Category: Law

Write an assignment of around 5 pages + references. Style is quite free but probably starting with an introduction and ending with a conclusion or final thoughts. It can be a mix of essay like writing, but it also can have points, definitions, my thoughts……. it should have valid references, and citations…. and it should be mainly from EU perspective but I study in Portugal so it can say a little something about that…..

Format
Assignment files should be prepared using MS Word to allow your tutor to insert comments and feedback. If you do not have this software, contact your tutor to discuss whether other arrangements can be accommodated.
Background
Businesses face multiple risks if they do not ensure a safe and respectful workplace for their employees and clientele. An employer must not discriminate against or engage in harassment of employees. Further, a business may be held liable for such acts committed by its employees if it does not take steps to prevent them or rectify the situation if they occur. One good way of avoiding such problems and dealing with them appropriately is by way of a harassment policy and related procedures. This assignment encourages you to explore the potential of such a policy in an employment context that you are familiar with.
Instructions
Identify an employer for whom you work or have worked, or another organization you have been a member of or volunteered for, and provide its name and website, Facebook page, or other online source of information about it using working links. Describe your relationship with the organization.
Determine whether the organization is subject to the Canadian Human Rights Act, or the human rights legislation of a province or territory by checking this Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) website . State the legislation which is applicable to your organization and explain why.
Assume that you have been tasked with preparing a harassment policy for the organization you have chosen and download this template from the CHRC . Open it in Word and save it as a document you can edit.
Review the instructions in the template and list the titles of personnel in your organization that you would choose to fill the following roles and explain your choices: Position A and Position B.
Complete the template filing in the blanks for Position A and B and change the references from the Canadian Human Rights Act to the relevant legislation if necessary. Attach the completed policy document to your submission.
Read this arbitration decision  and explain how the case of Mr. Lewis might have been handled differently if the policy you have prepared had been in force for the railway company at the time of the events of that case.

Part 1:  (20 per cent) Students are required to write a 500-word news story about a stranger, which is researched and written by the student. The story could be about anyone but needs to be someone that the student doesn’t know. Keep in mind that the story needs to be newsworthy.
Part 2:  (30 per cent) Students submit a 1200-word essay that addresses the ethical issues and key laws that arose in researching and writing the story (Part 1). Students explain how these ethical issues were resolved and include the reasoning behind the decisions made. This discussion needs to be referenced throughout using codes of ethics and scholarly referencing.
Length: 
500-word story
1200-word essay
Further Information: Students must address the following in their essay:
The process by which consent was obtained, including details about the student’s declaration of purpose, undertakings concerning identification and sourcing, and statements concerning the use of material from the interview
Comprehensive identification of the ethical issues that arose from the interview and the writing of the story, including fidelity to the undertakings given to the subject, and issues concerning the portrayal of the subject
Newsworthiness and suitability of writing and form
Attached documents:
1. Interview with Interviewee 
2. Further breakdown on the assignment 

Please do a correct solution without mistakes, without similarities, without plagiarism. Put the answer in the file and make sure to solve all the paragraphs. If you do a good job, I have many assignments that I will ask you to do. Check yourself and do your best
Make sure the plagiarism rate is zero

I attached the document that needs a case brief Do NOT use quotes from the opinion. Use your own words (except as indicated below) Remember to include only the most relevant information. There is purposely information below that is not supposed to be in your case brief. (Which is modeled after real judicial opinions which almost always include extraneous information.) As noted in a lecture, different headings are sometimes used, as they are in the course materials. For our purposes, however, use the following: NAME OF CASE: Simply copy the name of the case as shown. CITATION: Simply copy the citation. COURT: Simply copy the name of the court issuing the opinion. FACTS: These are the most relevant facts that happened to the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) or other relevant parties before anyone sued anyone. PROCEDURAL HISTORY: The first sentence should indicate that the plaintiff(s) sued the defendant(s) and what the legal claims were. Next will come a sentence indicating what happened at the trial court (i.e., who won what.) This is followed by a descriiption of any appeals that were made and the results of them. The last sentence will indicate that a party appealed to this court. ISSUE(S): List the legal issue(s) that the court is addressing in this case. (This is usually much narrower than whatever issues were raised at the lower court.) Phrase the issue(s) as a question and generalize beyond the specific parties (e.g., “Can a landowner shoot a trespasser with a bow and arrow?” and not “Whether Mr. Frank could shoot Mr. Joe or not.”) HOLDING(S): The answer(s) to the question(s) posed above. If the issue(s) is/are written correctly, then the holding(s) will merely answer the question(s) posed (e.g., “No, a landowner cannot shoot a trespasser with a bow and arrow.”) REASONING: This is a step-by-step descriiption of how the court answered the question(s) posed. This will always involve Rule(s) of Law that the court cites, as well as how the facts apply to the Rule(s) of Law. (“The Tower Doctrine allows landowners to protect their property but with swords or other handheld weapons, not with projectile devices. An arrow is a projectile, not a handheld weapon.”) JUDGMENT: This is what the court does in regards to the decision at the lower court. Usually it will be “Affirmed” (if they agree with the court below) or “Reversed” (if they disagree.” This section will usually be very few words. SUMMARY OF CONCURRING OR DISSENTING OPINIONS: If a decision is not unanimous, some of the judges might write a concurring opinion (typically when they agree with the holding, but not the reasoning) or dissenting opinion (typically when they disagree with the reasoning and/or the holding.) If a decision has such an opinion (the below does not), then write a one-paragraph summary of it/them. Focus on why the judge(s) wrote a concurrence or dissent

Your written assignment is to submit a paper answering each of the questions below. Based on the nature of these topics, it is anticipated that a thorough examination will result in approximately 1-2 pages of text for EACH of the following, not including your cover page, abstract, and references. You must collectively cite a minimum of two (2) scholarly resources in the body of your paper for this entire assignment, not each individual question. Please make sure that you are meeting all of the requirements outlined in the Assignment Requirements.

Your written assignment is to submit a paper on the topic below. Based on the nature of this topic, it is anticipated that a thorough examination will result in approximately 6-8 pages of text, not including your cover page, abstract, and references. You must cite a minimum of two (2) scholarly resources in the body of your paper. Please make sure that you are meeting all of the requirements outlined in the Assignment Requirements.

The Question will be posted on Saturday 09.30 (GMT+7). There will be 2 questions.
1. Restructuring shareholding structure to minimize tax burden (ex. setting up offshore holding companies in SG/HK)
2. Tax Related Questions: could be
– assessing taxable income of a foreigner bringing income into Thailand; or
– How can a person distribute their wealth to their family with least tax burden

i will add the rubric that has all the guidelines and instructions, please follow as asked and inword document style not pdf. as well ill add artciles and law’s from saudi that u can use as sources 🙂 if in arabic translate to english. thank you

Is the criminal justice system racist? 1. Answer this question and support your response by examining and explaining the disparity in incarceration rates between minorities and whites. 2. Do these statistics support the notion that the system is racist, or are there other factors that account for the disparities? Discuss.