Category: Business Law

CBLT Rubric (1)
CBLT Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCBLT – Suitable Topic
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCBLT – Guideline Length
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCBLT – Article Summarized, memo structured
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect format for the assignment
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubject of the article applied to business and/or management
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdditional Comments
0 pts
Total Points: 100

Please do research essay on a computer crime please talk about a crime made through the computer. Such as invasion of privac, hackers or the electronic funds transfer act. 

What kind of relationships are fiduciary trust relationships? Please answer in 2-3 sentences.
I’ll give you later the answer of two student to comment them

Read the article here: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/06/12/california-gender-board-diversity-law-is-held-unconstitutional/ and the U.S. Supreme Court case of Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964), a copy of which may be found at the Oyez site: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/543 After reading the assigned above, think about the role of government, civil rights, liberty and the private sphere of business, including the role of corporate boards and their primary, fiduciary obligations to shareholders, and write a thoughtful essay (2-3 pages) that reflects upon and addresses the attempt by the State of California to compel publicly traded corporations to include a minimum number of women on their Boards of Directors. Does the decision in the Katzenbach case have any relevance in the cases in issue in California? Why or why not? Be sure to address in your discussion the power and proper role of government over business, as well as dictates of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

This Discussion Board requires you to review the following Scenario and write a 3-4 paragraph response that makes a clear and thoughtful recommendation to the Corporate Vice President on how to resolve or address the issue(s) raised. This is an exercise in how to elevate your thinking from employee-type thinking to thinking like an executive or upper-level manager. Such thinking involves not only knowing what the law is (in this case, basic contract and criminal law), but prudent consideration of corporate goals, loyalties and practical considerations, such as adequacy of training, corporate morale and ultimately, ROI or “return on investment.” What would you recommend after careful consideration of the following scenario? When doing the Memo response, be mindful that any decision made by your VP boss will be reviewed, in all likelihood, by the corporate President – and may well reflect on your abilities too!

Hi Class, Recently, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. By a 6-3 vote, the Court has created a carve out to public state accommodation laws that bar discrimination based on sexual orientation. The Court ruled that a proclaimed Christian graphic artist who wants to design wedding websites can refuse to work with same-sex couples. The Court created this exception on the basis of 1st Amendment free speech. Summaries of this Court decision (including the full Court opinion) can be found in the links below. For a possible (3) points extra credit, please answer the following questions:
1. What potential ramifications does this decision have on businesses? Does this open the door for private businesses to legally discriminate against other protected classes of people?
2. Based on this decision, can the tables be turned – can a private business such as a lawyer refuse to represent a client based on their political orientation? For example, if a lawyer finds individuals who identify as MAGA to be adverse to their personal beliefs, and as their work involves the business of speech, can the lawyer expressly decline cases purely on the basis of political affiliation? 3. Does your answer in question #2 change if the facts are revised such that the lawyer refuses to represent any clients whose religious beliefs differ from those of the lawyer?
https://www.npr.org/2023/06/30/1182121291/colorado-supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-decision#:~:text=By%20a%206%2Dto%2D3,creating%20a%20message%20she%20opposesLinks to an external site..
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-website-designer-aa529361bc939c837ec2ece216b296d5Links to an external site.