Category: Medicine and Health

Cover page has only 
Title of paper, class, your full name, and date 
Abstract
150-200 words 
Introduction
1 paragraph that sums up the whole paper.
Results
7-10 high quality paragraphs that flow nicely (these should be 10 topics that you choose to talk about releated to the paper i will attach)
Include at least 3 figures and figure legend for each.
Conclusion
1 paragraph of your conclusion, it’s your thoughts .
References or Bibliography 
make sure that your citations are found in the  introduction and results.
Let me know if you have any questions .

All the information is all the files and also template provided 
All apa7 referencing and 0 ai information. 

Research articles that relate to legislation that has affected current healthcare policies such as: Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPPA), Affordable Care Act (ACA), Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA), Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), Paperwork Reduction Act
Develop a PPT presentation with at least 20 slides (1 with APA references) explaining the health policy and policy-making process. Discuss the roles nursing organizations have played in influencing policy as it relates to the health policy/legislation selected. Discuss how this policy has impacted the healthcare system. Include how nurses can become involved in policymaking. 

https://bit.ly/3SMxbbU
Read the above article. What is significant about the findings of this particular study, and how will this guide future studies? On a personal level, how will the findings influence your approach to exercise?
Note:
– Word count requirement is between 200 and 500 words
– Handwritten and image-based (jpg/png) answers will be immediately rejected
NO PLAGIARISM
Note: Answers must be 100% original. Any plagiarism will result in your application being rejected.
You should use your own words and ideas.
You may include quotes from outside sources that are up to one (1) sentence long only. All quotes must be cited with the appropriate format.
Paraphrasing outside sources without the respective citations and failing to add your own ideas is plagiarism. 
Taking your own ideas that are published elsewhere and not properly citing them is plagiarism.
Copying text generated by artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is plagiarism.
Must pass https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector

Write approximately 50 page bachelors thesis,
I have attached a image of a format to follow as well as a guided book to refer too 
Below is the general idea in Capitals and just 
underneath is the specific question. 
If you have any other ideas for a better suited question you can make your own changes 
Ethical Considerations and Processes in Medically Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia A Comprehensive Analysis of the Legal and Medical Perspectives, with an Emphasis on European Practices
How do European practices of medically assisted suicide and euthanasia reflect the complex interplay of ethical, legal, and medical considerations?

Research article written in a style suitable for publication in a peer reviewed journal. This assessment accounts for 70% of the module mark
The word count for the research article is 6000 words.
Assesses learning outcomes 1-4
o Demonstrate knowledge of relevant literature and of research methods in order to identify areas for investigation and to develop a feasible research plan relevant to the programme of study- DIABETES
You must include a cover page with your signed declaration (Appendix A).
Assessment Requirements, Submission Deadlines & Details
Assessment 1
o Develop personal research skills  through use of
academic literature, data collection and data analysis in order to undertake a Master’s
level research dissertation
o Synthesise findings from your own research with the research and scholarship of others. o Critically discuss the completed project highlighting the strengths, limitations and
implications for future study and/or investigation
The formatting of the research article should conform to the following guidelines:
Font style – Calibri (Body) (the same as this document)
Font size – size 10 for the main text. The font size for tables/figures should be slightly smaller, size 9.
Line spacing – single line spacing
Columns – the main text should be formatted into two columns (apart from the title, abstract,
tables and figures)
Page numbers – pages should be included as per the style of the BMC journal relevant to your programme
introduction (around 1500 words)
The main purpose of this section, as well as providing a concise critical review of the literature relevant to your research study, is to provide a clear rationale or purpose for the research that you have done.
The introduction should provide background that puts the article into context and allows readers outside the field to understand the purpose and significance of your research. You should define the problem you are addressing and why it is important. You should include a brief review of the literature that is key to your research area and note any relevant gaps in this current research area. The introduction should be concluded with a clear statement of the purpose of the research and the research question(s) should be clearly identified.
The introduction should essentially achieve the following:
Summarize existing research
Promote the need for your study by pointing out deficiencies in existing research.
Methods (around 1000 words)
The purpose of this section is to provide sufficient methodological information so that anyone who chooses to can evaluate the appropriateness (or validity) of your methods or can easily replicate it.
The Methods section should:
Tell the reader exactly what you have done;
Convince the reader that what you did was correct, i.e. it should clarify issues of validity, reliability, and describe widely accepted measurement techniques and protocols.
In order to aid clarity, it is important to arrange this information into sub-sections with subheadings. The methods section of a research article should be written in the past tense. Refer to previously published research articles methods sections for further guidance.
It is a good idea to ask someone who has no knowledge of your research to read this section. If it is detailed enough, the naïve reader should be able to exactly replicate your research.
Results (around 1000 words)
The results section should describe the results of your experiments. This section is normally supported by relevant figures and tables and includes clear empirical statements of your results
28
analysis. Again, put yourself in the position of the reader. This section must contain sufficient detail to enable full understanding of the results, allowing a clear conclusion to be made.
The data should be presented in logical sequence which follows the logical progression of your research – subheadings are encouraged to structure the results section.
Remember that you should only show data once, in the form of a graph or table and not in both graph and table form. As a general rule do not merely insert either tables or graphical material directly from SPSS – recast these in Word (tables) or Excel/Prism (graphical material) with a focus on the relevant material. If using Graphpad Prism software, graphs are easily exportable directly into your article, or can be saved as an image for use.
Tables should have a table, placed above the table
Figures should have a figure legend provided below the figure
Tables/ figures should not overlap pages
The research article should include summary tables and figures as appropriate. It is recommended that no more than six tables/figures be included. Remember that multiple figures can be combined as one figure that is split into a number of parts (A, B, C etc.), but the information presented should be related.
Although it is imperative that you accompany each table/figure with a text explanation, you must not go beyond an objective explanation. The results section is not the place to interpret or discuss your findings. It is not sufficient to merely refer to the table as in: The results of the analysis are shown in Table 1. Thus, you should highlight the main features of the results in your text, but do not attempt to interpret them (leave this for your discussion). It is important that you refer to the relevant figure/table within the main text.
Discussion (around 1700 words)
This section provides the opportunity to `make sense’ of your data in relation to previous research and your specific research question(s). The discussion is an important to section which allows you to demonstrate to the reader/marker that you can interpret the results correctly and that you understand the research undertaken.
The discussion section that allows you to put your work into a wider context; a description of each table and graph, which you included in the results section, is unlikely to be sufficient for a pass grade. You must attempt to synthesize your results and relate them to previous work – if the research was worth reviewing in the introduction, it is worth mentioning it again with respect to your findings.
Begin the discussion with a summary of the major findings (in relation to the aims of the study). Then proceed to explain systematically individual findings and support your discussion with relevant literature. In general, you should endeavor to determine whether the results:
answer your research question
are consistent with what other researchers have found in this area. If they differ, why might
this be so?
29
are likely to be due to any methodological shortcomings or flaws in the study;
have implications or applications for existing and/or future research.
You should write in an appropriately succinct style; this may be the section that lets you down. If you have relied too much on published work for the introduction, you may find it difficult to maintain the same style. You should aim to relate the findings of your study to most, if not all, the research evaluated in the introduction.
If you have followed the ‘hour-glass’ model of report writing, you will recall that the introduction became increasingly focused and ended with the hypotheses. The discussion should show a reversal of this pattern and begin with a statement emphasizing the primary findings of your study and whether or not the hypotheses were supported. The discussion should then become broader as these findings are discussed in relation to research that was reviewed in the introduction. Secondary findings (if appropriate) should also be discussed in a similar manner.
Do not worry if your findings are not consistent with those published previously. It is more important that you make an attempt to explain any inconsistencies; after all you are likely to have carried out your research under somewhat different conditions from that which was published. Inconsistencies with no explanation will be viewed somewhat negatively.
Limitations of your study should then be addressed along with implications these may have for your results (you may have begun to do this when explaining why your findings are not consistent with previous research in the area).
You should then make some recommendations for future research.
Conclusion (as a guide – 350 words)
Your report should end with concluding statements about the research. Your conclusions should provide a synthesis of your key results interpretations, and how these are relevant in a wider context – you should provide a succinct explanation of the implications of your findings.

Overview
(pls make sure it’s not plagiarized as I will be using turnitin.com tysmmm) The researched argument is the final step in the writing process. For this assignment, you will pull on all of the course work you have completed thus far, bringing the pieces together into a final, polished project: a well-analyzed, well-supported, claim-driven essay. Also, you will need to locate and read at least one more source to help you build your argument. Thus, this argument will be supported by 6 sources. (Note: previous assignments needed only 5 sources.)
Expectations
The researched argument is your chance to showcase all of your hard work, as you demonstrate:
The ability to take a position in a persuasive, logic-driven manner.
The art of crafting a debatable claim and supporting it with logic-driven evidence
The skill of building a solid structure and foundation in support of the debatable claim
Consideration of the counterclaim, and a well-informed rebuttal The skill of source support via valid points and credible evidence
Requirements
Length: a minimum of 1500 words are required for this assignment. *If the minimum word count is not met, your assignment will be returned with no grade and a resubmission will be required. Sources: An MLA formatted Works Cited page and in-text (parenthetical) citations are required for this assignment. The Works Cited page should include at least 6 cited sources. As a reminder, sources cited on your “Works Cited” page must also be cited within your essay as in-text citations. You may use all, some or none of the sources you originally read to prepare for all of the other assignments in this course; however you must include evidence from 6 read and reviewed scholarly sources for this assignment. *If the minimum source count (6) is not met, your assignment will be returned with no grade and a resubmission will be required. Organization
The researched argument should include the following four components: Topic Introduction, Body, Conclusion, and Works Cited Page with at least 6 sources. Check out the table below for more information about the required content and conditions of each component:
Component
Content
Conditions
Topic Introduction
In drafting the introduction, consider including the following elements:
Start with an attention grabber or hook: an extremely poignant but simple-to-the-point story, an example, statistic, or historical context that introduces the essay’s topic. Then, give an overview of any issues involved with the subject. Define any key terminology needed to understand the topic. Quote or paraphrase sources revealing the controversial nature of the subject. Highlight background information on the topic needed to understand the direction of the paper
Your main claim, and in brief, the reasons supporting the claim. (1-2 sentences) Top Tip: Aim for at least six to eight sentences here, to allow for full forecasting of the rest of the essay. The thesis / main claim should be underlined. Top Tip: The thesis is the main claim!
Body
Clearly present the reasons in the order as listed with the main claim in paragraph 1.
Provide warrants to connect each reason; then, explore the reason with evidence.
You will want to bring up a counterargument and rebuttal with each noted reason.
Top Tip: Make sure to use strong transitions to help readers move more easily with you, from one idea (and one paragraph) to the next. Conclusion
Restate your claim. Attempt to not copy verbatim from the introduction.
Briefly summarize each “reason” found in the body of the paper.
End with a strong clincher statement: an appropriate, meaningful final sentence that ties the whole point of the essay together (you may want to refer back to the attention grabber or hook noted in paragraph 1)
Top Tip: You should plan to really grab the readers’ attention one last time here–to leave them with some final food for thought. Works Cited
Plan to include 6 sources here (and each source should also be cited directly in the essay, as in-text citations). Top Tip: As a reminder, sources cited on your “Works Cited” page should also be cited within your essay. You may use all, some or none of the sources you originally read to prepare for all of the other assignments in this course. Use sources that best help you to prove your thesis; this may mean choosing new, or some new, articles. Note: 6 sources minimum.
Document Format: MLA formatting: Heading (name, assignment name, course name, date), original title, header (page numbers), line-spacing (double-spaced), 1” margins, 12-point font size, and Times New Roman or other sans-serif font. Includes properly formatting in-text citations and the Works Cited page. (6 sources minimum.) The thesis should be underlined.

Research paper on sequale of operator syndrome and traumatic brain injuries in military personnel.
3 pages , apa format, double spaced, 1 peer reviewed source. 

A 1800 word, structured response answering the specific questions presented in the following case study.

Mrs. Garcia a 62 year old female with a history of chronic
gastritis presents today to your primary care office with complaints of
weakness, fatigue, burning sensation in the tongue, paresthesias to bilateral
lower extremities, and memory loss. Patient reports symptoms began more than 3
months ago. She admits to drinking 1 bottle of wine on a daily basis to “relax
her nerves”.
Patient Medical History:
Hypertension,  osteopenia, chronic gastritis
Review of Systems
Uses glasses for distance and reading. Hard of hearing.
Occasional episodes of short term memory loss.  Fatigue and short of
breath when laying down and with exertion at times.  She has occasional
palpitations. Reports her bowel movements are normal and denies any melena or
blood in the stool.
Screenings:
Mammogram and colonoscopy are up to date and were all
unremarkable. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan shows osteopenia.
Surgical History:
Denies any surgical procedures.
Allergies:
NKDA
Medications:
Omeprazole 20 mg po daily  
Calcium carbonate (OsCal) with vitamin D twice daily
Physical Exam:
Appears disheveled, thin and frail. Skin is pale. Bilateral
conjunctivae appear pale. She is mildly short of breath at rest but in no
apparent pain or distress. She is 5 feet 2 inches tall and weighs 100 pounds.
The patient wears glasses for distance and reading. Her oropharynx is clear,
and her neck is supple. There is no lymphadenopathy. Lungs are clear. Heart:
S1-S2, Systolic 2+ murmur in the left MCL. The abdomen is soft, non-tender. BS
are positive x4 quadrants. No masses palpated. Decreased sensitivity to
bilateral lower extremities
Vital signs:
Blood pressure of 100/72 mm Hg; pulse 90 beats/minute;
temperature 97.4 degrees F; respirations 20 breaths/minute; and oxygen
saturation 93%.
Answer the following questions:
1.     What is your differential diagnosis?
2.     What is your working diagnosis?
You then order labs and these are the results on the subsequent
visit:
Complete Blood Count
RBC
3.2 million/microliter
Hemoglobin
10.5 g/dL
Hematocrit
32%
MCH
41 microliter
MCHC
42%
MCV
115
microliter                        
Leukocytes
5,700 cells/mcL
Serum iron
90 mcg/dL
Total iron binding capacity
300 mcg/dL      
Transferrin
250 mg/dL
Reticulocyte count
0.3%
Stool for occult blood
Negative (three samples)
Chemistry profile
Normal
Answer the following
questions:                                                                                                   
1.     Which lab values are normal, and which lab
values are abnormal?
2.     Explain the significance of each abnormal
result?
3.     What type of anemia does this patient most
likely have and what further lab(s) would you order to confirm your diagnosis?
4.     Discuss your treatment plan if the lab(s)
ordered to confirm the diagnosis are positive. (Be specific to your diagnosis).
5.     What is your follow up?
**Provide
References**