Analyze communication theories and skills for developing professional documents and oral presentations for audiences in diverse communities and disciplines.
Within the template, you will address the following information for three communication theories:
Explain how each theory would help engage the audience.
Explain how each theory would address the topic in a unique and interesting way.
Select one of these three theories to use for your presentation. In a paragraph or two, explain why you believe this is the best choice.
Category: Communication
-
Title: Communication Theories and Skills for Engaging Diverse Audiences in Professional Documents and Oral Presentations Introduction: Effective communication is crucial in any professional setting, especially when addressing diverse audiences from different communities and disciplines. In order to engage these
-
“Field Work in Nonverbal Communication: A Guide to Observing and Writing About Human Interaction”
Hello. This is a video to help explain the field work as the assignment.
0:01
The first rule is that you need to go out into the field.
0:06
This. It’s an observation. So you need to go somewhere and observe non-verbal communication.
0:11
You can go to a restaurant, a Starbucks, a mall, whatever works for you.
0:17
And you’re going to watch people and bring a notepad or a computer and take notes.
0:22
Take notes. At of the different types of nonverbal communication you observe are observing.
0:28
It could be one interaction between one particular group, or you could be watching a lot of different groups and just taking notes.
0:34
That does not matter. Then once you have your notes, you go back and you write a 675 word essay.
0:41
That’s the minimum. You can write more, but a minimum of 675 words.
0:49
You can organize it however you like. You could organize it according to the time.
0:54
You can organize it according to the different types of gestures affect displays, illustrators, emblems.
0:59
And you could do it that way. Or whatever works for you.
1:06
Use terminology from your textbook site.
1:10
Your textbook as well. That’s about it.
1:13
For this. I hope this helps you in your writing again.
1:18
It’s a Gordon Rule writing course. So I am looking at things of specifics of the writing.
1:22
Do you have an introduction? Do you have good transitions?
1:29
Do you have a conclusion? How’s your capitalization and spelling and grammar and all of those types of writing specifics?
1:33
So that’s it. Good luck. I look forward to reading your essays.
https://mdc.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=d3dca6e8-b5fe-43ac-96c0-b0ff010a7c7b
book
Human Communication (with McGraw-Hill Connect)
Authors: Scott Titsworth, Angela M. Hosek, Pearson Judy, and Paul Nelson
7th Edition
Year Published:2021
Publisher: McGraw- Hill Education
ISBN 978-1- 260-98506-1 (bound edition) -
“Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Interpersonal Communication: A Comprehensive Analysis”
Please follow the instructions on the attached document-The title is a little longer and it is in the attached document.
-
“The Power of Persuasion: Analyzing Barack Obama’s 2004 DNC Speech” Introduction: Title: “The Power of Persuasion: Analyzing Barack Obama’s 2004 DNC Speech” Introduction: “Hope and Change: A
Listen to/view your speech multiple times (strong familiarity will assist your analysis).
Use the Speech Context Questions (listed below) to establish the speech’s situational context.
Analyze the speech for Aristotle’s classic appeals and provide strong examples from the speech.
CONTENT:
Your paper should include the following elements:
Title: Remember a creative title for your speech will create a lens for your reader.
Introduction:
Gets the reader’s attention.
Establishes a thesis statement.
Previews the main points that will be discussed in the main body.
Provide context such as who spoke, when/where the speech took place, et cetera. You may use the context questions below to guide you.
Speech Context Questions:
What is the occasion for this speech?
Who is the speaker?
What is the title of the speech?
When was the speech delivered?
Where was the speech delivered?
Who was the intended (target) audience?
Are there additional things that the reader should know about in the background or on the occasion for which the speech was given?
Body:
Develop each previewed main point (including each of Aristotle’s appeals**).
Make informed judgements using specific evidence from the speech to support each point.
**Aristotle’s three persuasive appeals are used by speakers to motivate their audience. Your task is to identify within the speech at least one example for each of Aristotle’s three appeals (ethos, logos, pathos). Make sure that you use direct quotations from the speech to support your claims.
Aristotle’s Three Appeals
ETHOS: Appeals based on the credibility and manner of the speaker.
LOGOS: Appeals to logic and fact, or to the power of reason.
PATHOS: Appeals to the emotions of the audience.
What evidence can you find of these persuasive techniques in speech?
Conclusion:
Restates the thesis.
Summarize the main points.
Comment on the speech’s overall effectiveness.
In addition to identifying Aristotle’s appeal use, you should also include concluding remarks that comment on the speech’s overall effectiveness. How does this speech rate….is it a “great speech” or “just okay”? Make sure to support your opinion with specific reasons/details and vocabulary that relate to the speech content as well as to our class lessons on effective speech structure and organization.
STYLE REQUIREMENTS:
Adhere to college-level academic writing by:
using course content specific vocabulary.
utilizing effective transitions to connect ideas and paragraphs.
checking grammar and spelling.
following MLA or APA format and appearance rules for submitting a professional looking academic assignment.
including a work cited for the chosen speech you analyzed and any outside sources you used for support.
SPEECH VIDEO HERE – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8YJtvHGeUU -
“Exploring the Culture of a Conservative Christian College: An Ethnographic Study” Rubric: I. Introduction – Provides a clear and concise overview of the research topic and purpose – Establishes the significance of studying the culture of a conservative
Please complete the rubric throughly. Please use my field notes and interview guide assignment. It is a conservative Christian college please do not use any liberal or offensive views or comments. Please review the crux of an Ethnoographic research study.
-
“Effective Research Strategies: Utilizing Field Notes and Interview Guides for In-Depth Data Collection”
Please see the field notes and interview guide assignments that I did well. Use the 20 sources from the previous proposal assignment. Please use the same research questions from the proposal.
-
“The Production Context of Ferrero Group’s Response to the 2022 Salmonella Scandal: A Situational, Social, and Rhetorical Analysis” “Ferrero’s Salmonella Outbreak: A Threat to the Company’s Reputation and Consumer Trust”
This is a portion of my research paper, so should be treated as such. This portion regards the production context of my artifact. My artifact for the research paper is Ferrero Group’s press releases following their 2022 salmonella scandal. Below is the outline for writing this section. Please utilize this for and sections that are applicable to make a cohesive paper:
I. Situational Context A. Situational context: Date, time, place artifact’s message was delivered, medium and network of delivery
II. Social Historical Circumstances
A. Exigences/events/social justice issues that gave rise to the artifact 1. Exigence: Prior discourse, decision, event or controversy that prompted artifact
2. Events and social justice issues might include laws; economics; educational, religious, civil or human rights issues; social movements, etc., that are relevant to artifact 3. Scholarly literature and popular press typically provide “clues” to such events
B. Relevant cultural attitudes/norms/values that influence artifact’s content
1. Find reputable polling data describing public attitudes toward social issues/controversies at:
a. Gallup.com and Pewresearch.org b. Scholarly literature on topic
c. News articles about artifact
2. Legal norms/cases can be researched at Lexis Nexis using our library’s database (if relevant)
III. Rhetorical Circumstances (Similar Messages and Artifacts)
A. Similar Artifacts/Messages
1. Is the artifact part of a genre? If so, what are features of this genre? What are other examples in this genre that emerged prior to or around same historical time? a. Example: If analyzing The Bachelorette, what other reality TV shows have emerged, especially those resembling the same dating theme?
b. Example: If analyzing The Walking Dead, what other films and TV shows about zombies have emerged?
2. Similar Discourse within Earlier Artifacts a. Is this artifact a sequel, a spin-off?
b. What similarities do you see between the artifact and other discourse circulating at the time?
c. Scholarly literature can be helpful to get a sense of prior discourse
B. Symbols/values within the culture that the artifact incorporates a. Example: US Constitution’s “Declaration of Independence” was available to MLK in his appeal to “equality”; Disney caricatures in Jay-Z’s “Story of OJ”
b. Example: TV shows featuring working women (e.g., Law & Order: SVU, Scandal, etc.) integrate feminist movement’s critiques of gender discrimination C. Publicity leading up to debut of artifact
1. What medium was used to promote artifact? 2. What rhetoric is used to promote it to intended audiences? IV. Rhetor and Audience
A. Who is rhetor/director/producer/singer/artist that created or delivered artifact? 1. What are his/her credentials, reputation, background that preceded the artifact?
2. What does s/he value, not value?
B. Who is audience?
1. Number and demographics of immediate audience members
V. Expectations and values of ideal/intended audience
Please do not use other resources besides the ones I provide.
Production Context Sources:
Brummette, J. and Sisco, H.F. (2018). “Holy guacamole! Framing and the Chipotle contamination issue”, Journal of Communication Management, 22(3), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2017-0085 Chung, S., Chong, M., Chua, J.S. and Na, J.C. (2018). “Evolution of corporate reputation during an evolving controversy”, Journal of Communication Management, 23(1), 52-71. doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2018-0072 Coombs, W. T. (2013). Cadbury Salmonella Recall. Applied Crisis Communication and Crisis Management (pp. 63-74). Sage Publications Inc.
Dhanesh, G. S., & Sriramesh, K. (2018). Culture and crisis communication: Nestle India’s Maggi Noodles case. Journal of International Management, 24(3), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.12.004.
Ferrero. (2016, April 14). Ferrero 1st Food Company in the World for Reputation in the Ranking of the 100 Best Companies. Ferrero. https://www.ferrero.com/int/en/news-stories/news/ferrero-1st-food-company-in-the-world-for-reputation Golder, J. News, Z. (2022, April 6). Alleged Kinder Salmonella Crisis now Sweeping Europe After Recall. NewsWeek. https://www.newsweek.com/alleged-kinder-salmonella-crisis-now-sweeping-europe-after-recall-1695585 Jong, B. (2022, May 27). Cause of salmonella contamination in Kinder chocolate determined, says Ferrero. https://www.brusselstimes.com/229209/cause-of-salmonella-contamination-of-kinder-chocolate-determined-says-ferrero Press, A. (2022, April 12). Salmonella outbreak in chocolate eggs due to bad buttermilk. EUD health officials say. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2022-04-12/eu-salmonella-outbreak-chocolate-eggs Whitworth, J. (2022, May 19). More than 300 sick in Ferrero chocolate Salmonella outbreak. Food Safety News. https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2022/05/more-than-300-sick-in-ferrero-chocolate-salmonella-outbreak/ In the attachments section I have attached sources you may not be able to access. Thank you. -
Title: The Power of Communication: An Analysis of Conversation in “The Office”
This paper’s main concept is analyzing the communication in a conversation among characters in
the assigned television show / episode. The goal is to show how specific concepts are operating in
the conversation and to make a case for the importance of those concepts for the
interaction, the characters, and /or their relationship. Everything needed for the paper in the
documents attached below.