Category: Criminal justice

Why is cooperation between agencies critical in order to successfully address issues of homeland security? 
When is it necessary for cooperation between different governments? 
What could happen if there are failures in the cooperative process?

Step 1: Review Chapters 6–11 in the textbook.
Step 2: Review Communication Between Probation Officers and Judges: An Innovative ModelLinks to an external site. [PDF].
https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/63_1_7_0.pdf
Step 3: Review the APPA Code of EthicsLinks to an external site. [PDF].
https://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/APPA/Code-of-Ethics.pdf
Step 4: Play the InteractiveLinks to an external site..
Be sure to download the Ethics in the Courts Template document (located within the Interactive).
Step 5: Following the instructions in the template, write your answers within the template you downloaded from the Interactive.

You will discuss and express your current worldview in regard to the subject of Administration
of Justice Organizations. This paper’s content will include how the watch item in this module’s
Learn section influences your worldview.
2-3 pages excluding the title page, abstract, and reference pages.
• Current APA format.
• Minimum of two (2) peer-reviewed journal articles from Liberty University library.
• Acceptable sources (peer-reviewed articles published within the last 5-10 years only).
• Include a Christian and Biblical Worldview perspective.
***i have added the transcript from the watch item***
Thank you!

Criminal Theories Research Paper
The highlights:
• This paper is worth 50 points.
• No less than three pages (this does not include cover page and bibliography)
• 12 point font and normal margins
• Must use APA formatting
• Cite your references. You must use at least 2 references juther than the textbook. A reference is a peer-reviewed journal or published book, scholastic or government sponsored study, etc. Wikipedia is NOT a source. Neither is Instagram, YouTube, ChatGPT, or any other popular web resource like that.
You can get help with listing references at (). Use the Learning Resource Center for Rough Drafts.
I want this research paper on a Doc Document
Topic:
Research a criminogenic theory and explain why you identify with it most. For example, you believe environment makes some people commit crime, yet some just decide to do it because of free will; this is neo-classicalism. After explaining this, explain the daily factors (poverty, drugs, race, bad parenting, etc.) that exist in today’s society that affect your chosen theory and give examples. Does the media play a part in your criminal theory? Directly or indirectly? Explain.
What should be done to help eliminate crime in our society based upon your theory? Is there a perfect situation to grow up in that results in a person who does not think of committing crime?
Write as if you are trying to convince myself and others of your theory; people who don’t know much about the criminal justice system but do want to make it more effective. Your perspective must be well thought out, researched, and presented in a thorough manner. Consider the potential consequences of your paper. If your theory is right it holds the potential to change how law enforcement functions in one of the largest countries in the world! Not only that, but it has the potential to make society safer and reduce inequality among ethnic and socioeconomic classes.
Don’t sell yourself short. You could be the catalyst for social change.

Scenario: You are a juvenile corrections officer tasked with making recommendations to a judge for a juvenile’s entire course of treatment. You can advise on the sanctions they should receive; the components of their correctional treatment; the programs, training, or institutions that should assist them; any alternatives or special conditions to consider; and terms for their aftercare and transition back into the community.
Write a 525- to 700-word correctional dispositional plan for a juvenile.
Choose 1 of the following juveniles to use as an example case study for this week’s assignment:
Donovan from “Second Chance Kids” (see this week’s University Library Videos)
Rolon from “Second Chance Kids”
Shawn from Juvenile Justice
Jose from Juvenile Justice
Manny from Juvenile Justice
Marquese from Juvenile Justice
Gina, from the Ch. 11 Critical Thinking Exercises #3 (p. 313)
Any of the juveniles from the Week 3 court session videos
Note: If you choose an example with a known correctional plan, do not propose the same plan from the original case study. Make your own recommendations for a different process for the juvenile’s treatment. 
Complete the following in your recommended plan for the juvenile:
Summarize the outcome of the adjudication process and the disposition in this case.
Describe the treatment of the juvenile in this situation.
Explain how law enforcement and the courts might have interacted differently with this person as a juvenile than if he or she had been an adult.
Explain the risk factors that need to be considered in the assessment of this juvenile.
Explain how the combination of factors considered in this case were connected and influenced the original outcome, if at all.
List any additional information you would like to have before considering other correctional treatments for the juvenile.
Recommend 2 alternative correctional strategies for this juvenile: 1 that includes a correctional program that exists in your state and 1 other potential option.
Explain how you could monitor, measure, report, and support the juvenile’s progress through treatment.
Justify your plan with evidence that supports your recommendations.
Submit your assignment.

n everyday conversation, the term “theory” is used loosely. Almost everyone has personal theories about human behavior, and these extend to criminal behavior. In this week’s written assignment, please share your perspective and personal theory on why people commit crimes.
Chapter 1 of your text and the below links will be excellent resources to assist you with this assignment.
https://www.criminology.com/understanding-criminology-theories/

Presentation Guidelines
Select a criminal-justice
related topic that interests you.
Browse through the variables in
the datasets we used throughout the semester (or the supplementary
resource listed in the DATASETS link in the main menu) and determine which
of these variables you can use to propose a research question (and
subsequent research hypothesis) related to your selected topic. 
Read and summarize 3 (three) empirical studies that relate to
your topic
Study the levels of
measurements of the variables you have selected from the dataset(s) in
order to determine which statistical test covered in this class will be
most appropriate to use to test your proposed hypothesis.
Run the test in SPSS and save
the outputs (or recreate these outputs in Excel or Word)
Put together a short
PowerPoint presentation to discuss your proposed research and study
findings. 
Your presentation should not be
longer than 5 minutes. 
Presentation Outline
INTRODUCTION (1-2 slides)
State the thesis of your
presentation (what social phenomenon you are studying)
Briefly Discuss the literature
you have read in preparation for your presentation, and drawing from that
State your hypothesis and the
null hypothesis
ANALYSIS (2 slides)
Discuss your variables in the
hypothesis (independent, dependent, and their levels of measurement)
Discuss your analytical
strategy (i.e. what statistical test you are using and why)
Discuss the results (output
from SPSS) of your study
DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS (1 slide)
Discuss what you have concluded
based on the results found (i.e. whether you will reject or fail to reject
the null hypothesis) and what this tells you about the social phenomenon
you have examined. 
Discuss the policy implications
based on the findings of your research

PLEASE READ!! and look at rubric. I WON’T KNOW THE TWO questions UNTIL I OPEN the assessment. 
Description
Your final exam consists of two essay questions.
Each essay response is to be a minimum of 500 words and consist of fully developed paragraphs.
Rewriting the essay question is not considered a part of your response.
Direct quotes are not to be used in test answers.
A minimum of 2 up to date (less than 10 years old), peer reviewed, scholarly sources are required per question.
Answers are to be consistent with the college level. The essays shall be written in the most current APA format and include in text citations to credit your sources.

For this discussion, consider the business you selected for your course project. Pretend that while you were working to perform a risk assessment on the organization the unthinkable occurred – you discover it has been hacked (and may, in fact, still be under attack). At this moment, you have no idea how long this has been going on, the level of damage, the persistence of the hack, and what (if anything) has been compromised. You have learned that some hackers may gain access to network resources and stay relatively inactive until there is something of value to steal or exploit. Other hackers seek to embarrass or steal quickly, hoping to benefit immediately from the access gained. You do not know which type of situation you have, what type of hacker(s) you are dealing with, if it is a lone instance, or if there are multiple exploits across your organization’s vast network.
Now consider you found a way to answer at least some of these questions quickly. While you may not have all the answers, you have identified some characteristics of this hack and need a plan to move forward. Moving forward includes isolating all access and compromised systems, identifying hacking methods (what was successful and what was not), and determining if the hack is a compromise that must be reported per the governance required of your type of business or industry.
Create a basic plan of how you would identify the extent of the damage/access/breach.
Who/what has hacked your organization?
What was the goal?
What can you do to immediately triage the organization’s network?
What specific steps can be taken?
Who should be notified?
Do you alert your customers/patients/students/stakeholders?
***The selected line of business for my course project is digital forensics.***

Introduction
A controversial issue today in the American legal system is the justification of the use of force by police officers, given the actions and conduct of citizens. In this assignment, you will explore the requirements for use of force, constitutional rights pursuant to the Bill of Rights when it comes to free speech, and criminal defenses justifying actions.
Instructions
Write a 2-3 page paper in which you:
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by “reasonableness.”
Evaluate how free speech rights clash with the rights of others and the need for public order today.
Argue for or against the regulation of the First Amendment when it comes to speech that could or might incite “imminent lawless action or conduct.”
Analyze the defenses within today’s criminal law system.
Evaluate the fairness of the common law defense of necessity when citizens use deadly force.
Use at least three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
Write clearly and concisely in a manner that is grammatically correct and generally free of spelling, typographical, formatting, and/or punctuation errors.