Category: Law

Law ISU outline 
I. Introduction
A. Introduction to the intersection of sports law and gender equality
B. Thesis statement presenting a clear position on the topic
II. Gender Equality Issues in Sports Law
A. Discrimination in pay and sponsorship opportunities
1. Examples of gender pay gaps in various sports
2. Impact of sponsorship disparities on athletes’ careers
B. Lack of representation in leadership roles
1. Statistics on gender composition in sports administration
2. Challenges faced by women in accessing leadership positions
III. Legal Frameworks Addressing Gender Equality in Sports
A. Title IX and its impact on gender equality in US sports
1. Overview of Title IX legislation
2. Successes and limitations of Title IX enforcement
B. International conventions and guidelines promoting gender equality in sports
1. Analysis of UN initiatives like the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
2. Role of international sports federations in implementing gender equality policies (ex. Olympics)
IV. Challenges and Resistance to Gender Equality Efforts in Sports Law
A. Resistance to traditional norms and cultural barriers
1. Societal attitudes towards women’s participation in sports
2. Examples of cultural practices reinforcing gender stereotypes
B. Legal challenges and loopholes upsetting effective implementation
1. Vagueness in existing sports regulations regarding gender equality
2. Instances of legal disputes and lack of consistent enforcement
V. The Impact of Gender Equality in Sports Law on Athletes and Society
A. Empowerment and opportunities for female athletes
1. Case studies of successful initiatives promoting gender equality
2. Psychological and societal benefits of equal representation in sports
B. Broader implications for social progress and cultural shifts
1. Role of sports as a platform for challenging gender norms
2. Influence on perceptions of gender roles and identities beyond the sports realm
VI. Conclusion
A. Restatement of the significance of addressing gender equality in sports law
B. Summary of key points and reaffirmation of the thesis statement
Mention LFG movie
Ur picking a side in this essay
_________________________
The Intersection of Sports Law and Gender Equality 
Question: How does sports law impact gender equality in athletic settings, and what are the key
challenges and advancements in this field? 
I will explore the intersection of sports law and gender equality by looking at various
legal frameworks, policies, and cases that shape the rights and opportunities of athletes based on
their gender. Points of analysis will include discrimination in pay and sponsorship, access to
resources and facilities, representation in leadership positions, and the impact of landmark legal
cases on shaping gender equality in sports.
Significance:
Ensuring fairness and equality for athletes regardless of gender is essential in sports law.
Exploring legal frameworks allows us to pinpoint areas needing improvement. We can then
identify policies that foster gender equity in sports, from local youth leagues to the highest
professional levels. 
Reference List:
Australian Human Rights Commission. (2018). Face the facts: Gender Equality 2018. Retrieved
from https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/education/face-facts-gender-equality-2018
Cooky, C., Messner, M. A., & Hextrum, R. H. (2013). Women play sport, but not on TV: A
longitudinal study of televised news media. Communication & Sport, 1(3), 203-230.
Dworkin, S. L., & Messner, M. A. (2002). Just do … what? Sport, bodies, gender. Sociology of
Sport Journal, 19(3), 206-223.
Fasting, K., Pfister, G., & Ström, K. (Eds.). (2017). Women, Soccer and Transnational
Migration. Routledge.
Fink, J. S., Miller, L. K., & Schouten, J. W. (Eds.). (2002). Women, sport, and culture. Human
Kinetics.
International Olympic Committee. (2021). Gender equality in sport. Retrieved from
https://www.olympic.org/gender-equality-in-sport
Kidd, B., & Donnelly, P. (2001). When sport is not a game: Women, ethics, and gender in sports.
Rowman & Littlefield.
Lapchick, R. (2020). The Racial and Gender Report Card. Institute for Diversity and Ethics in
Sport. Retrieved from https://www.tidesport.org/racial-gender-report-card
Schultz, J. (2018). The Women’s Movement and Women in Sports. In Sports Law (pp. 39-58).
Springer, Cham.
Thorpe, H. (2019). Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women.
Princeton University Press.

A tanker, the Probo Koala, operated by an oil trading company based in the Netherlands, attempted to off-load 250 tons of petrochemical products in the Amsterdam port. The oil trading company indicated that the waste consisted of “regular slops,” wash water from a ship’s holds, which is normally laced with oil, gas, caustic soda, and other chemicals. 
When port workers started pumping out the tanker, they realized the liquid in the ship’s hold was not the kind the port usually accepts—it was thicker than normal and smelled especially foul. The workers believed the waste was hazardous and did not want to pump it out or handle it in any way. 
After researching the ship and investigating what might be in the ship’s hold, the Amsterdam port operator decided that it was not safe to dispose of the waste at the port for the agreed price. The new price, which included safe disposal, was going to be around $300,000 more than originally agreed. 
The oil trading company declined and decided to move on with the ship to off-load the hold contents at an as yet undetermined location.
Should the United States be concerned about situations such as these? Why or why not? Do the U.S. laws that you learned about reach situations like these? Should they? 
What would happen if the Probo Koala was a U.S. based ship and the Port was located in the United States, say New Orleans? Would there be laws that would apply to the off-load of the contents in the hold? Say that the Probo Koala, looking to save money, instead travelled to coastal Mexico to off-load the hold? Would the same laws apply? Could those laws be enforced? 
Finally, what do your answers to these questions say about the extent to which the U.S. protects the environment within and outside its borders? 
* Note – this is a real news story.
Write your answers to the above questions in a 500-word minimum comprehensive essay, double-spaced in Word file, and upload to Canvas. Cite any other sources that you use, including legal sources in APA style.
The book used in this course is Kubasek, N., Browne, M. N., Dhooge, L. J., Herron, D. J., Williamson, C., & Barkacs, L. L. (2020). Dynamic business law.
Chapter 45 – Consumer Law
Chapter 46 – Environmental Law

I will be using this assignment for my addmission in institute. Please make sure to mention about my father and my grand father as a police offericer background and growing up in the police family made an impact on me. 

-I need this assignment to bee 100% original and plagiarism ans AI free
-I will keep asking for editing if needed according to my professor instructions 
-I need to see a copy of the work of at least 80% progress in 2 weeks time to show it to my professor 
-I need a minimum of 80% on this module 
-the assessment is about 2 parts , part A and part B : all shown in the attachments below and its 1500 words in each part 
-the citation and referencing style that should be used in this assignment is OSCOLA 
–  if you have any questions please ask I am more than happy to check all your concerns daily 
– the seminars has questions that can help you fingering out the order of the answers
– the font type should be Arial 11 point 
– use numbered headings and subheading 
– I will be adding more instructions or files if needed

Write an assignment of around 5 pages + references. Style is quite free but probably starting with an introduction and ending with a conclusion or final thoughts. It can be a mix of essay like writing, but it also can have points, definitions, my thoughts……. it should have valid references, and citations…. and it should be mainly from EU perspective but I study in Portugal so it can say a little something about that…..

Format
Assignment files should be prepared using MS Word to allow your tutor to insert comments and feedback. If you do not have this software, contact your tutor to discuss whether other arrangements can be accommodated.
Background
Businesses face multiple risks if they do not ensure a safe and respectful workplace for their employees and clientele. An employer must not discriminate against or engage in harassment of employees. Further, a business may be held liable for such acts committed by its employees if it does not take steps to prevent them or rectify the situation if they occur. One good way of avoiding such problems and dealing with them appropriately is by way of a harassment policy and related procedures. This assignment encourages you to explore the potential of such a policy in an employment context that you are familiar with.
Instructions
Identify an employer for whom you work or have worked, or another organization you have been a member of or volunteered for, and provide its name and website, Facebook page, or other online source of information about it using working links. Describe your relationship with the organization.
Determine whether the organization is subject to the Canadian Human Rights Act, or the human rights legislation of a province or territory by checking this Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) website . State the legislation which is applicable to your organization and explain why.
Assume that you have been tasked with preparing a harassment policy for the organization you have chosen and download this template from the CHRC . Open it in Word and save it as a document you can edit.
Review the instructions in the template and list the titles of personnel in your organization that you would choose to fill the following roles and explain your choices: Position A and Position B.
Complete the template filing in the blanks for Position A and B and change the references from the Canadian Human Rights Act to the relevant legislation if necessary. Attach the completed policy document to your submission.
Read this arbitration decision  and explain how the case of Mr. Lewis might have been handled differently if the policy you have prepared had been in force for the railway company at the time of the events of that case.

Part 1:  (20 per cent) Students are required to write a 500-word news story about a stranger, which is researched and written by the student. The story could be about anyone but needs to be someone that the student doesn’t know. Keep in mind that the story needs to be newsworthy.
Part 2:  (30 per cent) Students submit a 1200-word essay that addresses the ethical issues and key laws that arose in researching and writing the story (Part 1). Students explain how these ethical issues were resolved and include the reasoning behind the decisions made. This discussion needs to be referenced throughout using codes of ethics and scholarly referencing.
Length: 
500-word story
1200-word essay
Further Information: Students must address the following in their essay:
The process by which consent was obtained, including details about the student’s declaration of purpose, undertakings concerning identification and sourcing, and statements concerning the use of material from the interview
Comprehensive identification of the ethical issues that arose from the interview and the writing of the story, including fidelity to the undertakings given to the subject, and issues concerning the portrayal of the subject
Newsworthiness and suitability of writing and form
Attached documents:
1. Interview with Interviewee 
2. Further breakdown on the assignment 

Please do a correct solution without mistakes, without similarities, without plagiarism. Put the answer in the file and make sure to solve all the paragraphs. If you do a good job, I have many assignments that I will ask you to do. Check yourself and do your best
Make sure the plagiarism rate is zero

I attached the document that needs a case brief Do NOT use quotes from the opinion. Use your own words (except as indicated below) Remember to include only the most relevant information. There is purposely information below that is not supposed to be in your case brief. (Which is modeled after real judicial opinions which almost always include extraneous information.) As noted in a lecture, different headings are sometimes used, as they are in the course materials. For our purposes, however, use the following: NAME OF CASE: Simply copy the name of the case as shown. CITATION: Simply copy the citation. COURT: Simply copy the name of the court issuing the opinion. FACTS: These are the most relevant facts that happened to the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) or other relevant parties before anyone sued anyone. PROCEDURAL HISTORY: The first sentence should indicate that the plaintiff(s) sued the defendant(s) and what the legal claims were. Next will come a sentence indicating what happened at the trial court (i.e., who won what.) This is followed by a descriiption of any appeals that were made and the results of them. The last sentence will indicate that a party appealed to this court. ISSUE(S): List the legal issue(s) that the court is addressing in this case. (This is usually much narrower than whatever issues were raised at the lower court.) Phrase the issue(s) as a question and generalize beyond the specific parties (e.g., “Can a landowner shoot a trespasser with a bow and arrow?” and not “Whether Mr. Frank could shoot Mr. Joe or not.”) HOLDING(S): The answer(s) to the question(s) posed above. If the issue(s) is/are written correctly, then the holding(s) will merely answer the question(s) posed (e.g., “No, a landowner cannot shoot a trespasser with a bow and arrow.”) REASONING: This is a step-by-step descriiption of how the court answered the question(s) posed. This will always involve Rule(s) of Law that the court cites, as well as how the facts apply to the Rule(s) of Law. (“The Tower Doctrine allows landowners to protect their property but with swords or other handheld weapons, not with projectile devices. An arrow is a projectile, not a handheld weapon.”) JUDGMENT: This is what the court does in regards to the decision at the lower court. Usually it will be “Affirmed” (if they agree with the court below) or “Reversed” (if they disagree.” This section will usually be very few words. SUMMARY OF CONCURRING OR DISSENTING OPINIONS: If a decision is not unanimous, some of the judges might write a concurring opinion (typically when they agree with the holding, but not the reasoning) or dissenting opinion (typically when they disagree with the reasoning and/or the holding.) If a decision has such an opinion (the below does not), then write a one-paragraph summary of it/them. Focus on why the judge(s) wrote a concurrence or dissent

Your written assignment is to submit a paper answering each of the questions below. Based on the nature of these topics, it is anticipated that a thorough examination will result in approximately 1-2 pages of text for EACH of the following, not including your cover page, abstract, and references. You must collectively cite a minimum of two (2) scholarly resources in the body of your paper for this entire assignment, not each individual question. Please make sure that you are meeting all of the requirements outlined in the Assignment Requirements.