Category: Law

In these discussion boards,
each student must provide a legal analysis of the underlying issues. 
A
proper legal analysis is presented in the Issue/Rule/Analysis/Conclusion (IRAC)
format:
Issue:
Identify the issue.
Rule:
State the applicable concept, law or rule.
Analysis:
Apply the applicable rule or law to the facts and circumstances as they are
presented in the article/case.
Conclusion:
State what the outcome should be based on the law and all available evidence.

Complete a short leadership paper that describes leadership and manager competencies & styles.
Essays must be structurally intact with appropriate grammar, sentence and paragraph composition, spelling, punctuation, and logical, clear essay development (including introduction and conclusion). Paper length 1-2 pages (MAX… POINTS WILL BE DEDUCTED IF OVER 2 PAGES), excluding cover and reference page. Must have a minimum of three references and references must be within 5 years.

you can choose the rating of before and and after rating Canadas overall performance on protecting human rights

Assignment: International Company Law
1.    You may refer to the textbook, notes, and any other
resources you have at your disposal.
2.    Answer the multiple-choice questions, write short
essays for the provided essay questions, and draft a joint venture contract
based on the given fact pattern.
3.    Use as a Font: Arial; Size 12; line spacing 1.5.
4.    Read each question carefully and provide a detailed
response.
5.    Use clear and concise language, and support your
answers with relevant information and examples (except for the multiple-choice
questions).
6.    This assignment is meant to assess your understanding
of the topic and your command of the English language.
Section 1: Multiple-Choice
Instructions: Choose the most
appropriate answer for each question.
1.
What is nationalization?
•          A) The process of privatizing public
assets
•          B) The process of taking private
property into public ownership by a state
•          C) The process of internationalizing a
company’s operations
•          D) The process of liquidating a
company’s assets
2.
Which of the following is a fundamental requirement for a legal nationalization
according to international law?
•          A) Public interest/purpose
•          B) Prior notification to the company
•          C) Majority approval by the national
parliament
•          D) Support from the international
community
3.
A state may face international legal challenges for nationalization if:
•          A) The process is discriminatory
•          B) There is no compensation provided
•          C) The nationalization lacks a public
purpose
•          D) All of the above
4.
Which of the following cases is to be considered a violation of international
law in nationalization?
•          A) Nationalization with fair
compensation and public interest justification
•          B) Nationalization without any
compensation or due process
•          C) Nationalization with delayed
compensation but clear public interest
•          D) Nationalization with compensation
below market value but justified by economic crisis
5.
Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the legality of nationalization
according to international law?
•          A) Public interest/purpose of the nationalization
•          B) Non-discrimination
•          C) Compensation
•          D) Approval by the International Court
of Justice
6)
Under international law, which of the following forms of compensation is
generally considered acceptable for nationalized property?
•          A) Full compensation
•          B) Appropriate compensation
•          C) Both A and B
•          D) None of the above
7.
Which of the following is NOT a type of nationalization?
•          A) Expropriation
•          B) Confiscation
•          C) Privatization
•          D) Direct nationalization
8.
What is “creeping nationalization”?
•          A) A sudden and outright seizure of
property
•          B) Gradual takeover through a series
of governmental measures
•          C) Nationalization limited to certain
sectors
•          D) The reversal of nationalization
through privatization
9.
The “Hull Principle” in the context of nationalization refers to:
•          A) The requirement of
non-discrimination
•          B) The need for public interest to
justify nationalization
•          C) The necessity of prompt, adequate,
and effective compensation
•          D) The obligation to notify international
bodies before nationalizing
10.
What constitutes a “public purpose” for nationalization?
•          A) Reasons of public utility, judicial
liquidation, and similar measures
•          B) Any purpose deemed necessary by the
state without justification
•          C) For the benefit to government
officials
•          D) Enhancing the profitability of
private enterprises
Section
2: Essay Questions
Question 1 (25 Points)
Explain
the concept of “public interest/purpose” in the context of
nationalization. Why is it significant, and how do courts typically assess
whether this requirement is met?
Question
2 (25 Points)
Discuss
the principle of “compensation” in international law. Compare the
notions of “full compensation” versus “appropriate
compensation” and provide examples of how different tribunals have applied
these standards.
Section 3: Drafting a
Joint-Venture-Contract
Fact Pattern:
ABC Ltd., a company incorporated in
Switzerland, and XYZ Corp., a company incorporated in the United States, decide
to enter into a joint venture to develop and market a new eco-friendly
packaging solution. The joint venture, GreenPack JV, will be incorporated in
the Netherlands. ABC Ltd. will provide the technology and patents, while XYZ
Corp. will handle marketing and distribution. Both companies will share the
costs and profits equally. The initial investment from both companies will be
USD 1 million each. The joint venture will operate for a period of 5 years,
with an option to renew based on mutual agreement. In case of disputes, the
parties agree to arbitration under the rules of the International Chamber of
Commerce (ICC).
Drafting
Task:
Based
on the fact pattern provided, draft a simple joint venture contract for
GreenPack JV.

CASE GREEN EARTH BUILDERS (GEB)
Green Earth Builders (GEB) is a UK-based company planning to expand into the Brazilian market. Mr. Thompson, the director of the company, visited Brazil recently to gain insights into the local market. He discovered that Brazil’s regulatory framework is quite complex. During his visit, Mr. Thompson met with a Brazilian construction firm located in Sao Paulo, which expressed interest in collaborating with GEB.
You work for a consultancy firm specializing in helping companies enter new markets. You have been tasked with creating a comprehensive strategy for GEB to enter the Brazilian market. You are to prepare a detailed and clear report for Mr. Thompson, outlining the opportunities and challenges of the Brazilian market, with a particular focus on legal aspects. As requested by Mr. Thompson, your report should address the following points:
Should GEB start operations in Brazil immediately by establishing a new company? If so, what type of company would you recommend and why? Provide detailed information about the recommended company structure, including amount of the capital, potential partners, and the location of the company’s headquarters. Justify all your answers.
If GEB decides to partner with the Brazilian company, what are the primary legal considerations to keep in mind? For example, what type of contract (joint venture, franchise, consortium, acquisition, merger, etc.) would you recommend and why? Should the agreement be between GEB and the Brazilian company directly, or between GEB’s Brazilian subsidiary (NEWCO) and the Brazilian company? What are the implications of each option? Provide your recommendation to Mr. Thompson, supported by clear justifications.
GEB is a well-known brand in Europe and the UK but not in Brazil or South America. What strategies would you recommend for building brand recognition and protection in Brazil? Additionally, GEB holds several patents in Europe and the UK but none in Brazil. Are GEB’s patents and trademarks protected in Brazil? If not, what measures should be taken and when (immediately, in the future, and why)?
Mr. Thompson has noted the recent corruption issues in Brazil, such as the Operation Car Wash scandal and the Odebrecht case. What concerns should GEB consider regarding corruption in Brazil? Note that GEB plans to undertake large-scale infrastructure projects like green buildings, renewable energy installations, sustainable urban developments, and eco-friendly transport systems, with the Brazilian government as a frequent client?
Prepare the report addressing the issues outlined above, no AI no Plagiarism, precise work. You can and shall consult books and references in general, as well as Internet sources. If you do copy from a book, internet materials etc., please indicate the source, otherwise this will be considered as an illegal copy (plagiarism) and shall be treated accordingly. 

Step 1. Edit and rewrite the document from a lawyer and
attorney perspective. You are defending a theoretical student who his college and the educational system have harmed with false promises. Then, the college tried to cover up its mistakes by deleting emails and using other psychological tactics.
Step 2. Use the information from the document and the story
to answer the questions and the defense application from an attorney’s and
lawyer’s perspective. This is probably the most essential part. It needs to be from a
Saul Goodman perspective, using terms only high-class judges and attorneys know. 

This task involves answering an unseen HSC-style question on the Family topic, under examination conditions.
The response should be approximately 1000 words (6 – 8 pages) and will be marked out of 25.
You will have 5 minutes of reading/planning time and 45 minutes of writing time. The question will be drawn from
the contemporary issue of Surrogacy and Birth Technologies.
In preparation for the in-class task, you need to:
• investigate and research the contemporary issue Surrogacy and Birth Technologies
• evaluate the effectiveness of the legal and non legal responses to the issue
• apply the criteria to make an evaluation. This may include, but is not limited to the following:
P – protection of individual rights
E – enforceability
A – accessibility
R – resource efficiency
R – responsiveness
J – justice been achieved?
A – application of the Rule Of Law
M – meeting society’s needs
 You will need to synthesise information from a range of sources, including cases, legislation, the media, and
international instruments, to support a legal argument in answering the Extended Response question.
 Make a list of relevant LCMID that you will use
 Familiarise yourself with the principal focus and the themes and challenges.
 Prepare a plan of proposed questions.
 Read exemplar responses from previous questions.

“Evolving standards of decency” is seen not only in fewer and fewer Americans supporting the death penalty, but it can be seen as a legal trajectory by the US Supreme Court to make it unconstitutional. Discuss.

First, after reading the article, “Preventing Fatal Attractions,” come up with an original suggestion as to how inappropriate relationships between inmates and correctional officers can be stopped. Please note, your suggestion may be creative; however, it should also be realistic. And, your suggestion must not have been discussed in the Worley et al. (2010) article. Next, after reading and reflecting upon the articles for Week Three, in your opinion, why do some correctional employees cross the line and behave inappropriately with inmates, given that this behavior is illegal and against policy. It should be evident that you have carefully reflected upon the assigned readings. And, after reading the article, “The Economics of Crossing Over,” point to one significant research finding that you found to be of interest. Be sure to discuss how this finding advances our understanding of guard-inmate boundary violations. Also, please discuss why this particular finding may be of interest to correctional administrators and/or policymakers. Next, how do you think inappropriate staff-inmate relationships occur? Who initiates the relationship: inmates or staff members? Try to explain these dynamics as best as you possibly can . Be sure to point to various aspects of all three article to support this aspect of your response. And, in your opinion, what is the most important aspect of article by Trammell and colleagues? How can correctional administrators use this study to create a more equalitarian and humane workplace for employees? Be specific. Finally, make a comparison between any two of the research articles (your choice). Explain how these two articles both provide insights into any aspect that is germane to the interactions between staff and inmates.

Separate each section accordingly. EACH section should have an intro, body, conclusion. Each section needs it’s own refrence. 
Section 1: Give your opinion as to what you consider the most effective discovery tool and why.
Section 2: Discuss the process of witness preparation and provide your opinion as to any ethical concerns there may be. Give an example of going too far!