Category: Law

Assignment
The paper must be typed on a computer and comply with the following requirements:
Font: Times New Roman, font size 12 and a line spacing of 1.5.
Word count: The length of the home assignment should not exceed 4000 words.
If the students exceed the word count, the essay will not be sent to grading.
Footnotes should be included in the word count of the main text. Not included in this count:
the front page (with name and title etc), summary, table of contents and references
(bibliography).
Please remember to include footnotes in word count!
See user guide below (User Guide for Microsoft Word, page 41)
Template: Students are required to use the template which can be found here:
http://www.jus.uio.no/english/studies/studentservices/juriteket/
The template is named template-assignment, and the format is .rtf.
On the same webpage you will find the User Guide for Microsoft Word when writing the term
paper. If you still have problems with using the template after reading the user guide, please
contact Juriteket, (3rd floor, Domus Nova); the Law faculty’s IT-service for students
(information on webpage above).
Structure
Technically the paper should be as good as possible: well organized in titles and subtitles,
footnotes and references. The paper should follow the following recommended structure for
each question:
(1) Table of contents
(2) Introduction.
The introduction is to be placed in the beginning of the paper and should contain the
following:
2
– Interpretation of essay question and formulation of research question, reasons you would
give for formulating this/these question/s including a short explanation of the relevant
background or context;
– Clarification of terms (or definitions) if necessary
– Presentation of the structure of the text (an overview of the chapters).
(3) Methodology (optional).
If relevant, a discussion of methodological issues that the research question raises and how
you want to address these issues, including a description of the main sources that you will use
in your assignment (e.g., an overview over applicable legal standards, procedures and
sources).
(4) Main text (body)
This is the section where you develop the arguments.
(5) Conclusion
(6) Annex: List of references (bibliography) or use of legal style formatting with references in
the footnotes.
The use of footnotes and references in the bibliography should be consistent  

Summative Assessment: Agency Budget Proposal A chief financial officer (CFO) is responsible for overall financial management in justice or security. The CFO oversees disbursements, accountability processes, and operational planning, budgeting, and analysis. STEP 1: Imagine you are the CFO for criminal justice or a private security agency in your home state. You are tasked with developing and presenting an operating budget proposal to your agency director. Your starting point for the operating budget is the current year. You will then build an operating budget for the next year. STEP 2: Select a state, local criminal justice, or security agency from your home state. STEP 3: Research the most recent budget for that agency. Use the resource at the end of the assignment as an example of an operating budget and how to search for one online. STEP 4 Write a 525- to 700-word budget proposal that contains operating expenses and revenue. Include the following in your proposal: Your total budget, including operating expenses and revenue. This can increase or decrease by 5 percent. The total for your operating budget and special line items. If you include the special line items, they must equal the total of all your revenue sources, which is called a balanced budget. There should be no deficit or surplus budgeting. Increase or decrease any expenditure or fund source you like. Any increase or decrease should be related to the issues you list in your summary. Base your budget adjustments and issues on actual concerns your home state or local jurisdiction is experiencing. STEP 5: Insert a table in the budget recommendation that includes columns for the current year (your starting point) and the next year (your recommendation). The table is not part of the summary word count. STEP 6: Explain the issues that justify increases or decreases in the total budget. STEP 7: Cite at least 2 outside references to support your assignment. Step 8: Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines to include, at a minimum, the APA cover page, Introduction, level headers/titles for each required assignment discussion point, Conclusion, and Reference page. Step 9: Run the paper through Safe Assign and ensure that Similarity Index is under 22%; double-check that all grammar and spelling are correct. STEP 10: Submit your assignment.

The subject is : Freedom of religion and refusal of medical treatment in Canada. 
Please note that the aim of the essay is not to summarize what has already been done, but to answer a particular question to which there is not necessarily an answer. The writer will therefore have to find a particular question on the topic to answer at the very end of the work and for which to offer solutions. 
(1)I firstly need a detailed plan, including the research question, the importance of it and all sources seperated in 3 sections: Canadian legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence. This plan will then be approved by my supervisor. 
(2)Once it is, the actual essay: 
Must include an overview of Canadian legislation on the subject. It must also be based on Canadian doctrine on the subject and finally present concrete examples of Canadian jurisprudence. After having taken stock of the current situation, we must do a section on the major historical issues and then the current issues-challenges. It would be interesting to make some comparisons with other countries where the law is different (this part must be brief because the project must relate to Canada). Finally, at the very end I would like to include a section presenting a personal opinion on the subject and a perspective on the future.
The sources format must be McGill. This is the link to the manual to follow for the format: https://nextcanada.westlaw.com/Browse/Accueil/ManuelcanadiendelarfrencejuridiqueGuideMcGill/CanadianGuidetoUniformLegalCitation10thEdition?guid=If3b9e53af51d511fe0440021280d79ee&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0 Please let me know if you’re able to open it. 
Thank you 

After Reading Chapter 6 of your book and learning of the authors’ perspectives, and in your own words, answer the following questions. Be sure to elaborate by giving examples to support your position. Explain the concept of intersectionality and why one status is not more important than another. Why is it important to understand the interaction between one’s race, class, and gender? Provide specific examples and feel free to elaborate on other privileges as needed. How does privilege impact the study of intersection? The book explains that university students admitted through a legacy admission are not viewed as having an unfair advantage, while those admitted through affirmative action are. Why does society view legacy students as deserving and affirmative action students as undeserving? What are the advantages of viewing society, crime and criminal justice from an intersectional perspective? What are the disadvantages of failing to take the intersectional perspectives when viewing society, crime and criminal justice?

Persuasive Writing Assignment
Topic: Allowing paralegals to work as paraprofessionals subject to licensure and
Allowing paralegals to work as paraprofessionals subject to licensure and
regulation would be beneficial to the legal profession and to the communities it serves.
Assignment:
READ:
The 2023 Texas report on paraprofessionals (excepts in Canvas)
The articles on other jurisdictions’ treatment of the issue (In Canvas) The 2023 Texas report on paraprofessionals (excepts in Canva The articles on other jurisdictions’ treatment of the issue (In Canvas)d
Format: Your paper should be typed, double spaced, using 12 point font, paginated, and
Your paper should be typed, double spaced, using 12 point font, paginated, and
stapled. You do not need a separate works cited page (but reference any sources you refer
to in the body of the essay
Note: Page numbers are approximate. 

Please look at the instructions below. This assignment is measuring your ability to “think” like a judge, taking the facts of a hypothetical (below) and applying the Constitutional standards as well as key precedent in coming to a decision. The key part of this is to show how you APPLY facts from the hypoethical to rules/ideas from previous cases, and how you REASON to reach your conclusion. At the end of the hypothetical I have provided a list of relevant cases (some we have seen already, some we have not). This is the only “research” you need to do, to look at those cases as well as anything covered in the textbook. Review the grading rubric in the “Grades and Progress” section of the main menu by locating the assignment and clicking View Rubric. To submit, use the link provided above

Please answer the following short-answer questions, which are based on the lectures in class. If you are using a case,
example, or hypothetical discussed in class, please cite to it. If there is an analogous case or example and you do not cite
to the correct one, your answer will not receive full credit. While there is no word limit to any answer or overall, I would
expect each answer to constitute 1-3 paragraphs. Usage of any artificial intelligence tools is strictly forbidden; you may,
however, consult with other students in the class. You should show your work and explain your reasoning; merely
conclusive answers will not receive credit. 
(i have examples of my previous hypothetical.) 

Should we sentence those convicted of DUI to use specialized license plates indicating that the driver was convicted of DUI.  The use of “whiskey plates” is popular in some areas of the country.  Should we, in NJ, adopt this practice  3 page essay (with citations please).

David
and Amy are brother-and-sister and live in Boca Raton, Florida. David
is a writer, working on his first book. He had been employed as a police
officer in Delray Beach, but left the force after being shot in the
line of duty. As a result of the shooting, David is paralyzed from his
waist down, and now uses a wheelchair.
Amy is an event planner, having earned her degree in Event
Management from Lynn University. She worked for Boca’s Best Party
Planners, Inc. for two years, but lost her job when the company went
bankrupt. She has an interview set up on Friday with Big Haas Country
Club for their open event manager position.
On Friday, David and Amy go their ways – David heads to the new
Italian Yummy restaurant to meet a friend, Amy goes to her interview.
When David arrives at Italian Yummy, he is shocked to see that
all of the tables are high, bar-top tables. He asks Jerry Jerk, the
manager, if there is a low table that he can use, accounting for his
wheelchair. “Sorry, pal,” Jerk responds, “we feel badly about it, but we
just don’t have any low tables. Don’t get many guys in wheelchairs in
here, ya know, so we don’t really bother.”
Amy’s interview actually goes worse than Adam’s attempt at lunch.
Amy thinks that her interview with Barry Bigot is going quite well, as
she determines that she is clearly well-qualified for this job.
Suddenly, Bigot looks up from Amy’s resume and says, “Oh, wait, you went
to Solomon Schechter Hebrew High School. You’re Jewish? Sorry, but we
don’t hire any Jews. Thanks for coming in.”
David and Amy each file lawsuits – David against Italian Yummy, Amy against Big Haas Country Club.
Write a report giving the following for each of these cases:
1) a complete overview of Title III of the ADA and Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act, specifying each of the legal elements of
discrimination to the facts of the case at hand;
2) offer your opinion as to how each case should be decided AND why.
The report shall be submitted in 12-point typed, double-spaced
form. A report that does not follow this form will be deducted per the
grading rubric. 1000 word minimum.

First, after reading and reflecting upon the article, “Texas Latino Prison Gangs,” what aspect of this study do you think would be the most helpful for prison and jail administrators? What is it, in particular, about this aspect of the study that you believe administrators could use in order to effectively manage their facilities? Be sure to elaborate; it must be evident that you have carefully reflected upon this article. Next, in the study, “Rape Lore in Correctional Settings,” Worley et al. focused on inmates’ awareness of prison rape. Based upon what all three of the articles you read this week, in your opinion, is prison rape a rare occurrence, or does it happen frequently? Please point to various aspects of the articles to bolster your argument. And, as you know from reading the article, “Adapting to Prison Life,” male inmates were asked to answer questions about how they coped with the pressures of incarceration. If female inmates were asked the same set of questions, do you feel the responses would be similar or different? Fully elaborate and explain your reasoning. Also, provide another possible way (not identified in the paper) of how inmates might cope with stressful prison environments. Finally, in your opinion, will prison gangs operate at more, less, or about the same frequency, as they do today, twenty years from now? Explain your reasoning.