Category: Law

PLease rewrite this ……
To whom it may concern:
I Rico Burgess, was enrolled in the Master program at FIU. I
was retaken a Pathophysiology with Dr. Delugash.  I had knew this was my final attempted taking
the course as I took the course with her previous. The first time taking with
her she was able to grade all of the exam before the midterm or the last day
that one could dropped the course. She had offer an addition exam for student
to replace their lowest exam during my first attempt with course during the fall
semester, not sure why that offer.
On March 12th, I message Dr. Delugash stating “Good
day, when can i schedule an appointment with you to see my best options?”
As she was also my advisor for the program and the professor I was struggling
in her course, it felt it was conflict of interest. She message me back stating
” I can meet Wednesday, the 20th” knowing that I’m
failing her course and at this point she had not graded mulit-assignment so
that I or other could had calculator my final grade.
As I am registered nurse, I know that I was the possibility me
of failing this course was, but it was hard for me to make a decision with all
of my assignment was due prior of the final date dropped a course. It would be
like me working in the ICU as nurse and making a diagnoses with result that are
pending test results.
As I noted she still haven’t graded mulit assignment, I decided
to email her again on March 18th “Exam 2 Good morning,
when the last day to drop classes for the semester is?”
As on March 18th I was hospitalization for my gout
as I was newly diagnose from previous day prior having a gouty attack not knowing.
She responded on March 19th “All university dates
can be found at https://onestop.fiu.edu/academic-calendar/
The
deadline to drop a course with a DR was March 18. Did you still want to
meet tomorrow? If so, is 11:30 a good time?”
I responded March 19th “Good day. I wanted
to discuss the possibility of dropping the course because I am now failing it,
as well as test 2 because I am struggling with the case studies on the exam.
Yes, I saw the dropped day online; however, I assumed it was a later day
according to the date you scheduled our meeting. I truly hoped and
expected midterm would be graded so that I would know what to do next. Yes, I’d
want to meet you tomorrow.”
During the meeting she still haven’t graded Exam 2 nor the mid-term
reflection assignment. I then emailed the Department of Nursing to found out
that I was an out of date.
I was already enrolled into the summer semester, and was told
that I would be withdrawn from the course then to find out they never withdrawn
from the course, so I started a payment plan and started the course. To find
out now that they withdraw me from the course and I have a balance with
FIU.  And wish I do not desire it.
I’m here by asking whomever to review this to allow me back
in the program, as I was following what the handbook stated to contact your
advisor before withdrawing from any course, Unfortuantly she the professor/advisor
was overwhelm that she could not had time to grade the assignment nor schedule
an appointment in a timely manner to help out.
As I previous took her course she allow the student to take
make up exam and she now didn’t allowing us to take a makeup exam. As it was
never on either syllabus. It leave me think if she did for a favor for someone
in the fall semester not for spring semester.  
I

1) Read Chapter 1 https://openstax.org/books/business-law-i-essentials/pages/1-introduction
– Explain
how business laws affect (a) your life as a consumer, (b) as a business owner,
and (c) in business operations as an employee/manager.
2)  Read Chapter 2 https://openstax.org/books/business-law-i-essentials/pages/2-introduction
– Name and explain the steps in Mediation.
– Describe the typical steps in Arbitration.
– Explain the differences between binding and non-binding arbitration.
– According to the lesson and our textbook, what are the four
advantages of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over traditional
litigation?
Instructions:
Use the materials in this course, not the
internet, and not artificial intelligence (AI) sources (see syllabus for
details on plagiarism). AI will not write how you do; the wording will
be vague, beyond the scope of this class/not at an intro level, and use
atypical words from a college student. Be warned. This is considered
cheating. 
Each essay question must be thorough and detailed. Vague and non-specific answers will not earn points. 
Do not copy the question directly into your assignment – this will negatively affect your Turnitin (TIN) percentage.

Forensic Psychology Research Portfolio. this is an 15-18 page paper! Please see the instructions attached. You will need my week 2,3 and 4 papers to use for this project. THESE ARE ALSO ATTACHED. Required reading chapter 13-14 is ALSO attached for reference. I have added the title of the actual book in the intructions attachment incase you want the actual book. Please be very thorough as i will check everything for plagarism, AI and topics covered. You must read the instructions in depth and cover everything. I will add a bonus upon completion of the job done correctly.

Identify a state-level animal welfare law, and provide the following information/responses in an essay/paragraph format. Please integrate the answers to the following questions into a narrative, instead of answering them in a numbered format: 
What state was the law enacted in? 
Provide a citation to the law. 
When was the law enacted? 
What does the state’s agricultural industry look like (ex. GDP from agriculture, major crops/livestock)?
What is the purpose of the law? 
Are there any exceptions for agricultural activities in the law? If so, what are they? 
How was the law enacted (i.e., legislature, referendum, etc.)? 
Has there been any litigation regarding the law?
What was the outcome of any litigation? 
Provide an evaluation of the law, for example: 
Does the law reinforce or combat agricultural exceptionalism/the agrarian ideal? 
Does the law make any significant changes to animal welfare policy? 
Is the law likely to impact animal welfare in other states? 
Your assignment response should be 750-1,000 words, double spaced, Times New Roman or Calibri 11-12 point font. 

Assignment
The paper must be typed on a computer and comply with the following requirements:
Font: Times New Roman, font size 12 and a line spacing of 1.5.
Word count: The length of the home assignment should not exceed 4000 words.
If the students exceed the word count, the essay will not be sent to grading.
Footnotes should be included in the word count of the main text. Not included in this count:
the front page (with name and title etc), summary, table of contents and references
(bibliography).
Please remember to include footnotes in word count!
See user guide below (User Guide for Microsoft Word, page 41)
Template: Students are required to use the template which can be found here:
http://www.jus.uio.no/english/studies/studentservices/juriteket/
The template is named template-assignment, and the format is .rtf.
On the same webpage you will find the User Guide for Microsoft Word when writing the term
paper. If you still have problems with using the template after reading the user guide, please
contact Juriteket, (3rd floor, Domus Nova); the Law faculty’s IT-service for students
(information on webpage above).
Structure
Technically the paper should be as good as possible: well organized in titles and subtitles,
footnotes and references. The paper should follow the following recommended structure for
each question:
(1) Table of contents
(2) Introduction.
The introduction is to be placed in the beginning of the paper and should contain the
following:
2
– Interpretation of essay question and formulation of research question, reasons you would
give for formulating this/these question/s including a short explanation of the relevant
background or context;
– Clarification of terms (or definitions) if necessary
– Presentation of the structure of the text (an overview of the chapters).
(3) Methodology (optional).
If relevant, a discussion of methodological issues that the research question raises and how
you want to address these issues, including a description of the main sources that you will use
in your assignment (e.g., an overview over applicable legal standards, procedures and
sources).
(4) Main text (body)
This is the section where you develop the arguments.
(5) Conclusion
(6) Annex: List of references (bibliography) or use of legal style formatting with references in
the footnotes.
The use of footnotes and references in the bibliography should be consistent  

Summative Assessment: Agency Budget Proposal A chief financial officer (CFO) is responsible for overall financial management in justice or security. The CFO oversees disbursements, accountability processes, and operational planning, budgeting, and analysis. STEP 1: Imagine you are the CFO for criminal justice or a private security agency in your home state. You are tasked with developing and presenting an operating budget proposal to your agency director. Your starting point for the operating budget is the current year. You will then build an operating budget for the next year. STEP 2: Select a state, local criminal justice, or security agency from your home state. STEP 3: Research the most recent budget for that agency. Use the resource at the end of the assignment as an example of an operating budget and how to search for one online. STEP 4 Write a 525- to 700-word budget proposal that contains operating expenses and revenue. Include the following in your proposal: Your total budget, including operating expenses and revenue. This can increase or decrease by 5 percent. The total for your operating budget and special line items. If you include the special line items, they must equal the total of all your revenue sources, which is called a balanced budget. There should be no deficit or surplus budgeting. Increase or decrease any expenditure or fund source you like. Any increase or decrease should be related to the issues you list in your summary. Base your budget adjustments and issues on actual concerns your home state or local jurisdiction is experiencing. STEP 5: Insert a table in the budget recommendation that includes columns for the current year (your starting point) and the next year (your recommendation). The table is not part of the summary word count. STEP 6: Explain the issues that justify increases or decreases in the total budget. STEP 7: Cite at least 2 outside references to support your assignment. Step 8: Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines to include, at a minimum, the APA cover page, Introduction, level headers/titles for each required assignment discussion point, Conclusion, and Reference page. Step 9: Run the paper through Safe Assign and ensure that Similarity Index is under 22%; double-check that all grammar and spelling are correct. STEP 10: Submit your assignment.

The subject is : Freedom of religion and refusal of medical treatment in Canada. 
Please note that the aim of the essay is not to summarize what has already been done, but to answer a particular question to which there is not necessarily an answer. The writer will therefore have to find a particular question on the topic to answer at the very end of the work and for which to offer solutions. 
(1)I firstly need a detailed plan, including the research question, the importance of it and all sources seperated in 3 sections: Canadian legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence. This plan will then be approved by my supervisor. 
(2)Once it is, the actual essay: 
Must include an overview of Canadian legislation on the subject. It must also be based on Canadian doctrine on the subject and finally present concrete examples of Canadian jurisprudence. After having taken stock of the current situation, we must do a section on the major historical issues and then the current issues-challenges. It would be interesting to make some comparisons with other countries where the law is different (this part must be brief because the project must relate to Canada). Finally, at the very end I would like to include a section presenting a personal opinion on the subject and a perspective on the future.
The sources format must be McGill. This is the link to the manual to follow for the format: https://nextcanada.westlaw.com/Browse/Accueil/ManuelcanadiendelarfrencejuridiqueGuideMcGill/CanadianGuidetoUniformLegalCitation10thEdition?guid=If3b9e53af51d511fe0440021280d79ee&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0 Please let me know if you’re able to open it. 
Thank you 

After Reading Chapter 6 of your book and learning of the authors’ perspectives, and in your own words, answer the following questions. Be sure to elaborate by giving examples to support your position. Explain the concept of intersectionality and why one status is not more important than another. Why is it important to understand the interaction between one’s race, class, and gender? Provide specific examples and feel free to elaborate on other privileges as needed. How does privilege impact the study of intersection? The book explains that university students admitted through a legacy admission are not viewed as having an unfair advantage, while those admitted through affirmative action are. Why does society view legacy students as deserving and affirmative action students as undeserving? What are the advantages of viewing society, crime and criminal justice from an intersectional perspective? What are the disadvantages of failing to take the intersectional perspectives when viewing society, crime and criminal justice?

Persuasive Writing Assignment
Topic: Allowing paralegals to work as paraprofessionals subject to licensure and
Allowing paralegals to work as paraprofessionals subject to licensure and
regulation would be beneficial to the legal profession and to the communities it serves.
Assignment:
READ:
The 2023 Texas report on paraprofessionals (excepts in Canvas)
The articles on other jurisdictions’ treatment of the issue (In Canvas) The 2023 Texas report on paraprofessionals (excepts in Canva The articles on other jurisdictions’ treatment of the issue (In Canvas)d
Format: Your paper should be typed, double spaced, using 12 point font, paginated, and
Your paper should be typed, double spaced, using 12 point font, paginated, and
stapled. You do not need a separate works cited page (but reference any sources you refer
to in the body of the essay
Note: Page numbers are approximate. 

Please look at the instructions below. This assignment is measuring your ability to “think” like a judge, taking the facts of a hypothetical (below) and applying the Constitutional standards as well as key precedent in coming to a decision. The key part of this is to show how you APPLY facts from the hypoethical to rules/ideas from previous cases, and how you REASON to reach your conclusion. At the end of the hypothetical I have provided a list of relevant cases (some we have seen already, some we have not). This is the only “research” you need to do, to look at those cases as well as anything covered in the textbook. Review the grading rubric in the “Grades and Progress” section of the main menu by locating the assignment and clicking View Rubric. To submit, use the link provided above