Category: English

the title of the paper is in bold font, and the title is descriptive of the work that has been done in the paper; it should not have more than 12 words per line and no more than 2 lines; if the title requires 2 lines, it should break where it makes sense; there should be an extra double space between the title and the rest of the information on the page; followed by students’ names (no title or degree), academic department and college, course and course name, professor, due date of the assignment; does not include an “Author Note”
10 to >0.0 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No
Marks
10 pts
Abstract
begins on page 2, title is in bold font and begins with a capital A; paragraph is not indented, 100 – 150 word summary of the completed essay, does not use future tense verbs; explains the research objective and what the results of the research yielded
10 to >0.0 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No
Marks
10 pts
Body
begins on page 3, title is exactly the same as the title on the cover page (bold font); there

ok all the instructions and details about the essay are in the 2 files I sent. please review them in detail

Write a 3-4 page (approximately 700-1000 words) comparison/contrast essay in the informative mode. In addition, must answer the “Think About Your Writing” questions, described below, beneath your essay.
Step 3. Think About Your Writing
Below your completed narrative, include answers to all of the following reflection questions:
Did you use the point-by-point or block method to organize your body paragraphs? What made you decide to organize your essay in this way (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Consider the ways a comparison/contrast essay can be organized. Which organization did you choose and why?
In what ways did writing a comparison/contrast essay differ from the Narrative essay you wrote in Touchstone 1? Give specific examples (3-4 sentences). Sophia says: Consider how the structure, point of view, and purpose of the two essays differ.
Remember that the writing process is a recursive process, and your first draft of an essay is rarely your last. What part of the draft did you struggle with (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Think about how you could improve the draft if you continued the writing process with revision and editing.

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY
The reading assignment this journal will focus on is included next in this module, but I think it will be helpful for you to view these questions first so you know what you are looking for when you do the reading.  
PURPOSE:
Welcome to your second reading journal assignment! This assignment is designed to help you get the most out of our latest reading assignment so you can begin to gather evidence and form arguments which will be useful to Essay #3.
DIRECTIONS:
Please choose EXACTLY FOUR of the questions in the list below to answer for up to 10 points each. DO NOT ANSWER ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS.
Your assignment is to read FOUR of the articles in your reading assignment. You are required to read the following pieces:
Clare Murphy’s “Cannibalism: A Modern Taboo”
J Jeremy Wisnewski’s “Murder, Cannibalism, and Indirect Suicide: A Philosophical Study of a Recent Case”
Mark Hay’s “How Courts Treat Consensual Cannibalis”
Please pick ONE of the following optional articles as your fourth article:
Laurence Goldman’s Encyclopedia piece on cannibalism OR
Alyssa Newcomb’s “Dutch TV Hosts Appear to Dine on Each Other’s Flesh”
Based on what you read, what makes people judge certain types of cannibalism as more acceptable than others? Feel free to briefly discuss the types of cannibalism, but don’t let simple definitions take over your answer.
Based on what you read, what type of cannibalism did Armin Meiwes partake in? Why does it not fit the other two types of cannibalism? 
Based on what you read, why is it significant that Meiwes and Brandes’ act was consensual? How does this fact make their act different than cannibalism that other people such as Jeffrey Dahmer, Issei Sagawa, Katherine Knights, Omaima Nelson, or Albert Fish partook in? (You can look these people up easily and see what they did, but beware. It’s awful.) 
Based on what you read, do you think Meiwes and Brandes’ act was morally wrong? What are the best arguments for the act being wrong that you read in this reading assignment?
Many are quick to label these men as mentally ill. What. does the reading say about these men’s mental health? Who does this information come from? Why is this significant?
Based on what you read, do you see any problem with the Brandes’ consent? If so, explain why his consent may not be valid and the act might be, therefore, immoral.
Based on what you read, do you think Meiwes and Brandes’ act was not morally wrong? What are the best arguments for the act not being morally wrong that you read in this reading assignment? 
Is what the Dutch TV hosts did morally wrong? Why or why not?
According to the reading, what are vore forums and online communities? Do you think partaking in these online discussions would have or should have satisfied Meiwes and Brandes? Why or why not?
Aside from morality, why is your opinion of what you read about the legality of cannibalism?
Wisnewski talks about obligations to the dead as a possible argument against what Meiwes and Brandes did. What are our obligations to the dead, if any? How did what Meiwes and Brandes did interfere with or not interfere with those obligations, if they do exist?
Based on what you read, how have accusations of cannibalism been used in the past as a tool of imperialism and racism? 
Please adhere to the following technical guidelines:
Double-space your document.
Do not type the question but number your answers 1-4. It’s ok if the numbers don’t exactly correspond with the number on the list above, as long as I can see four separate, numbered answers
Show that you read the three required pieces in the reading assignment as well as one optional piece.
Clearly name the author or article title in each answer.
Write at least 900 words total
Distribute your development evenly so you earn the maximum points on each question
Include one well-chosen quotation in every answer. Avoid including more than two per answer.
Place quotations early in your answers and analyze them thoroughly.

Essay #2: Rogerian Argument
We’ve probably all witnessed or even been a part of arguments where participants don’t seem to be listening to one another or changing their perspectives based on the discussion. Rogerian arguments and arguments of fact are designed for exactly these situations. These types of arguments follow a specific structure—summarizing alternative perspectives in a fair way, establishing common ground with people who hold these alternative views, and respectfully proposing and explaining your position. Rogerian arguments, developed by psychologist Carl Rogers, seek to develop respectful relationships with people of various viewpoints and demonstrate empathic listening skills while explaining your own viewpoint.
The Prompt:
Write a 5-6 page Rogerian argument essay that makes and defends a claim about a recent controversial event related to drugs, alcohol, and addiction. 
Andrea Lundsford describes Rogerian arguments as being written in report form. For this assignment however, you will be writing a well-developed Rogerian argument in essay form. You should also note that Rogerian arguments have a number of features that differ from traditional essays. For example, you should not include your thesis in the introduction. 
Instead, in the introduction, you should describe the issue and establish a cordial relationship with the audience. The first section(1-2 paragraphs) of the body should focus on summarizing alternative views in a fair and neutral way. The next section (1-2 paragraphs) of the body should focus on describing common ground between your own perspective and alternative perspectives. The final section (3-5 paragraphs) of the body should respectfully propose your own way of looking at the issue and support your claim with plenty of reasons and evidence. Your conclusion should wrap-up the essay and focus on one topic that relates to the entire essay.
Length requirements: 5-6 full pages
Source requirements: 4-7 reliable researched sources
Originality requirements: There should be no instances of plagiarism. Your originality score through Turnitin.com should be between 10%-20%. To achieve this percent, summarize and paraphrase sources most often, quote when it makes sense to do so (e.g., exact words are important, you want to show that someone actually said something, etc.), submit your essay early to check your originality score, and revise and resubmit as needed.
Format requirements: MLA format with a works cited page (not included in page count)
Things to Shoot for:
⬜ An essay that follows the Rogerian essay format
⬜ Claims (thesis and topic sentences) that are clear, logical, and respond well to the prompt;
⬜ Reliable and relevant grounds that sufficiently support the claims, fair descriptions of multiple perspectives, and effective responses to alternative views;
⬜ Sources that are well integrated (i.e., introduced with relevant details, cited, and responded to);
⬜ A tone that is respectful, empathetic, and/or neutral
⬜ A clear, well-organized, and focused final draft, and
⬜ A draft well-edited for clarity and MLA format.

Project 4 is a short 3 page research paper  on a disease.  You need to use at least three sources with direct quotations from each source using proper APA in-text format and a properly formatted References page.
i will leave it up to you to write about the disease you want needs to include symotoms, treatment  aand likely out come 

I need a literary analysis essay on the story edgar allen poe the cask of amontillado and and argument of why revenge is bad
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

My instructor need to see 4 paths on the essay (two from the first half of the book and two from the second half) (EX:knowledge,family,religion).Using book and 4 paths we need to become in the main idea Is Johnson right or wrong?(EX: Is happiness the key of life or no)
and i also send a picture of what instructor need from me you can quick look on that Thank you so much for helping me!

Poem (choose one of the following):
Eve Ewing, “Arrival Day” 
Eve Ewing, “To the Notebook Kid”
The response needs to be at least 350 words
Prompt:
This response paper is designed to build your intuition and ability to dig deeper into what you are reading and unpack the hidden layers of meaning that would lay unnoticed in a quick, cursory reading.
Your goal here is not to paraphrase the poem; it’s to unpack as much meaning as possible from it and to show what it is saying beyond the surface level. Assume that your reader has read the poem and is familiar with the content. This is an exercise in looking at a small section as closely as possible. This is a skill that you want to hone in order to better understand and critically analyze texts in general—not just literature.
Sources:
If outside sources are used, cite using MLA style.
No AI use or generated text. Provide a TurnItIn report to prove this.

1-Do you think that Moroccan literature and Andalusian literature can be considered one literature?
2- Literature in Morocco witnessed a remarkable flourishing during the Almoravid era? Talk briefly about this topic?
3- Did Moroccan literature written in French emerge in Morocco? Why? What is your knowledge about this type of literature?
-4 The great role of Syriacs in building Arab civilization is not hidden from everyone? List only the most important contributions of the Syriacs in establishing the foundations of Arab civilization?
-5 Why were most of the doctors in the era of early Islam Syriac Christians?
6 – Where were Syriac Christian doctors trained in the period between the pre-Islamic era and the emergence of Islam?
-7 Why was there leadership in translation into Syriac? What are the reasons? Only a number
– 8 What is your knowledge about the doctors of the caliphs in the Umayyad and Abbasid eras? Who were they? What is meant here is personal doctors? And why? Give examples?