Category: Leadership

There
are approximately 20 Leadership styles that are identifiable and defined. For this assignment
there are 15 styles of leadership in the attached document. The first 7 are
done for you to use as a guide and example. Define the characteristics of the
remaining 8 and include the pros and cons for each. Share which of these styles
best describe your preferred way to lead. Include the following: Do you believe
your leadership style is effective? What is your measure of effectiveness? What
areas of your leadership would you change or believe have room for growth? What
are the pros and cons of functioning in more than one leadership style?

what is the leadership qualities found in these countries that made it successful on a primary secondary and Tertiary health system. critical thinking discuss leadership requirement in each country and how can Saudia Arabia health system learn from it ?
referencing has to be Harvard style
and it’s UK English

This paper can’t be formal because is like a reflection of my own experience in this class. 
– Also i’m an internationka student. My teacher know that i don’t speak formal so, the words and vocabulary needs to be kept as simple as possible. no complicated or hard words as my english is not thatb good. 
* I’m going to upload some notes from the class and a draft from the paper that i kind of started but couldn’t finish. 

STRUCTURE:  A paper should have:  1.  Title page,  2. Introduction, 3. Body, 4. Analytical conclusion and 5.  Reference list.
Title page: All papers are to have a page that specifies the title of the paper, student name, course name/number, section, and instructor’s  See the example below.
Introduction: The introduction states the thesis and gives an overview of the paper.
Body: Presentation of the main points of the paper, documents evidence, presents  data, and/or details argument.
Analytical Conclusion: Presents a summary of the main points of argument and critique. Do not neglect this section as it is very important to give  your ideas and to finalize the thesis argument.
References: A paper must have references from books, journals, Internet and other sources. At least 3 references for each page.   This is a total count on average. (One page may have one citation and another 5 citations.) Other’s ideas and words must be referenced.  Only list sources actually used in the paper (This is not a bibliography). At least 2-3 references should be cited per page. Avoid repeated citations of the same reference; find parallel references. This is a major grade issue; as the quality/quantity of your references documents your evidence. It is your “proof”. Two-thirds of your references should be from scholarly sources. Do not list references not cited or used.  NB: remember the number of references is  a total (for a meta-analytical paper) and would be references actually used in the paper.  This does not mean that all of the references would be on your specific narrowed topic.  In fact probably only one third would be on the narrowed topic. The remainder would be in the general topic or comparisons with other related topics. References/citations are used  as evidence as well as to help narrow your topic. There will be a number of references/citations at the beginning of the paper to define key words, refine theory, or focus attention. For example, if your paper were on the use of Ritalin for attention deficit-hyperactivity in children under the age of three, this is your narrowed topic.  Definitions of ADHD, diagnosis, rate, prevalence, causes, and treatment would be outside your narrowed interest.  References/citations allow you to efficiently  and briefly summarize these topics so that you can focus your analysis on children under three.  Likewise, comparisons with children/persons of different ages may be used and cited as part of the analytical process. If a different method (experimental, case study, observation, etc.) is used, then the number of references would be proportionately adjusted.  If ¼ of your paper is empiricial method, then references/citations would be reduced ¼ from the 30+ requirement.

Conduct your research. (Your observation hours are your “research”) – feel free to use your past leadership observations essays to help you remember what you observed.
Brainstorm a list of similarities and differences. (A 3 Circle Venn Diagram may help – https://www.educationworld.com/tools_templates/venn_diagram_templates.shtmlLinks to an external site.)
Write your thesis. This will be based on what you have discovered regarding the weight of similarities and differences between the things you are comparing.
Write the body of your paper. There are two main approaches to organizing a comparative analysis:
Alternating (point-by-point) method: Find similar points between each subject and alternate writing about each of them.
Block (subject-by-subject) method: Discuss all of the first subject and then all of the second, then the third

Please see attachment:
Leadership Practicum B Final Assignment: Final Leader Development Paper
(5-6 pages, 12-point font, double space, you may answer question by question or essay format)
1
Part I: Insight and Reflection (approximately 4 pages double spaced)
a. About YOU
Having completed this year of the Leadership Practicum, you have pursued different
kinds of self-awareness (values, emotions, strengths, body) through a variety of
techniques (feedback, reflection, embodied awareness, discussion, assessment, etc.)
Discuss briefly one thing you have learned about yourself during this course that you did
not know, or were not aware of, before. How does this insight change you and factor
into your own leadership development?
b. About LEADERSHIP
We have also explored various capabilities required of leadership and the underlying
factors that make people more or less effective in these capabilities.
Discuss briefly one thing you have learned about the practice of leadership through our
discussions, readings, and assignments. What does this insight mean for you personally
as you develop leadership?
c. About your PURPOSE
Consider the presentation you gave on our last day of class as well as your preparation
for that class. What led you to choose your topic and how connected did you feel to
your larger purpose? What was connecting about it (or not connecting)?
Consider when in the last three months have you felt most connected to your larger
purpose. Describe the moment. Return to that moment, access memories, senses etc.
Where were you, what people were you with, what were you doing? What was it about
that moment that made you feel so connected? What most connects you with your
sense of purpose?
What can you do to create or access this sense of purpose in your daily life? (Note: you
can connect to it through your behaviors/tasks/jobs, and you can also connect to it
through a symbol or ritual that keeps you reminded of your purpose)
How does your unique sense of larger purpose influence what you want to do in terms
of your leadership development?  

Write a professional essay in two (2) parts.
Part 1: Write a paragraph (255 words) addressing all of the below topics:
What would be the motivation for participating in a professional leadership
program that develops participants’ essential leadership skills and develops agile leaders?
Interest in leadership development to
cultivate and nurture aspiring leaders
The importance of having a commitment to public service
Identify and discuss the benefits/assets a good leader would bring to an aspiring professional leadership program
What can be gained by
participating in a professional leadership program whose goal is to help enhance leadership skills
Part 2: Write a paragraph (145 words) answering, “What are your professional long-term goals?” if I am a supervisor with an advanced technical degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math looking to retire in 15 years. I desire to continue enhancing my leadership skills and love giving back to the community. I have worked in the private industry and the government. I believe you are never too old to learn and grow.

You have been hired by a data centre developer to lead a small scheduling team. The company you work for has constructed 4 DCs over the last 4 years, but has now committed to deliver 20 DCs over the next 4 years.
The design, procurement, and construction teams will be challenged to meet the ramp up in workload and this presents a cultural shift for the organisation as it expands. On time delivery is key and delays have the potential to impact your organisation’s customers.
Your objective is to provide best practice planning & scheduling across the portfolio of projects.  how you would approach this scenario. Include any assumptions or constraints your approach is based on. Please consider:
·       What steps would you take?
·       What would you implement at project level? How would you implement it?
·       What would you implement at portfolio level? How would you implement it?
·       Is there anything you’d like to emphasise in your approach as a point of difference?
·       Are there any new technologies that can be included in your approach?