A 500-word report
Step 1
Conduct research.
Using course materials and the Internet, find an image you wish to evaluate. Use the following to guide your research:
The image you select should be related to local, national, or international news events (for example, a newspaper image or a news magazine image).
Step 2
Write a report.
In a 500-word report, address the following:
1. Provide the source of the image (for example, News magazine, April 2003, Vol. 6, No. 2.). Be sure to include the image in the report, and to cite its source.
2. Is the message of the image accurate and fair, or is it distorted and biased?
3. Can you support, refute, or extend the message?
4. Does the image achieve its apparent purpose?
5. How does the image affect you?
Each full answer is worth 4 points.
Category: Healthcare
-
Title: Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of a News Image
-
Title: Gap Analysis Reflection on Literature Synthesis and Project Site Collaboration
One way you could organize your reflection is to take a
simplified gap-analysis approach for each of the two main topics for the
reflection:
What
happened?
What
did you do and what were the results of your work?
Remember
to mention the relevant evidence used to guide your approach to your
work.
What
went well?
What
did not go well?
How
did what happened differ from what should have happened?
If
relevant, mention the evidence that helped you formulate your prediction
about what should have happened.
How
are my experiences changing my thinking, analysis, and communication
patterns?
How
can I use this information to improve in the future?
If
relevant, look to the literature for support on a way to improve or
guide your potential changes.
While you can use any appropriate approach to organize your
reflection, be sure that in your reflection you address the following scoring
guide criteria:
Reflect
on process, outcomes, success, and improvement opportunities related to
the development of your literature synthesis.
Reflect
on process, outcomes, success, and improvement opportunities related to
collaboration and other relevant work at the project site.
Integrate
support from scholarly and authoritative sources to strengthen claims and
substantiate decision-making.
Communicate
orally in a clear, confident, and professional manner. -
“Improving Performance Appraisal Systems: Identifying Rating Errors and Implementing Solutions”
Review the performance appraisal system in your work environment by describing the type of system used, at least 2 rating errors that can occur, and at least three ways to improve the system based upon the readings. Be sure to mention the type of rater training for managers as one of your ways to improve the system.
2-2 page paper in APA format .
To demonstrate you read and understand the learning material, you must mention information from the article links and other documents or your own similar scholarly research, and cite the source(s) in-text (abbreviated at end of sentence) and on the separate reference page (full reference).
reading material
Performance Appraisal Rating Errors
As hard as managers try to be objective in assessing others’ performance, it is human nature to hold biases that may unintentionally influence ratings. Following is information the Dartmouth College Human Resources department uses to inform their managers on rating errors along with how to avoid them. Again, use this information in responses to one of this week’s discussion question and in your written assignment.
https://blog.kenjo.io/the-9-most-common-errors-in-performance-appraisal -
Title: “Ensuring Accurate In-Text Citations and References in Healthcare Writing: A Guide for Pharmacy Technicians”
Please make sure all in citations and references are listed correctly throughout the paper and Reference page. I am in the Healthcare field as a Pharmacy Technician.
-
“The Ethics of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study of Down Syndrome Abortions in Arkansas and Missouri” “Balancing the Rights of the Unborn: Ethical Considerations in Restricting Access to Abortion in Cases of Down Syndrome”
Essay Option 3a:
For purposes of this essay option, revisit our Discussion Forum for Week Eight (March 17—23), and
consider all the points made therein. Write a formal essay paper answering both the general and specific
questions presented in the Discussion Forum, showing that you have researched the required reading
assignments for that Discussion Forum, namely [1] “A Defense of Abortion,” by Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971),
[2] “In Defense of Abortion and Infanticide,” by Michael Tooley (1972), an Adobe Reader copy of which was
provided in my opening post to the Discussion Forum and [3] “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” by Don Marquis
(1991). The general question you must address for this Essay Option is “Can an unborn child’s “right to life”
ever outweigh the pregnant woman’s “procreative liberty” in consulting with a licensed doctor whom she
might afford to pay to perform an abortion — prior to the ability of the fetus to survive on its own, with
intensive hospital care, outside of the pregnant woman’s womb—and if so, then under what circumstances?”
The specific question is “Is it unethical for a state government, such as Arkansas and Missouri today, to restrict
access to abortion in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the unborn child has
Down syndrome in cases of Down syndrome, since such abortion discriminates against these disabled unborn
children?” In other words, if you were a lawmaker in a state such as Arkansas and Missouri today, both of
which states criminalize abortions in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the
unborn child has Down syndrome, would you vote to repeal that law? In May, 2021, led by the state of
Missouri, no less than twenty-two states filed a joint “Amici Curiae” (“Friends of the Court”) brief with the
U.S. Supreme Court, supporting and defending the Arkansas ban on Down syndrome abortions. The state of
Missouri, joined by twenty-one other states, argued that the Arkansas ban on Down syndrome abortions was
justified by at least eight compelling state interests. First, the law advanced the State’s interest in protecting an
entire class of persons from being targeted for elimination solely because of disability. Second, it advanced the
State’s interest in eradicating historical animus and bias against persons with Down syndrome. Third, it
safeguarded the integrity of the medical profession by preventing doctors from abandoning their traditional
role as healers to become the killers of disabled populations. Fourth, it drew a clear boundary against
additional eugenic practices targeted at disabled persons and others. Fifth, it served to counter the stigma that
eugenic abortion currently imposes on living persons with Down syndrome and other disabilities. Sixth, it
ensured that the existing Down syndrome community would not become starved of resources for research and
care for individuals with Down syndrome. Seventh, it protected against the devaluation of all human life
inherent in any decision to target a person for elimination based on an immutable characteristic. Eighth, it
fostered the diversity of society and protects society from the incalculable loss that would occur if people with
Down syndrome were eliminated. On August 1, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court filed judgment on an order
which vacated the Eighth Circuit ruling in Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Rutledge, No. 19-2690 (8th
Cir.), annulling the ruling and remanding the case “for further consideration in light of Dobbs v. Jackson
Women’s Health Organization, 597 U. S. 215 (2022),” effectively reversing the Eight Circuit’s order against the
enforcement of the Arkansas ban. The Supreme Court order dated June 30, 2022 also removed the Eighth
Circuit’s block against the enforcement of two other Arkansas statutes enacted in 2019 relating to abortions,
namely, § 20-16-2004, which banned providers from performing an abortion when the “probable age” of the
fetus is “determined to be greater than eighteen weeks’ gestation,” with exceptions for a “medical emergency”
or a pregnancy that results from rape or incest, and § 20-16-606, which provided that a provider who violates
these statutes commits a Class D felony and is subject to suspension or revocation of his or her medical license.
Again, the general question you must address for this Essay Option is “Can an unborn child’s “right to life”
ever outweigh the pregnant woman’s “procreative liberty” in consulting with a licensed doctor whom she
might afford to pay to perform an abortion — prior to the ability of the fetus to survive on its own, with
intensive hospital care, outside of the pregnant woman’s womb—and if so, then under what circumstances?”
The specific question is “Is it unethical for a state government, such as Arkansas and Missouri today, to restrict
access to abortion in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the unborn child has
Down syndrome in cases of Down syndrome, since such abortion discriminates against these disabled unborn
children?” In other words, if you were a lawmaker in a state such as Arkansas and Missouri today, both of
which states criminalize abortions in cases where the doctor knows that the pregnant patient believes that the
unborn child has Down syndrome, would you vote to repeal that law? For purposes of this Essay Option 3A,
you can augment or intensify your individual research, elaborate or to embellish your points, and
demonstrate, in formal essay paper style, the reasoning and argumentation that led you to certain conclusions
that you may have posted in our Discussion Forum for Week Eight. -
“Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: A Literature Review and Analysis”
It may sound like a lot but I need a research topic chosen based on the feedback my professor left what I did was wrong I will attach the feedback here. I need the sources attached to the literature review matrix that I will attach below. I will need a topic, lit review matrix with sources.
Please read everything carefully. -
Reflecting on the NHS Clinical Leadership Competency Framework Self-Assessment Tool and Self-Insights in Leadership Introduction: In this reflection, I will be using the Gibbs reflective model to critically analyze my experience in Session 4 and 5 of
The reflection you choose to submit is worth 5% of your grade for the module. Remember to complete your reflection using the Gibbs reflective model.
Your reflection should relate to one of the following sessions:
Session 4 – NHS Clinical Leadership Competency Framework (CLCF) Self-Assessment Tool
Session 5 – Self Insights and Leadership
IMPORTANT:
1. Remember to complete your reflection using the Gibbs reflective model. 2. Ensure that at the end of your reflection that you write a personal action plan that you will deliver back in your place of work. To ensure success make sure that your action plan includes, SMART goals, measures of success and a completion date.
Reffrnce should be in Vancover style please follow the guide that is stated in the PDF doc as it shows you how to cite things proprely
Do not change the formating style of the template.
Assure to fill in the tittles and headings.
I have attached the grading rubric assure that you write no less than 500 – 1000 words +-10% but make sure it is in between the range of 825 and above Clear detailes about the reflection is addedd
for smart goal you can create a table I work in ED so you can make it a 12 hour shift 570704719_Citing_and_Referencing : this is the vancover refercning guide
570704719_Pages_from_Student handbook: this doc contains the rubric Reflection 2 clear details .docx: this doc has full details about the reflection
Reflection Template 2024 V2.docx: you should use this doc to write in the reflection
570704719_Example_of_Excellent_Reflection_1.2_5723681991712581.docx: this is an example do not copy and past or plagrise -
“Preventing Teenage Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Approach” Introduction Teenage pregnancy is a major public health issue that has significant economic, ethical, and political implications. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the United States has one
Propose and discuss practical primary, secondary, and tertiary strategies for prevention for ONE of the following:
Cell phone use while driving
Teenage pregnancy
Avian influenza
Sickle cell anemia
Food-borne diarrheal disease
Be sure to use appropriate epidemiologic data to frame your proposals and consider the economic, ethical, and political impact of your ideas. Two scholarly citations in AMA format is required. -
Title: “Uncovering the Role of Exercise in Neuroplasticity: A Study on the Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Brain Structure and Function” Slide 1: – Background on the topic: — Introduction to the concept of neuroplastic
Hey I am supposed to do a presentation of two slides on the article that I will upload, I have started working on it however I am stuck and am having trouble moving forward.
This outline should encompass the information you intend to present on the slide and the additional information that you intend to cover. The outline (and presentation) should include:
– background on the topic;
– the research question;
– brief details on the experiment itself (overview of methods, and interesting/clever details;
– brief summary of results;
– application to current knowledge (how this relates to/augments what you already know about the A&P system/topic); and/or
– limitations of the study (what didn’t work, why the conclusions might be limited); and/or
– areas of future research that build on the conclusions from the current study. -
Title: “Post-Change Process: Mitigating Risks and Monitoring Outcomes”
Description
Assignment Details:
Post-Change Process
Focus your submission on the following:
Compile 10 action items that should be considered after a change implementation.
Examine the potential risks involved after the change interventions have been implemented.
Conclude with the steps needed to monitor the outcomes of the change implementation and the 10 action items that should be used to mitigate change in the future.
Include a minimum of 2 citations from the texts.
Please submit your assignment.