CASE GREEN EARTH BUILDERS (GEB)
Green Earth Builders (GEB) is a UK-based company planning to expand into the Brazilian market. Mr. Thompson, the director of the company, visited Brazil recently to gain insights into the local market. He discovered that Brazil’s regulatory framework is quite complex. During his visit, Mr. Thompson met with a Brazilian construction firm located in Sao Paulo, which expressed interest in collaborating with GEB.
You work for a consultancy firm specializing in helping companies enter new markets. You have been tasked with creating a comprehensive strategy for GEB to enter the Brazilian market. You are to prepare a detailed and clear report for Mr. Thompson, outlining the opportunities and challenges of the Brazilian market, with a particular focus on legal aspects. As requested by Mr. Thompson, your report should address the following points:
Should GEB start operations in Brazil immediately by establishing a new company? If so, what type of company would you recommend and why? Provide detailed information about the recommended company structure, including amount of the capital, potential partners, and the location of the company’s headquarters. Justify all your answers.
If GEB decides to partner with the Brazilian company, what are the primary legal considerations to keep in mind? For example, what type of contract (joint venture, franchise, consortium, acquisition, merger, etc.) would you recommend and why? Should the agreement be between GEB and the Brazilian company directly, or between GEB’s Brazilian subsidiary (NEWCO) and the Brazilian company? What are the implications of each option? Provide your recommendation to Mr. Thompson, supported by clear justifications.
GEB is a well-known brand in Europe and the UK but not in Brazil or South America. What strategies would you recommend for building brand recognition and protection in Brazil? Additionally, GEB holds several patents in Europe and the UK but none in Brazil. Are GEB’s patents and trademarks protected in Brazil? If not, what measures should be taken and when (immediately, in the future, and why)?
Mr. Thompson has noted the recent corruption issues in Brazil, such as the Operation Car Wash scandal and the Odebrecht case. What concerns should GEB consider regarding corruption in Brazil? Note that GEB plans to undertake large-scale infrastructure projects like green buildings, renewable energy installations, sustainable urban developments, and eco-friendly transport systems, with the Brazilian government as a frequent client?
Prepare the report addressing the issues outlined above, no AI no Plagiarism, precise work. You can and shall consult books and references in general, as well as Internet sources. If you do copy from a book, internet materials etc., please indicate the source, otherwise this will be considered as an illegal copy (plagiarism) and shall be treated accordingly.
Category: Law
-
“Entering the Brazilian Market: Legal Considerations and Strategies for Green Earth Builders (GEB)”
-
“Defending the Rights of a Wronged Student: Uncovering the Deceptive Tactics of a Manipulative College”
Step 1. Edit and rewrite the document from a lawyer and
attorney perspective. You are defending a theoretical student who his college and the educational system have harmed with false promises. Then, the college tried to cover up its mistakes by deleting emails and using other psychological tactics.
Step 2. Use the information from the document and the story
to answer the questions and the defense application from an attorney’s and
lawyer’s perspective. This is probably the most essential part. It needs to be from a
Saul Goodman perspective, using terms only high-class judges and attorneys know. -
“Assessing the Effectiveness of Legal and Non-Legal Responses to Surrogacy and Birth Technologies: A Critical Evaluation”
This task involves answering an unseen HSC-style question on the Family topic, under examination conditions.
The response should be approximately 1000 words (6 – 8 pages) and will be marked out of 25.
You will have 5 minutes of reading/planning time and 45 minutes of writing time. The question will be drawn from
the contemporary issue of Surrogacy and Birth Technologies.
In preparation for the in-class task, you need to:
• investigate and research the contemporary issue Surrogacy and Birth Technologies
• evaluate the effectiveness of the legal and non legal responses to the issue
• apply the criteria to make an evaluation. This may include, but is not limited to the following:
P – protection of individual rights
E – enforceability
A – accessibility
R – resource efficiency
R – responsiveness
J – justice been achieved?
A – application of the Rule Of Law
M – meeting society’s needs
You will need to synthesise information from a range of sources, including cases, legislation, the media, and
international instruments, to support a legal argument in answering the Extended Response question.
Make a list of relevant LCMID that you will use
Familiarise yourself with the principal focus and the themes and challenges.
Prepare a plan of proposed questions.
Read exemplar responses from previous questions. -
The Evolution of Standards of Decency: The Decline of Support for the Death Penalty and its Potential Unconstitutionality
“Evolving standards of decency” is seen not only in fewer and fewer Americans supporting the death penalty, but it can be seen as a legal trajectory by the US Supreme Court to make it unconstitutional. Discuss.
-
“Addressing and Understanding Inappropriate Relationships between Inmates and Correctional Officers: Suggestions and Insights from Research” Original Suggestion: Implement mandatory training and education programs for both inmates and correctional officers on appropriate boundaries and professional conduct within the prison setting.
First, after reading the article, “Preventing Fatal Attractions,” come up with an original suggestion as to how inappropriate relationships between inmates and correctional officers can be stopped. Please note, your suggestion may be creative; however, it should also be realistic. And, your suggestion must not have been discussed in the Worley et al. (2010) article. Next, after reading and reflecting upon the articles for Week Three, in your opinion, why do some correctional employees cross the line and behave inappropriately with inmates, given that this behavior is illegal and against policy. It should be evident that you have carefully reflected upon the assigned readings. And, after reading the article, “The Economics of Crossing Over,” point to one significant research finding that you found to be of interest. Be sure to discuss how this finding advances our understanding of guard-inmate boundary violations. Also, please discuss why this particular finding may be of interest to correctional administrators and/or policymakers. Next, how do you think inappropriate staff-inmate relationships occur? Who initiates the relationship: inmates or staff members? Try to explain these dynamics as best as you possibly can . Be sure to point to various aspects of all three article to support this aspect of your response. And, in your opinion, what is the most important aspect of article by Trammell and colleagues? How can correctional administrators use this study to create a more equalitarian and humane workplace for employees? Be specific. Finally, make a comparison between any two of the research articles (your choice). Explain how these two articles both provide insights into any aspect that is germane to the interactions between staff and inmates.
-
Title: The Power and Ethics of Discovery and Witness Preparation in the Legal System
Separate each section accordingly. EACH section should have an intro, body, conclusion. Each section needs it’s own refrence.
Section 1: Give your opinion as to what you consider the most effective discovery tool and why.
Section 2: Discuss the process of witness preparation and provide your opinion as to any ethical concerns there may be. Give an example of going too far! -
The Impact of Wealth, Race, and Gender on the Criminal Justice System 1. “Inequality in the Criminal Justice System: The Influence of Wealth, Race, and Gender” 2. “Uncovering the Truth: Hidden Realities in U.S
Part 1 Law Enforcement, Criminal Prosecution, Punishment and Sentencing After Reading Chapters 9 and 10 of your book and learning the authors’ perspectives, answer the following questions. Be sure to elaborate by giving examples to bolster your position. 1. Explain the main differences between being wealthy and being poor as an individual travels through the criminal justice system, give examples of similarities and differences along the way. Feel free to get intersectional by adding race, gender, sexual orientation or nationality. 2. In the U.S. penal violence is mostly hidden from the public as well as the realities about who is contained there. Why is this concern? Who does it impact? How could this be changed? What should be done? https://read.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&asin=B079YZ43Q6&consumptionLimitReached=false&hasMultimedia=false&requiredCapabilities=EBOK_PURCHASE_ALLOWED&ref=yb_qv_ov_kndl_rn_rw&yourBooksUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fyour-books%3Fref%3Dyb_ip_dp_iou_d%26ccs_id%3D92ebc959-7704-4aa8-8631-b7be40d99622%26filtersMapping%3D%257B%2522contentFilter%2522%253A%255B%255D%257D%26ref_%3Dyb_ip_kwf_rn_a 3. In terms of race control, how does the criminal justice system work to the disadvantage of minorities and to the advantage of nonminorities? Please give examples. 4. How has the identification of criminals been affected by the intersection of at least two of any combination of the three variables – class, race and gender? Kindly provide examples.
-
1. Who was selected Foreman and why? Identify characteristics and rationales. The Foreman in “Twelve Angry Men” was Juror 1, played by Martin Balsam. He was selected as the Foreman because he was
Please first list the question followed by your answer.
VIDEO: Watch the film: “Twelve Angry Men” and answer the following questions:
INCLUDE THE QUESTIONS IN BOLD AND NUMBERED IN YOUR FINAL WORK PRODUCT. THEN ANSWER EACH QUESTION BELOW THE QUESTION IN A WELL ORGANIZED AND WELL WRITTEN WORK PRODUCT.
Who was selected Foreman and why? Identify characteristics and rationales.
Identify and list the number and types of evidence considered during deliberation. -
Title: Compliance Risks and the Case of Mexico’s World Cup Captain on a U.S. Blacklist
1. Describe at least three compliance risks faced by financial institutions vis-a-vis Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.
2. “Rafael Márquez, one of the best-known stars on Mexico’s World Cup soccer team, is….on a United States Treasury Department blacklist of people it says have helped launder money for drug cartels….FIFA, world soccer’s governing body and organizer of the World Cup, routed Mexico’s portion of the $1.5 million it sent to each team to prepare for the tournament in euros via banks unconnected with the United States financial system.” See Mexico’s World Cup Captain Is on a U.S. Blacklist.
Actions
Please discuss the compliance risk to a bank involved in the transaction described above. -
“Auto Accident Interrogatories, Request for Admissions, and Proof of Service for Bob v. Sally in California”
Prepare form interrogatories, request for admissions and a proof of service for both in a matter involving an auto accident between Bob and Sally with injuries to both parties. Use California Judicial Council Forms. Assume Bob accuses Sally of running a red light and struck Bob in the intersection of 4th and Vine in Hollywood, California. All other details are left to your imagination.