Category: Health Care

1. Title Slide 2. Introduction (1 slide): Slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered. 3. Practice Issue (1-3 slides): Describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem related to NP practice selected in week 2 (DOCUMENT ATTACHED). Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Provide scholarly references to support your ideas. 4. PICOT Question (1 slide): Provide the PICOT question developed in week 2(DOCUMENT ATTACHED). Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all the following: 5. P-Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect? 6. I–Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply? 7. C–Comparison – What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions. 8. O–Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome. 9. T–Time frame – What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion? 10. Literature review (2-4 slides):Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 (DOCUMENT ATTACHED). Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented. 11. Recommendations (3 slides): Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation. Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail. Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, fe1. Title Slide 2. Introduction (1 slide): Slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered. 3. Practice Issue (1-3 slides): Describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem related to NP practice selected in week 2 (DOCUMENT ATTACHED). Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Provide scholarly references to support your ideas. 4. PICOT Question (1 slide): Provide the PICOT question developed in week 2(DOCUMENT ATTACHED). Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all the following: 5. P-Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect? 6. I–Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply? 7. C–Comparison – What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions. 8. O–Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome. 9. T–Time frame – What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion? 10. Literature review (2-4 slides):Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 (DOCUMENT ATTACHED). Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented. 11. Recommendations (3 slides): Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation. Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail. Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), Ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas. Conclusion: (1 slide)Slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic. References: Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents not required. asibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), Ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas. Conclusion: (1 slide)Slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic. References: Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents not required.

nstructions: Please choose one pediatric health condition learned in the course. Once the health condition is chosen, you are to write a three-to-five-page paper in APA format 7th edition with the following sections and level 2 headings: Introduction -Brief overview of pediatric health -Introduce the disease condition chosen -Importance of understanding the condition Presentation of Condition -Describe the condition chosen and its pathophysiology. -What signs/symptoms are identified in the patient that can be found? -Identify if there can be presentation variations based on culture, race, ethnicity, age, etc. Diagnosis of Condition -Diagnostic testing (include imaging, labs, and other necessary evaluations based on condition) -Clinical evaluation via medical history and physical examination Treatment of Condition -Medications -Treatments -Managing symptoms (if needed) -Non-pharmacological treatments (if applicable) Potential Health Risks if Left Untreated -Physical and mental health risks Recent Evidence-Based Advancements in Condition -Choose one evidence-based treatment that has shown to improve condition within the last 5 years. -Briefly summarize the treatment and results. Conclusion -Recap points discussed in paper -Importance of management and early diagnosis (if applicable)

Please see instructions that are attached. They are all there. The person that I am doing the meal plan info is also available on the instructions. Please put information on the chart I provided..

As the volume of data increases, information professionals have looked for ways to use big data—large, complex sets of data that require specialized approaches to use effectively. Big data has the potential for significant rewards—and significant risks—to healthcare. In this Discussion, you will consider these risks and rewards.To Prepare: Review the Resources and reflect on the web article Big Data Means Big Potential, Challenges for Nurse Execs. Reflect on your own experience with complex health information access and management and consider potential challenges and risks you may have experienced or observed. Post a description of at least one potential benefit of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Then, describe at least one potential challenge or risk of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Propose at least one strategy you have experienced, observed, or researched that may effectively mitigate the challenges or risks of using big data you described. Be specific and provide examples. Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering one or more additional mitigation strategies or further insight into your colleagues’ assessment of big data opportunities and risks.

Please find the attached research proposal and the narrative presentation that I already finished. The research paper should base on these documents.

Assignment Overview
Track down two different articles about the same topic and use them to illustrate the rhetorical conventions of your discipline. One of the articles should be intended to be read by “the general public” (i.e., non-specialists)—for example, newspaper or magazine articles, or most websites. The second article should be written for an audience of experts in the field—this could include articles in professional trade journals, conference presentations, peer-reviewed scholarly research, or other appropriate sources.
When you have selected and read each article, identify and analyze how each one uses the rhetorical categories of Purpose, Audience, Tone, Genre, and Context. Use that analysis to explain how writing within your professional field is different from writing for the general public.
Note: You are not trying to summarize the text or respond to the author’s arguments. The content—what the articles are about—is not really important (although I do encourage you to choose a topic that is interesting to you personally!). Instead, your goal is to understand the authors’ rhetorical choices, and how those choices illustrate the ways people in your field “talk” to each other.
Rhetorical Situation
According to Swales, “discourse communities possess and utilize specific genres.” What he means is that different disciplines use specific kinds of texts for specific purposes, and professionals within the field have specific (although often unstated) expectations about how those texts should be crafted and presented. These conventions cover everything from whether to use first or third person, when to use active or passive voice, how to cite sources, and more. To communicate effectively with professionals in your field, you need to be aware of those expectations.
Purpose: Identify, analyze, and compare the rhetorical features of documents both within and outside your discipline to help your readers understand the writing conventions of the field.
Audience: Fellow UB students (or those in the general public) who participate in your discourse community and would benefit from your explanation of appropriate writing behaviors in the field.
Genre: Professional report (note that this varies depending on the discipline—an accountant, a lawyer, and a marketing consultant will have different ideas about what a report is supposed to look like; part of your job is to decide what is appropriate in your own DC)
Assignment Details
3 pages
Track down two different articles about the same topic and use them to illustrate the rhetorical conventions of your discipline.
Analyze how each article uses the rhetorical categories of Purpose, Audience, Tone, Genre, and Context. Explain how writing within your professional field is different from writing for the generalpublic.
Other Requirements
Cite at least 2 sources that you have used in your research.
The Rhetorical Analysis Report should follow the formatting conventions of your discourse community.
My discourse community topic is Health Care management!

Please write seven (7) pages on Literature review of this Topic: “The strategies home healthcare nurses need to reduce stress when administering healthcare to patients in their residences in Houston Texas Metropolitan” please include references and citations from 2021 and above

Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Discuss the laws in your state related to the nurse practitioner’s (NP) role and responsibility in creating and signing advanced directives (ADs). Indicate if the NP can independently complete AD documents or a physician is required to sign or cosign the documents. Consider clients you’ve encountered in practicum (or in your practice as a registered nurse). Identify at least ONE client who may have benefited from a referral to hospice or palliative care. Indicate why this client would have benefited from these services. Describe how as an NP you might approach the conversation with the client. Discuss at least TWO recommendations you have for improving palliative and hospice care access to vulnerable and underserved populations in your community.

Listen to podcast then answer 5 questions …. https://www.npr.org/2020/08/22/904695784/as-pandemic-persists-health-care-heroes-beginning-to-crack-under-the-strain

Case Study 1: Sara is a 45-year-old female presenting for her annual exam. Her blood pressure today is 160/90 HR 84 RR 16. Her height is 64 inches and her weight is 195. Her last visit to the clinic 3 months ago shows a BP of 156/92. She is currently taking ibuprofen 600 mg tid for back pain. She has no known allergies. What is the goal for her blood pressure? What medication would you prescribe to treat her blood pressure? What education would you prescribe? Case Study 2: Monty is a 52-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on Lisinopril 20 mg po daily. He is allergic to penicillin. Fasting lipid profile shows total cholesterol 266, LDL cholesterol 180, HDL cholesterol 40, and Triglycerides 185. What treatment plan would you implement for Monty’s lipid profile? What is the goal Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, and LDL-C level for Monty? How would you monitor the effectiveness of your treatment plan? How many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them specifically. Case Study 3: Beatrice is a 17-year-old female diagnosed with mild persistent asthma since age 7. During her visit today, she reports having to use her albuterol MDI 3 to 4 days per week over the past 2 months. Over the past week she has been using albuterol at least once per day. She reports being awakened by a cough three nights during the last month. She is becoming more short of breath with exercise. She also has a fluticasone MDI, which she uses “most days of the week.” Her current medications include: Flovent HFA 44 mcg, two puffs BID, Proventil HFA two puffs Q 4–6 H PRN shortness of breath, Yaz one PO daily, Propranolol 80 mg PO BID. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication changes would you make? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan? Case Study 4: Daute is a 56-year-old man seeking evaluation for increasing shortness of breath. He noticed difficulty catching his breath about 3 years ago. Physical activity increases his symptoms. He avoids activity as much as possible to prevent any SOB. His previous physician had placed him on salmeterol/fluticasone (Advair Diskus) one inhalation twice daily 2 years ago. He thinks his physician initiated the medication for the shortness of breath, but he is not entirely sure. He did not refill the prescription and has not been taking it. Pertinent history – Chronic bronchitis X 8 years with one exacerbation in last 12 months of treatment with oral antibiotics. He has a 40-pack-year smoking history. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication(s) would you prescribe? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan?