Category: History

I will send the document with the requests and revisions I’d like from the ducment as well the additional document

Choose one of the following topics and write a 1500 word essay in which you support the position you adopt for or against one of the given propositions with historical evidence.
Cite any quoted material using end notes. You must use a minimum of three different sources to support your paper, and these must be cited in the end notes. At least one of the sources must be from a printed document (book, newspaper, magazine, journal, etc.), and at lease one source must be from an online resource, in other words, a website.
All sources must be cited according to the Chicago Manual of Style. 
Your research topic options are:
1. Religion was / was not a significant factor in the development of early world civilizations.
2. Trade was / was not a factor in generating cross-cultural contact between different civilizations.
3. Gender roles in early civilizations did / did not differ considerably from one society to another.
4. Settled agricultural societies were / were not superior to nomadic hunter-gatherer societies.
I would personally do 1 or 2, but I will leave you with full discretion to choose, however choose one and examples should be in relation or reference to either of the following time periods:
– Mesopotmia
– Ancient Persia
– Classical Asia and India 
– Classical Greece and Rome
– Medieval Easy Asia 
– The Fall of Rome
– Ancient Egypt
– Medieval South Asia 
– The Voyages of Discovery
I have personally expressed interest in Ancient Egypt, Byzantine Empire, Alexander the Great, Rome in general so I would perfer if specfic references to these were made, but not required. Once again you have full discretion to reference any point you wish.

I’m requesting a 3 1/2 min speech that speaks on behalf “Juneteenth Means to Me”. I need for the speech to be personable, heart-felt, passionate, DE&I inclusive.

This is a final research paper on a topic that you would like to choose. From there get 5 sources that relate to the topic and relate them in an essay format. If there is any confusion please relate to the attachments below.

[06:27, 12/05/2024] Makau Ngila: Lecciones Cultural (Cultural Lessons) Two Prompt: Using Studio and a presentation software such as Power Point, create a video presentation (using the ‘screenshare option on Studio provided in Canvas) exploring a cultural topic related to Mexican history during any point from 1910 to present day). Your presentation should balance 1) an overview of the topic meant to inform a general audience with 2) a deeper analysis that makes a nuanced argument or assertion (a thesis). Remember to include any/all necessary historical context that a general audience would need. Make sure to provide necessary names, definitions and dates. When creating your podcast, please use at least: One (1) scholarly, tertiary source (like a scholarly textbook or encyclopedia) Two (2) scholarly, secondary sources (like an article in an academic journal or edited volume/anthology) Two: (2) primary source ( these can be textual or visual or audio) Include a final slide providing bibliographic information from all sources used. An excellent podcast: Is informative, factually-accurate, and compelling. Strikes a balance between accessibility for a general audience with nuanced analysis for a scholarly audience. Draws on diverse and relevant sources to inform the producer(s)’s discussion of the topic. Is well-structured, so as to present a coherent narrative and analysis of the topic. Makes use of all required sources and cites them using proper bibliographic form. See “Citation Reference” link in Canvas. [09:44, 12/05/2024] Makau Ngila: Discussion Twelve Respond to all prompts with substantive, informed answers In Frazier and Cohen’s article, “Defining the Space of Mexico ’68: Masculinity in the Prison and ‘Women’ in the Streets,” discuss the authors lens and thesis. How did gender shape experiences and activism during the 1968 student movement in Mexico? Specifically, discuss the experiences of male student leaders imprisoned in Lecumberri. How did that experience shape the narrative of their role in the movement? What are specific ways in which women participated in the student movement, and why/how were they excluded from popular (and academic) recollections of the movement? Discuss primary sources included in Elena Poniatowska’s Massacre in Mexico. What stood out to you? What did you find most valuable for understanding the Tlatelolco massacre, and why? What did you find confusing or difficult to understand? Unread postHL Hector Loredo Apr 19 8:58am Last reply Apr 21 4:50pm Reply from Hector Loredo In Frazier and Cohen’s article, “Defining the Space of Mexico ’68: Masculinity in the Prison and ‘Women’ in the Streets,” discuss the authors lens and thesis. In Frazier and Cohen’s article, the authors adopt a critical lens to examine the events surrounding the 1968 student protests in Mexico City. They analyze two key locations during the protests: the prison, which they argue represents masculinity and state power, and the streets, where the presence of women and marginalized groups challenged traditional gender roles and power structures. The article’s central thesis revolves around the intersection of gender during 1968. Frazier and Cohen argue that the physical spaces of the prison and the streets served as sites where gender norms were contested and reaffirmed. They suggest that within the male-dominated space of the prison, notions of masculinity were rigidly enforced through acts of violence and domination. “The prison dynamic encapsulated a particular relationship between suffering and thriving that was mediated by a constant threat of violence.” (Frazier, Cohen, Pg. 632). On the other hand, the streets played significant roles in the protests for women, challenging patriarchal structures and asserting their agency. “Women had a very important role because we participated just like men” (Frazier, Cohen, Pg. 653). “These kinds of street initiatives are key to understanding the movement’s success in gathering support outside universities and secondary schools”(Frazier, Cohen, Pg. 642). Overall, Frazier and Cohen’s lens considers gender as a critical factor in understanding historical events and social movements. How did gender shape experiences and activism during the 1968 student movement in Mexico? Specifically, discuss the experiences of male student leaders imprisoned in Lecumberri. How did that experience shape the narrative of their role in the movement? What are specific ways in which women participated in the student movement, and why/how were they excluded from popular (and academic) recollections of the movement? Gender played a significant role in shaping experiences and activism during the 1968 student movement in Mexico. Male student leaders imprisoned in Lecumberri faced unique challenges that influenced the narrative of their role in the movement. Their imprisonment also helped their position as symbols of resistance. On the other hand, women played crucial roles in the student movement, actively participating in protests, organizing events, and providing essential support to their male partners. “Women not only supplied political prisoners with their daily rations but also donated their professional services as doctors, lawyers, psychiatrists, teachers, and journalists.” (Frazier, Cohen, Pg. 648). However, their contributions were often marginalized or overlooked. Women faced exclusion from leadership positions and were frequently relegated to supporting roles, reinforcing traditional gender roles and hierarchies within the movement. Discuss primary sources included in Elena Poniatowska’s Massacre in Mexico. What stood out to you? What did you find most valuable for understanding the Tlatelolco massacre, and why? What did you find confusing or difficult to understand? The Massacre in Mexico” by Elena Poniatowska is a paperwork that dives into the tragic events of the Tlatelolco massacre that occurred on October 2, 1968, in Mexico City. Poniatowska’s primary sources include interviews with survivors, eyewitness accounts, official documents, and journalistic reports. What stands out to me the most about Poniatowska’s paper is the use of primary sources she gathered. One of the most valuable aspects of Poniatowska’s approach is her inclusion of multiple perspectives. By including versions from various individuals involved in the events leading up to the massacre, she offers readers a complete view of the social tensions and government response. However, one of my challenges was the sources and viewpoints presented in the book. Poniatowska brings together interviews, historical documents, and her narrative, which can sometimes make it difficult to follow between firsthand accounts and the author’s interpretation. Overall, Poniatowska’s use of primary sources in “Massacre in Mexico” offers an effective and immersive exploration of one of the darkest moments in Mexico’s history. Make it 12 to 15 pages

Complete a 2-3 page paper answering ONE of these questions using primary sources:
1. What is “right” and “wrong” in the estimation of the writers about the capture and sale of human beings?  How do they justify slavery?  On what grounds do they protest the institution? 
2. Compare the different formats for these readings (official chronicles from government, military, and trading officials, personal accounts & letters, laws, and enslaved peoples’ accounts).  How do they differ in their viewpoints?
3. What are the essential differences or similarities between the European-Indigenous encounter we’ve been studying so far and the European-African encounter we’ve looked at this week?
Your case study for this module includes first-hand accounts of people involved in the slave trade in the sixteenth, seventeenth (and sometimes early eighteenth) centuries. These collections include authors from a variety of countries and discuss slavery in North America from multiple perspectives. Choose the sources that best fit your topic above.
Sources:
https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/exploration/text7/text7read.htm
https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/freedom/text6/text6read.htm
https://www.nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/power/text8/text8read.htm
https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/power/text9/text9read.htm
https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/settlement/text6/SlavePlotMexico.pdf
https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/settlement/text6/EnslavedIndians.pdf
How to approach this paper
1. Read through the assignment below, and the Grading Criteria for Papers prior to beginning this assignment.  
2. Identify the central question of the case study. 
KEY TO A GOOD GRADE: 3. Use quotes and descriptions of primary sources (from this course) to answer the central question.
4. Make sure your paper is well organized. It should have an introduction that addresses the central question. It should have organized paragraphs that address each central issue in turn and uses the primary sources as evidence. And it should have a conclusion.
5. Don’t summarize the primary sources paragraph by paragraph, but use topic sentences and then primary sources to answer the question and make an argument about the past.
6. Quote length: Use only 2-3 line quotes and MINIMIZE the quotes you add from secondary sources. Paraphrase longer quotes while editing.
7. NO secondary sources from outside of class. 

answer following questions below
Answer all of the below questions in complete sentences. Answers should be 3-8 sentences long. 
Chapter 1 Review Questions
1.How did humans evolve, and where did they migrate?
2.What were the key features of Paleolithic society?
3.How did plant and animal domestication develop, and what effects did it have on human society and the environment?
4.How did growing social and gender hierarchies and expanding networks of trade increase the complexity of society in the Neolithic period?
Making Connections and Comparisons
3. Why and how did social hierarchies develop?

Write a 2 page response essay in which you discuss the documentary.  Helpful hint: Take notes as you watch the documentary!
The first thing you’ll want to do in your paper is give a brief summary of the documentary.  Discuss its focus, themes, and  main points.  Include some details about the documentary.  If you had to describe this documentary to someone who has never seen it, what would you tell them?  
Next, discuss your thoughts on the video.  Questions to consider as you reflect on what you learned include:
-What was the main point of the documentary?
-Was the documentary successful in making its main points?
-What did you learn that you didn’t know before?  
-Did you like the documentary?  Why or why not?
-Is there anything that you learned that surprised you or didn’t surprise you?
-Would you recommend this documentary to friends and family? 
And remember, this is YOUR reflection/response.  Feel free to include your thoughts on what you watched even if they don’t necessarily line up with the questions listed above. 

so I have already made the exact same order but unfortunately I havent specified that this writing should be in the context of The Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment- at least in part- because this is the name of the subject.
i will attach both my teachers instructions as well as the previous essay which got accused of AI and did not get accepted by my teacher.
the highlighted parts are some of the parts that my teacher accused of being AI written.
So from what was said, i just need a new writing- you can correct this one I attached below(preferably)- and make it non-AI, or you can make another essay

Analyze the similarities, differences, and legacies of these two key struggles for racial just in the United States