Category: Education

Read “Academic Discourse and PBL” from Edutopia. Watch video sections 6 and 7 of “Topic C: Offering Intensive Supports Using Pull-Out Lessons” from Educational Impact in this week’s Learning Activities folder. Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: How does the teacher differentiate their instruction between the lower-level English learners and the upper-level English learners? How does the teacher model and guide academic discourse and academic language? Provide examples. How does the teacher have the students apply the vocabulary words they are discussing? Provide examples. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/sammamish-6-academic-discourse-PBL-danielle-lynch

Please answer the discussion questions uploaded.

Answer rows 1 and 2 ONLY in the given student template using the attached math lesson plan. 
An example of what the template should look like after you completed it, is also attached.

Hello,
You did a PowerPoint and a Word document for me and the teacher’s feedback was not that great. Please see all attachments for the feedback from the instructor. Please improve it. LET ME KNOW IF YOU NEED ACCESS TO MY ACAPELLA LIBRARY, BOOKS ETC.

A one page summary of your “problem”  You can take highlights from your lit review, so DO NOT reinvent the wheel.  Think of it as the way you might explain the project to a colleague that hasn’t seen it yet. 
2.  Your research methodology.  in a couple pages give a detailed explanation to what you were trying to change, how you proposed to change it, how you “tested ” for the change, what did you keep constant, did you have any significant events that might have influenced your results?
3.  What were your results?  Use whatever statistics you can to show that you found a Real Difference  between your pretest and posttest.  this is were you might use a t-test, Chi square, or etc.
4.  Use your final section to “close the loop” between what was seen in existing literature to what you found.  If you found the same or similar results, that is expected.  Directly cite the works that your results resemble.   Acknowledge the limitations of the study .  Lack of sample size, lack of time for a “treatment” would certainly be two of them.  Finally, is there further research that could be done in this area that would be beneficial to you, your school, your district, your students? Since we were trying to solve a problem, we should let people knw if we actually did.

Item yang mencatat skor min sangat tinggi adalah
item“I am aware of ChatGPT ” (Min = 4.31),
ini menunjukkan bahawa kebanyakan pelajar menyedari tentang kewujudan ChatGPT.
Ini mungkin disebabkan oleh kesedaran yang mendalam di kalangan pelajar
mengenai kelebihan ChatGPT.

1
ASSESSMENT 02
Assessment 02 is a written assessment and contributes 25% towards your promotion mark.
This assessment measures achievement of the outcomes of learning units 1 and 2.
1.1
Outcomes of Assessment 02
In this assessment, you will be required to demonstrate that you have met the following
outcomes and assessment criteria:
Learning outcome 1
Specific outcome 1:
Understand emergent literacy, its different forms and how it manifests itself in children.
Assessment criteria
Identify and explain emergent literacy and its manifestations in assignments.
Demonstrate the importance of emergent literacy in teaching and learning through
the selection of appropriate methodologies and techniques.
Identify different forms of emergent literacy case studies and interpret them
accordingly.
Specific outcome 2:
Promote emergent literacy through the development of perceptual skills.
Assessment criteria
Explain the different perceptual skills and their importance in emergent literacy in
assignments.
Describe the relationship between the perceptual skills and their contribution to
literacy acquisition and development.
Use appropriate activities and resources to develop and promote perceptual skills in
learners.
Evaluate the perceptual development of learners so that learning and teaching is
suited to individual learners.
Reflect on the teaching and learning of perceptual skills and adapt accordingly to
address gaps identified.
1.2 Resources
To complete this assessment, refer to the content of learning units 1 and 2 in your study
guide.

Help me three main negative effect of auntie bullying program in school and give me the line to set at the beginning and the end of the presentation

What is the  academic achievement impact on 5th grade students who are served in gender based classrooms in the elementary, public school setting when compared to their peers in non-gender based classrooms? 
This assignment will include the first two sections of the research proposal: Objectives and Purposes and Literature Review. These sections should consist of an introduction, the goals of the proposed study, the research questions and hypotheses/ propositions of your study, and a brief literature review. The proposal should be on a topic related to your field of study. The narrative will have 5-7 pages (excluding title page and references) and should follow the American Psychological Association (APA) writing guidelines. Please include at least five relevant references in the literature review from United States studies. The instructor will use the rubric below to assess your work. The rubric is very detailed and gives you information on the topics that need to be discussed in each section and the criteria for evaluation. Please use the rubric while working on this assignment to ensure you fully address every criterion.

In this activity, you will want to create a 3 – 5 page Literature Review, not including the Title Page and References, of the diverse ways in which coaches versus managers may approach goal-setting for employees. In addition, your literature review should also discuss the benefits of an employee-centered versus a coach-centered approach to goal-setting and the value this can have in improving the effectiveness of the coach. As this is a formative assessment, you can upload a document with your paper, and it needs to follow APA 7th Edition formatting. This paper will serve as a draft of a segment of your Research Paper summative assessment for this competency.
Please download and use this South College Literature Review resource as a guide.Download Please download and use this South College Literature Review resource as a guide.
Rubric
Formative Rubric (7)
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing
Affirmed
Writing is formal in language, avoiding colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.
Not Affirmed
Writing includes colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
Affirmed
Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (1-2 errors)
Not Affirmed
Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 2 errors)
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Content
Affirmed
Writing demonstrates a strong connection between ideas, ensuring that the reader can follow the logical progression of the arguments.
Not Affirmed
Writing lacks a connection between ideas, and there is no logical progression of the arguments.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAll Aspects Addressed
Affirmed
Writing addresses multiple relevant aspects of the topic with sufficient detail and analysis, providing a thorough understanding.
Not Affirmed
Writing fails to address relevant aspects of the topic with insufficient detail or analysis.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting (when appropriate)
Affirmed
Citations, references, and formatting follow the APA style guide, with less than 2 errors.
Not Affirmed
Formatting, citations, and references are not included or do not follow the appropriate APA style guide. There are more than 2 errors.