Category: Architecture

Write a three-paragraph, single-spaced response to the assigned readings. In your response, you should compare and contrast this module’s required reading assignments. Please discuss the similarities and differences between the techniques used in Vertov’s film and the performative behavior of the flaneur. Consider the concept of the flaneur—his motivations, behaviors, and preferences—and describe what type of “flaneur” exists in today’s urban environment.

Visit the websites of professional organizations such as the American Design Drafting Association (ADDA), the American Institute of Architects (AIA), the American Society of Interior Designers (ASID), SkillsUSA, and so on, and look for information about student membership and continuing education opportunities. After gathering the required information, create a presentation using any slideshow application. The presentation should have at least five slides that answer the following questions:
Do all organizations offer student membership? List the ones that do.
Which organizations offer continuing education or professional enrichment opportunities?
What are the different programs offered by the institutions?
Out of all the organizations you researched, which one would you most likely join and why?

I need 8 drawings total (I believe the concept drawing can be hand sketched) done according to the guidelines, I have inserted as well 2 exemples (ASSIGNMENT _3 reference drawings and Assignment 3-RS_MJ) of the completed assignment . If you need additional guidelines please reach out to me I really need this done by tomorrow 10 pm as my computer broke down and I have no access to Autocad.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

revista monumentet nr.14 1977. comparison of haxhi ethem beu mosquet, tirana, albania.
with the venice chart. the restauration and conservation made in this mosque. 

The art of materialization and dematerialization of buildings,
intricately woven with the poetics of construction, captures Frampton’s concept
of tectonics in architecture—a fundamental practice of shaping forms,
structures, and light. When
assessing a building’s exterior, we identify the prominent features that
characterize its overall shape and appearance. This idea goes
back to Frampton, citing that the concept of tectonics used in contemporary
buildings have been technically categorized in three solid manifestations: technological,
scenographic, and tectonic (Frampton & Cava, 2001). Technological elements
serve practical functions with design, while scenographic ones suggest hidden
aspects. Tectonic elements are further divided into ontological (relating to
essence or being) and representational forms, adding layers of meaning to
architectural design. As much as how it is defined, this framework provides
architects with a comprehensive approach to designing buildings, be it both
functional and rich in meaning, ensuring that tectonics are not just
structures but also narratives (why is it added there?).
However, it is within this investigation that the reinterpreting
how of the concept of tectonics should be discerned.  To breakdown my research into key points that will
be addressed under the umbrella of re-interpreting tectonics in contemporary
spacious buildings, I will have breakdown a quote stated by Charlotte Bundgaard,
an Associate Professor at Aarhus School of Architecture (AAA). Bundgaard
emphasizes that architects today design within specific contemporary
parameters, including production methods, materials, ethics, and cultural
values. Tectonic thinking, therefore, goes beyond mere constructional logic; it
encompasses how these constructions contribute to a building’s narrative and
material significance (). For instance, the Pompidou Centre in Paris (Figure 1.1),
designed by Renzo Piano and Richard Rogers, showcases exposed steel structures
and colourful pipes, serving both structural and aesthetic purposes. Its
transparent facade offers insight into the building’s inner workings,
challenging architectural norms with its avant-garde hint. Similarly, the
National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington (Figure 1.2),
by architects David Adjaye, Philip Freelon, and Max Bond, features a bronze-coloured
lattice facade inspired by traditional African American craftsmanship. This
three-tiered design symbolizes the journey from slavery to freedom, celebrating
African American history and resilience. These examples illustrate how
tectonics in architecture are influenced by cultural references and the
surrounding context. In other words, a symbiotic relationship between
tectonics, cultural references, and contemporary architectural initiatives. Eventually,
architects draw inspiration from local culture, history, and environment to
create unique design elements that reflect the identity of the building. This
paper seeks to delve further into this symbiosis, clarifying how these three
elements shape the built environment of today and tomorrow.
Additionally,
these examples often illustrate that architects either employ building
materials, systems, and construction methods in an aesthetically expressive
manner, or they seek to integrate and adapt building technology into the
architecture (). So, when a building seeks to use technology on the exterior of
a building it highlights the fact that in an expressive way with a possibility
of complexities since systems of structural, mechanical, and electrical, façade,
along with details and materials play a role on the architectural qualities of
a building. On the other hand, if it is concealed, it results in the
possibility of seeking simplicity instead. Thus, the distinction in
representation determines whether buildings are classified as tectonic or
stereotomic, high-tech or low-tech, with their approaches being either
representational or ontological.
Eventually, Kenneth
Frampton succeeded in repositioning tectonic theory as a medium of
architectural criticism in the 1980s and early 90s, recognizing the assigned
reading Rappel a L’Ordre, The Case for the Tectonic. Frampton explores
tectonics in a contemporary view and expands on the fact that it is used in both
construction technology as well as in design. I have used the case studies of Masdar City Abudhabi and Sidi Hrazem 

Hi, I am a first year architecture student, and for one of our modules called ”Historical and Cultural Developments of Cities and their Architecture”, we have to write an essay on a topic of our choice. I have attached the official instructions, so please read these carefully as it is very important in order for me to gain marks. 
I have already decided on an essay subject and title: ””Colonial Architecture and the Assertion of Dominance: Exploring Symbolism Through Housing in Hong Kong”. With my specific item of study being the ”Tong Lau” houses.
As for the specific title, you can deviate from it a little, but the basis of my essay is to communicate this underlying system of how: architecture, urban design and planning, was used as a tool for colonials to reinforce their dominance and show power. I also think it’s interesting because architecture and housing becomes a material consequence, and symbolic reminder of these dynamics throughout the colonial era. Additionally,  you can explore the link between historical housing policies and the contemporary housing crisis in Hong Kong (colonial legacy etc) – highlighting continuities and changes over time.
The file ”Speculative Modern Urban Forms and the Politics of Property.pdf” is a great resource for this essay. It is someone else’s research paper but is quite expansive. There are some parts where i have underlined/highlighted parts that i thought were important or relevant (I did not get to read paper fully though).
The rest of the files are other sources which i thought may be useful/relevant.
The book ”Housing in Hong Kong”, provides a decent overview and historical review of the housing situaiton in Hong Kong, specifically at the beginning period of the colonial rule. And so it is also a great resource specifically for Tong Laus, as it also has several juseufl diagrams and drawings that could be included. 
Below is a drop box link to a folder with a bunch of images of pages of the book (apologies if they’re out of order)
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/d4cbydq6gntneuvxlyekz/ADsPNbeg7HnvOwsxIhXMoZQ?rlkey=uer90y3d2uklxbjqixj705wr0&dl=0
Hong Kong has a very nuanced rrelationship with its colonial past; because while architecture/urban policies for example, were used in exploitative manners, they also stand as a foundation for the city’s modern identity. Britain’s colonial personel had a huge impact on its development, such as Osbert Chadwick who reported the sanitary conditions of Hong Kong which were significant in Hong Kong’s urban development story. Thus i think it is important to maybe recognise this, so i included his primary reports in the link below. The 2nd link directky below it, is an article which discusses these essentisal colonial personel and their impacts on the city.
Link to Chadwick’s reports on the sanitary condition of Hong Kong:
https://wellcomecollection.org/works/mpnmmdbz/items 
https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2012.705124
For more context on where my ideas came from:
The instructions say we need some reference or relation to our lectures. One of our lectures was by Tania Sengupta – in which she talked about post colonialism, power dynamics etc. I included a screenshot of information about her lecture so you can get a better idea.

Students will submit a written research paper of 1,200 words, a graphical analysis with accompanying images and citations to draw conclusions about the continuity of the architectural tradition and its value to current and future societal needs. I the Instructor assigns grades based on your detailed research, written production and appropriate image selection with all needed citations. The Final Written Assignment will be uploaded on Canvas via Assignments.
ASSIGNMENT: Final Research Paper, 20 Points or 20% of your Final Grade
The purpose of this project is to:
Apply research from a range of academic sources to evaluate the significance of historical and contemporary architecture. Critique contemporary architecture using architectural history and theory.
To achieve these learning outcomes, you will research and write a comparative analysis between a significant work of historical architecture and a significant modern or contemporary work of architecture in the Los Angeles region. You will compare and contrast central themes discussed in the readings and focus on the relationship between culture, ideas, and how architectural form expresses these meanings. As you conduct research and outline your findings, you will develop a thesis regarding the relationship of the works of architecture and their importance to the historical development of architecture and its relevance to contemporary cultural issues. The research paper will be 1200 words in length, plus diagrams, images and a list of works cited. Your analysis will apply research from scholarly texts, library resources, online sources and observation (where appropriate). In this research project you will analyze and evaluate both the historical and the modern works in terms of the architectural and historical context of each work and the relationship to cultural themes discussed in the course, including:
Site Context: Urban, Rural, Topography, Resources
Cultural Context: Social, Political, Religious, Artistic, Technical and Economic Scale, Order and Organization: Size, Proportion, Orientation, Geometry, Hierarchy, Axis, Symmetry, Module, Massing, etc.
Program and Circulation: Approach, Threshold, Entrance, Ambulation, Experiential Sequence, Spatial Relationships, Ritual Use and Purpose
Program and Circulation: Approach, Threshold, Entrance, Ambulation, Experiential Sequence, Spatial Relationships, Ritual Use and Purpose
Structure: Trabeated or Arcuated, Vaulted, Domed, Corbeled, Excavated, Truss, Poured, Cantilevered, etc.
Materiality and Technology: Earth, Stone, Concrete, Wood, Metal, Glass
Construction process: Design, measurement, logistics, challenges
Light: Natural light, Openings, Glazing, Artificial Light
Surface: Ornamentation, Surface Articulation, Texture, Material, Color
Other: Something peculiar to the work that makes it significant.
Examples of comparisons may include, (please check with me on your final selection):
The Athenian Acropolis and the Getty Center, Brentwood
The Villa of the Papyri, Herculaneum and the Getty Villa, Malibu
The Pantheon, Rome and the Griffith Observatory, Hollywood
The Colosseum, Rome and the SoFi Stadium, Inglewood
Saint-Étienne, Caen, France (or other Romanesque Cathedral) and the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angeles, Downtown Los Angeles •
Katsura Imperial Villa and Gardens, Kyoto, Japan and The Gamble House, Pasadena
Governor’s Palace + Nunnery, Uxmal, ca 900CE and the Barnsdall House, Frank Lloyd Wright, Hollywood
Diagrams and images you might include:
Exterior Photographs
Interior Photographs
Site Context
Site Plan
Plans
Sections
Exterior Elevations
Organization – axis, symmetry, module
Circulation – approach, threshold, program and path
Structure
This research project will progress over the course of the semester, please include:
Research Materials – Identify at least five relevant academic sources
Create a Resource list to use in Work Cited section of your submission
Submit Research + Resource List with Final Paper
Final Submission- Week 15, May 14th, Two Weeks Prior to Finals Week, see schedule.
Compare and contrast papers are used to analyze the difference between two subjects.
Make sure to sufficiently describe both sides in the paper, and then move on to comparing and contrasting both thesis and supporting the one you find most compelling.
This is not a writing or literature course; architecture is by its very nature a visual and theoretical endeavor. When making citations the MLA format is best for this assignment. You may use this link to help you with your citations: https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/mlacitation/intextLinks to an external site.
I look forward to reading and viewing your final paper!

Dear, it has to be rich in details.
it needs a good understanding of archeteture.
the powerpoint has to be in a good shape not basic.
expect to have a feedback to fix afterwards.

Design a simple, naturally day-lit structure or pavilion that resists solar heat gain & glare and which also incorporates some form of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV). Sketch a simple floor plan with nearby site context, roof plan and a building section to illustrate the active solar design methods being employed. As applicable, identify any nearby vegetation (trees?), and pay attention to aesthetics (this is a design exercise, not merely an engineering activity). Consider using color and line-weight differentiation as a way to clearly communicate your design intent and to distinguish between physical elements and graphic notation (such as a north arrow). PLEASE INCLUDE NORTH ARROW
Your structure/pavilion can be located either at the area where you performed a Site Analysis or, for students in the 200B class, at the project site for that class.
I will provide student examples here:

Read the rewrite section file first to understand the requirement then look at previous feedback and student example. We are only writing the site diary section. Make sure you annotate the provided images with subject related vocabularies. The major is construction.