Category: Healthcare

Please make sure all in citations and references are listed correctly throughout the paper and Reference page. I am in the Healthcare field as a Pharmacy Technician.

Essay Option 3a: 
For purposes of this essay option, revisit our Discussion Forum for Week Eight (March 17—23), and
consider all the points made therein. Write a formal essay paper answering both the general and specific
questions presented in the Discussion Forum, showing that you have researched the required reading
assignments for that Discussion Forum, namely [1] “A Defense of Abortion,” by Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971),
[2] “In Defense of Abortion and Infanticide,” by Michael Tooley (1972), an Adobe Reader copy of which was
provided in my opening post to the Discussion Forum and [3] “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” by Don Marquis
(1991). The general question you must address for this Essay Option is “Can an unborn child’s “right to life”
ever outweigh the pregnant woman’s “procreative liberty” in consulting with a licensed doctor whom she
might afford to pay to perform an abortion — prior to the ability of the fetus to survive on its own, with
intensive hospital care, outside of the pregnant woman’s womb—and if so, then under what circumstances?”
The specific question is “Is it unethical for a state government, such as Arkansas and Missouri today, to restrict
access to abortion in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the unborn child has
Down syndrome in cases of Down syndrome, since such abortion discriminates against these disabled unborn
children?” In other words, if you were a lawmaker in a state such as Arkansas and Missouri today, both of
which states criminalize abortions in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the
unborn child has Down syndrome, would you vote to repeal that law? In May, 2021, led by the state of
Missouri, no less than twenty-two states filed a joint “Amici Curiae” (“Friends of the Court”) brief with the
U.S. Supreme Court, supporting and defending the Arkansas ban on Down syndrome abortions. The state of
Missouri, joined by twenty-one other states, argued that the Arkansas ban on Down syndrome abortions was
justified by at least eight compelling state interests. First, the law advanced the State’s interest in protecting an
entire class of persons from being targeted for elimination solely because of disability. Second, it advanced the
State’s interest in eradicating historical animus and bias against persons with Down syndrome. Third, it
safeguarded the integrity of the medical profession by preventing doctors from abandoning their traditional
role as healers to become the killers of disabled populations. Fourth, it drew a clear boundary against
additional eugenic practices targeted at disabled persons and others. Fifth, it served to counter the stigma that
eugenic abortion currently imposes on living persons with Down syndrome and other disabilities. Sixth, it
ensured that the existing Down syndrome community would not become starved of resources for research and
care for individuals with Down syndrome. Seventh, it protected against the devaluation of all human life
inherent in any decision to target a person for elimination based on an immutable characteristic. Eighth, it
fostered the diversity of society and protects society from the incalculable loss that would occur if people with
Down syndrome were eliminated. On August 1, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court filed judgment on an order
which vacated the Eighth Circuit ruling in Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Rutledge, No. 19-2690 (8th
Cir.), annulling the ruling and remanding the case “for further consideration in light of Dobbs v. Jackson
Women’s Health Organization, 597 U. S. 215 (2022),” effectively reversing the Eight Circuit’s order against the
enforcement of the Arkansas ban. The Supreme Court order dated June 30, 2022 also removed the Eighth
Circuit’s block against the enforcement of two other Arkansas statutes enacted in 2019 relating to abortions,
namely, § 20-16-2004, which banned providers from performing an abortion when the “probable age” of the
fetus is “determined to be greater than eighteen weeks’ gestation,” with exceptions for a “medical emergency”
or a pregnancy that results from rape or incest, and § 20-16-606, which provided that a provider who violates
these statutes commits a Class D felony and is subject to suspension or revocation of his or her medical license.
Again, the general question you must address for this Essay Option is “Can an unborn child’s “right to life”
ever outweigh the pregnant woman’s “procreative liberty” in consulting with a licensed doctor whom she
might afford to pay to perform an abortion — prior to the ability of the fetus to survive on its own, with
intensive hospital care, outside of the pregnant woman’s womb—and if so, then under what circumstances?”
The specific question is “Is it unethical for a state government, such as Arkansas and Missouri today, to restrict
access to abortion in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the unborn child has
Down syndrome in cases of Down syndrome, since such abortion discriminates against these disabled unborn
children?” In other words, if you were a lawmaker in a state such as Arkansas and Missouri today, both of
which states criminalize abortions in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the
unborn child has Down syndrome, would you vote to repeal that law? For purposes of this Essay Option 3A,
you can augment or intensify your individual research, elaborate or to embellish your points, and
demonstrate, in formal essay paper style, the reasoning and argumentation that led you to certain conclusions
that you may have posted in our Discussion Forum for Week Eight.

It may sound like a lot but I need a research topic chosen based on the feedback my professor left what I did was wrong I will attach the feedback here. I need the sources attached to the literature review matrix that I will attach below. I will need a topic, lit review matrix with sources. 
Please read everything carefully. 

The reflection you choose to submit is worth 5% of your grade for the module. Remember to complete your reflection using the Gibbs reflective model.
Your reflection should relate to one of the following sessions:
Session 4 – NHS Clinical Leadership Competency Framework (CLCF) Self-Assessment Tool
Session 5 – Self Insights and Leadership
IMPORTANT:
1. Remember to complete your reflection using the Gibbs reflective model. 2. Ensure that at the end of your reflection that you write a personal action plan that you will deliver back in your place of work. To ensure success make sure that your action plan includes, SMART goals, measures of success and a completion date.
Reffrnce should be in Vancover style please follow the guide that is stated in the PDF doc as it shows you how to cite things proprely
Do not change the formating style of the template.
Assure to fill in the tittles and headings.
I have attached the grading rubric assure that you write no less than 500 – 1000 words +-10% but make sure it is in between the range of 825 and above Clear detailes about the reflection is addedd
for smart goal you can create a table I work in ED so you can make it a 12 hour shift 570704719_Citing_and_Referencing : this is the vancover refercning guide
570704719_Pages_from_Student handbook: this doc contains the rubric Reflection 2 clear details .docx: this doc has full details about the reflection
Reflection Template 2024 V2.docx: you should use this doc to write in the reflection
570704719_Example_of_Excellent_Reflection_1.2_5723681991712581.docx: this is an example do not copy and past or plagrise

Propose and discuss practical primary, secondary, and tertiary strategies for prevention for ONE of the following: 
Cell phone use while driving 
Teenage pregnancy 
Avian influenza 
Sickle cell anemia 
Food-borne diarrheal disease 
Be sure to use appropriate epidemiologic data to frame your proposals and consider the economic, ethical, and political impact of your ideas. Two scholarly citations in AMA format is required.

Hey I am supposed to do a presentation of two slides on the article that I will upload, I have started working on it however I am stuck and am having trouble moving forward.
This outline should encompass the information you intend to present on the slide and the additional information that you intend to cover. The outline (and presentation) should include:
– background on the topic;
– the research question;
– brief details on the experiment itself (overview of methods, and interesting/clever details;
– brief summary of results;
– application to current knowledge (how this relates to/augments what you already know about the A&P system/topic); and/or
– limitations of the study (what didn’t work, why the conclusions might be limited); and/or
– areas of future research that build on the conclusions from the current study.

Description
Assignment Details:
Post-Change Process
Focus your submission on the following:
Compile 10 action items that should be considered after a change implementation.
Examine the potential risks involved after the change interventions have been implemented.
Conclude with the steps needed to monitor the outcomes of the change implementation and the 10 action items that should be used to mitigate change in the future.
Include a minimum of 2 citations from the texts.
Please submit your assignment.

Explain what a healthcare stakeholder is. Select 2 healthcare stakeholders from the list below and explain the role they play within the healthcare delivery system. Describe their interdependence.
Consumers
Employers
Hospitals
Pharmaceutical Companies
Physicians and Practitioners
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
Third-Party Payers
Home Healthcare Services
Outpatient Care Centers/Ambulatory Healthcare Services
Support your perspective using evidence-based information from your research with at least two outside scholarly sources.

It is an essay about the big issue in the USA,about the obeasity.The amin point is to direct the issue and show why is this a big problem  today,how did it change the life of the peopleand how did it affect their lifes.

As the Stanfield book goes on, it will discuss a variety of diseases and conditions. Some of these discussions will be accompanied by illustrations. These illustrations are far less graphic than are the illustrations in some other textbooks covering similar material. For example, some books include hundreds of full-color photographs showing flesh in particular stages of healing or decay associated with given injuries or illnesses, while most of the illustrations in the Stanfield book are simplified line drawings with two-tone shading.
Choose two of the health care professions listed in Chapter 6. In a thread you start, support first the claim that people entering one of these professions would need to see the most graphic illustrations possible as they learn about diseases, then the claim that people entering the other profession would not need to see illustrations that are any more graphic than are those in the Stanfield book. You might want to specify what responsibilities people in the first profession would have that those in the second would not.
In response to a thread someone else has started, give a hypothetical example of a case where a member of one of the two professions that person has cited could either benefit from having seen graphic illustrations or could find a way to gain the same information without seeing particularly graphic illustrations. In this response, use at least three vocabulary items introduced in the first six chapters of the Stanfield book.