include the title page and reference pages. Citations from References that are synthesized from the assigned article, course text, evidence-based and peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. A minimum of 3 resources are used. References must be current within 5 years. AACN competencies and sub-competencies must be clearly stated and appropriately applied.