Category: Nursing

Discussion Post Question: “Institutional Review Board is an important step in the research process. State the required components one should look for in a project to determine if IRB submission is needed. Discuss an example of a research study in one of your literature review articles that needed IRB approval, and describe why IRB approval was needed in this instance”.   The study to be referenced is attached. 

Select an article about a situation where a decision by a physician, insurance company,     government agency, or health institution adversely affected a patient or countermanded a patient’s wishes. It is recommended that you utilize the LIRN Library when conducting research for this paper.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper analyzing this article and considering the following.
The nurse’s role in affirming the patient’s wishes and risks involved
The social and economic consequences of reversing this decision
Guidance from the Code of Ethic for Nurses that sheds light on this situation
The lessons to be learned for similar future situations
The moral residue that haunts the nurse
Provide a bibliography of at least three references. The first should be the citation for the article you selected, and another is the Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements.

The body of your paper should be 3-4 pages long NOT including the title page and reference page. Papers that are more than 4 pages long will not be accepted
References – incorporate information from the course text plus a minimum of two (2) scholarly references published within the last five (5) years. Textbooks are not to be considered scholarly references.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Your source(s) should be integrated into the paragraphs. Use internal citations pointing to evidence in the literature and supporting your ideas. 
Headings are required.
Be sure to allow time for editing and proofreading. Budget your time to take advantage of Tutor.com services.
Discuss all aspects of healthcare coordination in context to the chosen diagnosis.
Your paper must include the following:
Identifying a chronic health condition listed on the CMS websiteLinks to an external site. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/enrollment-renewal/special-needs-plans/chronic-conditions
*PMHNP students should select a population focused chronic condition (i.e., Depression, Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders, etc. from this list).
Description of the health issue chosen from the CMS website.
The incidence and prevalence of this condition in the US.
How the condition is diagnosed, monitored, and treated in individuals with this condition?
Description of the interdisciplinary team that will participate in coordinating care. Specifically, define the role of the APRN in management and coordination.  
Can care teams use the CCCR model? Think in terms of systems and complexity reflective thinking. If not, name another model to help manage care?
What is the cost of managing this disease in the county you live? Download the CMS Excel to determine the cost of the condition in context to the state and county. Use the CMS link below:
Spending County Level: All Beneficiaries, 2007-2018 (ZIP)Links to an external site. (ATTACHED BELOW)
What resources are available to help manage the costs of care related to this condition?
Identify barriers or challenges that you foresee for patients and care teams. How can barriers be overcome?
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Rubric
NURS 682 – Chronically Ill Patient Paper
NURS 682 – Chronically Ill Patient Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Content
30 to >27.6 pts
Proficient
Description leaves the reader with a “holistic” picture of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, and current plan of care.
27.6 to >24.6 pts
Acceptable
Description demonstrates a good understanding of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, and current plan of care.
24.6 to >20.7 pts
Needs Improvement
Description demonstrates a fair understanding of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, and current plan of care.
20.7 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Description demonstrates no understanding of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, and current plan of care.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinic Setting Content
30 to >27.6 pts
Proficient
Provides a rich and detailed description of the clinic setting, providers, and support staff. Description leaves the reader with a complete picture of the setting and patients and diagnoses typically seen.
27.6 to >24.6 pts
Acceptable
Provides a good description of the clinic setting, providers, and support staff. Description leaves the reader with a good picture of the setting and patients and diagnoses typically seen.
24.6 to >20.7 pts
Needs Improvement
Provides a fair description of the clinic setting, providers, and support staff. Description leaves the reader with a fair picture of the setting and patients and diagnoses typically seen.
20.7 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Provides no description of the clinic setting, providers, and support staff. Description leaves the reader with no picture of the setting and patients and diagnoses typically seen.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCare Coordination Model Content
20 to >18.4 pts
Proficient
Provides a rich and detailed description of the care coordination model proposed. Description is accurate and thorough demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the care model.
18.4 to >16.4 pts
Acceptable
Provides a good description of the care coordination model proposed. Description is accurate and mostly thorough demonstrating a good understanding of the care model.
16.4 to >13.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Provides a fair description of the care coordination model proposed. Description is generally accurate demonstrating a fair understanding of the care model.
13.8 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Provides no description of the care coordination model proposed. Description is inaccurate demonstrating a lack of understanding of the care model.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
20 to >18.4 pts
Proficient
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and of how the care model will be effective for patients exhibiting similar diagnoses and how the care model will fit into the clinic setting described. Provides an insightful explanation of what will need to change in the clinic setting to improve the fit.Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a rich and detailed explanation to the questions.Provides an in-depth, critical analysis appropriately connecting findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings.
18.4 to >16.4 pts
Acceptable
Demonstrates a good understanding of how the care model will be effective for patients exhibiting similar diagnoses and how the care model will fit into the clinic setting described. Provides an insightful explanation of what will need to change in the clinic setting to improve the fit.Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a rich and detailed explanation to the questions. Provides a fairly in-depth, critical analysis connecting many findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings.
16.4 to >13.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Demonstrates a fair understanding of how the care model will be effective for patients exhibiting similar diagnoses and how the care model will fit into the clinic setting described. Provides an insightful explanation of what will need to change in the clinic setting to improve the fit.Demonstrates a fair understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a rich and detailed explanation to the questions. Provides a somewhat critical analysis connecting some findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings.
13.8 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Demonstrates a lack of understanding of how the care model will be effective for patients exhibiting similar diagnoses and how the care model will fit into the clinic setting described. Provides an insightful explanation of what will need to change in the clinic setting to improve the fit.Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a rich and detailed explanation to the questions. Provides no critical analysis connecting findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-based Research
10 to >9.2 pts
Proficient
Supplements the paper with relevant and appropriate research; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information.
9.2 to >8.2 pts
Acceptable
Supplements the paper with relevant and somewhat thorough research; generally, correctly documents all sources of information.
8.2 to >6.9 pts
Needs Improvement
Supplements the paper with little relevant research into the present: not all sources of information are clearly and thoroughly documented.
6.9 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not supplement the paper with relevant research; does not appropriately document all sources of information.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Mechanics
10 to >9.2 pts
Proficient
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
9.2 to >8.2 pts
Acceptable
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
8.2 to >6.9 pts
Needs Improvement
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.
6.9 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.
10 pts
Total Points: 120
PreviousNext

Introduction – Capture the reader’s attention (ex., Grabbing statistics) and introduce the rationale for selecting the specific nursing theory for your area of nursing (Psychiatry) over other nursing theories (Do not write in the first person; Include a purpose statement of what you will describe in the paper as the last sentence of the introductory paragraph.) Next, begin the Body of Paper.
Theory Description (Level 1 Header) Briefly describe the theory. Give an overview of the theory’s purpose, scope, concepts, structure, and unique focus.
Rationale (Level 1 Header) -Discuss the rationale for selecting the theory for implementation in your specific practice setting. (Do not use first person)
Implementation Plan (Level 1 Header) – Describe a plan to implement the theory in your area of practice for your entire department or organization.
Barriers to Implementation (Level 1 or 2 Header, your choice) – Discuss potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan and how to overcome these barriers and challenges.
Conclusion (Level 1 Header) – Conclusion paragraph with concluding statements to summarize the content and re-state or re-phrase the original purpose statement.
Resources – Please be sure to support your paper with in-text citations.
Please build the paper off the attached document. 

Macee Perry
Jun 23, 2024 at 2:39 AM
Amalgamte, a professional organization as a nurse leader, presents abundant growth opportunities. Professional organizations are an influential platform for networking with peers and industry leaders. Attending conferences or conventions allows nurse leaders to engage with illustrious experts in the healthcare professional world, facilitating potential collaborations, mentorships, and career advancement. These connections expand knowledge and offer crucial support in navigating the complexities of the ever-evolving healthcare landscape.
Active participation in a professional organization is not just beneficial for nurse leaders, it is instrumental. It enables you to remain informed, connected, and influential in shaping the future of nursing practice and healthcare policy. This active engagement enhances your ability to drive positive change within your organizations and communities and plays a crucial role in strengthening your leadership capabilities. Ultimately, this collective effort, including your potential contribution, contributes to improving patient outcomes and advancing the nursing profession as a whole.
Likewise, nurse leaders collaborating within professional organizations possess a unified and influential voice. In cooperation, they advocate for healthcare policy changes and advancements. In addition to shaping policy decisions and addressing systemic healthcare issues, these organizations empower nurse leaders to champion initiatives that benefit both patients and healthcare professionals, ultimately making a tangible impact in the industry. Your voice, as part of this collective effort, can make a significant difference.
Moreover, professional organizations provide access to continuous education and training, including cutting-edge webinars, workshops on best practices in nursing and healthcare, and robust leadership development programs. This ongoing learning promotes professional growth and ensures that nurse leaders remain at the forefront of their field.

TOPIC: Health Literacy
Physical considerations: Low health literacy can lead to poor health outcomes and
difficulty managing chronic diseases.
Psychosocial considerations: Low health literacy can cause emotional distress,
anxiety, and depression.
Cultural considerations: Cultural beliefs and practices may influence an individual’s
health literacy.
Community resources: Health literacy programs, patient education materials, and
health navigators can provide resources and support for individuals with low health
literacy. 
Develop a 3-4 page preliminary care coordination plan for a selected health care               problem. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this health care   problem. Identify and list available community resources for a safe and effective                continuum of care.
Document Format and Length
Your preliminary plan should be an APA scholarly paper, 3–4 pages in length.
Remember to use active voice, this means being direct and writing            concisely; as opposed to passive voice, which means writing with a             tendency to wordiness.
In your paper include possible community resources that can be used.
Be sure to review the scoring guide to make sure all criteria are addressed in your paper.
Study the subtle differences between basic, proficient, and distinguished.
Scenario
Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center. Your facility has always      had a dedicated case management staff that coordinated the patient plan of care, but     recently, there were budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated to   the inpatient setting. Care coordination is essential to the success of effectively                 managing patients in the community setting, so you have been asked by your nurse        manager to take on the role of care coordination. You are a bit unsure of the process, but  you know you will do a good job because, as a nurse, you are familiar with difficult tasks.   As you take on this expanded role, you will need to plan effectively in addressing the          specific health concerns of community residents.
To prepare for this assessment, you may wish to:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you                understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Allow plenty of time to plan your chosen health care concern.
TO BE SUCESSFUL
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the   following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused            factors.
Analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health       improvement.
Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.
Describe specific goals that should be established to address a selected  health care problem.
Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective                   continuum of care.
Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead     patient-centered care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Please answer the following Discussion Question. Your post must have 3 references for full credit. Also, please ensure to have read the assigned chapters for the current week. 
Career Planning and Development in Nursing:
Mapping the Nursing Journey: Why is proactive career planning crucial in nursing, and how does it influence long-term professional outcomes?
Diverse Nursing Pathways: What are some of the diverse career paths and opportunities available to nurses today?
The Learning Continuum: How do continuous education, certifications, and nursing specialties play pivotal roles in career advancement?
Building Professional Bridges: Discuss the importance of mentorship and networking in nursing. How do they shape career trajectories?
Self-Assessment and Vision: How can self-assessment exercises aid nurses in identifying their career goals and potential future directions?

This essay is based on the information of a previous paper. 
I can provide the previous paper. 
Please see the attached requirements. 

Economics 
1. Please use country Norway only and answer questions. How does this SDOH impact health outcomes in each country? Is one system more effective than the other at addressing this SDOH, and why? What changes need to occur to create improvement? What discipline is making the most impact and why do you think this is? Include other information that you find pertinent.
2. Describe why the resource enhances or is important to the content. Use bold heading for organization 
3 .Reminder to include graphics for each section [Inforgraphics, Diagrams, Photos, YouTubes, Web Sites etc., Describe and Reference Them

I have attached the grading rubric, guiding questions and the original paper to use as a reference to write this paper
Negotiating budgets and communicating financial needs to stakeholders are vital skills for nurse leaders. Given today’s numerous constraints on funding and a highly competitive environment, the ability to win support for your budget proposals hinges on being able to present a compelling argument based on well-documented needs, accurate financial information, and a justifiable business case.
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to examine the mission and goals of a health care organization, in order to justify a budget proposal. A persuasive argument requires thoughtful justification and rationale for the expenses required to support your proposal. A proposal that supports the organization’s mission and goals strengthens your argument and is much more likely to get you what you need.
In every health care organization, dollars are scarce and the budget process is carefully scrutinized at every level. Nurse leaders must be business-savvy. They must be able to make a compelling case for why every budget line item and every dollar on a budget supports the mission and goals of the unit and the organization. This means that nurse leaders must be able to think in terms of the business of health care and be able to present a business proposal or plan with thorough and thoughtful justification and rationale for expenses. The business plan should present accurate, factual data and costs, and should also be concise and clearly organized.
The financial department has reviewed your unit’s operating budget and has asked you to submit an executive summary that provides support for your budget proposal. Your challenge is to position your unit favorably within an environment of competing demands for limited funding.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Consider the operating budget you developed in Assessment 2.
How would you justify your budget to executive leaders?
How would you link your budget to the organization’s goals and objectives?
How would you propose to meet productivity goals while staying within budget?
The following resources are required to complete the assessment.
Note: The following requirements correspond to the grading criteria in the assessment scoring guide. Be sure that your executive summary addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Guiding Questions: Budget Negotiations and Communication [DOCX] Download Guiding Questions: Budget Negotiations and Communication [DOCX]to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
Write an executive summary of the operating budget you prepared in Assessment 2 that makes a compelling case for why funds should be allocated for your budget.
Outline a strategic plan that ensures profitability and fiscal success.
Present a plan to meet staff productivity goals, while staying within budget parameters.
Justify equipment and service costs.
Analyze department, unit, or project alignment with the organization’s mission and goals.
Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support your assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Design an operating budget that incorporates variances or discretionary spending.
Outline a strategic plan that ensures profitability and fiscal success.
Competency 2: Develop a plan for managing the labor force, within the parameters of the budget and productivity.
Present a plan to meet staff productivity goals, while staying within budget parameters.
Competency 4: Determine the equipment and services needed to maintain seamless patient or client care.
Justify equipment and service costs.
Competency 5: Apply financial principles to a strategic plan for achieving organizational goals and fiscal success.
Analyze department, unit, or project alignment with an organization’s mission and goals.
Competency 6: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support your assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.