Category: Information ethics

This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
In this course, we look at a variety of different human resource theories and styles. We also look at the different kinds of perspectives on ethical issues and how they fit into HRM. You are required to write a paper on a HRM topic. You will choose the topic you are most interested in. Choose a topic, and expand on it.
Some examples are given below, but it is recommended that you choose to write on a topic you have already encountered or you have thought about previously. Of necessity, the instructions for this assignment are somewhat vague. Each student will have to explore different resources and will need to develop an individual approach to the subject.
Identify, specifically, the strengths of your topic and what some weaknesses are. Drawing on various sources, explain the details of your topic. Assume I know nothing about this topic and share your research on it with me. Why is it important? What have you learned? What are the Pro’s and Con’s? When would this be used? What is the history on this topic?
Requirement: Using the terms, concepts, and theories learned in this course, write a 5 to 7 page (Arial or Times New Roman 12 pitch font with double-spaced lines) essay focusing on one specific Human Resource topic that we have studied over the past 7 weeks. You must also include a title page and reference page. The 5-7 pages do not include the title page/reference page.
Topic Suggestions:
Designing Jobs
Training and Development
Teamwork
Safety
Goal-Setting
Strategic Planning
Recruitment
Job-Performance
Testing
Task-Analysis
Reduction of Errors
Relationships
Action Planning
Separation
Roles
Dissatisfaction
Pay-Schedule
Benefits
Be sure to incorporate at least two (2) sources to support your essay. Use APA Style in your writing and review the rubric for guidance.
Due:
This is due at the end of Week 7.
Due on Jun 23, 2024 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: HRMT Writing Rubric
Print
Criteria

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
Strong beginnings and endings have the ability to persuade readers to read through an essay and to believe the writer’s argument. Spend time crafting, revising, and editing your conclusion.
The Concluding Paragraph is a summary of the most interesting highlights, including the hook. There is no new information. Remember like a bad ending to a pretty decent film, you do not want to leave your reader unsatisfied by providing a weak or rushed conclusion. Spend some time giving your reader one last reason to believe your argument/assertion.
Begin with the topic you wrote about in the Week 2 Discussion.
Summarize at least 2-3 sentences of the most interesting supporting details and/or evidence. Present them in a new way with new words and a new word order; in other words, the reader should not recognize sentences from earlier in the essay.
Restate the thesis in a new way with new words and a new word order. The reader should not recognize the thesis statement.
Submit the Concluding Paragraph in one MSWord document. Please add the thesis statement to the top of the document and hand it all in by 11:59 PM EST Sunday, Week 6.
Review the rubric here.
ILO.IS.B2; ILO.AL.B1; ILO.DL.B3; ILO.DL.B5
CO1; CO2; CO3; CO4; CO5
Due on Jun 16, 2024 11:59 PM
Attachments
Week 6 Sample Assignment.docx (14.04 KB) Download All Files

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
Each of the Body Paragraphs of an essay consist of a topic sentence, supporting details and evidence, and a concluding sentence. This week you will build the body paragraphs of your essay.
Begin with the topic you wrote about in the Week 2 Discussion.
Revise and edit the topic sentences from the Week 3 Assignment.
Use the topic sentences to begin each of the three body paragraphs.
Add at least 2-3 sentences of supporting details and/or evidence to each of the three body paragraphs.
Research your topic in Google Scholar and/or in the Trefry Library.
Try to add a fact or statistic to each body paragraph. 
When use the ideas of other authors, make sure you add citations and a Works Cited page (see Course Content).
Do not use direct quotes. We are focusing on paraphrasing ideas from outside sources in this class.
If you need to add an in other words or a for example or an in other words sentence to explain a point of evidence, please do so. 
Add a concluding/transition sentence for each body paragraph.
Revise and edit the three body paragraphs.
While you must submit all three paragraphs in one MSWord document, choose only one of the body paragraphs for feedback. Please add the thesis statement to the top of the document and hand it all in by 11:59 PM EST Sunday, Week 4. 
Check out the rubric here.
ILO.IS.B2; ILO.AL.B2; ILO.DL.B2; ILO.DL.B3; ILO.DL.B4; ILO.DL.B5
CO1; CO2; CO3; CO4; CO5
Due on Jun 2, 2024 11:59 PM

Five decades after the murder of Civil Rights leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., America finally had its first Black President in Barack Obama.  But many see among the forces that elected Donald Trump as our current President a reactionary regression to white nationalism and fanning the flames of racism.  They see America as more divided today than it has been in some time.  Others see it differently and say it’s all about “making America great again.”
Whatever your politics may be, let’s ask ourselves about racism and other forms of discrimination in America today.
Consider the 2012 case of the 17 year old unarmed Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by George Zimmerman who regularly watched for suspicious persons in the Sanford Florida neighborhood where Trayvon lived. Zimmerman was later acquitted of all criminal charges in this killing.  Or consider another case that same year of the 47 year old software engineer Michael Dunn who confronted four Black teens about their loud rap music in their SUV at a Florida convenience store. Dunn claimed he felt threatened and fired 10 shots into the SUV killing 17 year old Jordan Davis. Dunn fled the scene but later reported the incident to the police, claiming self-defense. On February 15, 2014, Dunn was convicted of attempted murder against the three surviving teens but the jury could not reach a verdict on the charge of his murdering Jordan Davis.  He was later retried and sentence to life without parole for the killing.
For this week’s discussion on equality and discrimination, please answer just ONE of the following two questions and then post at least two reply postings to others in the discussion:
[1] What do you see as the difference between individual racism and systemic racism and which if any are at work in the killings of Trayvon Martin or of Jordan Davis? Explain your position. Discuss the case you choose with two different people, preferably at least one of them being a person of color. Do they see racism at work in this case, and, if so, do they see it as individual racism or systemic racism or both? 
Another appalling form of discrimination and abuse is sexism.  Many thought that the access Hollywood tape that came out last fall showing the sexism of Donald Trump would sink his chance of becoming President but it did not.  Sexism is widespread today.  One would hope we have made progress against sexism but now we have the news of the accusations against the filmmaker Harvey Weinstein, which many are saying is not news because his alleged history of sexual harassment and abuse against women was known.   And others say this is only the tip of the iceberg regarding what is all too common today in many places.  Here’s a news clip on the accusations against Weinstein: LINKLinks to an external site..
[2] Do you believe that sexism, sexual discrimination, and sexual abuse are systemic problems in today’s world or can they be viewed and judged on an individual basis as individual problems of certain people?  And if one concludes they are systemic problems, does this mitigate the individual responsibility of those who practice it?  Or if it is purely an individual problem, how can we explain its prevalence around the world and in so many parts of our own society?

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
Strong beginnings and endings have the ability to persuade readers to read through an essay and to believe the writer’s argument. Spend time crafting, revising, and editing the introductory paragraph.
The Introductory Paragraph should include all the most interesting highlights. Remember while a movie trailer attempts to attract the viewer through visual means, the introductory paragraph attempts to attract the reader through powerful images in words:
Begin with the topic you wrote about in the Week 2 Discussion.
Create a strong hook. 
Add at least 2-3 sentences of the most interesting supporting details and/or evidence. Use evidence/quote sandwiches and/or explainer sentences if needed.
Revise your thesis statement from the Week 3 Assignment and add it as the last sentence in the introduction.
Submit the Introductory Paragraph in one MSWord document. Please add the thesis statement to the top of the document and hand it all in by 11:59 PM EST Sunday, Week 5.
Review the rubric here. 
ILO.IS.B2; ILO.AL.B1; ILO.DL.B3; ILO.DL.B5
CO1; CO2; CO3; CO4; CO5
Due on Jun 9, 2024 11:59 PM
Attachments
Week 5 Sample Assignment.docx (13.79 KB

I need help creating a capstone portfolio on google sites or wix ********************* email to create it.
Provide 3-5 sources I can use in the portfolio. Including MLA or apa citations .
I will be doing the “additional  writing prompt”(picture attached below ) , instead of past assignments.
I am a little confused with the assignment myself, let me know anything else is needed 

Instructions: This assignment is the first step to the Ethical Analysis Essay that you will work to complete throughout the term. These assignments require that you analyze a film’s ethical dimensions that include its characters and the story.
First, select a film from the list of available works. If you cannot access these films, you may select a different film, but you will require prior approval from your instructor.
Films for Ethical Analysis Essay
The Jacket (2005) (R) - A Gulf war veteran is wrongly sent to a mental institution for insane criminals, where he becomes the object of a doctor’s experiments, and his life is completely affected by them. The film centers on a wounded Gulf war veteran who returns to his native Vermont suffering from bouts of amnesia.
Extraordinary Measures (2010) (PG) - John Crowley is a man on the corporate fast-track, with a beautiful wife and three children. Just as his career is taking off, he learns that his two youngest kids have a fatal disease. John leaves his job and devotes himself to saving their lives. He joins forces with Dr. Robert Stonehill, a brilliant but eccentric scientist. Together they battle the medical and corporate establishment, racing against time for a cure.
Contagion (2011) (PG 13) - When Beth Emhoff returns to Minnesota from a Hong Kong business trip, she attributes the malaise she feels to jet lag. However, two days later, Beth is dead, and doctors tell her shocked husband that they have no idea what killed her. Soon, many others start to exhibit the same symptoms, and a global pandemic explodes. Doctors try to contain the lethal microbe, but society begins to collapse as a blogger (Jude Law) fans the flames of paranoia.
Joe vs. the Volcano (1990) (PG) (Comedy)–Joe Banks is dying, but his life has pleased him anyway. When a millionaire offers him the opportunity to die and to help others by doing so and in the meantime, to live like a millionaire, Joe grabs the opportunity. His absurdist journey to his demise helps him discover the meaning of existence.
Beethoven (1992) (PG) (Comedy)-A family adopts a St. Bernard puppy, to the chagrin of the father. The puppy grows and causes mishap after mishap. The father’s and family’s love for the dog is tested when a corrupt veterinarian kidnaps the dog for a deadly experiment.
Outbreak (1995) (R) (Drama)–An airborne virus threatens the world, beginning in a California town. A team of doctors is brought in to contain the situation. The doctors must fight against the clock to save the town and its residents after the Army is called in.
The Rainmaker (1997) (PG 13) (Drama)–A new attorney works for a less-than-reputable lawyer and meets a paralegal. An insurance company refuses to pay coverage for a woman’s dying son, and the new lawyer and paralegal team up to fight.
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (2017) (NR) (Documentary)–This tells the story of an African-American woman who died in 1951 at age 31 of cervical cancer. Her legacy, the HeLa cell line, was taken from her tumor while she was still alive.
The Father (2020) (PG 13) (Drama)-A man begins to doubt those he loves and even his own mind as he refuses help from his daughter as he ages.
Dallas Buyers Club (2013) (Drama)-An electrician learns he has AIDS and has just 30 days left to live. He smuggles unapproved drugs into the U.S. and joins with a fellow AIDS patient to sell the treatments to people who can’t wait for science to find a treatment.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1994) (R) (Horror)-Viktor Frankenstein recounts events from his life regarding a creature he brings to life from assembled body parts of dead people. He abandons the creature and the creature seeks revenge upon its maker.
Take Care of Maya (2023) (PG 13) (Drama)- A family experiences a nightmare after their daughter exhibits unusual symptoms and they seek medical help.
Next, view the film and then write a planning document using the following subheadings: 1) Introduction 2) Ethical Analysis. The planning document should be a minimum of 250 words in length (excluding title and references pages).
Introduction (Film Synopsis) – Recommended one paragraph
Brief film synopsis in your own words that includes the medical ethical dilemma present in the film and what happens in the film, including the ending.
Ethical Analysis – Recommended one to two paragraphs
Identify the ethical theory you have chosen to apply to the film. Briefly explain how the theory you selected applies to the film. Select one:
Virtue Ethics – Core Principles – telos, virtue, eudaimonism
Kantian Ethics – Core Principles – duty, universality, impartiality, reciprocity
Utilitarian Ethics – Core Principles – welfare, impartiality, sum-ranking, consequences
Identify the core principles of the ethical theory that apply to a medical ethical issue present in the film. Briefly explain how at least one of these core principles applies to the medical ethical issue. (You will expand upon this in the final essay and incorporate all of the core principles for your selected theory.)
APA Formatting – Your planning document must be written using APA format (including APA-approved fonts – e.g., Calibri or Times New Roman 12-point fonts). It should be double-spaced and include a title page and references page. Include in-text citations and references as needed for sources that support your work.
Required Citations and References – You will need to provide in-text citation(s) and reference for the film you select as well as course materials (media or readings) you use to inform your planning document. (USLO 7.4)

For this week’s discussion you are asked to create a 3-5 paragraph “talking points” paper in which you discuss the (CA) family of security controls. You should identify and discuss at least three specific controls from this family. Focus on how these controls provide for implementation of assessment, authorization, and monitoring functions to protect the organization’s information and information systems. CA-5, for example, calls for developing a specific plan of action and milestones to track security controls implementation. CA-2 requires that all security controls be assessed to determine if they are working as intended.
Your talking points will be incorporated into a budget presentation and, for that reason, should support (explain) the Office of Risk Management’s planned activities in this area for the next fiscal year. Full paragraphs are preferred for a talking points paper, but you may use a limited number of bullet points. Remember to use and cite authoritative sources in your work. Place your list of references at the end of your paper.
Remember to submit your discussion response to the Turn It In for Discussions assignment folder. See the forum instructions for more information.
For your critiques, focus on providing suggestions for strengthening the original poster’s analysis of the CA controls. Include at least 3 examples and/or content suggestions supported by your own readings (include citations and references for authoritative sources). For full credit, a total of two critiques and two additional responses or follow-up postings are required in addition to your main posting.
In the discussion for this week, you and your peers will be analyzing the CA family of security controls. These controls provide for implementation of assessment, authorization, and monitoring functions to protect information and information systems. CA-5, for example, calls for developing a specific plan of action and milestones to track security controls implementation. CA-2 requires that security controls be assessed to determine if they are working as intended.
Week 3 Readings: 
Chapter 4 in the (ISC2) SSCP Systems Security Certified Practitioner Official Study Guide, 3rd Ed. Available from the UMGC online library (UMGC student login required). https://go.oreilly.com/umgc/https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/isc-2-sscp-systems/9781119854982/
Review Section 3.4 Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring in NIST SP 800-53 rev 5. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r5.pdf

1.subject：Infrastructure Information Management
2.After setting the theme, send it to confirm
This is a group work.
It is necessary to complete the first two parts (picture marking part), a total of 1500 words +PPT.
800-word speech +PPT is required

About assignment- Symbolic logic and venn diagrams are tools that can be used to remove the content of an argument and examine whether or not the argument itself make sense. Using these tools, you will examine an argument using Symbolic logic and vent diagrams and ot truth tables in your paper. The paper must be a minimum of 1500 words minimum.
Prompts-  Debates about policy, philosophy, theology, and ethics abound in social media between family, friends, and strangers, and these arguments can get very heated. Symbolic logic is an objective way to evaluate an arguments logical consistency. 
For this essay, summarize the authors argument in the following article:
The virtues of patriotism, the vices of nationalism – https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2022/04/virtues-patriotism-vices-nationalism-george-stanciu.html#
Include the following elements in analysis
– deconstruct the authors main points into Symbolic statements (Symbolic letters and operators need to be used together to create Symbolic statements)
– use venn diagrams and or truth tables to examine the soundness of the authors argument
– discuss the results of your examination and the limitations of your analysis
– demonstrate how the authors argument could be applied to a different subject 
Formatting and sources- paper and sources must be in apa format. You must use 3 sources and cite them using apa format. Include a mix of both primary and secondary sources with atleast one source from a scholarly peer reviewed journal. 
When converting statements into Symbolic logic they must be correct and error free. Truth table and venn diagrams must be tabled correctly and diagrammed
Detail discussion of meaning of analysis and demonstration that reveal the strenths and weaknesses of structural arguments
English use must be professional. Paper must be organized in a meaningful way and point must be systematically covered.