Engineering science:
The solution must be handwritten, clear and organized, the issue must be in one color, the two laws in another colour, and so on
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)
Author: admin
-
Title: Understanding the Importance of Clear and Organized Engineering Solutions in Solving Real-World Issues
-
Title: Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation of a Patient in the Clinic
Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template Download Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template to:
Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic.
Upload your completed comprehensive psychiatric evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will not be accepted.
For the Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Presentation Assignment: You will need to get it signed by your preceptor for the presentation (actual signature, not electronically typed).
Step 2: Each student will create a focused SOAP note video presentation in the next assignment. See Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Presentation 1 for more details.
SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.
S =
Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem (OLDCARTS or PQRST); Review of Systems (ROS)
O =
Objective data: Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family psychiatric history; Past surgical history; Psychiatric history, Social history; Labs and screening tools; Vital signs; Physical exam, (Focused), and Mental Status Exam
A =
Assessment: Primary Diagnosis and two differential diagnoses including ICD-10 and DSM5 codes
P =
Plan: Pharmacologic and Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; diagnostic testing/screening tools, patient/family teaching, referral, and follow-up
Other: Incorporate current clinical guidelines NIH Clinical GuidelinesLinks to an external site. or APA Clinical GuidelinesLinks to an external site., research articles, and the role of the PMHNP in your evaluation.
Psychiatric Assessment of Infants and ToddlersLinks to an external site. https://www.jaacap.org/article/S0890-8567(09)62592-2/fulltext
Psychiatric Assessment of Children and AdolescentsLinks to an external site. https://www.jaacap.org/article/S0890-8567(09)62591-0/fulltext
Reminder: You must complete this assessment using your critical thinking skills. You are expected to synthesize your clinical assessment, formulate a psychiatric diagnosis, and develop a treatment plan independently. It is not acceptable to document that “my preceptor made this diagnosis.” An example of the appropriate descriptors of the clinical evaluation is listed below. It is not acceptable to document “within normal limits.”
Graduate Mental Status Exam Guide Download Graduate Mental Status Exam Guide
Successfully Capture HPI Elements in Psychiatry E/M NotesLinks to an external site.
AAPC Admin. (2013, August 1). Successfully capture HPI elements in psychiatry E/M notes. Advancing the Business of Healthcare. https://www.aapc.com/blog/25848-successfully-capture-hpi-elements-in-psychiatry-em-notes/
Submission Instructions:
Upload your completed Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation as a Word document. It will be assessed through Turnitin.
Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Thursday. -
“Optimizing Wireless Internet Plans for a Virtual Startup: A Cost-Efficiency Analysis” “Choosing the Best Cell Phone Plan: An Analysis of Data Usage and Cost for Different User Profiles” Optimal Plan Selection and Company Savings for Tech Solutions “Proposal for Improving Provider Packages to Meet Startup’s Needs”
Background
The rapid digitization of the business world has paved the way for a multitude of virtual startups. These companies, unhindered by physical infrastructure, leverage wireless internet services to run their operations. Your startup, Tech Solutions, consists of a diverse team scattered worldwide, collaborating on projects, and sharing large files.
Objective
Your task is to identify the optimal wireless internet plan for the different profiles of users in your team, ensuring cost efficiency without compromising on the needed data. The team profiles are:
Developers who regularly upload and download large files.
Designers who utilize heavy graphics software and share high-resolution visuals.
Managers who mainly focus on communication (e.g., emails, video calls).
Sales and Marketing team that often requires a mix of communication tools, media sharing, and heavy browsing.
Three service providers have put forth their packages:
Mega Net: $20/month for up to 200 K-bytes. Additional data: $0.16/K-byte.
Ultra Connect: $50/month for up to 1000 K-bytes. Additional data: $0.08/K-byte.
Speed Wave: $100/month for up to 3000 K-bytes. Additional data: $0.04/K-byte.
Tasks:
(a) User Profiles: Estimate the monthly data usage for each team profile. Make an educated guess and tell which provider you think will eventually be chosen. Justify your assumptions. You will use these estimates to answer part (d).
(b) Algebraic Models: Develop cost functions, C(x), for each plan based on data usage, x. Each function should be in the form of a piece-wise function.
(c) Graphical Analysis: Plot the functions for each service provider. Analyze intersections to understand the best plan for different data usage levels. Graphing Utility InstructionsLinks to an external site.
Plotting the Functions:
Create a graph where the x-axis represents the amount of data usage, and the y-axis represents the cost.
For each service provider, there should be a distinct curve or line representing the cost as a function of data usage.
Each curve or line should be labeled or color-coded with a legend to distinguish between the service providers.
The graph should be appropriately scaled and labeled to ensure clarity and accuracy.
Identifying Intersections:
Accurately identify and mark the points where the curves or lines for the service providers intersect.
These intersections represent the data usage levels at which two service providers offer the same price.
Analysis of Intersections:
Analyze each intersection point to determine which service provider offers the best value before and after that data usage level.
For example, if Provider A and Provider B intersect at a certain point, students should be able to state which provider offers the best value for data usage levels below that point and which provider offers the best value for data usage levels above that point.
Implications for Best Plan Choices:
Based on the graph and the intersections, provide insights on which service provider offers the most cost-effective plan at different levels of data usage.
Highlight specific data usage thresholds where one plan becomes more cost-effective than another.
For example, “For data usage below X KB, Provider A is the most cost-effective, but for data usage above X KB, Provider B offers better value.”
(d) Optimal Plans: Determine which plan is most cost-effective for each user profile based on the estimated data usages from part (a).
(e) Company Savings: If Tech Solutions consists of 5 developers, 3 designers, 2 managers, and 4 sales/marketing members, calculate the potential savings of choosing the optimal plan for each profile versus the most expensive plan for all.
(f) Feedback to Providers: Based on your findings, draft a proposal to one of the providers suggesting improvements to their packages to make them more competitive for your startup’s needs.
Compose your project using MS Word and save as a .docx format. All information should be clear and legible, size 12 font.
Project 1 Rubric
Project 1 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUser Profiles: Estimate the monthly data usage for each team profile. Make an educated guess and tell which provider you think will eventually be chosen. Justify your assumptions.
15 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides clear and well-estimated monthly data usage figures for each team profile; Offers a robust justification for each assumption made, grounding them in logical or researched reasoning; Demonstrates a deep understanding of the user profiles and how their usage patterns might differ.
13 to >11.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides estimated monthly data usage for each team profile, but some figures may lack precision; Justifies most assumptions, though some explanations might be brief or lack depth; Shows a general understanding of the user profiles but may not fully account for specific nuances in their usage patterns.
11 to >9.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides estimates for monthly data usage, but several figures are questionable or lack clarity; Offers limited justifications for assumptions, and some may be based on unclear or flawed reasoning; Demonstrates a surface-level understanding of the user profiles with significant oversights in estimating their usage.
9 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide coherent estimates for monthly data usage or omits several team profiles; Provides minimal to no justification for assumptions or bases them on entirely flawed reasoning; Lacks a clear understanding of the user profiles, leading to largely incorrect or misguided estimates.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAlgebraic Models: Develop cost functions, C(x), for each plan based on data usage, x. Each function should be in the form of a piece-wise function
15 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Accurately develops cost functions C(x) for each plan. Each function is correctly structured as a piece-wise function, capturing all pricing tiers and overage costs. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the plan structures and represents them correctly in algebraic form.
13 to >11.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Develops cost functions C(x) for each plan but may have minor inaccuracies or omissions. Most functions are in the form of a piece-wise function, but there might be slight formatting or structural errors. Generally, understands the plan structures but may miss some subtleties in their algebraic representation.
11 to >9.0 pts
Below Expectations
Attempts to develop cost functions C(x), but there are notable errors or missing elements. Some functions are not in the correct piece-wise structure or contain significant misrepresentations of the plan costs. Demonstrates a limited understanding of the plan structures, leading to flawed algebraic models.
9 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide coherent cost functions C(x) for the plans or omits significant portions. Does not correctly use the piece-wise structure or misapplies it entirely. Lacks a clear understanding of the plans, leading to largely incorrect or incomplete algebraic models.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraphical Analysis: plot the functions for each service provider. Analyze intersections to understand the best plan for different data usage levels.
15 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Accurately plots the functions for each service provider on a suitable and well-labeled scale. Clearly identifies and marks intersections. Provides a comprehensive analysis of the intersections, correctly interpreting the implications for the best plan choice at different data usage levels.
13 to >11.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Plots the functions for each service provider but may have minor inaccuracies or scale issues. Identifies intersections, but annotations may lack clarity. Provides an analysis of the intersections but may miss some subtleties in interpreting the best plan choice at specific data usage levels.
11 to >9.0 pts
Below Expectations
Attempts to plot the functions, but there are notable inaccuracies, or the scale is inappropriate. Struggles to correctly identify and mark intersections. Provides a partial or flawed analysis of the intersections and struggles to relate them to the best plan choices.
9 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Does not correctly plot the functions for the service providers or omits them entirely. Fails to identify intersections or misidentifies them. Offers little to no analysis of the intersections, and any provided interpretation is largely incorrect or unrelated to the task.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOptimal Plans: Determine which plan is most cost-effective for each user profile based on the estimated data usages from part (a).
15 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Accurately determines the most cost-effective plan for each user profile, making full use of the estimated data usages provided in part (a). Provides clear justification for each plan selection, grounding choices in the developed algebraic models. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of how data usage impacts plan cost and correctly applies this knowledge to the user profiles.
13 to >11.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Determines the cost-effective plan for most user profiles, but there might be minor oversights or inaccuracies. Provides justifications for most plan selections, though some might be brief or lack depth. Shows a general understanding of the relationship between data usage and plan cost but may miss specific nuances in cost-effectiveness for some user profiles.
11 to >9.0 pts
Below Expectations
Attempts to determine the most cost-effective plan for user profiles, but several choices are questionable. Offers limited justifications for selected plans, with some explanations based on unclear or flawed reasoning. Demonstrates a limited understanding of how data usage impacts plan cost, leading to significant errors in plan selection for some user profiles.
9 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to coherently determine the most cost-effective plans for the user profiles or omits significant portions. Provides minimal to no justification for selected plans or bases them on entirely flawed reasoning. Lacks a clear understanding of data usage implications on plan cost, resulting in largely incorrect or misguided plan recommendations.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompany Savings: If Tech Solutions consists of 5 developers, 3 designers, 2 managers, and 4 sales/marketing members, calculate the potential savings of choosing the optimal plan for each profile versus the most expensive plan for all.
15 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Accurately calculates the total cost of the optimal plan for each profile, considering the number of team members in each category. Correctly calculates the total cost of the most expensive plan for all members. Precisely determines the potential savings between the two scenarios and presents the result clearly.
13 to >11.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Calculates the total cost for most profiles accurately but might have minor inaccuracies or omissions. Mostly accurate in calculating the total cost of the most expensive plan, with slight discrepancies. Determines the potential savings, but the calculation might have minor errors or lack clarity in presentation.
11 to >9.0 pts
Below Expectations
Attempts to calculate the total cost for each profile, but there are notable errors or missing elements. Significant discrepancies in calculating the total cost of the most expensive plan. Struggles to correctly determine the potential savings, with multiple errors present.
9 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide coherent calculations for the total costs or omits significant portions. Cannot correctly calculate the total cost of the most expensive plan. Provides minimal to no determination of the potential savings or gets it entirely incorrect.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFeedback to Providers: Based on your findings, draft a proposal to one of the providers suggesting improvements to their packages to make them more competitive for your startup’s needs.
15 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents a well-structured proposal that clearly addresses specific shortcomings of the chosen provider’s package based on the findings. Provides concrete suggestions for improvements that are aligned with the startup’s needs. Incorporates relevant data and analysis from previous parts to support the recommendations.
13 to >11.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Presents a proposal that addresses some of the shortcomings of the provider’s package but might lack depth or detail in some areas. Offers suggestions for improvements, though some might be general or not entirely aligned with the startup’s needs. Uses some data and analysis from previous parts but might not fully integrate them into the recommendations.
11 to >9.0 pts
Below Expectations
Attempts to draft a proposal, but it lacks coherence or misses significant elements. The suggestions for improvements are either too vague, not particularly relevant, or lack justification. Limited use of data and previous findings, leading to weakly supported recommendations.
9 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The proposal is either extremely brief, largely off-target, or missing entirely. Provides minimal to no meaningful suggestions for improvements. Fails to incorporate any relevant data or findings from previous parts.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Flow
5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Cohesive/ Effective organization and flow
4 to >2.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Adequate organization and flow
2 to >1.0 pts
Below Expectations
There are issues with the organization and flow
1 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The organization and flow are unclear
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar
5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectations
No spelling or grammar errors
4 to >2.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Spelling and grammar are mostly error-free
2 to >1.0 pts
Below Expectations
There are a few spelling and grammar errors
1 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
There are many spelling and grammar errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100 -
“Understanding the Constitution: Examining the Importance of Select Amendments and the Need for Civic Education”
W2: The Constitution
The Constitution
The Constitution is the framework for the organization of the United States government and for the relationship of the federal government with the States, citizens, and all people within the United States. The Constitution has been amended twenty-seven times, the last occurring in 1992.
To assist in better understanding the Constitution, please answer the following question: Of the Constitutional amendments we are addressing in this class (Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth), which one is most important? Why? There is obviously no wrong answer, so your analysis in support of the amendment you choose is key.
Why is this week’s discussion so important? Sadly, a high percentage of Americans do not know basic information about the Constitution.
Here are some examples:
“What is the supreme law of the land?” Seventy-percent of the 1,000 citizens polled by Newsweek could not answer the “Constitution.”
Sixty-one percent didn’t know that the length of a U.S. senator’s term is six years, 63 percent couldn’t name the number of Supreme Court justices on the bench (nine), and 86 percent didn’t know that 435 members fill the U.S. House of Representatives.
And finally, fifty percent could not name an amendment to the Constitution, and twenty percent said the Constitution has never been amended. -
Direct Guidance Strategies for Teaching Appropriate Behavior in Preschoolers Understanding and Addressing Inappropriate Behavior in Children: Causes and Guidance Strategies “Guiding Children’s Behavior: Strategies for Effective Solutions and Understanding Mistaken Behaviors” “Understanding the Root of Level 3 Mistaken Behavior: Unmet Needs and Its Impact on Children’s Behavior”
Module 02 Assignment – Direct Guidance Strategies
For this assignment, you will look critically at two real-world scenarios and determine which direct guidance strategies would be most appropriate to apply to the given situation. Read each of the scenarios below.
Scenario 1: Joey
Ms. Juanita is a teacher in a four-year-old preschool room. She has developed classroom rules/guidelines with her children. The rules/guidelines are reviewed each morning during circle time, and when children are having difficulty throughout the day. Most of the children are doing well adhering to the classroom rules; however, Joey is having difficulty. He constantly interrupts during circle time, and asks off-topic questions, such as, “Where do whales live?” “What time is it on the moon?” Although Ms. Juanita finds Joey’s questions interesting, this behavior does not give the other children a chance to participate in the activity. Joey’s behavior also violates the classroom rule/guideline, “Take turns.” Ms. Juanita also notices that Joey takes materials from peers during free play and tells others what to do. Ms. Juanita would like to help Joey learn how to wait his turn circle time and during free play, so other students have a turn to participate.
Scenario 2: Olivia
Mr. Jacob is a teacher in a three-year-old preschool room. He has taught the classroom rules/guidelines to the children and reviews them daily. Olivia generally follows the rules except for the rule, “Clean up after play.” Each day when Mr. Jacob announces that it is time to clean up and go outside, Olivia immediately runs to the door, leaving behind the materials she was using. Typically, Mr. Jacob has to give Olivia three reminders before she cleans up her toys, and the whole class has to wait for her to finish. Mr. Jacob would like to help Olivia learn to clean up materials with the class after free play.
The direct guidance strategies below could be applied to each scenario to assist the child with learning the appropriate behavior:
Identify the level of mistaken behavior
Following Guidelines/ Rules
Teaching Guidelines/Rules
Partnering with or Engaging Families
Encouraging Appropriate Behavior
Considerations for Individual Differences (Temperament, Culture, Special Need)
Choose two (2) of the strategies above to apply to each of the scenarios. In 2-3 pages in a Word document, address the following for each scenario:
How could the educator use the two strategies over a 2-week period to teach the child appropriate behavior?
What would the educator do and say?
How might the child react to each strategy?
What could the educator do if the strategies were unsuccessful?
Include at least one reference to a resource from this module (readings, lecture notes, and videos). Use in-text citations where appropriate. In addition to the 2-3 pages, include an APA formatted title page and a reference page.
Resources
Library Video: Positive Guidance and Discipline
For assistance with writing, visit the Rasmussen Library’s Writing Guide and APA Guide.
Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.
Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:
Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504
Here is a resource from my readings
Inappropriate and Mistaken Behaviors
Handling Inappropriate Behavior
All children demonstrate inappropriate behavior at some point for some reason. Consider these examples:
A child drops their jacket on the floor instead of hanging it on a hook.
A child bites another child.
A child refuses to clean up a mess.
A child interrupts during circle time.
What can be done to help children to learn appropriate behavior? What can be done to prevent inappropriate behavior? It is critical to determine why the inappropriate behavior is occurring. The cause of the inappropriate action will inform the intervention and prevention measures.
Common Reasons for Inappropriate Behavior in Children
Young children use behavior to show educators their thoughts and feelings. Children often communicate through behavior, things they are unable to verbalize. Below is a list of common reasons why children may behave inappropriately.
Stage of development (unable to share, desire for independence, lack of exposure, large group environment)
Temperament, personality, or individual differences
Developmental delay or a special need
Need for attention or boredom
Environmental needs not met (too crowded, not enough materials, too open, children must wait for long periods)
Crisis or trauma at home (not getting basic needs met of love, food, safety, sleep
Copying other children
Unable to control emotions
Inappropriate behavior has proven effective (and been reinforced) in the past.
Sometimes the cause of the inappropriate behavior is obvious. For example, Ruby grabs a toy truck from Gracie. An educator can quickly determine that Ruby wanted the toy but didn’t know how to ask for a turn. The cause is related to the developmental level of the child. An educator can intervene by modeling how to ask for a turn playing with the toy. The educator also needs to monitor the situation. Is a duplicate truck required to prevent future inappropriate behavior? Perhaps, read a story to the children during circle time that reinforces the importance of taking turns.
In other instances, the cause is not as apparent. The behavior may be out of the ordinary for a child. For example, John is usually friendly to his peers. He shares materials and often offers to help others. Today, he lashes out at a peer and says, “Don’t take that! Go away!” An educator can attempt to talk to John about his feelings, but he may not be able to express exactly how he is feeling and why. Observation techniques may be useful to assist with determining the frequency and cause. If behaviors persist, involving families can assist with determining the cause of the undesired behavior. Furthermore, educators may have to compile data from observations and discussions from families to make an educated guess about the cause of the inappropriate behavior. The cause should not be a “bad child” or a “spoiled child.” Educators have a responsibility to look deeper into the causes of inappropriate behavior.
Guidance Strategies
Educators implement guidance strategies throughout the day to teach children appropriate behavior. The previous module introduced the basic concepts of direct and indirect guidance strategies, but this section will explore some specifics.
Age Appropriate Environment
Create an age appropriate physical, temporal, and interpersonal environment.
Educators ensure that the room arrangement, amount of materials and choices, the schedule/routines/ transitions, and interactions are appropriate for developmental age of the children present. For example, toddlers have duplicate materials and shorter amounts of time for free play. A preschool environment has longer blocks of time for free play without many duplicate materials.
Ignore Behavior
A behavior that does not harm the child, classmates, or educators. The behavior does not interfere with learning. Example, a child sits with their knees up instead of legs crossed. This behavior can be ignored. Bringing attention could reinforce the undesired behavior. Offer immediate positive reinforcement when sitting appropriately.
Reinforce Appropriate Behavior
Genuinely bring attention the desired behavior and the reason it is appropriate. Example, “Getting a tissue for your friend is a kind. Thank you for taking care of your friend.”
Facilitate Problem Solving Skills
Toddlers will need the problem-solving process modeled. Encourage preschoolers to state the problem, and express emotions. Educators encourage the children to suggest solutions or if unable, offer 2 solutions to choose from. Check in with the children to determine if the solution was successful. Adjust or reinforce appropriate behavior. Teach the vocabulary words “problem” and “solution” during group time and throughout the day. Model how to use these words.
Realistic Expectations
Understand the developmental levels of the children in the educational environment. Establish simple, clear guidelines/rules with pictures, and refer to them daily. For example, A child is running in the classroom. The educator brings the child to the guideline/rule that states “Walk in the classroom”, and explains safety.
Offer Choices
A child offered two appropriate choices is less likely to engage in inappropriate behavior. For example, an educator offers crayons or markers at the art center. Both are appropriate; however, the choice offers the child feelings of control.
Engages all Senses & Domains
Create Learning Experiences that Engage all the Senses and Domains (PILES)
Activities that engage the 5 senses and target PILES allow children to be fully involved in meaningful learning. For example, a rice table with dinosaurs, small letters and numbers, measuring cups, shovels etc. invites discovery, language, social skills, and movement. A worksheet does involve the 5 senses, and may appear meaningless and boring.
Clear Instructions
Provide Short, Clear, Instructions to Children
Keep instructions short without long explanation so the meaning is not lost. For example, Educator pats a chair and says, “Sit in your chair. It is time for lunch.”
Express Feelings
Teach and model the vocabulary that reflect emotions. Teaching vocabulary, such as, happy, sad, frustrated, mad through modeling, songs, and stories encourages children to use it in appropriate situations. For example, an educator states, “l see that you are sad. Can I help you?”
Redirect
Olivia is throwing dolls into the doll bed in the dramatic play center. Educator shows Olivia bean bags and a basket, and asks her how many she can throw in the basket.
Culture and Special Needs
Understand Culturally Based Behavior and Behaviors as a result of a special need
A child who recently moved the United States from another country avoids eye contact. A child with Autism flaps his hands when he is excited. An educator is aware of these differences, and responds in a caring, supportive manner.
Mistaken Behavior
According to Gartrell (2014), “the guidance approach requires educators to look at the conflicts that children have not as misbehavior, but as mistaken behavior. Mistaken behaviors are errors in judgment and action made in the process of learning life skills. Mistaken behaviors occur at three levels: experimentation, socially influenced, and strong unmet needs.”
Level of Mistaken Behavior / Motivational Source
Level 1: Experimentation – The child displays a desire to explore the environment, people, and activities.
Level 2: Socially Influenced – The child displays a desire to please and connect with peers and others.
Level 3: Strong Unmet Needs – The child is unable to cope with issues related to wellness and difficult life experiences.
Level 1: Experimentation Mistaken Behavior
The motivation behind Level 1 mistaken behavior is experimentation; this type of behavior is not violent or persistent. Children are curious, and often do things to see what happens. For example, an infant grabs a handful of curly hair and pulls a peer to the ground. The infant was curious about the head full of curly hair.
Level 2: Socially Influenced Mistaken Behavior
The motivation behind Level 2 mistaken behavior is social influence; this is learned behavior and is often unintentionally reinforced. Children frequently copy or mimic the behavior of others to gain approval. Behavior influences include television shows or family members. For example, children may repeat the inappropriate language of family members or copy wrestling moves of superheroes.
Level 3: Strong Unmet Needs Mistaken Behavior
The motivation behind Level 3 mistaken behavior is strong unmet needs. Children sometimes are deprived of basic needs (e.g., food, love, attention, sleep), which impacts behavior. A child’s behavior can be persistent and extreme. The child is often unable to cope with high levels of stress and anxiety. For example, severe lack of sleep, unstable household, homelessness, lack of love, or food can all contribute to Level 3 behavior.
Additional Resources
Library Video: Preventing Challenging Behaviors – Part 1 – Responsibility and Rules
Library Video: Preventing Challenging Behaviors – Part 2 – Teaching Problem-solving
References
Gartrell, D. (2014). Guidance approach for the encouraging classroom. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. -
Title: A Comparison of Traditional and Differentiated Instruction for Meeting the Needs of Diverse Student Groups in the Music Classroom
Refer to the chart you created during week one. Utilizing the same document, add two columns (see example) for the name of student groups and specific strategies or elements to meet the needs of the four student groups. Add these interactions within at least six of the eleven (11) activities listed in the instructional flow. Address the needs of each of the four student groups. The last two groups you address are your choice. These details could address the academic, social, or emotional needs for each student group. Reference the rubric for further details and required elements.
Example:
Content Area: Music Grade: 4-6
Element Activity/Strategy/Instruction Group Details 1 Teacher pre-assesses students on their ability to identify note names and values. 2 Teacher introduces note names with mnemonic devices ELL Students will be given a worksheet as a reference, showing the name of each note in English and in their home language. Cognates will be highlighted. 3 Teacher models graphic organizer identifying note values and models how to think about the relationship of note values 4 Students work in small, heterogeneous groups to discover and identify notes within current pieces Advanced Learners Because they already know the note names, they will be given a worksheet with riddles on it, requiring them to use their music reading skills to solve the problems. 5 Class comes together to…
Part 2: Write a 1-2-page analysis comparing traditional and differentiated instruction. Utilize at least one scholarly source (from ASCD or other database) to support your claims. Write your paper in a compare/contrast format with an introduction and conclusion. The components of your paper are:
Title Page
Introduction
Body (2 student groups and 6 approaches/strategies)
Conclusion
Reference Page
Focus on two of the four student groups for your analysis. In reference to those two groups, provide a minimum of three approaches within traditional and DI. Point out the benefits, drawbacks, and potential issues within each.
resources:
Beliefs that deflect good instruction. (n.d.). ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/beliefs-that-deflect-good-instruction
Differentiated learning and technology: a powerful combination. (2023, June 12). ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/differentiated-learning-and-technology-a-powerful-combination
Differentiation Myths and realities. (n.d.). ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/differentiation-myths-and-realities
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate instruction in academically Diverse Classrooms, third edition. ASCD. -
“The Importance of Understanding Ethical Issues in Management: A Reflection on Two Topics and their Relevance to Real-World Scenarios”
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
This assignment is a 2-3 page (excluding cover and reference page) essay is required for this course. The source material for this paper can be found in the course reading material. However, students are required to seek additional external source material to bring another perspective to their papers. Students must obtain at least one research source from the APUS Online Library. Wikipedia is not a valid source for this paper!
After reading the required reading content for weeks 1-3 this week, tell me the following:
As a manager, explain the importance of understanding the TWO most interesting aspects of our reading material (Pick two topics that you thought were most interesting). Why did you find these topics interesting and HOW does EACH topic relate to one ethical scenario that you have heard about or read about in the news (Exxon Valdez, Enron, Tyco etc). You can talk about any case that relates to unethical behavior.
Use our reading material and the library to support your positions. Be creative with how you link the content of our reading to the cases that you picked. This might require you to do additional research on the cases in our library or on the internet.
The paper must contain the following format:
Title Page – Include a title page with your name, student number, title of review, course number, course name, session, section, semester and date.
Abstract-brief introduction to the essay
Introductory Paragraph – Include an introductory paragraph.
Font and Spacing – Use Arial or Times New Roman, 12 pitch font with double spaced lines.
Length – Write a 2-3 page review, not including the title page and reference page.
Reference Page – Include all references. Minimum of two (Course text and APUS Online Library)
Formatted and referenced using APA style
Punctuation, essay format (thesis, supporting paragraphs with transitions and topic sentences, and summary) grammar and documentation count toward grade.
Save your review as Last Name – Week #1 Paper.doc and submit via the Assignment tool.
Due on May 26, 2024 11:59 PM -
Title: Research Problem and Purpose Statements, Research Questions, and PICO Clinical Question for a Study and Quality Improvement Project 1. Example of Research Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, and Research Questions for a Study and Quality Improvement Project: Topic of Interest
1. Using Box 4-2 (p.95) in Chapter 4 of Schmidt and Brown -give an example of a research problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions using ONE topic of interest to you for a research study verses a quality improvement project.
2. Propose a PICO clinical question. Using Exhibit 5.1 (pp. 130-131) in Chapter 5 of Schmidt and Brown. Use the Worksheet to Formulate a Search Strategy in answering a proposed question -
“Chapter 1 Dissertation Revision: Incorporating TZ Feedback”
Hello, I need help with chapter 1 of my dissertation. Please see the document TZ feedback. From this document can you make the changes on pages 10 …
-
Memo: The Integral Focus of Audience and Ethics in Technical Communication Date: [Insert Date] To: [Instructor Name] From: [Your Name] Subject: The Integral Focus of Audience and Ethics in Technical Communication Introduction: In the
This term, we discussed three essential areas within technical communication:
1. understanding and meeting the needs of our readers; 2. practicing an appropriate standard of ethics; and
3. writing and editing clear and concise documents. Choose TWO of these topics, and in a Word document, write a memo explaining why these TWO of the three areas (audience, ethics, and style) are an integral focus and central component for the field of technical communication. Remember to begin your memo with a clear introduction that sets up the purpose of the memo. In addition, be sure that your discussion of these two topics relies on your own understanding of the topics as central components of the field of technical communication. Support your discussion with specific or hypothetical examples to demonstrate an understanding of the topics you’ve chosen. While you can reference the textbook and class notes for definitions and terms (and you should cite the book if you reference it), you should largely provide your own ideas and understanding for the memo. Your memo should be between 300-500 words and should follow the standard structure and organization for memos. You should format the response as a memo to me. Your memo will be graded based on the structure and organization of the response as well as the quality of and support for your answer in understanding these topics.