Category: Law

Below is the link to search for the location of the court and retrieve the virtual information for joining. I could do this part, but not sure what information will be needed. 
https://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/court-locations/ 

1. Complete the CALI Lessons on Specific Jurisdiction and on Transient Jurisdiction.  
a. See Content > Week 1 > Learning Material > Accessing CALI Lessons for instructions on how to reach these and other related Lessons. 
b. Taking these CALI Lessons will provide you with the necessary background information to answer these questions. Also, please feel free to do outside research.  
2. Answer the following 3 questions (some with sub-parts) by placing your answers in this Assignment’s text box and submitting them for grading. Please DO NOT attach a document. Each answer should consist of approximately 3 – 6 sentences. Do not copy and paste content; if you do so, you cannot earn credit. Instead, use your own words. 
a. What two requirements must be satisfied in order for a civil court to exert personal jurisdiction over a defendant?
b. Suppose that Utah had a statute declaring that its courts have jurisdiction over any person who commits a tort that injures a Utah citizen, no matter where the tort is committed. Suppose that Sadie, a Utah resident, visits the California countryside on her vacation. While Sadie is in California, Franco runs over Sadie with his car. After returning to Utah, Sadie files suit against Franco to recover medical expenses associated with the car incident. 
Franco needs your advice. Is Franco subject to personal jurisdiction in Utah? Why or why not? What is a long-arm statute? Does the Utah long-arm statute apply here? Why or why not? 
c. Trips R Us, Inc. (“Trips”) is a travel company and is a Georgia corporation. However, Trips was incorporated in Georgia for reasons of convenience only as Trips do not offer tours in Georgia. Trips was running a tour in Maine and there was a fatal accident. Polly sued Trips in Georgia, alleging that Trips is responsible for the wrongful death of her (Polly’s) parents. Trips moved to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction, citing its lack of contacts with the forum state. Should the judge grant or deny the motion?

Separate each section accordingly. EACH section should have an intro, body, conclusion. Each section needs its own refrerence. 
Section 1: Describe the method of selecting a jury and provide your opinion as to whether the system is adequate and fair.
Section 2: Discuss why was O.J. Simpson found “not guilty” of the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ronald Goldman, but found liable for the wrongful death of these two individuals? (Hint: compare elements of crimes vs. torts.)

Instructions: 
Watch the videos discussing Carbon Tax. Which video did you prefer and why? 
Visit the Carbon Tax Center to learn about the carbon tax
Link-  https://www.carbontax.org/whats-a-carbon-tax/
“What’s a Carbon Tax?” to read about it.
Answer the questions below. The total assignment must be a minimum of 500 words total (roughly one page)
Must be under 30% Turnitin score.


Answer the following questions:
– Identify and discuss the main points addressed in each video.
– Reflect on the videos. THIS IS NOT a summary, but HOW did these
videos affect you?  A video summary will be zero points. I want to know
the video’s impact on you, how you feel, what you will do with this
information, and how it impacts your work life
– Explain the Carbon Tax in your own words using the Carbon Tax Center link provided.

I) on Google Scholar. Find a relevant law review article dealing with your issue and summarize the
key points of the article.
2) On west Law: Find 2 cases that relate to your issue and summarize the cases.
3) Key cite the cases in westlaw and found out if those cases are still good law. What color flag do
they have, if any, and do those case holdings help or hurt your case? How?
4) use a rolevan! secondary source on the internet, summarize and cite in using ALWD format in
your assignment.

Hypothetical
You are a compliance manager in the United States at a major U.S. bank that operates internationally.
A compliance analyst on your team flags a pending $2,500 payment for your review because the payment appears to involve a Specially Designated National (“SDN”), Gaston Tomaghelli.
The pending payment was originally automatically flagged in the bank’s systems as a potential sanctions hit because of the presence of the name “Tomaghelli” in the related payment documentation.
The compliance analyst manually reviewed the flagged pending payment and escalated it to you for further review. 
Based on your initial review of the information available, it appears one of the bank’s U.S. customers (the originator) is attempting to send money to Tomaghelli (the beneficiary).
Questions
Do you clear the pending payment and allow it to be processed? Explain why or why not.
What types of U.S. sanctions compliance policies and procedures should the U.S. bank have in place?
If your bank is a major UK bank that frequently operates with U.S. banks and has correspondent and payable-through accounts at major U.S. banks, what types of U.S. sanctions-related compliance policies and procedures should the UK bank have in place (if any)?
What types of ongoing monitoring and due diligence processes should the U.S. bank have in place to mitigate against compliance failures?
What types of contract provisions should the U.S. bank have in its agreements with customers to mitigate against compliance failures and position the bank to terminate payments or customer relationships that become problematic due to sanctions compliance concerns?

PLease rewrite this ……
To whom it may concern:
I Rico Burgess, was enrolled in the Master program at FIU. I
was retaken a Pathophysiology with Dr. Delugash.  I had knew this was my final attempted taking
the course as I took the course with her previous. The first time taking with
her she was able to grade all of the exam before the midterm or the last day
that one could dropped the course. She had offer an addition exam for student
to replace their lowest exam during my first attempt with course during the fall
semester, not sure why that offer.
On March 12th, I message Dr. Delugash stating “Good
day, when can i schedule an appointment with you to see my best options?”
As she was also my advisor for the program and the professor I was struggling
in her course, it felt it was conflict of interest. She message me back stating
” I can meet Wednesday, the 20th” knowing that I’m
failing her course and at this point she had not graded mulit-assignment so
that I or other could had calculator my final grade.
As I am registered nurse, I know that I was the possibility me
of failing this course was, but it was hard for me to make a decision with all
of my assignment was due prior of the final date dropped a course. It would be
like me working in the ICU as nurse and making a diagnoses with result that are
pending test results.
As I noted she still haven’t graded mulit assignment, I decided
to email her again on March 18th “Exam 2 Good morning,
when the last day to drop classes for the semester is?”
As on March 18th I was hospitalization for my gout
as I was newly diagnose from previous day prior having a gouty attack not knowing.
She responded on March 19th “All university dates
can be found at https://onestop.fiu.edu/academic-calendar/
The
deadline to drop a course with a DR was March 18. Did you still want to
meet tomorrow? If so, is 11:30 a good time?”
I responded March 19th “Good day. I wanted
to discuss the possibility of dropping the course because I am now failing it,
as well as test 2 because I am struggling with the case studies on the exam.
Yes, I saw the dropped day online; however, I assumed it was a later day
according to the date you scheduled our meeting. I truly hoped and
expected midterm would be graded so that I would know what to do next. Yes, I’d
want to meet you tomorrow.”
During the meeting she still haven’t graded Exam 2 nor the mid-term
reflection assignment. I then emailed the Department of Nursing to found out
that I was an out of date.
I was already enrolled into the summer semester, and was told
that I would be withdrawn from the course then to find out they never withdrawn
from the course, so I started a payment plan and started the course. To find
out now that they withdraw me from the course and I have a balance with
FIU.  And wish I do not desire it.
I’m here by asking whomever to review this to allow me back
in the program, as I was following what the handbook stated to contact your
advisor before withdrawing from any course, Unfortuantly she the professor/advisor
was overwhelm that she could not had time to grade the assignment nor schedule
an appointment in a timely manner to help out.
As I previous took her course she allow the student to take
make up exam and she now didn’t allowing us to take a makeup exam. As it was
never on either syllabus. It leave me think if she did for a favor for someone
in the fall semester not for spring semester.  
I

1) Read Chapter 1 https://openstax.org/books/business-law-i-essentials/pages/1-introduction
– Explain
how business laws affect (a) your life as a consumer, (b) as a business owner,
and (c) in business operations as an employee/manager.
2)  Read Chapter 2 https://openstax.org/books/business-law-i-essentials/pages/2-introduction
– Name and explain the steps in Mediation.
– Describe the typical steps in Arbitration.
– Explain the differences between binding and non-binding arbitration.
– According to the lesson and our textbook, what are the four
advantages of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over traditional
litigation?
Instructions:
Use the materials in this course, not the
internet, and not artificial intelligence (AI) sources (see syllabus for
details on plagiarism). AI will not write how you do; the wording will
be vague, beyond the scope of this class/not at an intro level, and use
atypical words from a college student. Be warned. This is considered
cheating. 
Each essay question must be thorough and detailed. Vague and non-specific answers will not earn points. 
Do not copy the question directly into your assignment – this will negatively affect your Turnitin (TIN) percentage.

Forensic Psychology Research Portfolio. this is an 15-18 page paper! Please see the instructions attached. You will need my week 2,3 and 4 papers to use for this project. THESE ARE ALSO ATTACHED. Required reading chapter 13-14 is ALSO attached for reference. I have added the title of the actual book in the intructions attachment incase you want the actual book. Please be very thorough as i will check everything for plagarism, AI and topics covered. You must read the instructions in depth and cover everything. I will add a bonus upon completion of the job done correctly.

Identify a state-level animal welfare law, and provide the following information/responses in an essay/paragraph format. Please integrate the answers to the following questions into a narrative, instead of answering them in a numbered format: 
What state was the law enacted in? 
Provide a citation to the law. 
When was the law enacted? 
What does the state’s agricultural industry look like (ex. GDP from agriculture, major crops/livestock)?
What is the purpose of the law? 
Are there any exceptions for agricultural activities in the law? If so, what are they? 
How was the law enacted (i.e., legislature, referendum, etc.)? 
Has there been any litigation regarding the law?
What was the outcome of any litigation? 
Provide an evaluation of the law, for example: 
Does the law reinforce or combat agricultural exceptionalism/the agrarian ideal? 
Does the law make any significant changes to animal welfare policy? 
Is the law likely to impact animal welfare in other states? 
Your assignment response should be 750-1,000 words, double spaced, Times New Roman or Calibri 11-12 point font.