I’d like an research paper on the history and orgins of the concept of race and how it led to the concept of racism. I’d like the part of essay explaing the orgins of racisms and how it evolved over time into today’s more modern concept of racism. I’d like to end the essay providing ways we can contribute to end racism.
Category: Ethics
-
Title: “Promoting Ethical Governance: Websites and Policies for Government Accountability”
Provide three websites that assist or address ethics in government. Also, list two federal government ethics policies and an analysis as to how those policies have shaped ethics in government
-
“Applying Rules and Rational Thinking: A Guide to Effective Decision Making”
I will apply a PDF File of rules and questions. PLEASE
FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS. ESPECIALLY IF YOU SEE THE
LETTER R AT THE END OF THE QUESTIONS THAT MEANS
TO PROVIDE A RATIONLE. You do NOT need to answer questions, 1,2,3,4,5,6,6,8,10,13,15,16,20,22,27,32,35. -
Title: Exploring Public Service Ethics: Understanding Myths, Reasons, and Levels of Analysis
Book: https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceap77jw3oovxq7szwk3i4cr625zxbb2n6mdvi3l5opukhl7agi2aw?filename=James%20S.%20Bowman%2C%20Jonathan%20P.%20West%20-%20Public%20Service%20Ethics_%20Individual%20and%20Institutional%20Responsibilities-Routledge%20%282021%29.pdf Include the “Word Count” after each of your answers. Not doing so will keep you from
earning the points assigned in the grading rubric for including the word count.
Part A:
• You need to answer the following questions/prompts (in no less than 150 words per answer)
focusing on expressing accurate knowledge as presented in the course, without expressing your
opinion or ideas not covered during class discussions or in the required readings/materials
assigned in the course —please do not copy others’ answers (I will give you F in the course if
you do). You need to independently develop your own answers.
PUB – Public Sector Ethics Spring 2024
© 2024 Dr. Hugo D. Asencio Page 3 of 5
1. Explain the myths about ethics (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 2 Chapter 1).
2. Discuss the reasons for studying ethics (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 2 chapter 1).
3. Explain the levels of analysis in ethics (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 3 chapter 2).
4. (a) Define values and ethics and (b) explain their relationship (Key: review book chapter
assigned for Week 4 chapter 3).
5. Compare Lawrence Kohlberg’s moral development theory and Jonathan Haidt social
intuitionalist approach (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 5 chapter 4).
6. Explain the takeaways from the Milgram and Zimbardo experiments (Key: review book
chapter assigned for Week 5 chapter 4).
7. Compare cognitive (result and rule problem-solving) and virtue ethics (Key: review book
chapter assigned for Weeks 6 and 7 chapter 5/6).
8. Explain how the psychological tendencies discussed by James Bowman and Jonathan
West influence the thinking and actions of people when they are faced with ethical
dilemmas (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 8 chapter 7 ).
• You need to include the full question (in bold) before your answer (not in bold).
• After each answer, please include (in bold) the word count under the heading “Word Count.”
Part B:
• You need to answer the following questions/prompts (in no less than 250 words per answer)
focusing on expressing what is in your mind/your moral character —Please reflect, reflect, and
reflect as you develop your answers. Do not copy others’ answers (I will give you F in the
course if you do).
1. (a) Identify the values of your personal moral code (i.e., your individual attitudes
with respect to what is moral) and (b) illustrate with examples from your own
experience how the values of your personal moral code actually guide your thinking
and actions.
2. Based on the ethical decision-making models that you learned about/applied in the
course, explain the mental steps that you will take in your life when faced with
ethical dilemmas (i.e., “… when competing or conflicting ethical principles or values
are embedded in a particular problem” (Cooper, 2012, p. 32):
a. When you do not have the luxury of time to make a decision; and
b. When you do have the luxury of time to make a decision.
• You need to include the full question (in bold) before your answer (not in bold).
• After each answer, please include (in bold) the word count under the heading “Word Count.”
Developing an answer that avoids quoting directly from the instructional materials provided in
the course.
5. Including the question/prompt (in bold font) before the answer.
Including after the answer (in bold font) the word count under the heading “Word Count”.
8. Formatting an answer in line with APA style (7th edition) guidelines. -
“Environmental Disaster: The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill” 1. Article: “The Gulf Oil Spill: A Timeline of Events” Link: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/04/deepwater-horizon
1.Choose an environmental disaster that was caused, at least in part, by human agency, and that occurred in the past five years. This disaster will be the one you focus on for your final paper.
Find an article that describes the event. In this discussion, post a link to the article, and present a brief summary of the event. The ethical dimensions of an environmental disaster cannot be analyzed until the basic information about what actually happened is understood, so being able to explain the event and its consequences is a crucial first step to performing an ethical analysis.
2.The second asssignment for this class is attached -
“Promoting Gender Equality through Ethical Frameworks: A Project Proposal”
Hi! This paper is for my global ethics class, and the paper is a project proposal. The focus of the paper is Social Justice/Human Rights and the theme chosen is gender equality. Below I have added the project guide and rubric for this assignment, and a pdf of the chapter of the textbook that supports this theme. You don’t need to add any sources but if would be helpful if there was sources included.
This is a link to help with question three of the assignment:
https://aese.psu.edu/teachag/curriculum/modules/bioethics/modules/copy2_of_introductory/4-scenarios/what-are-ethical-frameworks
This is a link of a video my professor added that relates to this theme as well:
Thank you so much! -
Title: The Moral Dilemma of Heinz: A Perspective through Kohlberg’s and Gilligan’s Stage Theories of Moral Development
Write a 450-600-word essay that addresses the following questions through the lens of Kohlberg’s and/or Gilligan’s stage theories of moral development.
Should Heinz steal the drug?
Why or why not?
If so, should he go to jail?
Why or why not?
What would you do?
Why or why not?
you can watch this video as well for reference
-
The Morality of Abortion: A Care Ethics Perspective
Abortion is always a sticky subject. Taking the notions of care ethics and relationships in moral matters into consideration, present a researched argument that there are times when having an abortion is the morally right thing to do.
Before you post, please thoroughly edit your writing to ensure it is professional and academic. For more details about how the initial post and peer replies are graded, see the “Discussion Guidelines” and “Grading Rubric” linked below. -
Title: Understanding the Pygmalion Effect and Ability Grouping in Education: A Presentation for the School Board Meeting Handout: Introduction: As we discuss the proposal to require an entrance exam for incoming freshmen and the potential implementation of ability grouping
Scenario
You are the superintendent of a high school district engaged in a debate over requiring all incoming freshmen to sit for an entrance exam. Students will be placed in college-preparatory courses (including several advanced placement courses) OR a standard track based on the entrance exam results. Thus, students who perform well on the entrance exam will be grouped with students of similar advanced academic abilities. Many parents and teachers have strong opinions about this proposed policy (both for and against). You have been asked to conduct a presentation for the upcoming school board meeting, at which many parents and teachers will be present.
Directions
First, read the following articles:
“The Pygmalion Effect in Distance Learning: A Case Study at the Hellenic Open University” (Niari et al., 2016).
“Positive Adult Education, Learned Helplessness and the Pygmalion Effect” (Cobos-Sanchiz, 2022).
You may also wish to read the following popular press articles:
“Another last-minute change could come to high school admissions process” (Elsen-Rooney, 2022a).
“’Gifted’ more diverse ; Black, Hispanic students double after test tossed” (Elsen-Rooney, 2022b).
“The Access Trap” (Heller, 2022).
Next, develop a 1-page handout (Microsoft Word) explaining the Pygmalion Effect and the practice of ability grouping. Your audience for this handout should be the school board meeting attendees. Imagine that you have to explain the Pygmalion Effect and ability grouping to them. You must be creative and use images and graphics to help illustrate the principles. You should indicate both the pros and cons of these practices. Please be sure to cite graphics/images properly in APA format as if you were going to publish them in a journal article (see Ch. 7 of the APA manual).
Finally, write a 1–2 -page paper to accompany your handout answering the following questions:
How have you experienced the effects of the Pygmalion effect in educational or organizational settings? What informal practices do educators engage in that illustrate the Pygmalion effect? What are the impacts of these informal practices on educational settings?
What has been your experience with the practice of ability grouping? Is this strategy ethical, or is it unethical? To support your conclusions, evaluate the impact of ability grouping policies on your educational setting using evidence from Niari et al. (2016) and Cobos-Sanchiz et al. (2022).
References -
Title: Critical Thinking on Privacy and Freedom of Speech Issues: Handling Scenarios and Analyzing Case Studies
What Would You Do? Scenario #2
The purpose of this exercise is to practice thinking critically about privacy-related issues. On page 174 of the textbook, review scenario #2 in the “What Would You Do?” section, and describe how you would handle the situation. Outline your response by using the five-step decision-making process as described in Chapter 1. Use your critical thinking skills, and compose your response in your own words. Your responses to Part 1 should be at least one page in length.
Part 2: Case #2: China’s Great Firewall
The purpose of this exercise is to practice thinking critically about how technology has impacted freedom of speech. On pages 215-216 of the textbook, analyze Case #2. Answer the three critical thinking questions that follow the case. Use your critical thinking skills, and compose your response in your own words. Your response to Part 2 should be at least one page in length.
You will combine both Part 1 and Part 2 together into one document and submit it for grading in Blackboard. Ensure that you label your responses as Part 1 and Part 2.
Your assignment will be at least two pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. You must use at least your textbook as a source in completing this assignment. All sources used will have proper citations and references formatted in APA style.