Category: Medicine

Develop a three-dimensional advocacy approach to provide nursing leadership for the healthcare, professional, and community arenas aimed at overcoming implicit bias.
Slide 1 – Assignment Title, Your Name, Course Code, and Faculty Name
Slide 2 – Provide a definition of implicit bias and its impact on healthcare disparities and organizational culture. Include your in-text citation.
Slide 3 – Provide a brief overview that highlights the importance of a nursing leadership approach for addressing implicit bias in the healthcare, professional, and community settings. Include your in-text citation.
Next, identify a specific area within the healthcare system where implicit bias may manifest, such as in patient-healthcare professional interactions, clinical decision-making, healthcare policy development, etc. From your nursing leadership mindset, conduct a comprehensive analysis of the impact of implicit bias on patient outcomes, provider/healthcare professional satisfaction, and organizational effectiveness. Slide 4 – Healthcare Dimension: Outline a strategic advocacy approach of initiatives to mitigate implicit bias within healthcare institutions. Such initiatives could include training programs, cultural competence education, diversity recruitment efforts, or other initiatives you identify in the literature, etc. Define the outcome(s) you anticipate these initiatives will result in. Include an in-text citation for the resource that supports each identified initiative.
Next, consider the role of the nursing leader in addressing implicit bias within professional settings including academic nursing education, professional nursing organizations, and the wide range of environments/organizations that professional nurses may participate in either direct or indirect care activities. Identify key areas where implicit bias may affect professional practice, professional development, and leadership opportunities.
Slide 5 – Professional Dimension: Propose advocacy strategies aimed at improving awareness, education, and accountability to combat implicit bias within the nursing profession. Such strategies could include diversity training, mentorship programs, policy advocacy, or other strategies you identify in the literature, etc. Define the outcome(s) you anticipate these strategies will result in. Include an in-text citation for the resource that supports each identified strategy.
Now examine the broader community context and identify instances where implicit bias may impact healthcare access, social determinants of health, and community relationships. Engage with community stakeholders, either directly or through a survey of the literature, to gain an understanding of their experiences with implicit bias. Slide 6 – Community Dimension: From your nursing leadership lens develop a community focused advocacy plan that addresses implicit bias through. Community level strategies could include development of community partnerships, community-based education programs, community policy or legislative initiatives, or other strategies you identify in the literature, etc. Define the outcome(s) you anticipate these strategies will result in. Include an in-text citation for the resource that supports each identified strategy.
Slide 7 – Provide a brief reflection on the potential synergies and challenges of implementing an integrated nursing leadership approach across the different dimensions (settings) described. Include an in-text citation if appropriate.
Slide 8 – Identify strategies for sustaining and evaluating the impact of your three-dimensional advocacy approach. Include an in-text citation if appropriate.
Include speaker notes for each slide to provide a greater depth/explanation of the slide content.

reviewing the literature to cover the motor performance characteristics in children with DDH including the weight bearing, physical activities, muscle strength, endurance, and postural stability

No unread replies.No replies.
Welcome to Week 9. This week we will review the “Assessment of Cognition and the Neurologic System”. You have a case study due this week on Assessing Neurologic Symptoms. I have assigned the case studies below. You will see the corresponding case study number next to your name. For this assignment you will create a focused/episodic note on your assigned case study. You will create all the missing information that is needed to develop the SOAP note. Then provide at least 5 differential diagnoses with rationales for each diagnosis.
You also have your final DCE which is a Head-to-Toe Comprehensive Physical Exam due this week. As per the syllabus and rubric, you must pass this assignment with a combined score of 80 or better (lab pass & documentation template) to pass the course. So please do not leave a section unanswered. Remember the physical exam goes under the objective section and the diagnoses are under the assessment section. If you are confused, please reach out to me. Please thoroughly document this comprehensive visit. If you attempt to use the SOAP format, be sure to include everything in each section. But I advise you to use the template provided to make sure you do not miss a section.
Please do not add any mnemonics, bullet points or write your entire note in bold. Points will be taken off if you continue to do this. Also do not write within normal limits in your physical exam or review of systems. You should write out the symptoms (ROS) or exam findings (Physical Exam).
We are nearing the end of the course. I am looking forward to everyone finishing strong. If you have any questions, please feel free to send me an email. If you have any missing assignments from week 7 or 8, please complete them now.
Have a great week!
Case Studies
Case Study 1: Facial Droop
22 year old african american female looks in the mirror and notices the left side of her mouth is slanted when she smiles. She notes she has had some headache off and on a few days. Her taste has decreased as well when she started brushing her teeth. CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS
Imagine not being able to form new memories. This is the reality patients with anterograde amnesia face. Although this form of amnesia is rare, it can result from severe brain trauma. Anterograde amnesia demonstrates just how impactful brain disorders can be to a patient’s quality of living. Accurately assessing neurological symptoms is a complex process that involves the analysis of many factors.
In this Case Study Assignment, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP notes have specific data included in every patient case.
With regard to the case study you were assigned:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
THE CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT
Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each. BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 9
Submit your Assignment. SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn1+last name+first initial.
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6512_Week_9_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Week_9_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsing the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template: · Create documentation or an episodic/focused note in SOAP format about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned. · Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for your case.
50 to >44.0 pts
Excellent
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response thoroughly and accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
44 to >38.0 pts
Good
The response accurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
38 to >32.0 pts
Fair
The response follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. The response provides evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness or inaccuracy in the evidence selected.
32 to >0 pts
Poor
The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each.
35 to >29.0 pts
Excellent
The response lists five distinctly different and detailed possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the five conditions selected.
29 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response lists four to five different possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides an accurate justification for each of the five conditions selected.
23 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response lists three to four possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or some inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justification for each.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response lists three or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justification for each condition selected.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
NB
MUST HAVE AT LEAST 3 REFERENCES IN APA
DO NOT TAKE UP THIS PAPER IF YOU ARE NOT KNOWLEDGEABLE IN MEDICINE OR ADVANCED HEALTH ASSESSMENTS

Attached you will find instructions for this analytical project. I am requesting a research paper on the benefits of utilizing Life Scan Wellness Centers for law enforcement personnel. Information on this service is located at www.lifescanwellness.com. People who have chosen a career field in law enforcement often have higher mortality rate and an increase in heart disease, cancer, etc. With the utilization of preventative medicine, there is significant benefits in the use of Life Scan.

The student must write a 750-1000 word case study paper that is relevant to Human Anatomy and Physiology on subjects related to humans with respect to a disease, syndrome or malady, particularly related to conditions associated with Human A&P body systems. Please see the preferred listed topics in Canvas. If there is a specific disease or condition that the student may have a special interest in studying, please consult the
professor for permission to use this topic. The report should be up-to-date and referenced with in-text citations in APA format which includes 12 point, Times New Roman font, double-spacing and should include a cover
page in APA format.
In order to complete the requirements, the following steps and information are needed:
1) Select a topic as soon as possible.
2) The report should have a title page which includes your name, class, time of class and subject.
3) Research relevant and up-to-date articles about the subject by going to the library or searching online.
DO NOT use encyclopedias or books older than published in 2000. DO NOT use magazines typically
found on the supermarket shelves. DO NOT use journal articles from magazines such as “Science”,
“Science News”, “Scientific American”, “Nature”, “Preventive Medicine” or other health or medical
research journals.
4) It is suggested that your write a rough draft of your paper. In writing a scientific report, use facts and
present your information as directly as possible without much flowery descriiptions.
5) Have at least FIVE sources of information and cite the references to these sources including authors,
title of reference article, book publisher and year of publication. These reference sources should be listed
together at the end of the paper and the reference cited in your report as with the author’s names, a comma and the year of publication (e.g., Thomas, 1999; Thomas & Simons, 2005; Thomas, Simons & Trent, 2008). If using a website, please indicate the URL of the website.
Please DO NOT use Wikipedia as a source or reference. You may use a maximum of three (3) references from the
Internet—two (2) sources must come from other publications. If you interview someone, this will count
as one reference source.
****PLEASE DO NOT USE AI, NO PLAGERISM PLEASE*******

Qualitative research appraisal on provided article. The appraisal mus be based on the reporting quality of the article, marked against the reporting quality guide criteria given. please make sure this can get a high distinction.

– one paragraph about bladder cancer , its rank among other types of cancer , incidence and mortality rate world wide , then in Saudi Arabia , gender affect ( more common in male or female ) add numbers .
– types and how diagnostic , available treatments for bladder cancer the start to Criticize their negativity ( side effects , complication )
– new technique using protein in treat cancers
Please use new articles as much as you can ( not more 8 years ) and only use articles journal

Instructions:
For this assignment, you will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation and submit it to this discussion forum for peer review and grading. Please follow these instructions:
1. Select a relevant and complex healthcare ethical dilemma facing APRNs.
2. Conduct an in-depth exploration of the literature on the ethical dilemma you have selected.
3. Identify Stakeholders relevant to the selected dilemma and explore their individual perspectives.
Presentation Requirements
Your presentation needs to include the following:
1. Introduction:
1. Provide an overview of healthcare ethics and its importance in the healthcare field.
2. Introduce the selected dilemma and its relevance to ethical problem-solving.
2. Ethical Problem Analysis:
1. Discuss the ethical principles, applying relevant theories or frameworks as appropriate.
2. Analyze the conflicting values and perspectives of the stakeholders.
3. Conclusion:
1. Summarize the main points discussed in the presentation.
Maintain the principles of an effective presentation including, readability, text, and design. The notes section should be used to further explore your subject matter.
**SPEAKER NOTES ARE REQUIRED** @ 100 words per slide

Please use the case below to write the assignment. I attached two examples below. Please follow the instructions and everything written in the instructions and guidelines files. Thanks

please write the modelling of COVID 19 in the middle east this assignment. please expalin in detalies i will provide powerpoint in this modelling . please keep in mind this litarture review.