Category: Leadership

  • Title: Effective Strategies for Managing Conflict during Organizational Change

    conflict can be linked to differences in beliefs, ideas, or standards, then resolution, as discussed in Chapter 22, of the conflict must result in a change of beliefs, ideas, or standards, or the conflict does not resolve. Change in any organization creates conflict to some extent.  Please locate an article in the literature supporting effective change in an organization. Summarize the article and why you believe it was effective. What strategies did they utilize? How do you, as a leader, reduce conflict due to organizational change? Insert a link to the article, or attach it as a PDF to share with your classmates attach link to article no blogs link just be functional if cannot post link pdf is acceptable

  • “Reflecting on My Journey: From Resume to Aspirations” Reflecting on My Journey: From Resume to Aspirations As I sit down to reflect on my journey from creating my resume to setting my aspirations, I am filled with a

    Write a well-structured and introspective reflection paper.
    Instructions will be provided, as well as a resume and aspirations papers to provide proper background information.

  • The Importance of Followership in Public Safety: An Assessment of Skills and Development Opportunities

    Followership is a complement to leadership. In all organizations, leadership is not just the responsibility of the leader. Likewise, followership is not just the responsibility of followers. Followers are integral to organizational failures and successes. Leaders establish the vision and then inspire followers to action. However, the vision cannot be realized without the work of followers. Leadership cannot occur without committed followership.
    Read the following article:
    Reynolds, B. (2015). Why followership is as important as police leadership. Law Enforcement Today.
    Based on the course readings and your own research on followership, describe the concept of followership in detail and how the concept of followership can be effectively applied in a public safety environment.
    Conduct an assessment of your followership skills by answering Reynolds (2015) questions. Provide a specific example of how you engage in followership as you answer the questions:
    Do your leaders believe that you are a valuable member of the team? Are you actively engaged in the goals of your leader and the organization, and do you seek to provide usefulness to your work unit?
    Do you actively display behaviors that show your commitment to the organization? Regardless of your personal views or self-interest, do you provide the same level of support and commitment towards organizational goals that you would expect from your own followers?
    Are you able to transition from a leadership role to a followership role with ease, and with an equal amount of enthusiasm for both roles?
    Do you believe that you have to be a good follower before you can be a good leader? Do you recognize that by actively seeking to improve your followership skills, you are also improving your ability as a leader?
    Be thorough in your response to the questions. How do you assess your followership abilities? What can you do to develop your followership skills?
    The entire paper should be at least three (3) pages, double-spaced, using 12-point fonts. The paper must include the details addressing each of the elements described above.
    The paper should be formatted in accordance with APA 7th Edition requirements to include a title page and a reference page listing no less than three (3) academic or professional references in addition to any course materials or references already provided. Make sure to cite all references in accordance with APA 7th Edition requirements. It is not necessary to include an abstract for this assignment.

  • Title: Crisis Communication Response Plan for a Global Nonprofit

    This is a 3 part project so should be submitted in 3 parts:
    Part I- 3 Pages
    Part II- 2 Pages
    Part III- 2 Pages
    Appendix-1 page
    In this module, you will complete a three-part Assignment that is submitted over the course of 3 weeks. This week, you will complete and submit Part 1. You will complete and submit Part 2 in Week 10 and Part 3 in Week 11.
    For this Assignment, you are a member of the executive team for a global nonprofit aimed at improving health and reducing child mortality rates in the developing world. Funding for the organization comes primarily from private donors (mainly in the U.S. and Canada) and through foundation grants. You have just learned that a shipment of straw-type personal water filters provided (but not manufactured by) your organization have been found to be defective. These filters are widely distributed by your organization in areas with contaminated water supplies and have proven highly effective at reducing instances of water-borne infections caused by bacteria and parasites. However, reports are coming in of increased illness rates from contaminated water in the areas where this shipment was distributed.
    You have been asked, as a member of a quickly convened crisis response team, to outline a crisis communication response plan for the organization with an accompanying rationale (with appropriate academic and professional resources to support your report) that will be reviewed by the CEO, Mary Stevenson. Your communications report should be 7–10 pages in total (3–4 pages for Part 1, 2–3 pages for Part 2 and 2-3 pages for Part 3), not including title page, references page, and appendix (with your completed Stakeholder Worksheet).

  • Title: “Resolving Workplace Conflict: A Case Study and Critique” Conflict Resolution in the Workplace: A Case Study and Critique Introduction: In any workplace, conflicts are bound to arise due to differences in opinions, personalities, and

    Conflict resolution has many avenues of resolution. Utilize the textbook for the following situation. Describe a conflict, either real or fictitious, from your workplace and how it was handled. Describe who was involved. Critique the handling of the conflict and how you would approach it differently.  Use techniques outlined in the textbook as well as from the literature and describe at least 3 techniques or strategies. 

  • Title: Servant Leadership in Action: A Case Study of XYZ Nonprofit Organization

    Using the topic study materials, research a reputable nonprofit organization that serves people and the community as a servant leader.
    Create a 3-6-slide PowerPoint presentation, then record your 5-7-minute presentation using YouTube video or Loom that illustrates how the nonprofit organization you chose puts servant leadership into action.
    The content slides should provide detailed speakers notes that include supporting examples and citations. The detailed speaker’s notes will serve as verbatim transcript of the audio portion of your video that will cover the following:
    Specific information about the servant leadership principles employed by the organization
    Examples of how implementing servant leadership principles has helped the organization achieve success while having a positive impact on people and the community.
    Explanation of which servant leadership principles you recognize as most valuable and would consider integrating within your own organization.
    Use a minimum of two resources to strengthen and support your claims. Each section of your presentation should include in-text citations. 
    On the title slide of your PowerPoint presentation, provide the link to the YouTube or Loom video recording that you created
    APA format is not required, but solid academic writing with supporting citations and specific examples is expected.
    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

  • Title: Applying Normative Leadership Theory to a Decision-Making Case

    Step 1: Each team member rewatches the video lecture “M4V4: Normative Leadership Theory and Models” under Module 4 to get familiar with the Normative Leadership Theory. 
    Step 2: Each team member reads the following case, applies the Normative Leadership Theory, and post your own answers of the 9 questions following the case by Thursday, June 20. 
    Case: You are the Vice-President of Production in a small manufacturing company. Your plant is working close to capacity to fill current orders. Now you have just been offered a contract to manufacture components for a new customer. If the customer is pleased with the way you handle this order, additional orders are likely and they could become one of the company’s largest clients. You are confident that your production supervisors can handle the job, but it would impose a heavy burden on them in terms of rescheduling production, hiring extra workers, and working extra hours. How would you decide whether to accept the new contract?
    Applying the Normative Leadership Theory, what are your answers to the following questions in this case:
    How important is the technical quality of the decision (decision significance)?
    How important is team member commitment to this decision?
    Do you have sufficient information to make a high-quality decision?
    Is the problem well structured?
    If you were to make the decision by yourself, is it reasonably certain that team members would be committed to the decision?
    Do team members share the organizational goals to be attained in solving this problem?
    Is conflict among team members over preferred solutions likely?
    Do team members have sufficient information to make high-quality decisions?
    Based on your answers to these questions, what’s the best decision-making style for this case?

  • “Strategic Leadership: Insights from Interviews, Creation of a Hybrid Model, and Personal Reflection” “Word Count and Plagiarism Guidelines for Academic Writing”

    Please consult the document named Individual Project Proposal for all necessary instructions. 
    Improvement Intervention Paper.
    As strategic leaders, we encounter daily challenges. If we are not strategic leaders, we use the leaders in our environment as touchstones to determine whether we want to emulate them. To be more effective leaders, knowledge of strategic leaders’ character, competencies, and actions is critical. With this in mind, you are asked to do the following: Part 1: Determining Strategic Leaders’ Views of Leadership In 2,500-3,000 words:
    1. Conduct a short interview (10 questions) with 2 leaders/managers in your workplace (place interview questions in appendix); 2. Ensure that you ask their opinions on the following: (questions must cover a-h) : a. Evolving Leadership Realities; b. The role of strategic leadership competencies in executing their leadership functions. c. The role of Ethics and Value in Leadership; d. Which theory/theories of leadership do they practice? e. What leadership attributes do they consider the most critical given their work environment? f. What symbols do they use to represent a successful strategic leader? g. What is their understanding of the interactional framework for analysing leadership? h. What is their strategy for dealing with conflict and negotiations? 3. Categorize the findings into themes (related to one or more theories) and use 3 to 5 scholarly peer-reviewed articles to justify the themes; the responses from the 2 interviews have to be looked at as ‘one’ and not separately to determine the themes that came out from the interviews. It must relate back to one or more leadership theories. coding into themes can be done via Nvivo or manually. 4. Create a concept map showing the connection of theories to the themes.
    Part 2: Design a Leadership Approach In 1,450-1,500 words: Based on the findings from the interview and your observations of the leaders. Do the following: 1. create a hybrid strategic leadership approach that would best suit your workplace; 2. create a definition of the hybrid model; 3. describe two examples of how it can be implemented in your workplace; and 4. substantiate this approach using 3 to 5 scholarly peer-reviewed literature. Part 3: Personal Framework Reflection (PFR) In 1,500-2,000 words: 1. Throughout the process, use journaling, memoing, bracketing, and reflexivity to document the experience; 2. Present the information in number 1 in your discussion and refer to it in the appendix; 3. While conceptualizing the assignment, what was your initial approach to planning and implementing it? 4. Re-read your journal and fieldnotes etc. and determine, based on the interviews and the creation of a hybrid strategic leadership model, whether a paradigm shift took place in your belief about strategic leadership. 5. At any time, throughout the process, did you experience cognitive dissonance, if yes, give an example, if no why not? 6. Use 3-5 scholarly peer-reviewed literature to substantiate what you are saying. Presentation of assignment • Your work should be typed on A4 or letter-sized paper, one side only, double-spaced with margins (at least one inch) on both sides of each page. • Use APA format for references. Please use this link to ensure that you adhere to APA 7TH edition format https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_a nd_style_guide/general_format.html • Pages should be numbered consecutively, including the references and/or appendices. • All sources appearing in your text must be cited in the “References”, in alphabetical order. • Each piece of work should have a cover sheet, showing your name, course code and title, an appropriate title of the assignment, course tutor, and submission date. • Avoid errors of punctuation and spelling. Keep your tense usage consistent. Check your work by using the spell checker and ask friends to proofread your completed work. • ANYONE WRITING LESS THAN THE EXPECTED WORD COUNT WILL BE PENALIZED. TWO MARKS WILL BE DEDUCTED FOR MORE THAN 10% LESS THAN THE REQUIRED AMOUNT. • ANYONE WRITING MORE THAN THE EXPECTED WORD COUNT AND 10%, THE REMAINING WORDS WILL NOT BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN GRADING THE PAPER. • PLEASE NOTE THAT THE USE OF CONTENT-GENERATED AI TOOLS IS NOT PERMITTED AND WILL RESULT IN AN AUTOMATIC FAIL GRADE

  • Title: The Debate on Gun Control in the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis and Recommendations for Policy Changes

    Write a 3-page essay discussing gun control policies in the United States. 
    Your essay should cover the following aspects:
    Introduction: Provide an overview of the current state of gun control laws and policies in the US.
    Compare and contrast different perspectives on gun control, including arguments for and against stricter regulations.
    Discuss the societal, legal, and ethical implications of existing gun control policies.
    Recommendations: Propose potential changes or enhancements to current policies and justify your recommendations based on research and analysis. 
    Use a minimum of 3 credible sources to support your analysis.
    Format your essay according to APA style, including in-text citations and a reference page.
    Ensure clarity, coherence, and organization in your writing.

  • Examining Research Methods: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in the Field of [Program of Study] “Developing a Strong Problem Statement: A Step-by-Step Guide for Dissertation Writing”

    Exam Content
    When conducting research, it is necessary to know the difference between qualitative and quantitative research methods.
    This assignment has two parts. Complete Parts 1 and 2 below.
    Part 1: Identifying Qualitative and Quantitative Research Characteristics
    Locate 1 qualitative and 1 quantitative research article on a topic in your program of study (e.g., DBA, DHA, DM, EDD) from the University Library. Add the references to the articles you selected in the reference section of the Research Outline Template.
    Write a 700- to 1,400-word analysis about the articles in which you:
    Explain what characteristics make the study and research methods used quantitative.
    Explain what characteristics make the study and research methods used qualitative.
    Analyze the major differences between the 2 types of research methods.
    Refer to Quantitative and Qualitative Terminology for examples of qualitative or quantitative language that may be used in each article.
    Note: Part 1 of this assignment needs to be submitted in a separate document using the Student Paper Template. Provide properly formatted citations and references. You will be using the Research Outline Template for Part 2 of the assignment.
    Part 2: Supporting Selected Research Method Appropriateness
    Using peer-reviewed journal articles, classroom materials, and information from the weekly overview, select a research method (qualitative or quantitative) that you might use to achieve your study purpose.
    Write a 200- to 350-word explanation of the research method you selected and why this method appropriately aligns with your problem, purpose, and research question. To help justify your chosen methodology, you may find it helpful to review and use as guides a few finished dissertations in the ProQuest database that used the same methodology you are considering. Substantiate your discussion and provide appropriate citations and references.
    Incorporating feedback is essential and beneficial in the learning process and is an expectation throughout the dissertation journey. Reading feedback, reflecting on the feedback, and then properly incorporating the feedback will help to progress through the dissertation journey and improve your writing, critical thinking, and APA formatting skills.
    Change Matrix
    A change matrix describes the changes you make to a document based on instructor feedback.
    Review the Week 5 feedback from your instructor on the research question(s) and using the Change Matrix in Appendix E of the Research Outline Template, record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, state in your own words the feedback provided in the second column, and explain what you have done to address the feedback in the third column.
    Checklist
    Part 1:
    Completed article analysis in a separate document, using the Student Example Paper.
    Part 2:
    Continue using the Research Outline Template provided in Week 3 and:
    Revise your problem and purpose statements, if needed.
    Revise the RQs from Week 5 based on instructor’s feedback.
    Add your research method to the Methodology section and include an explanation, using scholarly tone, of why you selected the methodology. Substantiate your discussion using peer-reviewed literature.
    Complete the Change Matrix in Appendix E of the Research Outline Template for feedback provided in Week 5.
    Format in-text citations and references according to APA guidelines.
    For a well-structured scholarly paragraph please refer to the MEAL Plan section in Appendix H of the Research Outline Template.  
    Use the APA Tutorials located in Doctoral Writing Resources and format your paper according to APA guidelines.
    Reminder: Before submitting your assignment, proofread for grammatical and sentence structure, re-read the assignment directions, and refer to the Summative Assessment rubric to ensure each element of the assignment has been addressed.
    Submit Part 1 as a separate document.
    Submit Part 2 as your updated Research Outline Template. 
    Thank you for your W3 submission!  The purpose of this assignment was to use the Guide to Developing the Problem Statement and Dissertation Series Tutorial – Problem Formulation. As you continue to go through the assignments and updating your Research Outline Template you are familiarizing yourself with the steps to writing your more extensive dissertation.
    Best,
    Dr. Etienne