Category: Health & Medical

After studying Module 4: Lecture Materials & Resources, review and discuss the Case Studies in Psychotherapy Workbook – An interview with a depressed and suicidal patient.
In your own words, summarize the case in your video:What was the case about
Who did it involve
What happened in the case
What caused the distress
Create a video that demonstrates you instructing the patient regarding the automatic thought record Download automatic thought record/A Star is Born Download A Star is Bornduring the patient session as a tool to relieve the patient in this case. Your video should be at least 5-7 minutes and recorded with the media recorder or uploaded into Canvas Studio. Then, post the video in this discussion as your initial post. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
Submission Instructions:
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response).
All replies must be constructive and use evidence-based articles where possible to support your position.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is located by clicking on the 3 dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting “Show Rubric” in the menu.

In a rapidly evolving global landscape, the relationship between art and society has become increasingly complex and multifaceted. Consider the following scenario:
You are a cultural analyst tasked with examining the impact of a controversial public art installation in a major urban center. The installation, a large-scale sculpture situated in a prominent public space, has sparked heated debates among the city’s residents, art critics, and policymakers. The sculpture, created by a renowned contemporary artist, is abstract and open to interpretation, leaving ample room for diverse perspectives.
The artwork has raised questions about the role of public art in shaping civic identity, the boundaries of artistic expression, and the responsibility of artists to consider the cultural and social context in which their work is displayed. Moreover, it has become a focal point for discussions on the relationship between public funding, artistic freedom, and community values.
Your task is to conduct an in-depth case study that explores the following aspects:
Artistic Intent and Interpretation:
Analyze the artist’s intent behind the installation, drawing on their previous works, statements, and artistic philosophy.
Investigate how the public interprets the artwork. Examine various perspectives, considering the diversity of cultural, social, and economic backgrounds of the residents.
Public Reception and Reaction:
Document and analyze the public response to the artwork. Include opinions expressed through social media, public forums, and traditional media outlets.
Explore any organized protests, petitions, or community initiatives in response to the installation.
Civic Identity and Cultural Context:
Examine how the artwork contributes to or challenges the city’s civic identity. Consider the historical, cultural, and social context of the urban environment.
Investigate the role of public art in shaping perceptions of the city and fostering a sense of community.
Policy and Funding Issues:
Evaluate the city’s policies regarding public art installations. Assess whether the controversy surrounding this installation has prompted any policy revisions or discussions.
Examine the use of public funds for art projects and the ethical considerations involved, considering the balance between artistic freedom and community values.
Future Implications:
Consider the potential long-term effects of this case on the city’s approach to public art and cultural initiatives.
Reflect on broader implications for the intersection of art and society, particularly in the context of evolving societal values and global trends.

Identify and describe one practice-related issue or concern. You may choose
to build on the practice issue you identified in NR500NP/NR501NP. Provide
support for the issue from scholarly nursing sources current within the last 5
years.
2) Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and
the issue’s impact on health outcomes. Provide support for the importance of the
issue from scholarly nursing sources current within the last 5 years.

Comprehensive Genogram Draft
This is a scaffolding assignment to help students understand how a genogram is created and how to use the various symbols to denote family relationships, marital status, family issues, family patterns of mental illness, and substance abuse.
Develop a genogram illustration that addresses the following criteria:
Choose a family (for this assignment this can be your own family)
Draw three generations of genealogy, legal family, pets, and others who have played an integral role in the family, if applicable.
Use only standardized genogram symbols.
Show structure of family members: siblings, aunts/uncles, grandparents, remarriages, blended families (step-members and half siblings), divorces, pets, close family friends, and god families.
List dates birth/death, dates of marriage, and divorce. Include the race, ethnicity, culture, place of birth, residency, cause of death, mental health, and substance abuse issues.
Identify family characteristics, i.e., type of family structure, type of marriage/parental union, length of the relationship, type of family, and authority pattern (who has the power). Identify emotional patterns i.e., close, conflicted, cut off, distant, unknown, passive-aggressive (or fused & conflicted).
Identify family or generational values and issues and patterns: occupation, education, hobbies, military duty, work ethic, family business, religion, addiction/recovery, incarceration, homicide, suicide, reunions, parenting style, mental illness, emigration from the country of birth, marriage within or outside the culture, sexuality, cancer, longevity, foster care, adoption, and child abuse. Every generation manifests its values and issues differently.
Identify social patterns i.e., neighborhoods, communities, places of worship, places of work and education, social clubs.
The submission in this module is a rough draft.
Review the draft submission critique and submit the final Comprehensive Genogram in Module 4.

Patients are often asked to write their record their negative thoughts as homework for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) session.
Explain how difficult this task might be for depressed patients? Identify your culture and ethnicity. Describe how negative thoughts are perceived in your culture.
Discuss ways you could increase the likelihood that a depressed patient completes the Automatic Thoughts Download Automatic Thoughtsassignment.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and ConceptsDistinguished – 4 points
Post substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.Excellent – 3 points
Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.Fair – 1-2 points
Demonstrate limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.Poor – 0 points
Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. Or nothing was posted.4 pointsAPA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished – 2 points
The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations.Excellent – 1.5 points
References page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Fair – 1 point
References page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Poor – 0 points
References page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. Or nothing was posted.2 pointsWriting MechanicsDistinguished – 2 points
Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.Excellent – 1.5 points
Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.Fair – 1 point
Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.Poor – 0 points
Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.2 pointsPeer ResponsesDistinguished – 2 points
Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.Fair – 1 point
Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.Poor – 0 points
Provided no response to a peer’s post.
2 pointsTotal Points 10

I am medical student help me learn the following question. What is anemia, its types, causes and how its presented on a silde.

Role: union
For the union, list all the reasons why you think the docking pilots are not supervisors.
In responding to this assignment, in a word document, you are to answer the question from your assigned role’s perspective. From your assigned perspective write your argument for the following question: Should the docking pilots be classified as supervisors and thus excluded from participating in a bargaining unit for purposes of collective bargaining?
The union sought to become the exclusive bargaining representative for a group of five harbor pilots employed by Pacific Coast Docking Pilots (the employer). The union won a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)–supervised secret-ballot election by a vote of 5–0. The employer refused to recognize and bargain with the union in an effort to force a federal court to determine if the five harbor pilots who composed the bargaining unit were supervisors or employees. The union filed an unfair labor practice against the employer for a refusal to bargain in good faith. The Board granted summary judgment in favor of the union, which the employer then appealed to a federal court of appeals for review.
The employer argued that the harbor pilots should be classified as “supervisors” and therefore excluded from the definition of “an employee” covered under the LMRA, as amended. The burden of proving the supervisory status of an employee is on the party asserting such a status. Section 2(11), LMRA defines a supervisor as “any individual having authority, in the interests of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsible to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in conjunction with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.”
The Supreme Court has established a three-part test for determining the supervisory status of an individual under the LMRA, as amended (NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp., 511 U.S. 571 [1994]). First, an employee must perform at least one of the 12 specific functions outlined in the statutory definition of a supervisor under Section 2(11) of the LMRA. Second, in performing one of the 12 specified supervisory functions, the individual must be required to exercise independent judgment. Third, the exercise of independent judgment in performing one or more of the 12 listed supervisory functions must be “in the interest of the employer.” The third test is typically the easiest to prove because virtually any action related to the attainment of a legitimate business goal or purpose of the firm will be considered an act “in the interest of the employer.” Most cases involving the determination of supervisory status will rest on an analysis of the evidence related to parts one and two of the three-part supervisory status test.
The employer maintains that the docking pilots make recommendations on hiring and promotion decisions, assign work to employees, and are responsible for directing employees’ work during the docking process. More specifically, the employer states that the advice of docking pilots is almost always followed in making decisions regarding who to hire or promote into a docking pilot position or relief docking pilot position. U.S. Coast Guard regulations require that docking pilot trainees make trips with licensed docking pilots before becoming eligible to obtain a docking pilot’s license. Docking pilots are required to evaluate the performance of trainees on such trips and provide a recommendation as to the suitability of each trainee for the job position of docking pilot. Docking pilots do not discipline other employees, adjust employee grievances, or evaluate the job performance of nontrainee pilots. The final authority for all hiring and promotion decisions rest with the president and vice president of the employer.
When a large ship enters a port, it requires the assistance of tugboats to maneuver into a position to dock or undock. The docking pilot receives from the employer a list of the ships scheduled to arrive or depart the port on a given day. The information provided by the employer includes such items as the current location and dimensions of each ship. The docking pilot uses this information together with current information on other factors (e.g., current wind speed, water current speed, existing navigation hazards in the channel) to determine the number of tugboats required to accomplish the docking procedure. Once a ship’s captain has entered the port, a tugboat delivers the docking pilot to the ship. The docking pilot then assumes command of the ship from the ship’s captain and directs the docking procedure. The docking pilot communicates directly with the captain of each tugboat involved to ensure that each tugboat will render the necessary assistance to ensure a safe and accurate docking experience. Essentially, the docking pilot communicates what must be accomplished to each tugboat captain, who then determines what actions his tugboat crew must take to accomplish the defined objective. Each tugboat captain is responsible for directing his or her own boat crew to carry out the instructions of the docking pilot. Tugboat captains have been previously determined by the NLRB to be supervisors under the LMRA. Once the docking procedure is completed, the docking pilot returns control of the ship to the ship’s captain and reboards one of the tugboats to prepare for the arrival or departure of the next ship on the daily schedule.
The employer argued that the docking pilot’s determination of how many tugboats will be required to perform a particular docking operation constitutes an assignment of work using independent judgment, which is a supervisory function under the LMRA’s definition of a supervisor. The employer also notes that a docking pilot “responsibly directs” others during the docking procedure by giving orders to the tugboat captains regarding the number and placement of towing lines to ensure a safe and efficient docking procedure.
The union argued that the five docking pilots were professional employees covered by the LMRA, not supervisors. The docking pilots have no authority to hire anyone, although they may be asked to give a professional opinion regarding the qualifications of an applicant for a vacant docking pilot position. Compliance with Coast Guard regulations, which require less-experienced pilots to ride along with a more experienced pilot to learn information about a particular port before assuming responsibility for docking procedures in that port, represents a discharge of professional responsibility, which is a job duty of being a docking pilot. The docking pilots do not discipline other employees, handle grievances, or formally evaluate other employees’ job performance.
The union further argued that instructions given by docking pilots to other tugboat captains (who are supervisors) during docking procedures are part of the job duties of a professional docking pilot. The docking pilot has no authority to order members of a tugboat captain’s crew to perform any specific job duties. The determination of the number of tugboats required to perform docking procedures is a function of the size of the ship to be docked and prevailing sea and weather conditions. This determination does not require the exercise of significant independent judgment on the part of the docking pilot.

lack of nutrition awareness
APA formatting for the document, including an appropriately formatted title page and references page A thesis statement at the end of the introduction paragraph An introduction paragraph that establishes the issue Well-developed paragraphs that include evidence from sources to support your argument for a specific change in your community Effective transitions between and within paragraphs A conclusion paragraph that brings the essay to an effective close Four credible sources appropriate for academic writing should be cited within the text of the essay; at least one of the cited sources should be either a book/ebook or a periodical article09:48 pm
All cited sources need to have full citations on a references page (except for any interviews you conduct, which only require in-text citations) Standard English and a formal tone throughout the writing (e.g., stay in third-person voice, avoid slang, etc.) A strong and well-supported argument will be at least 3–4 pages, not including the title page and references page

the nurse is caring for a client scheduled for removal of a pituitary tumor using the transsphenoidal approach. the nurse should be particularly alert to:

Help me learn following quedtion What is anemia, types, and what are its causes along with its representation on slide?