Category: Healthcare

Part 1 
Group roles (3)
Task completion(3)
Cooperation(4)
Conflict resolution (2)
Focus on task (1)
Part 2:
I’d consider myself time manager so we can work everything out as a group and to make sure we are working within the rubric of the project 
2The digital product about teenagers vaping and i reached out for help with a friend that animator so they guide me step to step and teaching me about animation so we can deliver the most creative with the help of my group about the transcript for the video
3)I think when we divided the work everyone chose the task they are best when i chose time management to remind everyone of the time making sure everyone is doing their work on the time before submission i was happy and turning in early relieved me and i think it was a stress until we turned everything in 
4)I think the best process we made that helped us as a group is meeting regularly from time to time online and at campus this is the best thing we made that helped us as a group to keep track and give each other comments and ideas suggestions and any points to make sure we are working as the rubric 
5)I think i could have done better if i had a look on the presentation double checking the presentation before turning in so we couldn’t have over lapping of ideas on the introduction we worked together and this is the best group i worked with this course as everyone cares for the final outcome . But if id change one thing is to start earlier so we could not be in stress . I think we did the best group working together and cooperation was the best think and we all reply to each other quickly in WhatsApp group. I think we could have done better to edit the slides more and to make sure we are not over lapping ideas 
6)
Please go through the rubric and make sure it is in the highest grade

What does succession planning entail and what are its essential steps?
Are there any disadvantages to using a nine-box grid for succession planning? Would you have any difficulty in categorizing anyone who reports or has reported to you into one of the boxes? If you never managed a team, think about employees you have worked with in the past and how you would categorize them.
Do you think most people frequently move from one box to another or do most people tend to stay in one box for long periods of their careers?

Assignment Instructions
For this assignment, use the Environmental Analysis Briefing Report Assignment Template [DOCX] to prepare a 2–3 page briefing report. Imagine creating this report for your CEO to review. Keep your report precise, clear, and professional. For this report:
Provide a brief introduction to this report and its purpose.
Use the factor from the AHA’s most recent Environmental Scan report you chose for the Week 2 assignment and evaluate 2–3 environmental issues you feel best relate to this factor and your organization.
Using a tool of your choice or a tool your current workplace uses (e.g., TOWS, SWOT, PESTEL, et cetera) evaluate where the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats exist related to this factor.
Explain the tool you chose for the internal and external analysis and why you chose it.
For example, if you chose workforce as your factor, what tool would you use to determine the issues?
Explain the environmental issues you identified using the tool you chose and that are related to the AHA factor you chose. Explain how these issues impact the growth of the organization, and why.
Explain your plan to address the issues identified in your analysis.
Use evidence to support your assertions about how you would address the issues.
For example, for workforce, you might consider SHRM as one of your resources.
Depending on the factor chosen, consider additional data and resources from reputable sources and associations such as the American Hospital Association (AHA), American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE), National Center for Healthcare Leadership (NHCL), National Institutes of Health (NIH), et cetera.
Attach the tool you used as an appendix after the reference page of your report.
Additional Requirements
Document Format: Use the provided Environmental Analysis Briefing Report Assignment Template [DOCX] to create a professional executive summary.
Document Length: 2–3 double-spaced pages, not including the title, reference, or appendix pages.
Supporting Evidence: Include at least 3–5 academic or scholarly sources that match their in-text citations.
Readers of your summary will want to know the sources of your information, including any authoritative sources that support your analysis. Be sure to include all applicable sources.
Supporting evidence may include current accrediting body standards, industry standards, and government agency reports, including such sources as the AHA, National Academy of Medicine, Harvard Business Review (HBR), et cetera.
One source should be the AHA’s most recent Environmental Scan report.
APA Formatting: Format in-text citations and references according to current APA style and formatting. Evidence and APALinks to an external site. can help with this.
Submission Requirements: Submit your briefing report and appendix in the Assignment area.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze organizational structure, design, culture, and climate in relation to environmental forces.
Evaluate environmental issues that best relate to an environmental factor.
Evaluate where the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats exist related to an environmental factor.
Explain a tool used for internal and external analysis, and explain why it was chosen.
Explain the issues identified related to a chosen environmental factor, and explain how they impact the growth of an organization.
Competency 2: Develop a strategic organizational plan that provides human and financial resources to support targeted organizational outcomes.
Explain a plan for addressing issues identified in an environmental analysis.
Use evidence to support a plan for addressing issues.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in health care administration.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Assignment Instructions
Create an executive presentation in the form of 8–10 PowerPoint slides and create an audio or video recording (5 minutes or less in length) of yourself making the presentation to your audience. The presentation must describe an action plan to address the identified issues and a communication strategy to share the action plan with the organization’s stakeholders.
In the PowerPoint presentation:
Briefly share the issues you identified in your Week 4 assignment.
Analyze how you would address the issues relevant to the factor you chose (your action plan).
In your explanation include at least 3 actions.
Analyze the human resource and financial perspectives of your action plan.
For example, if you chose the factor Better Care and Greater Value (affordability and access, quality and safety, value-based delivery and payment models), and determined that under accessibility and affordability there were customers who did not have a way to communicate or access follow-up care, an issue is identified. Now that you know this issue, perhaps your action plan to address the issue is partnering with Verizon or AT&T to provide cell phones to those customers who are not able to afford the means of communicating or participating in their plan of care. Keep in mind that means addressing the financial perspective and how this impacts operations.
Describe your communication strategy that addresses the identified issues related to the factor chosen in your initial assignment and the resulting action plan.
Describe the effective leadership soft skills that are essential for this delivery, such as communication, motivating others, teamwork, problem-solving, adaptability, delegation, active listening, et cetera.
Describe a communication strategy that is appealing to your stakeholders.
Describe how you will get your stakeholders motivated to climb on board with your action plan.
Your executive PowerPoint presentation should have the following basic structure. It should be 8–10 slides in length, not including the title and reference slides. Be sure to use an appealing slide design:
Slide 1: Title slide.
Slide 2: Overview of the factor from the AHA Environmental Scan report you chose in Week 2.
Slides 3–5: Action Plan Initiatives (explain at least 3 action items based on your Week 4 analysis).
Slides 6–8: Communication Plan (consider leadership soft skills and best practices).
Slide 9: Conclusion slide (highlights the important takeaways for your audience).
Slide 10: Reference slide.
Presentation slides should consist only of bullet points to express the intended message. Add images where applicable.
Include detailed or in-depth discussion notes in the Notes section for each PowerPoint slide (the Notes section is required).
Proofread your presentation and make sure your citations and references are complete and are in APA format.
Create an audio or video recording of yourself presenting the PowerPoint presentation to your audience. This recording must be 5 minutes or less in length. You may use Kaltura or other compatible software.
Practice delivering your presentation to keep it less than 5 minutes in length.
Think about the content and how it should be delivered. You want this to be a motivating and captivating presentation to your CEO. If the CEO is captivated, the other stakeholders will be captivated.
As a current or future healthcare leader, your presentation is expected to be delivered clearly and professionally. Create this presentation as if you are presenting this to your workplace CEO.
Additional Requirements
Assignment Format: PowerPoint slides that include a Notes section, and audio or video recording.
PowerPoint Length: 8–10 slides, not including the title and reference slides.
Recording Length: 5 minutes or less.
Supporting Evidence: Include at least 3 academic or scholarly sources as needed to highlight and support strategies suggested and evidence-based assertions and best practices.
APA Formatting: Format in-text citations and references according to current APA style and formatting. Evidence and APALinks to an external site. can help with this.
Submission Requirements: Submit your PowerPoint slides and recorded audio or video presentation in the Assignment area.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze organizational structure, design, culture, and climate in relation to environmental forces.
Describe issues identified in an environmental scan of an organization.
Describe a communication strategy that addresses identified issues related to a specific environmental factor and the resulting action plan.
Competency 2: Develop a strategic organizational plan that provides human and financial resources to support targeted organizational outcomes.
Analyze how to address the issues identified in an environmental scan relevant to a specific environmental factor.
Analyze the human resource and financial perspectives of an action plan.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in health care administration.
Describe effective leadership soft skills that are essential for communicating an action plan.
Create an effective PowerPoint presentation, including detailed discussion notes.
Create an effective audio or video presentation conveying an action plan and communication plan.

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:
Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece to review the case studies you will be using for this assessment.
Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The Health Care Administration Undergraduate Program Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
Assess the credibility of the information source.
Assess the relevance of the information source.
Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 3 Example [PDF].

Medication Assisted Treatment has grown in popularity in recent years. For this assignment, students are asked to:
Attend a training on MAT. Go to this County website to choose a training: http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/phcommon/public/cal/index.cfm
Go into the discussion board on Medication Assisted Treatment and report on the following:
List the date and the name of the training you attended. 1 pt
Tell us what your understanding is of MAT and what its goals are for the patient who is taking it. 2 pts
Do you believe this is a good/promising treatment method? Give reasons to support your opinion. There is no ″one right answer″ to this question, but I am looking for your thinking on the topic. Support your views with supporting data from peer-reviewed journal articles or the course textbook. 3 pts
Who is eligible for MAT and where would they have to go to have it administered to them? 1 pts
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Discussion Topic
After reviewing “Required supplemental reading weeks 1-6” for week one material posted in Lectures, discuss What is meant by “communications skills” and, more specifically what we mean by good communications skills in Business Communications. You might talk about how business communications differs from “social” or other professional communications; you might talk about what you learned from the material, what you agreed with, what you disagreed with, what was missing, why it matters, and so on. I will be looking for discussion postings that reflect your understanding of the “Required” reading material and your ability to apply what you have learned to a real life business conversation.
Start the conversation early so others can participate– posting your contribution at 11PM on Sunday Night is not participating in the conversation.
There should be two threads per person at the forum (your initial and one other thread for your classmate) It is suggested that you distribute your postings throughout the week, at the beginning of the week and then comeback middle of the week and complete your other post. The next students are expected to read what others have already written and to add to the conversation once there is activity at the forum by posting the initial, and subsequent one other classmate post.. . Just saying ” I agree with Maria” does not add to the conversation. Opening a new thread is like talking to yourself in an empty room.
You must submit at least one other posting to your classmate in addition to your original “thread”.
Start the conversation early so others can participate– posting your contribution at 11PM on Sunday Night is not participating in the conversation.
Rubrics
Criteria
Exemplary (3 points)
Competent (2 points)
Developing (1 point)
Emerging (0 points)
Content (25%)
Discussion postings actively stimulate and sustain further discussion by building on peers’ responses including. — affirming statements or references to relevant research or, — asking related questions or, — making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research.
Discussion postings contribute to the class’ ongoing conversations as evidenced by stimulating additional discussion with limited supporting experience or research. Discussion postings respond to most postings of peers within a 48 hour period.
Discussion postings sometimes contribute to ongoing conversations as evidenced by stimulating additional discussion with limited supporting experience or research.
Discussion postings do not contribute to ongoing conversations or respond to peers’ postings. There is no evidence of replies to questions. Discussion postings are at midpoint or later in the week/module or contributions are only posted on the last day of the module. Student did not attempt activity.
Attitude & Etiquette (25%)
Written interactions on the discussion forum show respect, interest, and sensitivity to peers’ gender, cultural and linguistic background.
Written interactions on the discussion forum show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Some of the written interactions on the discussion board show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Written interactions on the discussion forum show disrespect for the viewpoints of others. Student did not attempt activity.
Quality of Writing/Proofreading (25%)
Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.
Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader.
Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication. Student did not attempt activity.
Timeliness/Frequency (25%)
Meets posting timeline guidelines in syllabus or special assignment.
All required posts with no more than one late.
All required posts with several late or missing required posts.
Missing required posts and/or all late. Student did not attempt activity.

Nurse Shuffle worked as a registered nurse in a state-run organization for fifteen years. In 1970, the state made a decision to close and transition all state-run hospitals to the private sector. The state required a number of nurses to remain employed with the new facility for a period of eight years. Nurse Shuffle was one of the state employees to continue employment under the new ownership. The facility Nurse Shuffle worked at was transitioned to a long-term acute care facility (LTAC). Nurse Shuffle remained as a staff nurse in the LTAC, which was a small facility with thirty-five inpatient beds.
In the years that followed, Nurse Shuffle became depressed over matters in her personal life. Given the mounting life pressures, she contrived ways to obtain controlled prescription medication from the medication drawers of patients. This practice became more urgent for Nurse Shuffle, who contrived more blatant, desperate measures to obtain controlled prescription medication. Eventually, she was caught, and she also confessed to having an addiction problem. Since Nurse Shuffle was a state employee, the administration decided to not terminate her but offered her an option of treatment at an addiction center. The facility would satisfy the due process protection afforded to government employees.
In the next ninety days, the LTAC facility closed down. Nurse Shuffle was released from rehabilitation treatment services but was without employment. She decided a change was needed and sought employment with a healthcare professional agency that provided nurses with healthcare facilities throughout the country. Nurse Shuffle accepted a one-year temporary position at a large teaching hospital as a nurse working the night shift in a surgical stepdown unit. Unfortunately, the strain of acclimating to a new setting and the night shift was too much to cope with, and she found opportunities to remove controlled prescription medication from the facility for personal use. Again, the behavior was discovered, Nurse Shuffle was prosecuted, and, as a consequence, her license was revoked.
An investigation revealed that there was no information on the file for the previous controlled prescription medication offense at the LTAC. Since the LTAC facility was in its waning days, some top human resource personnel left for other opportunities and the department was understaffed. The remaining personnel were lower-level clerks, who were unaware of the policy or procedure, and hence, no information was reported to the state for licensure purposes. The LTAC believed that Nurse Shuffle was entitled to due process since she was a government employee, and hence it her offered addiction treatment to resolve the matter. The employment agency conducted the standard state nursing license verification, and Nurse Shuffle failed to offer any information regarding the substance theft matter. The teaching facility where Nurse Shuffle accepted the assignment relied on the agency’s verification process because Nurse Shuffle was not considered the facility’s employee.
Interpret and explain the basis of due process protection and why it might or might not apply to Nurse Shuffle’s situation. Express your opinion regarding whether Nurse Shuffle should have been terminated or afforded the option of an addiction treatment program.
Explain the applicability of the FMLA to Nurse Shuffle’s situation.
Discuss the responsibility of the teaching hospital’s requirement to verify the licensure and professional credentials of Nurse Shuffle. Compare the verification burden for an agency employee versus a regular employee.

This is a 3 part assignment: I have attached the templates and rubric
Part 1 (1-2 pages)
Complete and apply Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to your own practice setting.
Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Part 2 (Reviewing the Literature)
Select at least one additional peer-reviewed article, not in the Competency Resources, that addresses a theory or concept for promoting healthy workplace environments.
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory or concept highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. NOTE: The response must synthesize and integrate at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.
Part 3 (Evidence Based Strategies to create high performance interprofessional teams (1-2 pages)
Recommend at least two evidence-based strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two evidence-based strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level desсrіptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
For this assessment, research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 4. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.
Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]resource. Write a brief overview of the selected health care problem or issue. In your overview:
Summarize the health care problem or issue.
Describe the professional relevance of this topic.
Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this health care issue or problem.
Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references.
Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find.
Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
Determine if the publication is current.
Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide a rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:
Identify the purpose of the article.
Summarize the information.
Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.
Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 2 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.