Submit a 2- to 3-page paper in which you do the following:
Describe the population or problem with which you are interested in working.
Identify the roles social workers take with this population/problem.
Describe what you learned about working with this population during your Walden Library search.
Identify types of skills and knowledge you want/need to develop in order to effectively work with this population/problem.
Support this paper with 3 sources, including from the Learning Resources throughout this course and information found in the Walden Library.
Author: admin
-
“Exploring Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Case Study Analysis Using Theoretical Orientations and Evidence-Based Treatment Options” “The Impact of Social Media on Interpersonal Communication: A Critical Analysis”
The Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper must include the following: Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation using professional terminology. Identify symptoms and behaviors exhibited by the patient in the chosen case study. Match the identified symptoms to potential disorders in the DSM-5-TR diagnostic manual. Propose a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and the criteria listed for the disorder(s) in the DSM-5-TR diagnostic manual. Analyze and explain how the patient meets criteria for the disorder(s) according to the patient’s symptoms and the criteria outlined in the DSM-5-TR diagnostic manual. Justify the use of the chosen DSM-5-TR diagnostic manual (i.e., What evidence supports the validity of this manual? What are limitations of this manual?). Summarize general views of the diagnosis from at least three theoretical orientations (g., cognitive, behavioral, humanistic, biological, sociocultural, evolutionary, psychoanalytic, integrative, etc.). NOTE: Be clear that you are writing about theoretical orientations and using the theoretical orientations to explain the diagnosis. Do not use the theoretical orientations to discuss any therapy or treatment approaches. Your application of the theoretical orientations should answer the question: What causes this diagnosis? For example, “Based on the cognitive perspective, what causes this diagnosis?” “Based on the humanisitic perspective, what causes this diagnosis?” Etc. In addition, you may include a historical perspective on the diagnosis, but this is not required. Also note that here you are summarizing views of the overall diagnosis, not specific individual symptoms. Include a discussion on comorbidity if the diagnosis includes more than one disorder. Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis (e.g., cognitive, behavioral, humanistic, biological, sociocultural, evolutionary, psychoanalytic, integrative, etc.). NOTE: Here you are evaluating specific symptoms, not the overall diagnosis. Use at least two peer-reviewed articles to assess the validity of this diagnosis, and describe which demographics are at a higher risk of developing the disorder or receiving the diagnosis based on age, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Provide a brief evaluation of the scientific merit of these peer-reviewed sources in the validity assessment. Summarize the risk factors (i.e., biological, psychological, environmental, and/or social) for the diagnosis If one of the categories is not relevant, address this within the summary. Compare evidence-based and non-evidence-based treatment options for the diagnosis Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment. Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendation In the annotated bibliography, write a two- to three- sentence evaluation of the scientific merit of each of these references. For additional assistance with this portion of the assignment, access the Writing Center’s Sample Annotated BibliographyLinks to an external site.. The Psychiatric Diagnosis Must be 8 to 15 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the UAGC Writing CenterLinks to an external site.. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name University name (The University of Arizona Global Campus) Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years in addition to the course text. Must include a separate annotated bibliography page. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. (Reference the Professional Voice and WritingLinks to an external site. resource provided by the Writing Center for assistance.) Support the analysis with at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last ten years in addition to the course text.
-
“Interdisciplinary Approach to Addressing Organizational Issues in Healthcare: An Interview and Issue Identification Report”
For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], Download Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX],which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style. -
“Exploring the Role of Tragedy in Drama” Discussion Question 1: What is the role of tragedy in drama? Tragedy plays a significant role in drama by exploring the human experience through the depiction of characters facing extreme adversity and suffering
Answer each discussion Questions 3-5 sentences or more if needed
TEXTS: The Norton Anthology of Drama, Vol. One, 3rd Edition -
Title: Critical Thinking on Privacy and Freedom of Speech Issues: Handling Scenarios and Analyzing Case Studies
What Would You Do? Scenario #2
The purpose of this exercise is to practice thinking critically about privacy-related issues. On page 174 of the textbook, review scenario #2 in the “What Would You Do?” section, and describe how you would handle the situation. Outline your response by using the five-step decision-making process as described in Chapter 1. Use your critical thinking skills, and compose your response in your own words. Your responses to Part 1 should be at least one page in length.
Part 2: Case #2: China’s Great Firewall
The purpose of this exercise is to practice thinking critically about how technology has impacted freedom of speech. On pages 215-216 of the textbook, analyze Case #2. Answer the three critical thinking questions that follow the case. Use your critical thinking skills, and compose your response in your own words. Your response to Part 2 should be at least one page in length.
You will combine both Part 1 and Part 2 together into one document and submit it for grading in Blackboard. Ensure that you label your responses as Part 1 and Part 2.
Your assignment will be at least two pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. You must use at least your textbook as a source in completing this assignment. All sources used will have proper citations and references formatted in APA style. -
“Growing in Christ: My Personal Journey and Philosophy on Making Disciples”
This research paper will express my viewpoint concerning my spiritual growth
and my philosophy on making disciples.
Please compose this paper using Turabian 9th edition.
Here’s your outline:
1. Share your story of coming to Christ and how you’ve grown spiritually.
2. What implications does your experience have for helping people mature in
faith?
3. Explore the tension between working out our salvation and working to earn
our salvation (See Galatians 3).
4. What does it mean to be an apprentice of Christ?
5. What can a local church do to help people in their spiritual growth?
Unlike other research papers, please use first person in this paper. I need to express my own opinion on making disciples, but it needs to be an informed opinion. In other words, there have been many great thinkers throughout Church history, and I would like you to reference some of them in this paper (e.g., Willard and Foster have written a lot). Of course, the Bible is a foundational reference for
all we do, so I also would like you to reference biblical material.
In addition to the Bible, I need a minimum of eight high-quality references.
Please do NOT use the following in this paper as they are NOT academic sources,
even if they are wonderful ministers/speakers/Bible teachers (and they are!)
Matthew Henry, Chuck Swindoll, John MacArthur, David Jeremiah, Beth Moore, J.
Vernon McGee, Warren Wiersbe, H. Ironside, Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, etc.
Below, I attached my personal written testimoney so that you have a baseline for my spiritual growth and can therefore make an assumption on my philosophy for making disciples. -
Title: Strategic Planning Analysis and Recommendations for CLC Group’s Selected Company
This is the second – Topic 2 – assignment after the first – Topic 1 – “CLC-Vision and Mission Statements Analysis and Company Overview”.
The template is listed below.
PLEASE DO PART 1 AND PART 1 ONLY.
I know this is a lot of work. And the professor is super picky and detail. So please be very specific.
Part I: External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
Create an External Factor Evaluation Matrix for the CLC group’s selected company by completing the following steps:
Step 1: See Chapter 3 of Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts, and Cases to learn how to complete an EFE Matrix.
Step 2: Open your Strategic-Planning Template you started in Topic 1. Click on the “EFE” tab at the bottom of the template.
Step 3: Complete the matrix using the external opportunities and threats you identified in the Topic 1 assignment. Make sure the factors you include are actionable, quantitative, comparative, and specific.
Step 4: Use the online sources listed in Table 3-7 located in Chapter 3 of Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts, and Cases to assist you with your analysis and calculations. Be sure not to include strategies as opportunities; but do include as many monetary amounts, percentages, numbers, and ratios as possible.
Step 5: Write a brief explanation (250-350 words) of the findings and implications of the data identified in the EFE Matrix. See the Sample Strategic Plan for Colgate-Palmolive (2019) as an example.
Part II: Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
Develop a Competitive Profile Matrix for your CLC group’s selected company. Complete the following steps.
Step 1: Refer to Chapter 3 of Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts, and Cases to learn how to complete a CPM.
Step 2: Open your Strategic-Planning Template. Click on the CPM tab at the bottom of the template.
Step 3: Refer back to the information provided for the team’s project case that you initially reviewed in at the beginning of the Topic 1 assignment and review the section on competitors. Also view online resources that compare the company with their primary competitor, or, if possible, two closest competitors. You should also use the sources listed in Table 3-7.
Step 4: Prepare a CPM that includes the team’s company and two primary competitors.
Step 5: Write a brief explanation (250-350 words) of the findings and implications of the data identified in the CPM. See the “Sample Strategic Plan for Colgate-Palmolive” (2019) as an example.
Deliverables
Part I: Submit the EFE Matrix.
Part I: Brief explanation (250-350 words) of the findings and implications of the data identified in the EFE Matrix.
Part II: Submit the CPM.
Part II: Brief explanation (250-350 words) of the findings and implications of the data identified in the CPM.
Additionally, submit a brief explanation of implications of the EFE Matrix, CPM and what it means to the company’s future. Explain (500-700 words) what steps could be taken to improve the company’s competitive advantage? -
Creating a Thesis Statement and Topic Sentences Revising and Editing the Exemplary Rating: Improving Main Components
Creating a Thesis Statement and Topic Sentences
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Use the attachment as a example
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
It is time to use what you have learned about thesis statements and topic sentences.
Begin by choosing a topic: a favorite place, a hated food, a musical group or theatre performance, a best friend, a bully from high school, a profession, something you just learned, a great idea. Whatever you choose, be ready to write a whole essay on it. If you like the topic you chose for the Week 2 Discussion on prewriting strategies, you can use it for this assignment.
Use the topic to write a thesis statement. Make sure you include:
Use the essay map to create a topic sentence for each of the three body paragraphs.
The thesis statement and the three (3) topic sentences should be submitted in the same MSWord file.
Week 3 Sample Assignment from Professor Crawford
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: ENGL101 Thesis and Topic Sentences (Week 3) (March 20201)
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Criteria
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
Thesis Statement
55 points
The thesis is complete with a topic that is neither too broad nor too narrow, a strong argument/assertion, and a well-formulated three point essay map. The thesis is clear and edited, and each point of the essay map is parallel in structure.
44 points
Most of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are present in some form. Minor work may be required to improve. The thesis may need some revising/editing.
39 points
Several of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
33 points
Many of the main components of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Thesis Statement,
/ 55
Topic Sentence 1
15 points
The topic reflects but does not repeat the first point in the essay map. It states a strong argument/assertion, is mostly free from error, and is written to appeal to the reader.
12 points
Most of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are present in some form. Minor work may be required to improve. TS1 may need some revising/editing.
11 points
Several of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
9 points
Many of the main components of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Topic Sentence 1,
/ 15
Topic Sentence 2
15 points
The topic reflects but does not repeat the second point in the essay map. It states a strong argument/assertion, is mostly free from error, and is written to appeal to the reader.
12 points
Most of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are present in some form. Minor work may be required to improve. Topic Sentence 2 may need some revising/editing.
11 points
Several of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
9 points
Many of the main components of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Topic Sentence 2,
/ 15
Topic Sentence 3
15 points
The topic reflects but does not repeat the third point in the essay map. It states a strong argument/assertion, is mostly free from error, and is written to appeal to the reader.
12 points
Most of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are present in some form. Minor work may be required to improve. TS3 may need some revising/editing.
11 points
Several of the main requirements of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
9 points
Many of the main components of the Exemplary rating are missing or poorly done. It may need significant revising and/or editing.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Topic Sentence 3,
/ 15
Rubric Total Score
Total
Score of ENGL101 Thesis and Topic Sentences (Week 3) (March 20201),
/ 100
Overall Score
Overall Score
Exemplary
90 points minimum
Accomplished
80 points minimum
Developing
70 points minimum
Beginning
60 points minimum
Did not attempt
0 points minimum
Submit Assignment
Files to submit
(0) file(s) to submit
After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.
Add a File
Record Audio
Record Video
Comments
Skip Toolbars for Comments.
More Insert actions.
Format
Paragraph
Address
Preformatted
H1 – Heading 1
H2 – Heading 2
H3 – Heading 3
H4 – Heading 4
H5 – Heading 5
H6 – Heading 6
More Text actions.
More Paragraph Style actions.
Font Family
Arabic Transparent
Arial (Recommended)
Comic Sans
Courier
Ezra SIL
Georgia
SBL Hebrew
Simplified Arabic
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Traditional Arabic
Trebuchet
Verdana
돋움 (Dotum)
宋体 (Sim Sun)
細明體 (Ming Liu)
Font Size
1 (8pt)
2 (10pt)
3 (12pt)
4 (14pt)
5 (18pt)
6 (24pt)
7 (36pt)
Show All Components -
Title: The Crucial Role of Dogs in the Military During Times of War
The author of the passage makes the claim that dogs have been crucial to the military, especially during times of war. In your own words, write a multi-paragraph response explaining how dogs have been crucial to the military. Your response must be based on ideas and information that can be found in the passage.
-
Title: Ethical Factors and Kantian Ethics in Contemporary Debates
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapters 9, 10
Lesson
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook)
Instructions
First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Include the following:
Publication details
Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)
Each annotation section should include the following:
Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.
Use the following as a model:
APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.
Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.
Requirements
Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Assignment Grading Rubric.
Outcomes
CO 5: Analyze the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side given a contemporary debate, such as those concerning animal rights, euthanasia, stem cell research, abortion, and so forth.
CO 6: Evaluate the ethical positions arrived at by using a key moral theory (such as Kantian ethics) relative to the long standing debate surrounding the death penalty, cloning, or some other key topic of moral controversy.